Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
YES, it was reported that they started out just to harm our confidence in our elections and to harm Hillary is what was in the intelligence report back in January on it....all partisan tripe....how do you think the Russians financed their entire operation?no, I don't think so....counter intelligence agents are the best of the best...can handle where ever the investigation leads...
our Treasury Dept investigators may also be involved.
The FBI has money laundering and bank fraud specialist it's not really a counterintelligence thing.
.
Spare change, I mean what do a few geeks and computers cost now days? Especially when they are targeting dumb asses like the DNC and Podesta. The FBI warned the DNC of cyber attacks against them and they did nothing about it. A bunch of the email released was dated after the initial FBI warning. Podesta fell for a simple phishing scam. Only the US would spend substantial amounts of money on such a simple operation.
.
try informing yourself on their whole operation...start with watching the congressional house and senate hearings in FULL...
I've watched a few of the hearings, Dems trying to score cheap points and republicans asking questions that can't be answered in an open forum. Watched the one with Comey and Rogers, and the one with Calper and Yates, didn't know a damn thing after I didn't know going in. Well except Comey verifying what everyone pretty much knew anyways.
BTW it's not all partisan hype.
(CNN)Federal investigators tried to warn the Democratic National Committee about a potential intrusion in their computer network months before the party moved to try to fix the problem, U.S. officials briefed on the probe tell CNN.
The revelation raises questions about whether the DNC could have done more to limit the damage done by hackers suspected of working for Russian intelligence.
The DNC brought in consultants from the private security firm CrowdStrike in April. And by the time suspected Russian hackers were kicked out of the DNC network in June, the hackers had been inside for about a year.
Sources: US officials warned DNC of hack months before the party acted - CNNPolitics.com
That means the Russins, if indeed it was them, had gained access to the DNC servers as early as April 2015, that was two months before Trump announced he was running. And had access a year before they hired Crowdstrike and they didn't get them out of their system till June 2016.
.
they got them out of their system before june 2016, the emails posted from June 2016 etc were supposedly fake is what was reported...all partisan tripe....how do you think the Russians financed their entire operation?no, I don't think so....counter intelligence agents are the best of the best...can handle where ever the investigation leads...
our Treasury Dept investigators may also be involved.
The FBI has money laundering and bank fraud specialist it's not really a counterintelligence thing.
.
Spare change, I mean what do a few geeks and computers cost now days? Especially when they are targeting dumb asses like the DNC and Podesta. The FBI warned the DNC of cyber attacks against them and they did nothing about it. A bunch of the email released was dated after the initial FBI warning. Podesta fell for a simple phishing scam. Only the US would spend substantial amounts of money on such a simple operation.
.
try informing yourself on their whole operation...start with watching the congressional house and senate hearings in FULL...
I've watched a few of the hearings, Dems trying to score cheap points and republicans asking questions that can't be answered in an open forum. Watched the one with Comey and Rogers, and the one with Calper and Yates, didn't know a damn thing after I didn't know going in. Well except Comey verifying what everyone pretty much knew anyways.
BTW it's not all partisan hype.
(CNN)Federal investigators tried to warn the Democratic National Committee about a potential intrusion in their computer network months before the party moved to try to fix the problem, U.S. officials briefed on the probe tell CNN.
The revelation raises questions about whether the DNC could have done more to limit the damage done by hackers suspected of working for Russian intelligence.
The DNC brought in consultants from the private security firm CrowdStrike in April. And by the time suspected Russian hackers were kicked out of the DNC network in June, the hackers had been inside for about a year.
Sources: US officials warned DNC of hack months before the party acted - CNNPolitics.com
That means the Russins, if indeed it was them, had gained access to the DNC servers as early as April 2015, that was two months before Trump announced he was running. And had access a year before they hired Crowdstrike and they didn't get them out of their system till June 2016.
.
