Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok, here is the jacket when he was being booked. Did the paramedics launder it too?
(Back of Zimmerman's Jacket 45 minutes after he was alleged on his back in a bloody, muddy scuffle)
How does this prove your case? If the witnesses are testifying that the guy in red was on the bottom. How does posting Zimmerman in his jacket prove he was the aggressor?
snip
>>> You are either doing a piss poor job at sarcasm, or you are retarded.
Nah.. you are just having difficulty putting your feet in TMs shoes. Your feet are in GZs shoes.
Ok, here is the jacket when he was being booked. Did the paramedics launder it too?
Ok, here is the jacket when he was being booked. Did the paramedics launder it too?
(Back of Zimmerman's Jacket 45 minutes after he was alleged on his back in a bloody, muddy scuffle)
blood would likely have more of a horizontal slant towards his ears/temples.
See any grass stains, mud, blood, anything? Looks like he just washed it.
See any grass stains, mud, blood, anything? Looks like he just washed it.
Ok, here is the jacket when he was being booked. Did the paramedics launder it too?
(Back of Zimmerman's Jacket 45 minutes after he was alleged on his back in a bloody, muddy scuffle)
How does this prove your case? If the witnesses are testifying that the guy in red was on the bottom. How does posting Zimmerman in his jacket prove he was the aggressor?
See any grass stains, mud, blood, anything? Looks like he just washed it.
Witness John Good - probably should have been considered the most important witness for this trial. He is the one that went outside and saw more of what happened than anyone else.
Yeah he's also the despicable jerk that decided to not help the guy crying out for help.
See any grass stains, mud, blood, anything? Looks like he just washed it.
That question has merit.
If Zimmerman were on the bottom, and presumably this scuffle was on wet grass, why are there no stains on the back of his jacket?
Furthermore, are there any stains on Martin's pants?
How can being called a delicious salty snack be racist? there was no rage, Martin was trying to get away from Zimmerman. Zimmerman was not violently beat. Zimmerman chased Martin down and confronted him, they got into a fight,Zimmerman got a couple minor injuries and killed Martin.
You are either doing a piss poor job at sarcasm, or you are retarded.
Anyone?
Insults don't intimidate anyone on a message nor do they advance your argument.
How does this prove your case? If the witnesses are testifying that the guy in red was on the bottom. How does posting Zimmerman in his jacket prove he was the aggressor?
See any grass stains, mud, blood, anything? Looks like he just washed it.
Why would you? Was the ground moist? hard to get grass stains or mud without moisture? Was the struggle even in the grass or on the sidewalk?
Why would there be blood on the back of the jacket? The injuries were to the head. If the injuries were caused by his head hitting the ground, the back of the jacket would have been against the ground. Why would you expect blood on it?
It's clear from the pictures that while the head blead a bit, that it was dry before hitting the jacket. Not to mention there is a collar to the jacket and if any blood reached the jacket, you wouldn't see it because it would likely deposit behind the collar.
Are you expecting huge stains of blood? There could be small starts of blood mud, or grass stains on the jacket. Without closer examination you can't say there arent.
See any grass stains, mud, blood, anything? Looks like he just washed it.
That question has merit.
If Zimmerman were on the bottom, and presumably this scuffle was on wet grass, why are there no stains on the back of his jacket?
Furthermore, are there any stains on Martin's pants?
See any grass stains, mud, blood, anything? Looks like he just washed it.
Why would you? Was the ground moist? hard to get grass stains or mud without moisture? Was the struggle even in the grass or on the sidewalk?
Why would there be blood on the back of the jacket? The injuries were to the head. If the injuries were caused by his head hitting the ground, the back of the jacket would have been against the ground. Why would you expect blood on it?
It's clear from the pictures that while the head blead a bit, that it was dry before hitting the jacket. Not to mention there is a collar to the jacket and if any blood reached the jacket, you wouldn't see it because it would likely deposit behind the collar.
Are you expecting huge stains of blood? There could be small starts of blood mud, or grass stains on the jacket. Without closer examination you can't say there arent.
Regardless of whether or not there was blood or stains on the jacket, if he had washed it, he would have been guilty of tampering with evidence.
Why do you think that?Chantel served as the most devastating to the prosecution's case.
I think she was a very credible witness...she resonated well with most people. She was certainly real, there was no faking anything with her.
It's not looking good for Zimmerman right about now.
See any grass stains, mud, blood, anything? Looks like he just washed it.
That question has merit.
If Zimmerman were on the bottom, and presumably this scuffle was on wet grass, why are there no stains on the back of his jacket?
Furthermore, are there any stains on Martin's pants?
Why would we presume the scuffle occured on wet grass?
See any grass stains, mud, blood, anything? Looks like he just washed it.
That question has merit.
If Zimmerman were on the bottom, and presumably this scuffle was on wet grass, why are there no stains on the back of his jacket?
Furthermore, are there any stains on Martin's pants?
The police report states that the back of Z's jacket was wet and covered with grass clippings. No indications of mud, blood or grass stains
The pictures of Martins hoody show the front is soaked while the back is relatively dry. There are grass stains at the knee on Martins pants
Why would you? Was the ground moist? hard to get grass stains or mud without moisture? Was the struggle even in the grass or on the sidewalk?
Why would there be blood on the back of the jacket? The injuries were to the head. If the injuries were caused by his head hitting the ground, the back of the jacket would have been against the ground. Why would you expect blood on it?
It's clear from the pictures that while the head blead a bit, that it was dry before hitting the jacket. Not to mention there is a collar to the jacket and if any blood reached the jacket, you wouldn't see it because it would likely deposit behind the collar.
Are you expecting huge stains of blood? There could be small starts of blood mud, or grass stains on the jacket. Without closer examination you can't say there arent.
Regardless of whether or not there was blood or stains on the jacket, if he had washed it, he would have been guilty of tampering with evidence.
Since he wasnt charged with that, I would say it's a safe conclusion that he didn't
That question has merit.
If Zimmerman were on the bottom, and presumably this scuffle was on wet grass, why are there no stains on the back of his jacket?
Furthermore, are there any stains on Martin's pants?
Why would we presume the scuffle occured on wet grass?
Martin's pants were wet at the knees. There were wet grass stains on the back of Zimmerman's jacket. Martin on top, Zimmerman on bottom. The facts are irrefutable.
