The liberal march towards EXTREME fascism

[Cellblock2429]

The left has always been fascist in nature (obviously - since fascism is a form of government oppression). But in the past few years, the left has made a rapid march towards extreme fascism.

They engage in massive speech control campaigns. If Donald Trump attempts to hold a political rally - they riot (costing a fortune in damage to public and private property). If someone attempts to merely attend a Donald Trump political rally, the left engages in violent assaults. Fascism.

They engage in massive thought control campaigns. If someone wishes to avoid homosexual acts or homosexual celebrations (whether it be for religious reasons, comfort reasons, or just plain old hate), the left attempts to turn that into a crime and advocates for the government to place a gun to the head of those individuals and force them to take part in the homosexual activities. And of course - they've advocated for and manufactured the comical "hate crime" fallacy. Fascism.

This story here is a remarkable indication of the left's embrace of extreme fascism. It revolves around the "Soldiers of Odin". A group rightfully concerned with radical islam. And yet despite being peaceful while liberals engage in violent assaults, the left wants to label these individuals as a "hate" group. So what happened when this group deployed members to a mosque in Denver? Did they brutally attack and bloody muslims like liberals do? Nope. Quite the contrary - the imam of the mosque invited the group in to sit down and talk. They had a peaceful and cordial interaction?

This "incident" is literally the shining example of America at its finest. Concerned citizens form a group of their own free will. The muslims not only continue to engage in their right to religious freedom - but they invite the concerned group into their mosque to see for themselves and to engage in dialect. Everything America was built on and intended to be. And yet the left is angry about this - desperate to falsely label the group a "hate" group and to eliminate them.

A Growing Vigilante Group Is Targeting U.S. Mosques

/----/ Great News:
The DNC is reportedly 'dead broke.' The RNC has nearly $40 million.
The DNC is reportedly 'dead broke.' The RNC has nearly $40 million.

The Democratic National Committee had a rough 2017, plagued by leadership troubles, internal squabbling, and unflattering reports. To top it off, the party ended the year "dead broke," says The Intercept's Ryan Grim.

The Democratic Party is carrying more than $6 million in debt, according to year-end filings — and has just $6.5 million in the bank. Do the math, and the party is working with just over $400,000 overall. Meanwhile, the Republicans are swimming in pools of money. The Republican National Committee had raised $132 million by the end of 2017 — about twice as much as the DNC — and entered 2018 with almost $40 million to spare, with not a penny of debt.

 

[P@triot]

End the drug war!

That’s exactly what Republicans are doing (while the Dumbocrats continue to ramp up the war on drugs).

Policymakers in Texas, led by then-Gov. Rick Perry, expanded drug courts and other proven alternatives to incarceration for nonviolent offenders. Texas' crime rate has declined 31% and the state has closed eight prisons.

Which begs the question - why do you oppose the side giving you what you claim you want and supporting the side doing what you claim you don’t want?

Trump's Conservative Approach to Criminal Justice Reform

The right wing is all political talk and no political action. there is no drug war clause in the Republican Doctrine.

Uh...the Republicans took action. The article proves it. Why do you insist on lying? And why aren’t you whining about the Dumbocrats who had a super-majority under Barack Insane Obama and didn’t end “the drug war”? Oops...

 

[P@triot]

/----/ Great News:
The DNC is reportedly 'dead broke.' The RNC has nearly $40 million.
The DNC is reportedly 'dead broke.' The RNC has nearly $40 million.

The Democratic National Committee had a rough 2017, plagued by leadership troubles, internal squabbling, and unflattering reports. To top it off, the party ended the year "dead broke," says The Intercept's Ryan Grim.

The Democratic Party is carrying more than $6 million in debt, according to year-end filings — and has just $6.5 million in the bank. Do the math, and the party is working with just over $400,000 overall. Meanwhile, the Republicans are swimming in pools of money. The Republican National Committee had raised $132 million by the end of 2017 — about twice as much as the DNC — and entered 2018 with almost $40 million to spare, with not a penny of debt.

No surprise there...everything the left does always ends in extreme debt and financial collapse.

 

[P@triot]

Those are white people.

Notice the racism of deanrd? That’s the hallmark of the left. Why would one even notice, much less mention, skin color here?

Most likely Republicans.

Notice the propaganda of the deanrd? Another hallmark of the left. He not only doesn’t have the facts, he doesn’t even attempt to uncover them. Instead he just arbitrarily declares “most likely Republicans”.

ReDeantard illustrated the quintessential left in one small post.

 

[Lastamender]

The Lefts attacks identity which it forms with names and opinions. The fact that identity has no effect on intelligence does not bother them.

 

[danielpalos]

the multiplier effect works, either way. Who benefits more, with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage?

Not the guy who lost a job that was only worth $12/hr.

There is no unemployment under true capitalism, only underpayment so the rich can get richer faster.

You're as predictable as night following day. And you won't address the guy who lost his $12/hr job. Here's what will happen. I'll press you on that guy, you'll mutter some increasingly meaningless blargle and will simply refuse to deal with it.

Eventually, you'll pop up somewhere else saying the same things, having learned nothing.

dude; unemployment compensation should go up to fourteen dollars an hour, so Labor doesn't have to indulge lousy capitalists simply Because they have capital.

USE is very specific. You know that now. What you're talking about is welfare. You also know that now.

You are doing exactly what I predicted you would do.

Solving for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

 

[danielpalos]

End the drug war!

That’s exactly what Republicans are doing (while the Dumbocrats continue to ramp up the war on drugs).