YES, it was reported that they started out just to harm our confidence in our elections and to harm Hillary is what was in the intelligence report back in January on it....all partisan tripe....how do you think the Russians financed their entire operation?The FBI has money laundering and bank fraud specialist it's not really a counterintelligence thing.
.
Spare change, I mean what do a few geeks and computers cost now days? Especially when they are targeting dumb asses like the DNC and Podesta. The FBI warned the DNC of cyber attacks against them and they did nothing about it. A bunch of the email released was dated after the initial FBI warning. Podesta fell for a simple phishing scam. Only the US would spend substantial amounts of money on such a simple operation.
.
try informing yourself on their whole operation...start with watching the congressional house and senate hearings in FULL...
I've watched a few of the hearings, Dems trying to score cheap points and republicans asking questions that can't be answered in an open forum. Watched the one with Comey and Rogers, and the one with Calper and Yates, didn't know a damn thing after I didn't know going in. Well except Comey verifying what everyone pretty much knew anyways.
BTW it's not all partisan hype.
(CNN)Federal investigators tried to warn the Democratic National Committee about a potential intrusion in their computer network months before the party moved to try to fix the problem, U.S. officials briefed on the probe tell CNN.
The revelation raises questions about whether the DNC could have done more to limit the damage done by hackers suspected of working for Russian intelligence.
The DNC brought in consultants from the private security firm CrowdStrike in April. And by the time suspected Russian hackers were kicked out of the DNC network in June, the hackers had been inside for about a year.
Sources: US officials warned DNC of hack months before the party acted - CNNPolitics.com
That means the Russins, if indeed it was them, had gained access to the DNC servers as early as April 2015, that was two months before Trump announced he was running. And had access a year before they hired Crowdstrike and they didn't get them out of their system till June 2016.
.
also, Trump's entrance in to the campaign on the golden escalator ride was not the day he decided to run...
My brother tells me he could have easily hacked the DNC himself, and he wouldn't need the Russians to help him do it. The fact is, there were millions of people in the world with enough skill to hack the DNC, they had minimal or non-existent security. Also, Julian Assange has said that Russia was not his source, Seth Rich was.
they got them out of their system before june 2016, the emails posted from June 2016 etc were supposedly fake is what was reported...all partisan tripe....how do you think the Russians financed their entire operation?The FBI has money laundering and bank fraud specialist it's not really a counterintelligence thing.
.
Spare change, I mean what do a few geeks and computers cost now days? Especially when they are targeting dumb asses like the DNC and Podesta. The FBI warned the DNC of cyber attacks against them and they did nothing about it. A bunch of the email released was dated after the initial FBI warning. Podesta fell for a simple phishing scam. Only the US would spend substantial amounts of money on such a simple operation.
.
try informing yourself on their whole operation...start with watching the congressional house and senate hearings in FULL...
I've watched a few of the hearings, Dems trying to score cheap points and republicans asking questions that can't be answered in an open forum. Watched the one with Comey and Rogers, and the one with Calper and Yates, didn't know a damn thing after I didn't know going in. Well except Comey verifying what everyone pretty much knew anyways.
BTW it's not all partisan hype.
(CNN)Federal investigators tried to warn the Democratic National Committee about a potential intrusion in their computer network months before the party moved to try to fix the problem, U.S. officials briefed on the probe tell CNN.
The revelation raises questions about whether the DNC could have done more to limit the damage done by hackers suspected of working for Russian intelligence.
The DNC brought in consultants from the private security firm CrowdStrike in April. And by the time suspected Russian hackers were kicked out of the DNC network in June, the hackers had been inside for about a year.
Sources: US officials warned DNC of hack months before the party acted - CNNPolitics.com
That means the Russins, if indeed it was them, had gained access to the DNC servers as early as April 2015, that was two months before Trump announced he was running. And had access a year before they hired Crowdstrike and they didn't get them out of their system till June 2016.
