The reason why Hillary was never indicted and Trump will be Impeached

It's simple, really.fbi

You see, regardless of how bad you may think HC's transgressions were vis-à-vis having a private e-mail server, she fundamentally understood something when it came to dealing with the FBI. It's this: You don't lie to the FBI if you want to avoid federal charge.

Enter Trump...

To put it mildly, Trump lies more easily, more effortlessly, more frequently, and quite frankly, more needlessly than anyone before him. In fact, Trump's lying is so incessantly frequent that it probably rises to the level of compulsive lying. (If you don't know what compulsive lying truly is, please look it up).

What that means is this: If and when Trump is ever interviewed by the FBI, even though I'm not a betting man, I WOULD bet that Trump would lie simply because he can't help himself. Trump would essentially pave the way to his own Impeachment.

Then why did the FBI leak information to cost Hillary the election?


The underlings of the FBI wanted to convict her so bad..


.


.

You sure pretend to know a whole bunch of stuff you have no way of knowing. Maybe the R's would elect you as their Standard Bearer after Trump is dismissed - you have that in common with him.


Who is pretending? Not me news and especially politics has been my hobby since I could read a newspaper at around 6 years old...always been fascinated by the OP eds ...other kids would turn to the comics.. Not me I would turn right to the OP eds.


Yes the FBI underlings hated Hillary with a passion

Yes they leaked the information about Hillary investigations.

That's why Comey had to go public.



.

Did you read that in the OP-ED? Six is a little young to be reading OP-ED's and comprehending the source and its significance. I was 12 (I know, I had my paper route at 12) and would read Arthur Hoppe's Column every morning before folding the papers.

50 YEARS . . . THE ART OF HOPPE

My family got the Chronicle for free, but they continued to receive the evening paper - at the time - the SF Examiner. There I turned to the sports and read Prescott Sullivan's often funny prose.

"Former San Francisco Examiner sports columnist Prescott Sullivan died Sunday in a convalescent hospital. He was 79.

"Sullivan, who retired in 1976 after a 54-year career, had been ill for several years.

"According to the Examiner, playwright Neil Simon patterned his Oscar Madison character in The Odd Couple after Sullivan, who wore his hat in the office, chewed or smoked a cigar and always had a cluttered desk.

"Examiner Sports Editor Charles Cooper called Sullivan the model for the next generation of sportswriters because he approached his work with a light touch instead of a sledgehammer."

Today's columnists take themselves too seriously, they ought to read back columns from these two masters who had me hooked to the Newspaper until the Internet and partisan politics made them boring as well as obsolete.


Again I was reading OP eds at 6 years old, also had subscriptions to the national Enquirer, popular science, popular mechanic , and mechanix illustrated ...


Got all 3 for my birthday and had them till around 1989 when my grandmother passed away..

I was a reader..


When I was a kid , I could never wait for the next issues of them, when I got them I would read them over and over again..


Same with the Chicago Sun-Times, the Chicago Tribune, the daily hearld and later on with USA today..

.
 
It's simple, really.fbi

You see, regardless of how bad you may think HC's transgressions were vis-à-vis having a private e-mail server, she fundamentally understood something when it came to dealing with the FBI. It's this: You don't lie to the FBI if you want to avoid federal charge.

Enter Trump...

To put it mildly, Trump lies more easily, more effortlessly, more frequently, and quite frankly, more needlessly than anyone before him. In fact, Trump's lying is so incessantly frequent that it probably rises to the level of compulsive lying. (If you don't know what compulsive lying truly is, please look it up).

What that means is this: If and when Trump is ever interviewed by the FBI, even though I'm not a betting man, I WOULD bet that Trump would lie simply because he can't help himself. Trump would essentially pave the way to his own Impeachment.

Of course, you're not just a bitter Brown Shirt masturbating to a fantasy, the faithless electors will absolutely impeach Trump during the recounts.

You fascists have it all figured out! :thup:

You must be so proud, six members of the echo chamber voted your post a winner. I'd advise you to keep in mind the fable of the worm.

It seems a worm wiggled across the RR Tracks and in his slow progress a train came along and cut off his tail.

The worm turned around and went back to retrieve his tail, and another train came by and cut off his head.

The moral of the story is this: Don't lose your head over a piece of tail.

