The Nuking of Nagasaki: Even More Immoral and Unnecessary than Hiroshima

[Vegasgiants]

There were hundreds of high level officers involved in the Pacific you have what? 5?

If you have others with different testimony I would be happy to see their quotes

 

[RetiredGySgt]

rYou're getting very upset again gunny. A sign of a failing argument


Just answer my simple question and leave the histrionics to others. You are better than that

You keep posting stupid shit. The records are CLEAR and you believe 5 men from out of the dozens and hundreds of high ranking officers.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

If you have others with different testimony I would be happy to see their quotes

Their LACK of statements says it all.

 

[Vegasgiants]

Their LACK of statements says it all.

No. That is called a LACK OF EVIDENCE

 

[Vegasgiants]

You keep posting stupid shit. The records are CLEAR and you believe 5 men from out of the dozens and hundreds of high ranking officers.

Its a simple question. Just answer it

 

[RetiredGySgt]

No. That is called a LACK OF EVIDENCE

LOL NO no statement to support your 5 is a VERY BIG statement indeed.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

No Officer with direct combat experience against the Japanese ever stated any such nonsense.

 

[Vegasgiants]

LOL NO no statement to support your 5 is a VERY BIG statement indeed.

I think its seven actually but I would have to check.


You can't find a single general that supports that we needed the bomb to end the war

 

[Vegasgiants]

No Officer with direct combat experience against the Japanese ever stated any such nonsense.

Correct. They never stated we needed the bomb to end the war

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I think its seven actually but I would have to check.


You can't find a single general that supports that we needed the bomb to end the war

You cant find a single General with direct combat againt the Japanese that supports your claim.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Why? Why not give them the condition we gave them anyway?

Because that was what the leaders of the Allies agreed to. What we allowed the Japanese after surrender was for our convenience, NOT something they could demand.

 

[Vegasgiants]

You cant find a single General with direct combat againt the Japanese that supports your claim.

I don't need to. If their opinion was the most important they would be in charge. They weren't.


Should we get a private to weigh in? LOL



Why not just answer my question

 

[Vegasgiants]

Because that was what the leaders of the Allies agreed to. What we allowed the Japanese after surrender was for our convenience, NOT something they could demand.

It was something we could offer.....since we gave it to them anyway

 

[AZrailwhale]

They surrendered right after Russia invaded. You are only talking about the formal signing


The war was over when Russia entered in and they surrendered that day

Nope the Kwantung Army surrendered to Soviet forces on August 18th and actual combat lasted longer than that.

 

[Vegasgiants]

Nope the Kwantung Army surrendered to Soviet forces on August 18th and actual combat lasted longer than that.

I think we all know when Japan surrendered

 

[AZrailwhale]

I think we all know when Japan surrendered

Yeah, the Japanese announced their UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER on August 15th. Not the 18th when the Kwantung Army surrendered.

 

[Vegasgiants]

Yeah, the Japanese announced their UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER on August 15th. Not the 18th when the Kwantung Army surrendered.

So AFTER the invasion by russia.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I don't need to. If their opinion was the most important they would be in charge. They weren't.


Should we get a private to weigh in? LOL



Why not just answer my question

LOL NONE of the Generals in the Pacific ever said the atomic bombs were not needed. Are you claiming none of the dozens of 2 and 3 and 4 star Generals were not in command?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

For that matter you only have 2 of the Admirals saying it wasnt needed.

 

[Vegasgiants]

LOL NONE of the Generals in the Pacific ever said the atomic bombs were not needed. Are you claiming none of the dozens of 2 and 3 and 4 star Generals were not in command?

I am waiting for your evidence. The quotes I gave were big news at the time


Quote those who disagreed