The oath of office no longer applies to Republicans

[bigrebnc1775]

If that were true you wouldn't be a democrat

Your statement is a lie of course. Who is the Democrat who has proposed a Constitutional amendment to get rid of it?

Any push to ban any guns is going against the Constitution so you are a lying sack of shit

An Ar15 is not a gun. It's a weapon designed for war that kills in mass quickly. The same as a bazooka, or a grenade.

Wrong. AR-15s are semi-automatic. They are not used by the military.

1. Harris County, Texas (2013)

A 15-year-old boy saved both his life and the life of his 12-year-old sister by fending off a pair of home invaders with his father’s AR-15.

2. Rochester, New York (2013)

Two armed burglars retreated from a college student’s apartment after coming face-to-face with an unloaded AR-15. The rifle itself instilled enough fear to cause them to flee.

3. Ferguson, Missouri (2014)

During the Ferguson, Missouri, riots, nearly all businesses within a particular 2-square-mile area of the city were looted or destroyed—except for one. African-American men guarded the gas station and convenience store of a white friend from looters and rioters. They did so armed with an AR-15, a MAC-10 “machine pistol,” and a variety of handguns.

4. Houston, Texas (2017)

A target of a drive-by shooting successfully fended off the attack by using his legally owned AR-15 against his three armed attackers. He was able to hit all three men in the moving vehicle.

5. Broken Arrow, Oklahoma (2017)

A homeowner’s 19-year-old son used an AR-15 to defend himself against three would-be burglars who broke into the home in broad daylight. The 19-year-old was later determined to have acted in justifiable self-defense.

6. Sutherland Springs, Texas (2017)

After a gunman opened fire on congregants inside First Baptist Church, a man living near the place of worship grabbed his AR-15 and engaged the shooter. The shooter subsequently dropped his own firearm and fled the scene as the courageous neighbor pursued him.

7. Oswego, Illinois (2018)

A man with an AR-15 intervened to stop a neighbor’s knife attack on a pregnant woman. The rifle’s “intimidation factor” was credited as a reason why the attacker dropped his knife.

8. Catawba County, Illinois (2018)

After his 17-year-old relative successfully used his own firearm to fend off three would-be robbers who attacked him in the driveway of his home, a man used his AR-15 to stop a threat from one of the would-be robber’s upset family members.

You're an idiot who doesn't know what an AR 15 is; ArmaLite AR-15 - Wikipedia

I am a certified Law Enforcement firearms expert. I can say without a doubt you don't know what you are talking about when you have to use wiki as a source.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Impeached Trump was impeached for breaking a law. But nice to see the right wringing their hands to impeach a Democrat even if they don't break any laws or public trust.

What law did he break?

You're as dumb as BWK.

We've been over this repeatedly, lying fucking moron. Every time I've shown you that law, you proved to be too stupid to understand it.

Exactly! This is going to play against them. You know, that strategy of the willfully stupid who always ask the same stupid questions every day. Willful stupidity only creates real stupidity.

So what law did Trump break? Neither of you have posted it.

Liar. I've posted it repeatedly.

What law?

 

[jc456]

'Inconsistent': McConnell slammed for violating 'oath' as 'constitutional officer' Republicans like Mitch McConnell of kentucky no longer value the rule of law, the Constitution, honesty, and fairness, while Republican elected officials threw out their oath of office to country, the citizenry, and sent them straight into the garbage. Folks, we are watching history here. When Mitch McConnell and his criminal subordinates decide not honor their oath with a "real" trial, they will be judged harshly for decades. This is a much bigger deal than just putting Trump on trial. Pretend if you will Trump Sheep, but if a fair trial does not come about, the Republican party loses its soul and credibility as a representative party. With Trump, they have all but destroyed the party after 3 years, and if they push this stunt with no trial, where there is overwhelming evidence against Trump, that will finally finish them off.'Constitutional travesty': See Trump and McConnell block fair impeachment trial

During the Clinton impeachment Schumer announced he would vote to acquit before the trial started.

Oops!

Because a blow job isn't a crime. Campaign finance violations are.

Perjury, obstruction of justice, and getting others to commit perjury on your behalf is. Clinton wasn't charged with getting a blow job, Dummy.

Glad I could educate the ignorant.