Herr Goebbels, you Nazicrats have predicted the most fantastic bullshit for the last 3 years. Virtually nothing you little Brown Shirts have predicted was true. Now here you are again, confidently demanding that "IZZZZ TWO TWOOO."

You Nazicrats cannot distinguish between you fantasies and reality. You're not just stupid, not just evil, you're delusional as well.
 
YOU idiots are going to have a really hard sixteen years with Trump's eight, and Pence's eight, and probably a completely new Democratic party with all of the liberal shit kicked out or hung BTKTD.

And if the congress even calls for impeachment of Trump, There will probably be hundreds of thousands of US on the steps dragging them out and beating the hell out of them. Except the liberals will who almost surely be stomped to death.
 
YOU idiots are going to have a really hard sixteen years with Trump's eight, and Pence's eight, and probably a completely new Democratic party with all of the liberal shit kicked out or hung BTKTD.

And if the congress even calls for impeachment of Trump, There will probably be hundreds of thousands of US on the steps dragging them out and beating the hell out of them. Except the liberals will who almost surely be stomped to death.
Dump is through after 4 ,,,maybe sooner if he can't keep his big mouth shut
 
YOU idiots are going to have a really hard sixteen years with Trump's eight, and Pence's eight, and probably a completely new Democratic party with all of the liberal shit kicked out or hung BTKTD.

And if the congress even calls for impeachment of Trump, There will probably be hundreds of thousands of US on the steps dragging them out and beating the hell out of them. Except the liberals will who almost surely be stomped to death.
Dump is through after 4 ,,,maybe sooner if he can't keep his big mouth shut

Trump is going ahead with his agenda, Eddie. I hate to break this to you but all you liberals wetting your panties and running in circles with your hair on fire screaming "RUSSIA....RUSSIA!" isn't going to change that! You ran Hillary...she's a corrupt political insider who would sell her own mother for power and has told so many lies about so many things at this point it's hard to keep track of them all. The voters decided they wanted change. They got it. If YOU want change...why don't you stop dreaming about impeaching Trump (because that IS a pipe dream!) and start pushing policies and candidates that have something new to offer the country.
 
YOU idiots are going to have a really hard sixteen years with Trump's eight, and Pence's eight, and probably a completely new Democratic party with all of the liberal shit kicked out or hung BTKTD.

And if the congress even calls for impeachment of Trump, There will probably be hundreds of thousands of US on the steps dragging them out and beating the hell out of them. Except the liberals will who almost surely be stomped to death.
Dump is through after 4 ,,,maybe sooner if he can't keep his big mouth shut

Trump is going ahead with his agenda, Eddie. I hate to break this to you but all you liberals wetting your panties and running in circles with your hair on fire screaming "RUSSIA....RUSSIA!" isn't going to change that! You ran Hillary...she's a corrupt political insider who would sell her own mother for power and has told so many lies about so many things at this point it's hard to keep track of them all. The voters decided they wanted change. They got it. If YOU want change...why don't you stop dreaming about impeaching Trump (because that IS a pipe dream!) and start pushing policies and candidates that have something new to offer the country.
Old I appreciate your post I really don't want him impeached I want him to endure the pain coming to him for the next 4 years ,,,,,,and then see his repub friends abandon him in 2020 and speaking of lying curs?? He makes Hillary look like a 5 year old
 
It's simple, really.fbi

You see, regardless of how bad you may think HC's transgressions were vis-à-vis having a private e-mail server, she fundamentally understood something when it came to dealing with the FBI. It's this: You don't lie to the FBI if you want to avoid federal charge.

Enter Trump...

To put it mildly, Trump lies more easily, more effortlessly, more frequently, and quite frankly, more needlessly than anyone before him. In fact, Trump's lying is so incessantly frequent that it probably rises to the level of compulsive lying. (If you don't know what compulsive lying truly is, please look it up).

What that means is this: If and when Trump is ever interviewed by the FBI, even though I'm not a betting man, I WOULD bet that Trump would lie simply because he can't help himself. Trump would essentially pave the way to his own Impeachment.

when are you leaving the country??
 
Hillary Clinton has been investigated, and investigated and investigated. For over 25-Years she has been investigated.

Including the RePuBliKlan dog and pony show that resulted in "Nothing New Was Learned", from Trey Gowdy.

No evidence of criminal wrong doing.

No evidence of sufficient proof to warrant an indictment.

That's why.
 