.
the hearing with Clinton Watts is the hearing you should listen to in full
sure but any other candidate, in the history of USA would never in a million years also have as many Russian connections with their campaign as Trump had, nor would they have continually defended Putin and Russia,YES, it was reported that they started out just to harm our confidence in our elections and to harm Hillary is what was in the intelligence report back in January on it....all partisan tripe....how do you think the Russians financed their entire operation?
Spare change, I mean what do a few geeks and computers cost now days? Especially when they are targeting dumb asses like the DNC and Podesta. The FBI warned the DNC of cyber attacks against them and they did nothing about it. A bunch of the email released was dated after the initial FBI warning. Podesta fell for a simple phishing scam. Only the US would spend substantial amounts of money on such a simple operation.
.
try informing yourself on their whole operation...start with watching the congressional house and senate hearings in FULL...
I've watched a few of the hearings, Dems trying to score cheap points and republicans asking questions that can't be answered in an open forum. Watched the one with Comey and Rogers, and the one with Calper and Yates, didn't know a damn thing after I didn't know going in. Well except Comey verifying what everyone pretty much knew anyways.
BTW it's not all partisan hype.
(CNN)Federal investigators tried to warn the Democratic National Committee about a potential intrusion in their computer network months before the party moved to try to fix the problem, U.S. officials briefed on the probe tell CNN.
The revelation raises questions about whether the DNC could have done more to limit the damage done by hackers suspected of working for Russian intelligence.
The DNC brought in consultants from the private security firm CrowdStrike in April. And by the time suspected Russian hackers were kicked out of the DNC network in June, the hackers had been inside for about a year.
Sources: US officials warned DNC of hack months before the party acted - CNNPolitics.com
That means the Russins, if indeed it was them, had gained access to the DNC servers as early as April 2015, that was two months before Trump announced he was running. And had access a year before they hired Crowdstrike and they didn't get them out of their system till June 2016.
.
also, Trump's entrance in to the campaign on the golden escalator ride was not the day he decided to run...
Remind us again what chances he was given to win the primaries again? LMAO According to you a huge bet on a long shot. Putin had animosity toward the bitch, do you really think he wouldn't try to hurt her no matter who her opponent might be?
.
Because, if the hack could have been performed by anyone, then there are millions of suspects, and Russia is only one out of millions.My brother tells me he could have easily hacked the DNC himself, and he wouldn't need the Russians to help him do it. The fact is, there were millions of people in the world with enough skill to hack the DNC, they had minimal or non-existent security. Also, Julian Assange has said that Russia was not his source, Seth Rich was.
what does an easy hack have to do with anything?
What are my sleazy accusations?Where is the classified information that proves Russia's interference and details how they did it? "I could tell you but then I'd have to kill you"well then where is the russia stuff that confirms your sides fking story? someone on your side declared it so so where is that original evidence?Investigating a handful of bad actors is much different than saying the entire administration and congress and intel agencies are lying for unknown reasons.I don't know Tillerson's motivation, but it doesn't require a conspiracy for all of Washington to pile on Trump. They are all a bunch of lying scumbags who hate the guy.
You ridicule conspiracy, yet you and all the other snowflakes are accusing the Trump administration of that very thing.
Of course, you've never been above gross hypocrisy
Guess you're gonna just have to be patient like the rest of us and wait for the findings of the investigation.
Just admit that at this point there is no evidence of any kind to support your sleazy accusations.
sure but any other candidate, in the history of USA would never in a million years also have as many Russian connections with their campaign as Trump had, nor would they have continually defended Putin and Russia,YES, it was reported that they started out just to harm our confidence in our elections and to harm Hillary is what was in the intelligence report back in January on it....all partisan tripe....Spare change, I mean what do a few geeks and computers cost now days? Especially when they are targeting dumb asses like the DNC and Podesta. The FBI warned the DNC of cyber attacks against them and they did nothing about it. A bunch of the email released was dated after the initial FBI warning. Podesta fell for a simple phishing scam. Only the US would spend substantial amounts of money on such a simple operation.