Now, do you have any coherent comment on Chucky's blatant hypocrisy?

Nor was he removed from office

 

[BWK]

Do they? I support the second amendment and haven't had a hard time at all. Are you in need of a distraction from the argument?

If that were true you wouldn't be a democrat

Your statement is a lie of course. Who is the Democrat who has proposed a Constitutional amendment to get rid of it?

Any push to ban any guns is going against the Constitution so you are a lying sack of shit

An Ar15 is not a gun. It's a weapon designed for war that kills in mass quickly. The same as a bazooka, or a grenade.

The Supreme Court ruled that in order for a firearm to be protected by the second amendment, it must have some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia, in common use of the time, and supplied by the citizen.

So tell me what firearm is there that is in common use that would have some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia?

You conveniently never get it on purpose. We get that. Heller merely says the government can't enforce laws that prevent (most) Americans from possessing commonly used weapons in their homes for self-defense. Commonly used weapons in the home for self defense for decades were what? They certainly weren't AR 15's. They were shotguns and hand guns.

We don't even know what a "well regulated militia" even means other than for a citizen to protect him or herself. “The interesting thing about District of Columbia v Heller is that Scalia had to accommodate the other four justices who ultimately sided with him, ” Choper says. “As a consequence, it provides a very limited interpretation of the Second Amendment. It stipulates that a person has the right to own a gun to protect himself or herself, family, and property. That’s it. The decision does not imply the right to carry a weapon in public, including public buildings.” In other words, that decision has nothing to do with a well regulate militia, because that term was used back then, and has no meaning now.

 

[jc456]

Sure they do, they are both campaign finance violations.

Really? Explain exactly, in detail, how they are both the same?

I just did. Again, they are both campaign finance violations. Those happen all the time as the candidate is not overseeing the money coming in or going out. They hire people to do that.

Trump hired his lawyer to pay it, then hide it from financial disclosures. Did Obama do that?

Ohh Barbie, let’s see that evidence too. Hly shit Batman, you got all of it. How come you didn’t give it to mueller?

Lol! Your posts are lame and retarded. When do you go back on the gurney? You need assistance.

So nothing huh Barbie?

 

[blackhawk]

It is so fucking funny seeing these hypocrites bitch about the Senate being unfair yet they didn't give a furry rats ass about the partisan shit show Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler put on in the House. I will freely admit the Republican controlled Senate is being partisan but it's not being any more partisan than the Democrat controlled House was anyone who thinks otherwise is a liar a fool or both.

Your argument has no resemblance to logical deductive reasoning. Why? Because you failed to acknowledge that Trump gagged key WH witnesses and didn't release relevant documents. Now that the Center for Integrity got their hands on some of them, that reveal the smoking gun of guilt where the correspondence between OMB and the pentagon pointed out that they were being held back in secret about the money, solidifies the guilt by the WH. The evidence is right there for all to see, and yet, you haven't got the balls to address that reality where fairness was turned into obstruction by trump, and the OMB.

In other words, you want fairness, yet, you can't debate the smoking gun. I thought you wanted fairness?

Grade A bullshit response the House Democrats could have waited for the courts to work that out. Joe Biden has said he won’t respond to any subpoena from the Senate same rules apply here as well they can go to the courts. This has never been about truth or fairness it’s about politics always has been. If you want to keep lying to yourself about this be my guest I see it all for what it is.

 

[jc456]

If that were true you wouldn't be a democrat

Your statement is a lie of course. Who is the Democrat who has proposed a Constitutional amendment to get rid of it?

Any push to ban any guns is going against the Constitution so you are a lying sack of shit

An Ar15 is not a gun. It's a weapon designed for war that kills in mass quickly. The same as a bazooka, or a grenade.

The Supreme Court ruled that in order for a firearm to be protected by the second amendment, it must have some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia, in common use of the time, and supplied by the citizen.

So tell me what firearm is there that is in common use that would have some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia?

You conveniently never get it on purpose. We get that. Heller merely says the government can't enforce laws that prevent (most) Americans from possessing commonly used weapons in their homes for self-defense. Commonly used weapons in the home for self defense for decades were what? They certainly weren't AR 15's. They were shotguns and hand guns.