YOU idiots are going to have a really hard sixteen years with Trump's eight, and Pence's eight, and probably a completely new Democratic party with all of the liberal shit kicked out or hung BTKTD.

And if the congress even calls for impeachment of Trump, There will probably be hundreds of thousands of US on the steps dragging them out and beating the hell out of them. Except the liberals will who almost surely be stomped to death.
Dump is through after 4 ,,,maybe sooner if he can't keep his big mouth shut

Of course he is, you leftists have been right about everything so far, so we can take this to the bank.
 
YOU idiots are going to have a really hard sixteen years with Trump's eight, and Pence's eight, and probably a completely new Democratic party with all of the liberal shit kicked out or hung BTKTD.

And if the congress even calls for impeachment of Trump, There will probably be hundreds of thousands of US on the steps dragging them out and beating the hell out of them. Except the liberals will who almost surely be stomped to death.
Dump is through after 4 ,,,maybe sooner if he can't keep his big mouth shut

Trump is going ahead with his agenda, Eddie. I hate to break this to you but all you liberals wetting your panties and running in circles with your hair on fire screaming "RUSSIA....RUSSIA!" isn't going to change that! You ran Hillary...she's a corrupt political insider who would sell her own mother for power and has told so many lies about so many things at this point it's hard to keep track of them all. The voters decided they wanted change. They got it. If YOU want change...why don't you stop dreaming about impeaching Trump (because that IS a pipe dream!) and start pushing policies and candidates that have something new to offer the country.
What agenda is that? Healthcare? Jobs? Tax Reform? I heard they just put their budget out and Congressmen are saying its DOA. And doesn't he still have 100's of department positions to fill, including selecting a new head of the FBI? Can you say trainwreck?
 
It should have never lasted this long.
Where theres smoke theres fire Why else would dump try to reach out to 3 different investigative agencies to get them to stop??


how do you know that he did that? Were you there? or did you get that info from SNL?
It's all over TV all over the papers The mens names were named You think its above trumps code of ethics to try and squelch the investigation?


the investigation is ongoing. He didn't try to stop it. He said he wants it to be completed. So its on "TV and the papers"? Do you think those media outlets are telling us the truth?
Tell us how you trust Trump more than the media you loser lol


I don't trust anyone in politics to tell us the truth. They all lie. The problem is that our media has taken sides and are repeating the lies of one side as if they were truth. That is a huge danger to our democracy and the future of our country.
 
It's simple, really.fbi

You see, regardless of how bad you may think HC's transgressions were vis-à-vis having a private e-mail server, she fundamentally understood something when it came to dealing with the FBI. It's this: You don't lie to the FBI if you want to avoid federal charge.

Enter Trump...

To put it mildly, Trump lies more easily, more effortlessly, more frequently, and quite frankly, more needlessly than anyone before him. In fact, Trump's lying is so incessantly frequent that it probably rises to the level of compulsive lying. (If you don't know what compulsive lying truly is, please look it up).

What that means is this: If and when Trump is ever interviewed by the FBI, even though I'm not a betting man, I WOULD bet that Trump would lie simply because he can't help himself. Trump would essentially pave the way to his own Impeachment.

You may be on to something here. Although Hellary, like all politicians, has proven she has no issues with lies and deceit, she did tread lightly with the FBI. Trump is not so political savvy, and the most recent report does seem to suggest he is concerned with the ongoing investigation. Each day this Russia probe does seem to smell more like Watergate. It isn't there yet to be sure, but Watergate wasn't Watergate until it was. One has to wonder why Trump is so anxious to have the investigation end. Investigators have an instinct which tells them "if somebody tells you there is nothing over there to see, there is probably something over there they should look at".
Trump asked intelligence chiefs to deny evidence of Russia collusion


OH, holy shit----------Watergate. one political party breaks into the office of the other political party and the president tries to cover it up. Big fuckin deal.

All Nixon had to do was say: "yeah they broke in, they should not have done it, I will make sure they are prosecuted" The cover up is always worse than the crime. Duh, Hillary and her illegal email server.

Ok, so what's your point?