.
try informing yourself on their whole operation...start with watching the congressional house and senate hearings in FULL...
I've watched a few of the hearings, Dems trying to score cheap points and republicans asking questions that can't be answered in an open forum. Watched the one with Comey and Rogers, and the one with Calper and Yates, didn't know a damn thing after I didn't know going in. Well except Comey verifying what everyone pretty much knew anyways.
BTW it's not all partisan hype.
(CNN)Federal investigators tried to warn the Democratic National Committee about a potential intrusion in their computer network months before the party moved to try to fix the problem, U.S. officials briefed on the probe tell CNN.
The revelation raises questions about whether the DNC could have done more to limit the damage done by hackers suspected of working for Russian intelligence.
The DNC brought in consultants from the private security firm CrowdStrike in April. And by the time suspected Russian hackers were kicked out of the DNC network in June, the hackers had been inside for about a year.
Sources: US officials warned DNC of hack months before the party acted - CNNPolitics.com
That means the Russins, if indeed it was them, had gained access to the DNC servers as early as April 2015, that was two months before Trump announced he was running. And had access a year before they hired Crowdstrike and they didn't get them out of their system till June 2016.
.
also, Trump's entrance in to the campaign on the golden escalator ride was not the day he decided to run...
Remind us again what chances he was given to win the primaries again? LMAO According to you a huge bet on a long shot. Putin had animosity toward the bitch, do you really think he wouldn't try to hurt her no matter who her opponent might be?
.
there was manafort, gorden, paige, flynn, ross, tillerson, kushner, sessions lie, and stone with wikileaks connection
we weren't born yesterday, my dear!
gotta have motive...and the knowledge of when to release them....like podesta's were released the evening the access hollywood tapes were releasedBecause, if the hack could have been performed by anyone, then there are millions of suspects, and Russia is only one out of millions.My brother tells me he could have easily hacked the DNC himself, and he wouldn't need the Russians to help him do it. The fact is, there were millions of people in the world with enough skill to hack the DNC, they had minimal or non-existent security. Also, Julian Assange has said that Russia was not his source, Seth Rich was.
what does an easy hack have to do with anything?
Thats really what you think? Tillerson is acknowledging a false partisan attack story, validating it and speaking out about the seriousness of it just he is scared of making enemies? Same for all the heads of our intel agencies including those appointed by Trump. All these guys don't have the balls to speak the truth because why? They are scared to make enemies of the minority party? Come on dude, Turn your brain on and think before you make idiotic statements like that. They make no sense.How about you answer my question first and then I'll answer yours. You keep dodging my question about why a guy like Tillerson would acknowledge the seriousness of the Russian interference.So you claim it is a joke and everybody who is taking the Russian interference seriously is lying and being partisan, is that right? So explain why Tillerson, Trumps outsider friend who he appointed as SOS, is taking it very seriously? I could make a list of other similar people in the Trump admin who feel the same way, but let's start simple. Please explainPartisans will likely always make a fuss to degrade their opponents
From the October Surprise to the Russian Hack of the Election, degradation was the correct call.
You can't dismiss this as partisan smearing
I can and I do.
they are privy to the classified information and you are not.
Pssst...Russians posted fake stories on Facebook to beat Hillary....shhhh.....classified.
So you claim it is a joke and everybody who is taking the Russian interference seriously is lying and being partisan, is that right?
No. Some of the partisan idiots who take it seriously aren't lying.
So explain why Tillerson, Trumps outsider friend who he appointed as SOS, is taking it very seriously?
Laughing at idiots tends to trigger them.
Why don't you explain your theory of the election?
Did the Russians "hack the election"?
Did the Russians "spread fake news"?
Did any of their actions impact the election?
Which ones? How?