We don't even know what a "well regulated militia" even means other than for a citizen to protect him or herself. “The interesting thing about District of Columbia v Heller is that Scalia had to accommodate the other four justices who ultimately sided with him, ” Choper says. “As a consequence, it provides a very limited interpretation of the Second Amendment. It stipulates that a person has the right to own a gun to protect himself or herself, family, and property. That’s it. The decision does not imply the right to carry a weapon in public, including public buildings.” In other words, that decision has nothing to do with a well regulate militia, because that term was used back then, and has no meaning now.

McDonald vs city of Chicago

McDonald v. City of Chicago | Summary, Decision, History, & Facts

 

[Faun]

What law did he break?

You're as dumb as BWK.

We've been over this repeatedly, lying fucking moron. Every time I've shown you that law, you proved to be too stupid to understand it.

Exactly! This is going to play against them. You know, that strategy of the willfully stupid who always ask the same stupid questions every day. Willful stupidity only creates real stupidity.

So what law did Trump break? Neither of you have posted it.

Liar. I've posted it repeatedly.

What law?

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

​

 

[fncceo]

The AR is capable of mass slaughter just like a grenade or a bazooka.

It's obvious you've never been on the receiving end of any of the three.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

If that were true you wouldn't be a democrat

Your statement is a lie of course. Who is the Democrat who has proposed a Constitutional amendment to get rid of it?

Any push to ban any guns is going against the Constitution so you are a lying sack of shit

An Ar15 is not a gun. It's a weapon designed for war that kills in mass quickly. The same as a bazooka, or a grenade.

The Supreme Court ruled that in order for a firearm to be protected by the second amendment, it must have some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia, in common use of the time, and supplied by the citizen.

So tell me what firearm is there that is in common use that would have some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia?

You conveniently never get it on purpose. We get that. Heller merely says the government can't enforce laws that prevent (most) Americans from possessing commonly used weapons in their homes for self-defense. Commonly used weapons in the home for self defense for decades were what? They certainly weren't AR 15's. They were shotguns and hand guns.

We don't even know what a "well regulated militia" even means other than for a citizen to protect him or herself. “The interesting thing about District of Columbia v Heller is that Scalia had to accommodate the other four justices who ultimately sided with him, ” Choper says. “As a consequence, it provides a very limited interpretation of the Second Amendment. It stipulates that a person has the right to own a gun to protect himself or herself, family, and property. That’s it. The decision does not imply the right to carry a weapon in public, including public buildings.” In other words, that decision has nothing to do with a well regulate militia, because that term was used back then, and has no meaning now.

Nope IN common use for legal purposes not for use in the home but anywhere you need to defend yourself.
Well Regulated means in working order as to be expected
Is your first amendment right only restrained for use in your house?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

We've been over this repeatedly, lying fucking moron. Every time I've shown you that law, you proved to be too stupid to understand it.

Exactly! This is going to play against them. You know, that strategy of the willfully stupid who always ask the same stupid questions every day. Willful stupidity only creates real stupidity.

So what law did Trump break? Neither of you have posted it.

Liar. I've posted it repeatedly.

What law?

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.
​

Precedence just shot you down
GREENSBORO, N.C., May 31, 2012— -- A North Carolina jury found former Sen. John Edwards not guilty today on one of six counts in a campaign-finance trial, and declared itself hopelessly deadlocked on the remaining charges, leading the judge to declare a mistrial on those counts.

Edwards, a two-time presidential candidate, accused of soliciting nearly $1 million from wealthy backers to finance a cover up of his illicit affair and illegitimate child during his 2008 bid for the White House, was found not guilty on count 3 of the six-part indictment. That count pertained only to whether Edwards illegally received several hundred thousand dollars in donations from wealthy heiress Rachel "Bunny" Mellon to cover up the affair in 2008.
John Edwards Not Guilty on 1 Count, but Admits Moral Failing; Mistrial on 5 Other Counts

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Because a blow job isn't a crime.

Perjury is.

 

[Faun]

Exactly! This is going to play against them. You know, that strategy of the willfully stupid who always ask the same stupid questions every day. Willful stupidity only creates real stupidity.

So what law did Trump break? Neither of you have posted it.

Liar. I've posted it repeatedly.

What law?