1. that Watergate was nothing
2. that the coverup was worse than the crime
3. Nixon was stupid
4. Clinton getting BJs from a 19 year old in the oval office and then lying under oath about it was a much more serious crime that what ran Nixon out of office.
5. that Hillary should have been indicted. If you did what she did you would be in jail today.
You have something against a BJ in your office ? You need to be brought into court because of it ?


when the blower is a young employer of the blowee and it occurs in the oval office of the president, yes I do have something against it. If that happened in private industry, the president would be fired immediately and probably charged with sexual battery.
 
It should have never lasted this long.
Where theres smoke theres fire Why else would dump try to reach out to 3 different investigative agencies to get them to stop??


how do you know that he did that? Were you there? or did you get that info from SNL?
It's all over TV all over the papers The mens names were named You think its above trumps code of ethics to try and squelch the investigation?


the investigation is ongoing. He didn't try to stop it. He said he wants it to be completed. So its on "TV and the papers"? Do you think those media outlets are telling us the truth?
Really ?? He needed to go to 3 investigative officers to tell them he wanted it completed?? Pardon me but that's bullshit


and how exactly do you know that he did that? Give us the names of these 3 people and the quotes of exactly what was said.

this is a witch hunt because you libtardians cannot get over Hillary losing and being rejected by the American people.
 
The Russians gave millions to the Clinton foundation and paid Bubba hundreds of thousands for speeches, was that collusion? did they expect/demand something in return?

The Clinton guilt is well established, Trump did nothing.

Clinton's guilt is only established in wingnut's delusional fantasies.

Trump may well not have colluded with the Russians, but he sure seems to be busy committing all sorts of crimes covering up his non-existing crimes.

Show how stupid he truly is.


you need to look at Comey's testimony when Gowdy was questioning him. Comey said that she committed crimes regarding the protection of classified data. There was no confusion about that. Then he said that she would not be charged because she did not "intend" to violate laws and was too stupid to realize that she did.

So tell me, will those arguments work when a cop stops you for speeding?

"but officer, I didn't intend to go 90 in a 40 zone, and I'm didn't know that speed limits applied to me" Try it, let us know how you make out.
You're not have a very good day with your dimwitted arguments. Intent matters for some offenses and not for others. That's why we have manslaughter and different degrees for murder charges. That's why somebody who gets lost and wanders into private property probably isn't going to get a ticket vs a stalker who climbs a fence to take pictures of somebody in there home is probably getting charged.


I held top secret and SAP security clearances. Intent does not matter if you let classified data out. The act of releasing it is a crime, whether you meant to do it or not. Gross negligence or carelessness is not an excuse.
My analogy with the speeding ticket is perfectly accurate.


Just as Pres. Trump had the legal authority to over-ride the classified designation of information that he told to the Russian Ambassador, the Secretary if State has the legal authority to over ride the classified designation of any information pertaining to the Department of State. So, Clinton's seniority made it legal for her to send previously classified material.

Besides, some if not all the material did not get designated as classified until long after Clinton sent it.


wrong again, little fool. SecState does not have the authority to declassify top secret material. The markings were removed from the classified material when she sent it, that is an illegal act. She should have been indicted. Comey saved her with bullshit about "carelessness, and not sophisticated enough". In reality he said that Hillary was ignorant and stupid and therefore should not be prosecuted. It was a circus filled with donkey shit.
 
Hillary Clinton has been investigated, and investigated and investigated. For over 25-Years she has been investigated.

Including the RePuBliKlan dog and pony show that resulted in "Nothing New Was Learned", from Trey Gowdy.

No evidence of criminal wrong doing.

No evidence of sufficient proof to warrant an indictment.

That's why.


Comey's testimony proved her guilt. not being prosecuted does not equal innocence. Are you happy that we have one set of laws for the political elite and another for you and me?
 
It's simple, really.fbi

You see, regardless of how bad you may think HC's transgressions were vis-à-vis having a private e-mail server, she fundamentally understood something when it came to dealing with the FBI. It's this: You don't lie to the FBI if you want to avoid federal charge.

Enter Trump...

To put it mildly, Trump lies more easily, more effortlessly, more frequently, and quite frankly, more needlessly than anyone before him. In fact, Trump's lying is so incessantly frequent that it probably rises to the level of compulsive lying. (If you don't know what compulsive lying truly is, please look it up).

What that means is this: If and when Trump is ever interviewed by the FBI, even though I'm not a betting man, I WOULD bet that Trump would lie simply because he can't help himself. Trump would essentially pave the way to his own Impeachment.