Tillerson is just playing both sides of the street so he can avoid making enemies.
sure but any other candidate, in the history of USA would never in a million years also have as many Russian connections with their campaign as Trump had, nor would they have continually defended Putin and Russia,YES, it was reported that they started out just to harm our confidence in our elections and to harm Hillary is what was in the intelligence report back in January on it....all partisan tripe....Spare change, I mean what do a few geeks and computers cost now days? Especially when they are targeting dumb asses like the DNC and Podesta. The FBI warned the DNC of cyber attacks against them and they did nothing about it. A bunch of the email released was dated after the initial FBI warning. Podesta fell for a simple phishing scam. Only the US would spend substantial amounts of money on such a simple operation.
.
try informing yourself on their whole operation...start with watching the congressional house and senate hearings in FULL...
I've watched a few of the hearings, Dems trying to score cheap points and republicans asking questions that can't be answered in an open forum. Watched the one with Comey and Rogers, and the one with Calper and Yates, didn't know a damn thing after I didn't know going in. Well except Comey verifying what everyone pretty much knew anyways.
BTW it's not all partisan hype.
(CNN)Federal investigators tried to warn the Democratic National Committee about a potential intrusion in their computer network months before the party moved to try to fix the problem, U.S. officials briefed on the probe tell CNN.
The revelation raises questions about whether the DNC could have done more to limit the damage done by hackers suspected of working for Russian intelligence.
The DNC brought in consultants from the private security firm CrowdStrike in April. And by the time suspected Russian hackers were kicked out of the DNC network in June, the hackers had been inside for about a year.
Sources: US officials warned DNC of hack months before the party acted - CNNPolitics.com
That means the Russins, if indeed it was them, had gained access to the DNC servers as early as April 2015, that was two months before Trump announced he was running. And had access a year before they hired Crowdstrike and they didn't get them out of their system till June 2016.
.
also, Trump's entrance in to the campaign on the golden escalator ride was not the day he decided to run...
Remind us again what chances he was given to win the primaries again? LMAO According to you a huge bet on a long shot. Putin had animosity toward the bitch, do you really think he wouldn't try to hurt her no matter who her opponent might be?
.
there was manafort, gorden, paige, flynn, ross, tillerson, kushner, sessions lie, and stone with wikileaks connection
we weren't born yesterday, my dear!
It's called treason but you DEPLORABLES are fine with that.I've posed this hypothetical question to a couple of members and so far no one seems up to the task of providing an answer. So now I'm posing it the whole board.
Ok, here's a hypothetical scenario. Let's say a Trump associate spoke to a Russian representative. The Russian told him we have some really bad shit on the hildabitch and the representative said wow, it would sure help us if you released it on Tuesday and they did exactly that.
Tell me, what specific law would have been broken? Don't give me an opinion, quote the law.
Any takers?
.
We're going to get to the bottom of this Russian scandal no matter how many roadblocks and obstruction of justice this thin skinned whiny little bitch tries.
Amazing you think Russia subverting our democracy is just fine and dandy.
Seth Rich hacked the DNC. His motive was because he was a Bernie Sanders supporter, and he wanted revenge because the DNC stole the primaries from Sanders. This is all known.gotta have motive...and the knowledge of when to release them....like podesta's were released the evening the access hollywood tapes were releasedBecause, if the hack could have been performed by anyone, then there are millions of suspects, and Russia is only one out of millions.My brother tells me he could have easily hacked the DNC himself, and he wouldn't need the Russians to help him do it. The fact is, there were millions of people in the world with enough skill to hack the DNC, they had minimal or non-existent security. Also, Julian Assange has said that Russia was not his source, Seth Rich was.
what does an easy hack have to do with anything?
i suppose the Trump campaign had motive to steal them, if not the Russians...
how do you think the Russians financed their entire operation?no, I don't think so....counter intelligence agents are the best of the best...can handle where ever the investigation leads...money laundering and not disclosing being agents of a foreign power are the 2 probable charges that could come out of the investigation...I'm not certain on the coordination thing yet....mainly because they could have some how been fooled by the Russian friendliness....like Carter Paige....he seems like he's just 'out there' and unaware...
though there seems to be the case of a quid pro quo with the Russians, changing the Republican platform to what the Russians wanted them to change it to, in exchange for going after hillary with the hacking and dissemination of the stolen goods?