Policymakers in Texas, led by then-Gov. Rick Perry, expanded drug courts and other proven alternatives to incarceration for nonviolent offenders. Texas' crime rate has declined 31% and the state has closed eight prisons.

Which begs the question - why do you oppose the side giving you what you claim you want and supporting the side doing what you claim you don’t want?

Trump's Conservative Approach to Criminal Justice Reform

The right wing is all political talk and no political action. there is no drug war clause in the Republican Doctrine.

Uh...the Republicans took action. The article proves it. Why do you insist on lying? And why aren’t you whining about the Dumbocrats who had a super-majority under Barack Insane Obama and didn’t end “the drug war”? Oops...

It is the Republicans that want to expand the drug war and cut social services for the poor.

 

[danielpalos]

The Lefts attacks identity which it forms with names and opinions. The fact that identity has no effect on intelligence does not bother them.

The right wing has nothing but fallacy, and allege they are for the "gospel Truth" in any given argument.

 

[Lastamender]

The Lefts attacks identity which it forms with names and opinions. The fact that identity has no effect on intelligence does not bother them.

The right wing has nothing but fallacy, and allege they are for the "gospel Truth" in any given argument.

And identity politics is better? Remember you can prove someone wrong, the Left has decided it needs to prove nothing and can rely on emotion and manufactured guilt, and, of course, useful idiots.

 

[danielpalos]

The Lefts attacks identity which it forms with names and opinions. The fact that identity has no effect on intelligence does not bother them.

The right wing has nothing but fallacy, and allege they are for the "gospel Truth" in any given argument.

And identity politics is better? Remember you can prove someone wrong, the Left has decided it needs to prove nothing and can rely on emotion and manufactured guilt, and, of course, useful idiots.

It is the Republicans that want to expand the drug war and cut social services for the poor.

 

[Lastamender]

The Lefts attacks identity which it forms with names and opinions. The fact that identity has no effect on intelligence does not bother them.

The right wing has nothing but fallacy, and allege they are for the "gospel Truth" in any given argument.

And identity politics is better? Remember you can prove someone wrong, the Left has decided it needs to prove nothing and can rely on emotion and manufactured guilt, and, of course, useful idiots.

It is the Republicans that want to expand the drug war and cut social services for the poor.

It is also the Republicans that are creating jobs for the poor with their policies.

 

[danielpalos]

The Lefts attacks identity which it forms with names and opinions. The fact that identity has no effect on intelligence does not bother them.

The right wing has nothing but fallacy, and allege they are for the "gospel Truth" in any given argument.

And identity politics is better? Remember you can prove someone wrong, the Left has decided it needs to prove nothing and can rely on emotion and manufactured guilt, and, of course, useful idiots.

It is the Republicans that want to expand the drug war and cut social services for the poor.

It is also the Republicans that are creating jobs for the poor with their policies.

a less effective use of public policy. how much have we spent on welfare already. cutting taxes and simply relying on the private only exacerbates that problem.

 

[hadit]

Not the guy who lost a job that was only worth $12/hr.

There is no unemployment under true capitalism, only underpayment so the rich can get richer faster.

You're as predictable as night following day. And you won't address the guy who lost his $12/hr job. Here's what will happen. I'll press you on that guy, you'll mutter some increasingly meaningless blargle and will simply refuse to deal with it.

Eventually, you'll pop up somewhere else saying the same things, having learned nothing.

dude; unemployment compensation should go up to fourteen dollars an hour, so Labor doesn't have to indulge lousy capitalists simply Because they have capital.

USE is very specific. You know that now. What you're talking about is welfare. You also know that now.

You are doing exactly what I predicted you would do.

Solving for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

You're holding true to form. Why don't you try something a little different?

 

[danielpalos]

There is no unemployment under true capitalism, only underpayment so the rich can get richer faster.

You're as predictable as night following day. And you won't address the guy who lost his $12/hr job. Here's what will happen. I'll press you on that guy, you'll mutter some increasingly meaningless blargle and will simply refuse to deal with it.

Eventually, you'll pop up somewhere else saying the same things, having learned nothing.

dude; unemployment compensation should go up to fourteen dollars an hour, so Labor doesn't have to indulge lousy capitalists simply Because they have capital.

USE is very specific. You know that now. What you're talking about is welfare. You also know that now.

You are doing exactly what I predicted you would do.

Solving for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

You're holding true to form. Why don't you try something a little different?

I prefer solutions to fantasy, every time.

 

[hadit]

You're as predictable as night following day. And you won't address the guy who lost his $12/hr job. Here's what will happen. I'll press you on that guy, you'll mutter some increasingly meaningless blargle and will simply refuse to deal with it.

Eventually, you'll pop up somewhere else saying the same things, having learned nothing.

dude; unemployment compensation should go up to fourteen dollars an hour, so Labor doesn't have to indulge lousy capitalists simply Because they have capital.

USE is very specific. You know that now. What you're talking about is welfare. You also know that now.

You are doing exactly what I predicted you would do.

Solving for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

You're holding true to form. Why don't you try something a little different?

I prefer solutions to fantasy, every time.

No you don't. Your posts are all fantasy, no solutions.

 

[danielpalos]

Solving for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

 

[P@triot]

Solving for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

Which is exponentially less than failed left-wing socialism’s very unnatural rate of excessive unemployment.

 

[hadit]

Solving for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

Meaningless statement 5. You're a broken record.

 

[danielpalos]

Employment is at will in our at-will employment States. It is only a matter of time, now.

 

[hadit]

Employment is at will in our at-will employment States. It is only a matter of time, now.

Meaningless statement 6. You're talking about welfare again.