Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Poe's Law - RationalWikiYes, they are called bisexuals.Are you aware heteros defend the rights of gays?
It's hard to tell if you're a parody or truly so consumed by your bigotry it is absolutely useless to have a dialogue. The ironic part is you bitch about islamophobes but your homophobia is no different.
☭proletarian☭;1935677 said:Poe's Law - RationalWikiYes, they are called bisexuals.
It's hard to tell if you're a parody or truly so consumed by your bigotry it is absolutely useless to have a dialogue. The ironic part is you bitch about islamophobes but your homophobia is no different.
It said that in the old testament, where as they don't go for society in this time.
God didn't create homosexuality.Simple,
God hates sin.
Homosexuality is sin.
Therefore, God hates homosexuality.
The why did He create it?
People did.
Gay sex cannot be natural for the simple fact that two gays cannot produce offspring. Heterosexual sex is natural because it produces life. the first man and first woman were heterosexuals and combined together to give birth to all humans, no gays could have done that.
It said that in the old testament, where as they don't go for society in this time.
Anyone got a goofy sentence translator handy???
Didn't all of Rome become Christian by the 3rd century?All this talk about the Bible as the source of validiation/invalidation for ethics is BS. Try something different or make up something new. That is what the Romans did!!
Didn't all of Rome become Christian by the 3rd century?All this talk about the Bible as the source of validiation/invalidation for ethics is BS. Try something different or make up something new. That is what the Romans did!!
Didn't all of Rome become Christian by the 3rd century?All this talk about the Bible as the source of validiation/invalidation for ethics is BS. Try something different or make up something new. That is what the Romans did!!
Didn't all of Rome become Christian by the 3rd century?All this talk about the Bible as the source of validiation/invalidation for ethics is BS. Try something different or make up something new. That is what the Romans did!!
To elaborate on the main point I am trying to reach
I doubt theologians fully understand what they are trying to accomplish. In a sense, religion is supposed to be a format for humans to live full and enriching lives. But there exists issues and problems presented by nature that throw some of the "inspired texts" into a tail spin and directly contradicts what some theologians profess.
I think Homosexuality would fall into this area if it turns out that this is a naturally occuring abnormality. The concept of GOD hating what GOD created is, in itself, a contradiction. I, Of course, do not put much stock in GOD based cosmologies, I do find it a bit interesting that proponents of religion try to retain a claim on the issue of sexuality.
Before I was of the belief that those who would argue that homosexuality is a choice may be repressed homo/bisexuals themselves. Now I am starting to realize that this is just another case of religion sitting half-drunk on a bar stool, and the gays and Biology are invading their percieved turf!. Belief is impossible without ignorance, and so does follow theology.
God didn't create homosexuality.
Men with perverted minds did.
God created the rectum to excrete bodily waste.
But mentally ill men DECIDED to use it for sex.
Now these sodomites want everyone to view their sick lifestyle as normal.
And claim that God is responsible for their nasty perversion.
God didn't create homosexuality.
Men with perverted minds did.
God created the rectum to excrete bodily waste.
But mentally ill men DECIDED to use it for sex.
Now these sodomites want everyone to view their sick lifestyle as normal.
And claim that God is responsible for their nasty perversion.
No, they became Catholics.Didn't all of Rome become Christian by the 3rd century?All this talk about the Bible as the source of validiation/invalidation for ethics is BS. Try something different or make up something new. That is what the Romans did!!
☭proletarian☭;1935988 said:No, they became Catholics.Didn't all of Rome become Christian by the 3rd century?All this talk about the Bible as the source of validiation/invalidation for ethics is BS. Try something different or make up something new. That is what the Romans did!!
☭proletarian☭;1935989 said:
I was addressing the delusion that they followed Christ, not the timeline.☭proletarian☭;1935988 said:No, they became Catholics.Didn't all of Rome become Christian by the 3rd century?
Constantine didn't hold the first council until the 4th century.
Caesar Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus Augustus[3] (27 February c. 272[2] 22 May 337), commonly known in English as Constantine I, Constantine the Great, or (among Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox and Byzantine Catholic Christians) Saint Constantine (pronounced /ˈkɒnstəntaɪn/ or /ˈkɒnstəntiːn/), was Roman emperor from 306, and the sole holder of that office from 324 until his death in 337.
Lets say homosexuality is natural, that is- people are born that way, that still doesn't explain why gay men like taking it up the anus and why women like lick licking each others vagina and use dildos to have sex. The fact that women use dildos instead of a penis prove its all a choice, because naturally they would not be born wanting to use a dildo, just as men are not born wanting to have anal sex, both are learned sexual practices meaning it involves choice.
Whether or not homosexuality is natural or not has not been proven either way.
Homosexual ACTS are a choice.
As are heterosexual acts
