He was not in his own gated community. He was visiting his dad's girlfriend's gated community. He wasn't on his turf, he was on Zimmerman's turf.
If he was just going to the store to buy iced tea and skittles, ducking in and out the rain between buildings. That's understandable.
There is testimony that he was either back to the girlfriend's house or right near it. My point was if he had just gone inside, completing his mission, he would have been alive the next morning.
Interesting point.
Is there case law on what constitutes a place of residence (home) of a victim? I figure that's where his dad is staying.. thus that's where his dad's home is thus that's where the child's home is. I just figure that when you have split parents you have two homes.. Am I wrong here? Interesting point.
You are not wrong. I didn't get to finish because I had someone in my office I had to deal with.
Treyvon, had every right to be where he was. I'll even stipulate that he would be in his right to confront someone that was following him to ask if there was a problem.
What neither person had a right to put their hands on the other person.
Thanks.