- Thread starter
- #261
Again, keep carrying around that torch for the stupids. How many people do you see walking down the streets with Bazookas and grenade launchers? None! Why? Because someone is going to get them off the streets if they do see it. Why? Because they are capable of mass murder in a very short period of time. I can do the same with an AR. None of these weapons or "arms" have nothing whatsoever to do with the second.The AR is capable of mass slaughter just like a grenade or a bazooka. None of the three weapons were referenced in the second amendment. How many people do you see walking down a public street with a bazooka or a grenade launcher? Exactly, none! Because these three weapons have zero to do with the second amendment. Nothing! NADA! They are for mass killing.An Ar15 is not a gun. It's a weapon designed for war that kills in mass quickly. The same as a bazooka, or a grenade.Any push to ban any guns is going against the Constitution so you are a lying sack of shitYour statement is a lie of course. Who is the Democrat who has proposed a Constitutional amendment to get rid of it?
No, the AR is a tool used by Democrats to make the case for gun confiscation.
The Second says "arms" as in any arms. If the Democrats want to change that, let them offer up an amendment.
The fact of the matter is the AR is no different in it's ability to fire ammunition. It does it at the same rate as any semi-automatic handgun. It's range is better of course, but outlawing it won't stop anything.
A bazooka, grenade or nuclear weapons are not self-defesne weapons. They cannot be used to fire at a specific person. They cannot be used for hunting. Your comparison is apples and oranges.