You may be on to something here. Although Hellary, like all politicians, has proven she has no issues with lies and deceit, she did tread lightly with the FBI. Trump is not so political savvy, and the most recent report does seem to suggest he is concerned with the ongoing investigation. Each day this Russia probe does seem to smell more like Watergate. It isn't there yet to be sure, but Watergate wasn't Watergate until it was. One has to wonder why Trump is so anxious to have the investigation end. Investigators have an instinct which tells them "if somebody tells you there is nothing over there to see, there is probably something over there they should look at".
Trump asked intelligence chiefs to deny evidence of Russia collusion


OH, holy shit----------Watergate. one political party breaks into the office of the other political party and the president tries to cover it up. Big fuckin deal.

All Nixon had to do was say: "yeah they broke in, they should not have done it, I will make sure they are prosecuted" The cover up is always worse than the crime. Duh, Hillary and her illegal email server.

Ok, so what's your point?


1. that Watergate was nothing
2. that the coverup was worse than the crime
3. Nixon was stupid
4. Clinton getting BJs from a 19 year old in the oval office and then lying under oath about it was a much more serious crime that what ran Nixon out of office.
5. that Hillary should have been indicted. If you did what she did you would be in jail today.

Still really not sure what has you so rattled here. Are you saying what this is, is worse that what Nixon did? That's hard to say since we have no idea if anything happen d here. My only point is Trump is acting like a guilty man, the same way Nixon did.
 
Clinton's guilt is only established in wingnut's delusional fantasies.

Trump may well not have colluded with the Russians, but he sure seems to be busy committing all sorts of crimes covering up his non-existing crimes.

Show how stupid he truly is.


you need to look at Comey's testimony when Gowdy was questioning him. Comey said that she committed crimes regarding the protection of classified data. There was no confusion about that. Then he said that she would not be charged because she did not "intend" to violate laws and was too stupid to realize that she did.

So tell me, will those arguments work when a cop stops you for speeding?

"but officer, I didn't intend to go 90 in a 40 zone, and I'm didn't know that speed limits applied to me" Try it, let us know how you make out.
You're not have a very good day with your dimwitted arguments. Intent matters for some offenses and not for others. That's why we have manslaughter and different degrees for murder charges. That's why somebody who gets lost and wanders into private property probably isn't going to get a ticket vs a stalker who climbs a fence to take pictures of somebody in there home is probably getting charged.


I held top secret and SAP security clearances. Intent does not matter if you let classified data out. The act of releasing it is a crime, whether you meant to do it or not. Gross negligence or carelessness is not an excuse.
My analogy with the speeding ticket is perfectly accurate.


Just as Pres. Trump had the legal authority to over-ride the classified designation of information that he told to the Russian Ambassador, the Secretary if State has the legal authority to over ride the classified designation of any information pertaining to the Department of State. So, Clinton's seniority made it legal for her to send previously classified material.

Besides, some if not all the material did not get designated as classified until long after Clinton sent it.


wrong again, little fool. SecState does not have the authority to declassify top secret material. The markings were removed from the classified material when she sent it, that is an illegal act. She should have been indicted. Comey saved her with bullshit about "carelessness, and not sophisticated enough". In reality he said that Hillary was ignorant and stupid and therefore should not be prosecuted. It was a circus filled with donkey shit.
I'd be willing to bet that if you gathered and read everybody's emails in our government you'd find similar "carelessness". She didn't give classified information to anybody, just had a few that slipped through the cracks on a private email account, which I'd bet is true for many many other government officials. Perhaps its good that this thing got a spotlight as i'm sure people are going to be way more careful about this stuff from now on, but it makes sense that criminal charges weren't pressed.
 
It's simple, really.fbi

You see, regardless of how bad you may think HC's transgressions were vis-à-vis having a private e-mail server, she fundamentally understood something when it came to dealing with the FBI. It's this: You don't lie to the FBI if you want to avoid federal charge.

Enter Trump...

To put it mildly, Trump lies more easily, more effortlessly, more frequently, and quite frankly, more needlessly than anyone before him. In fact, Trump's lying is so incessantly frequent that it probably rises to the level of compulsive lying. (If you don't know what compulsive lying truly is, please look it up).

What that means is this: If and when Trump is ever interviewed by the FBI, even though I'm not a betting man, I WOULD bet that Trump would lie simply because he can't help himself. Trump would essentially pave the way to his own Impeachment.