I think what is taking so long is not the collusion, for the FBI to build or drop a case on that collusion should not take that long....
But it is to build a case and cracking a big Russian money laundering case....this takes time, and maybe some on the Trump team have merely lead them in to finding it?
Wouldn't a money laundering case be separate form a counterintelligence case? Two totally different skill sets.
.
our Treasury Dept investigators may also be involved.
The FBI has money laundering and bank fraud specialist it's not really a counterintelligence thing.
.
YES, it was reported that they started out just to harm our confidence in our elections and to harm Hillary is what was in the intelligence report back in January on it....all partisan tripe....how do you think the Russians financed their entire operation?The FBI has money laundering and bank fraud specialist it's not really a counterintelligence thing.
.
Spare change, I mean what do a few geeks and computers cost now days? Especially when they are targeting dumb asses like the DNC and Podesta. The FBI warned the DNC of cyber attacks against them and they did nothing about it. A bunch of the email released was dated after the initial FBI warning. Podesta fell for a simple phishing scam. Only the US would spend substantial amounts of money on such a simple operation.
.
try informing yourself on their whole operation...start with watching the congressional house and senate hearings in FULL...
I've watched a few of the hearings, Dems trying to score cheap points and republicans asking questions that can't be answered in an open forum. Watched the one with Comey and Rogers, and the one with Calper and Yates, didn't know a damn thing after I didn't know going in. Well except Comey verifying what everyone pretty much knew anyways.
BTW it's not all partisan hype.
(CNN)Federal investigators tried to warn the Democratic National Committee about a potential intrusion in their computer network months before the party moved to try to fix the problem, U.S. officials briefed on the probe tell CNN.
The revelation raises questions about whether the DNC could have done more to limit the damage done by hackers suspected of working for Russian intelligence.
The DNC brought in consultants from the private security firm CrowdStrike in April. And by the time suspected Russian hackers were kicked out of the DNC network in June, the hackers had been inside for about a year.
Sources: US officials warned DNC of hack months before the party acted - CNNPolitics.com
That means the Russins, if indeed it was them, had gained access to the DNC servers as early as April 2015, that was two months before Trump announced he was running. And had access a year before they hired Crowdstrike and they didn't get them out of their system till June 2016.
.
also, Trump's entrance in to the campaign on the golden escalator ride was not the day he decided to run...
gotta have motive...and the knowledge of when to release them....like podesta's were released the evening the access hollywood tapes were releasedBecause, if the hack could have been performed by anyone, then there are millions of suspects, and Russia is only one out of millions.My brother tells me he could have easily hacked the DNC himself, and he wouldn't need the Russians to help him do it. The fact is, there were millions of people in the world with enough skill to hack the DNC, they had minimal or non-existent security. Also, Julian Assange has said that Russia was not his source, Seth Rich was.
what does an easy hack have to do with anything?
i suppose the Trump campaign had motive to steal them, if not the Russians...
I don't think Trump colluded with the Russians to interfere with the election. Never said I did. He and his minions have certainly lied about meetings and are covering something up, don't know what it is though. My guess is it's just his giant ego trying to make him look tough but we will have to see what info the investigation yields.What are my sleazy accusations?Where is the classified information that proves Russia's interference and details how they did it? "I could tell you but then I'd have to kill you"well then where is the russia stuff that confirms your sides fking story? someone on your side declared it so so where is that original evidence?Investigating a handful of bad actors is much different than saying the entire administration and congress and intel agencies are lying for unknown reasons.
Guess you're gonna just have to be patient like the rest of us and wait for the findings of the investigation.
Just admit that at this point there is no evidence of any kind to support your sleazy accusations.
That Trump is colluding with the Russians. there isn't a shred of evidence to support it. The whole thing is a giant hoax.
