The odds are in favor of Hunter Biden in imminent lawsuit against computer repairman

[OKTexas]

The police can't seize evidence from someone (4th amendment) via a third parties unauthorized disclosure of them.
They can still use the evidence, but it's treated as tainted by the jury.

Is your weed laced with PCP or something, where the hell are you coming up with this shit?

.

 

[Care4all]

So your argument is the same as if I repo a car, I can't take the seats and other items within the vehicle because they weren't specified on the original used car sales agreement? Are you really that stupid?

.

You can take the car, but NOT the personal files in the briefcase left in it. It has to be returned to the owner.

 

[gipper]

You can take the car, but NOT the personal files in the briefcase left in it. It has to be returned to the owner.

Hey did you hear? Hunter admits it’s his laptop. So, all those intelligence officers and dumb Joe LIED! You believed it was Russian disinformation campaign.

Did you learn anything from this?

 

[GWV5903]

Right-wingers argue that the computer repairman acquired the laptop as abandoned property, but according to this legal analyst, only the hardware and not the data belongs to the repairman in this case. The repairman cannot use Hunter Biden's copyrighted images, emails, etc. The only permissible action the repairman could have taken with the data is to recover it:

Guest view: Hunter Biden’s laptop and data: A legal and data privacy analysis

By David L. Hecht, Esq. A newly released document suggests that on April 12, 2019 Hunter Biden signed an $85 services “quote” from the Mac Shop in Wilmington covering labor

delawarebusinessnow.com

This is your defense of the morons laptop? You sound like him and his daddy, do you have big shovel trailing behind them cleaning up all their crap?

 

[Cellblock2429]

Right-wingers argue that the computer repairman acquired the laptop as abandoned property, but according to this legal analyst, only the hardware and not the data belongs to the repairman in this case. The repairman cannot use Hunter Biden's copyrighted images, emails, etc. The only permissible action the repairman could have taken with the data is to recover it:

Guest view: Hunter Biden’s laptop and data: A legal and data privacy analysis

By David L. Hecht, Esq. A newly released document suggests that on April 12, 2019 Hunter Biden signed an $85 services “quote” from the Mac Shop in Wilmington covering labor

delawarebusinessnow.com

/----/ Your link:

403 Forbidden​

---

nginx

 

[DBA]

It seems to me that Democrats don’t care if Hunter and Joe are crooked. They are just looking for some legal loophole to get them off. One would think they if they really cared about the country, they would be concerned. Oh well.

 

[Zincwarrior]

You can not successfully just add emails to a single laptop.
There are many multiple copies on other computers.
There would be copies on every server in the server chain, tap backups, copies on the receiving computer, etc.
A good investigation could easily verify what was real and if anything had been added.

Sure you can.

 

[Zincwarrior]

It seems to me that Democrats don’t care if Hunter and Joe are crooked. They are just looking for some legal loophole to get them off. One would think they if they really cared about the country, they would be concerned. Oh well.

Joe is a politician. Of course he is crooked.

Hunter is the child of one. Of course he is crooked and milking his name. See: Trump's, Clinton, and two generations of Bushes. I think the Obama's are still minors, but they will too.

 

[Care4all]

The FBI did suppress it.

.

Hogwash Tex. The FBI does not confirm or deny cases they may be working on

The FBI had the laptop subpoenaed for another case they were woking on, and for specific reasons listed in the warrant.

They could not legally filter through the whole laptop searching for any crime.... They could only go through it looking for the specifics listed in the subpoena that were the possible crimes.

And without an additional subpoena to search the computer for another probable crime,

I doubt to this day, the FBI has gone through the whole content.

 

[Zincwarrior]

What's on the laptop is physical evidence and fully admissible.

.

No. It has to have a chain of custody. No judge would allow it in.

Fail harder.

 

[Care4all]

Hey did you hear? Hunter admits it’s his laptop. So, all those intelligence officers and dumb Joe LIED! You believed it was Russian disinformation campaign.

Did you learn anything from this?

It could have been doctored. There was no way to know at the time, without a forensic audit, or the Post sharing it with the main stream newspapers so they could confirm or deny it.... and the NYPost is a tabloid like rag, that Giuliani gave it to, after yanking it back from the Wall Street Journal's exclusive, who were spending the time to verify its content to get their lap top story as accurate and worthy as possible.... But for Giuliani, Trump's campaign lawyer, that caution and accuracy defeated his purpose of a trump campaign, October surprise.... thus the tabloid like NYPOST getting it.I

And Giuliani getting a copy from a computer repair man, who could not identify Hunter as the person who dropped off the laptop... Come on man!

No, I do not regret for one nano second, my caution taken....as to the legitimacy of all content on the laptop Giuliani gave to the Post, just in the Nick of time before the election, with no time to verify it.

I stand by, my position.....

 

[gipper]

It could have been doctored. There was no way to know at the time, without a forensic audit, or the Post sharing it with the main stream newspapers so they could confirm or deny it.... and the NYPost is a tabloid like rag, that Giuliani gave it to, after yanking it back from the Wall Street Journal's exclusive, who were spending the time to verify its content to get their lap top story as accurate and worthy as possible.... But for Giuliani, Trump's campaign lawyer, that caution and accuracy defeated his purpose of a trump campaign, October surprise.... thus the tabloid like NYPOST getting it.I

And Giuliani getting a copy from a computer repair man, who could not identify Hunter as the person who dropped off the laptop... Come on man!

No, I do not regret for one nano second, my caution taken....as to the legitimacy of all content on the laptop Giuliani gave to the Post, just in the Nick of time before the election, with no time to verify it.

I stand by, my position.....

Cult!

 

[Care4all]

Cult!

Street smart!

 

[Care4all]

Exactly who would that be?

.

he gave a copy to Trump's Campaign lawyer.... That's not law enforcement...

 

[Nostra]

What is it you're alleging he did?

For once in your life...just type out what you're accusing him of and why you think this. If it comes from the copies of the laptop...sorry...there is no way to know if the laptop repair guy added whatever "evidence" you're using into the copies he made. And please don't try to insinuate that the poor old laptop repair guy was just an innocent bystander in this...if he was..he would have given the copies he made to a police department; not some politically connected friend of the family.

I know that was too much to ask of a blunt object such as yourself so do what you always do...bring on the conspiracy theories and faux outrage.

He gave it to the FBI, Dumbass.

How can you still be this ignorant on a topic?

 

[Nostra]

he gave a copy to Trump's Campaign lawyer.... That's not law enforcement...

The FBI is, Moron.

 

[candycorn]

He gave it to the FBI, Dumbass.

And how did Rudy get it?

Tell us that, dumbass.

 

[Nostra]

No. It has to have a chain of custody. No judge would allow it in.

Fail harder.

Crackhead-shop owner-FBI.

Looks like a chain of custody to me.

 

[Nostra]

And how did Rudy get it?

Tell us that, dumbass.

Shop owner gave him a copy after he gave it to the FBI and they did nothing.

Man, you know nothing about this topic. What a moron.

 

[Care4all]

He gave it to the FBI, Dumbass.

How can you still be this ignorant on a topic?

He gave it to the FBI upon a subpoena. Initially he only gave a copy to the FBI and kept the laptop, and made other copies for political purposes like giving it to the Trump campaign.... So the FBI had to get a subpoena to get the actual laptop, from him.