You may be on to something here. Although Hellary, like all politicians, has proven she has no issues with lies and deceit, she did tread lightly with the FBI. Trump is not so political savvy, and the most recent report does seem to suggest he is concerned with the ongoing investigation. Each day this Russia probe does seem to smell more like Watergate. It isn't there yet to be sure, but Watergate wasn't Watergate until it was. One has to wonder why Trump is so anxious to have the investigation end. Investigators have an instinct which tells them "if somebody tells you there is nothing over there to see, there is probably something over there they should look at".
Trump asked intelligence chiefs to deny evidence of Russia collusion


OH, holy shit----------Watergate. one political party breaks into the office of the other political party and the president tries to cover it up. Big fuckin deal.

All Nixon had to do was say: "yeah they broke in, they should not have done it, I will make sure they are prosecuted" The cover up is always worse than the crime. Duh, Hillary and her illegal email server.

Ok, so what's your point?


1. that Watergate was nothing
2. that the coverup was worse than the crime
3. Nixon was stupid
4. Clinton getting BJs from a 19 year old in the oval office and then lying under oath about it was a much more serious crime that what ran Nixon out of office.
5. that Hillary should have been indicted. If you did what she did you would be in jail today.

1. Ordering the Watergate break in was a serious crime. It was a serious violation of his Presidential oath.
2. Both the cover up and the Break in were serious crimes
3. Yes, Nixon was stupid for ordering the break in. He was going to win the election by a landslide anyway.
4. Bill Clinton's lying about his affair with Lewinsky was not related to the main point of the inquiry. If he was not a victim of a political witch hunt, no perjury charges would have ever been filed.
5. Hillary had the seniority to over ride the classification. If you did it you could be prosecuted - because you're not the Secretary of State.

1-it has never been determined if Nixon ordered the break-in.
2-"Serious crime" is not a very quantitative term. The B&E is a misdemeanor crime where those convicted would get less than a year if any jail time. Obstruction of justice in a federal case is a felony and it could get you a 10 year sentence. They are quite different in reality.
3- Again, we don't know who ordered the break in, and he was forced out because of obstruction of justice, not the B&E. It's a fact of history.
4- Clinton Gave false testimony under oath in a sexual harassment case against him.
5-As SOS she can only declassify documents which are classified by the State department. Any other documents which may have come to be on her server from other departments she can not declassify.

You were very lose with the facts, to say the least.
 
It's simple, really.fbi

You see, regardless of how bad you may think HC's transgressions were vis-à-vis having a private e-mail server, she fundamentally understood something when it came to dealing with the FBI. It's this: You don't lie to the FBI if you want to avoid federal charge.

Enter Trump...

To put it mildly, Trump lies more easily, more effortlessly, more frequently, and quite frankly, more needlessly than anyone before him. In fact, Trump's lying is so incessantly frequent that it probably rises to the level of compulsive lying. (If you don't know what compulsive lying truly is, please look it up).

What that means is this: If and when Trump is ever interviewed by the FBI, even though I'm not a betting man, I WOULD bet that Trump would lie simply because he can't help himself. Trump would essentially pave the way to his own Impeachment.

You may be on to something here. Although Hellary, like all politicians, has proven she has no issues with lies and deceit, she did tread lightly with the FBI. Trump is not so political savvy, and the most recent report does seem to suggest he is concerned with the ongoing investigation. Each day this Russia probe does seem to smell more like Watergate. It isn't there yet to be sure, but Watergate wasn't Watergate until it was. One has to wonder why Trump is so anxious to have the investigation end. Investigators have an instinct which tells them "if somebody tells you there is nothing over there to see, there is probably something over there they should look at".
Trump asked intelligence chiefs to deny evidence of Russia collusion
When a president makes every apparent effort to shut down or derail an investigation into his own campaign's actions, only a fool or a sycophant would interpret those actions as completely innocent in nature.
 
That's what has Republicans supporting the investigation?

Many Republicans do not like Trump either. Too bad, so sad!
They've also been briefed on the investigations.

What investigations? The ones that have found NOTHING?

You mean the five in Congress and the FBI?

Yes, those. They have found nothing!

Shouldn't the FBI be looking for ISIS cells here in the US instead of going on a witch hunt?

How do you know what the investigators have or haven't found?
 

Forum List

Back
Top