antagon
The Man
- Dec 6, 2009
- 3,572
- 295
- 48
Again, you are continuing to act stupider than shit.funny you call me stupid, but fail to address the viability of the LEI.
what say you of the declines it indicates before recession? what say you about the upward trend in the expansion?
call me stupid to the extents of your satisfaction neubarth. it adds great flourish to your argument. but it would be validating of your wits if you could explain why the LEI effectively precedes and coincides economic cycles despite your contention that it is a fundamentally flawed sham.
as an aside, on your theory as to why an independent org would want to mix kool-aid for the government, i'll chalk that up to your robust paranoia.
Remember the criteria in the LEI. Stocks do go down when the economy is starting to go to hell. That downturn in stocks is usually exaggerated by the market manipulators. Thus, because stock prices are a major ingredient in LEI, LEI will reflect a collapse in the economy. Building permits go down when there is economic malaise. Thus LEI again will reflect a collapse in the economy. Need I go on? Because of those criteria, LEI is very good at predicting recessions even when we do not have recessions. It still has no validity in indicating an improvement in the economy as you can see the criteria have no relevance to economic improvement.
The "independent org" as you call it is doing exactly what the government wants it to do, post bullshit data for the ignorant sheeple. It does it with regularity and it does it with consistency. That does not mean that the data have any validity with respect to economic recovery from a Depression that has over 30 million people out of work.
Show me people going to work in newly created jobs and I will believe we are in recovery. I have not seen that yet and do not expect to see it for some time to come.
well, you're smarter than shit, neubarth. so you say. to back that up, you've conceded that the index can indicate when the economy is slowing and is likely to slip into recession. can you go one further and concede that it also indicates trends in an expansion? if not you could explain what conspiracy or flaw works to make those predictions coincidental, but just not coincidental to 2010?
does the government want the LEI to post declining indicators? what do you think happened when those indicators were derived? what do you think is different when there's positive news?
while you pick a couple indexes which you disapprove, or which you say are gripped in conspiratorial flux, what credibility, if any, does such a wise man and economic apothecary as yourself attribute to hedging all of these indexes together and weighing them by factors?
what say you, again, that the LEI has been so successful up to and including the anticipation of this recession, and what in the last year has made it so impotent to predict any further?
i eagerly await your wisdom and jaded rehashes of intellectual superiority quips. ...plus an answer/admission that the trends in the LEI indicate those in the wider economy, if even by your conspiratorial happenstance.