- Thread starter
- #21
Prove me wrong. Who benefits the most from a high charged issue?You can't even prove yourself to be correct so why would I try to prove you wrong?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Prove me wrong. Who benefits the most from a high charged issue?You can't even prove yourself to be correct so why would I try to prove you wrong?
I have, your acceptance or agreement is not needed.Prove you are right then.
You have nothing as already proven by your own hand...I have, your acceptance or agreement is not needed.
That is speculative at bet, which would never pass the test.Prove me wrong. Who benefits the most from a high charged issue?
Prove me wrong go______That is speculative at bet, which would never pass the test.
Prove me wrong.You have nothing as already proven by your own hand...
Yup. You notice how Psaki refused to condemn the leaker? The WH is either behind it, at worst, or very accepting of it, at best, because to Marxists, the end justifies the means.Of course it was intentional. Not only that, I'm sure it was sanctioned by the Biden regime, and possibly even ordered by them. This is a hail Mary to try to avoid the slaughter the DemoKKKrats are facing in November. It won't work, but it is what it is.
Who would benefit the most from the leak?
I think I see the problem, here. That shred in question is completely lacking in the true believers here.
I mean, they all believe that women have penises and burning down businesses is an act of peacefulness, don't they?
That is speculative at bet, which would never pass the test.
I have read that Roberts is trying to turn 2 conservative justices.How do you know it was a "leftist judge"? How would a leftist judge get ahold of the rough draft anyways?
It was leaked to a Politico reporter. Most likely from a conservative staffer.Yup. You notice how Psaki refused to condemn the leaker? The WH is either behind it, at worst, or very accepting of it, at best, because to Marxists, the end justifies the means.
Jets, I know you're intelligent enough to see all the upside of the leak is for the democrats. That spin you put as a repub motivation is weaker than PH's commitment to open dialog.This could go in either direction.
Why would the GOP leak it?
To get it out in the open as soon as possible. The further away from the midterms the greater the chance the issue cools off.
Why would the Democratic Party leak it?
To have a longer period to mobilize on the issue going into the midterms.
Granted, Im aware that the former is in conflict with the latter.
What I can't believe is all you have is gossip for proof.The signs and placards and protests came out the very next day, it was well organized. You can bet Schumie, Pelosie and Shiftie were all sitting on this one. You know well when it comes to community organizing and protest coordination the Democrats are light years ahead of the Republicans. Leaks and protests are to the Democrats what meat and potatoes are to the Irish. Cant believe you cant see this one.
Jets, I know you're intelligent enough to see all the upside of the leak is for the democrats. That spin you put as a repub motivation is weaker than PH's commitment to open dialog.
What I can't believe is all you have is gossip for proof.
You've now mentioned two of the attributes of the new neo-nazi hybrid the CIA has produced, such as Rubio and Nuland: communism and marxism. The third attribute is fascism, and this last one links especially well to the history of the Ukrainian rhizome that has been molested by the CIA for the last 70 years.Yup. You notice how Psaki refused to condemn the leaker? The WH is either behind it, at worst, or very accepting of it, at best, because to Marxists, the end justifies the means.