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

Precedence just shot you down
GREENSBORO, N.C., May 31, 2012— -- A North Carolina jury found former Sen. John Edwards not guilty today on one of six counts in a campaign-finance trial, and declared itself hopelessly deadlocked on the remaining charges, leading the judge to declare a mistrial on those counts.

Edwards, a two-time presidential candidate, accused of soliciting nearly $1 million from wealthy backers to finance a cover up of his illicit affair and illegitimate child during his 2008 bid for the White House, was found not guilty on count 3 of the six-part indictment. That count pertained only to whether Edwards illegally received several hundred thousand dollars in donations from wealthy heiress Rachel "Bunny" Mellon to cover up the affair in 2008.
John Edwards Not Guilty on 1 Count, but Admits Moral Failing; Mistrial on 5 Other Counts

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, that's not a precedent here. Edward's wasn't even charged with being in violation of §30121.

 

[Faun]

Because a blow job isn't a crime.

Perjury is.

So is soliciting a foreign national to look for dirt on a political rival.

 

[bripat9643]

If that were true you wouldn't be a democrat

Your statement is a lie of course. Who is the Democrat who has proposed a Constitutional amendment to get rid of it?

Any push to ban any guns is going against the Constitution so you are a lying sack of shit

An Ar15 is not a gun. It's a weapon designed for war that kills in mass quickly. The same as a bazooka, or a grenade.

No, the AR is a tool used by Democrats to make the case for gun confiscation.

The AR is capable of mass slaughter just like a grenade or a bazooka. None of the three weapons were referenced in the second amendment. How many people do you see walking down a public street with a bazooka or a grenade launcher? Exactly, none! Because these three weapons have zero to do with the second amendment. Nothing! NADA! They are for mass killing.

The AR-14 is a semi-automatic. It's no different than any standard hunting rifle. It just looks scary to morons like you.

 

[bripat9643]

Because a blow job isn't a crime.

Perjury is.

So is soliciting a foreign national to look for dirt on a political rival.

I keep telling you that the term "soliciting" assumes something illegal.

 

[bripat9643]

So what law did Trump break? Neither of you have posted it.

Liar. I've posted it repeatedly.

What law?

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

Precedence just shot you down
GREENSBORO, N.C., May 31, 2012— -- A North Carolina jury found former Sen. John Edwards not guilty today on one of six counts in a campaign-finance trial, and declared itself hopelessly deadlocked on the remaining charges, leading the judge to declare a mistrial on those counts.

Edwards, a two-time presidential candidate, accused of soliciting nearly $1 million from wealthy backers to finance a cover up of his illicit affair and illegitimate child during his 2008 bid for the White House, was found not guilty on count 3 of the six-part indictment. That count pertained only to whether Edwards illegally received several hundred thousand dollars in donations from wealthy heiress Rachel "Bunny" Mellon to cover up the affair in 2008.
John Edwards Not Guilty on 1 Count, but Admits Moral Failing; Mistrial on 5 Other Counts

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, that's not a precedent here. Edward's wasn't even charged with being in violation of §30121.

Neither is Trump, you fucking moron.

 

[fncceo]

Because a blow job isn't a crime.

Perjury is.

So is soliciting a foreign national to look for dirt on a political rival.

Cite statute.

 

[fncceo]

The AR is capable of mass slaughter just like a grenade or a bazooka

There are literally millions of AR platforms in the hands of private Americans who have never damaged anything but a paper target.

Given that these weapons are not living up to their potential, I suggest their owners may be due reparations.

Federally funded reparations.

 

[jc456]

If that were true you wouldn't be a democrat

Your statement is a lie of course. Who is the Democrat who has proposed a Constitutional amendment to get rid of it?

Any push to ban any guns is going against the Constitution so you are a lying sack of shit

An Ar15 is not a gun. It's a weapon designed for war that kills in mass quickly. The same as a bazooka, or a grenade.

No, the AR is a tool used by Democrats to make the case for gun confiscation.

The AR is capable of mass slaughter just like a grenade or a bazooka. None of the three weapons were referenced in the second amendment. How many people do you see walking down a public street with a bazooka or a grenade launcher? Exactly, none! Because these three weapons have zero to do with the second amendment. Nothing! NADA! They are for mass killing.

Hey Barbie, a revolver is capable of mass murder, in fact, one can hold two at once. You aren’t bright at all.