The Republican Plan

And you're good with most super rich getting a pass because there aren't enough employees to audit them?

When industry needs more labor, they wisely choose making their current employees work more hours than hiring new and paying benefits. It's cheaper in the long run.

So how many IRS agents are working more than 8 hours a day or six days a week?

The more government workers, the more Democrat votes statistic wise. If the IRS wants to audit those evil rich, let them stop auditing Ma and Pa workers.
 
When industry needs more labor, they wisely choose making their current employees work more hours than hiring new and paying benefits. It's cheaper in the long run.

So how many IRS agents are working more than 8 hours a day or six days a week?

The more government workers, the more Democrat votes statistic wise. If the IRS wants to audit those evil rich, let them stop auditing Ma and Pa workers.
You're such a silly MAGA. Perhaps you will understand better when you grow up.
 
You are such a gullible goober.

Yeah, well I'm a loyal CNN reader:

A federal agency is considering a ban on gas stoves, a source of indoor pollution linked to childhood asthma.

Richard Trumka Jr., a US Consumer Product Safety commissioner, set off a firestorm this week by saying in an interview with Bloomberg that gas stoves posed a “hidden hazard” and suggested the agency could ban them.

Trumka confirmed to CNN that “everything’s on the table” when it comes to gas stoves, but stressed that any ban would apply only to new gas stoves, not existing ones.

 
You're such a silly MAGA. Perhaps you will understand better when you grow up.

Maybe when you grow up you'll come to the understanding how full of shit the Democrats are, and what a puppet you are for listening to their bullshit.

In any case, you asked what the Republicans are doing, and they just saved this country 80 billion dollars we didn't need to spend.
 
Yeah, well I'm a loyal CNN reader:

A federal agency is considering a ban on gas stoves, a source of indoor pollution linked to childhood asthma.

Richard Trumka Jr., a US Consumer Product Safety commissioner, set off a firestorm this week by saying in an interview with Bloomberg that gas stoves posed a “hidden hazard” and suggested the agency could ban them.

Trumka confirmed to CNN that “everything’s on the table” when it comes to gas stoves, but stressed that any ban would apply only to new gas stoves, not existing ones.

By all means, you should set your hair on fire because an agency made a report.
 
Trump claimed he had done an extensive search, and nothing was there. He also claimed they were his rightful property. He also claimed he had de-classified them by thinking about them. Trump didn't cooperate at all. Biden is cooperating 100%.

Ok, and he's being investigated for those things. You haven't addressed anything else in my post. Biden had those documents for almost 6 years, and NARA never once made a request for them? He had them for almost 6 years and never even knew they were there? How did he even come in possession of them? If he had no idea they were even there, then the handling of those documents was apparently not very secure, either he, or someone, who probably doesn't have a security clearance to have access to those documents, packed them and moved them to an unauthorized location. If Biden packed them, then his handling of those documents was not secure, if it was someone else who packed them, then his handling of those documents was still not secure. Then, those TS/SCI documents were missing from the national archives, for 6 years. They were stuffed in a box in a closet, for 6 years, and nobody knew. The national archives, who were going after trump for documents just 4 months after he left office, never once made an inquiry about missing secrets in 6 years?

So, what is the more plausible explanation? that they were extremely careless in the handling of those documents? Or, he knew he had them all along? at least Trump admitted to taking them.
 
Maybe when you grow up you'll come to the understanding how full of shit the Democrats are, and what a puppet you are for listening to their bullshit.

In any case, you asked what the Republicans are doing, and they just saved this country 80 billion dollars we didn't need to spend.
Get back with me when they come to get your gas stove, or your guns, or your hamburger meat, you whiney dumb ass.
 
Ok, and he's being investigated for those things. You haven't addressed anything else in my post. Biden had those documents for almost 6 years, and NARA never once made a request for them? He had them for almost 6 years and never even knew they were there? How did he even come in possession of them? If he had no idea they were even there, then the handling of those documents was apparently not very secure, either he, or someone, who probably doesn't have a security clearance to have access to those documents, packed them and moved them to an unauthorized location. If Biden packed them, then his handling of those documents was not secure, if it was someone else who packed them, then his handling of those documents was still not secure. Then, those TS/SCI documents were missing from the national archives, for 6 years. They were stuffed in a box in a closet, for 6 years, and nobody knew. The national archives, who were going after trump for documents just 4 months after he left office, never once made an inquiry about missing secrets in 6 years?

So, what is the more plausible explanation? that they were extremely careless in the handling of those documents? Or, he knew he had them all along? at least Trump admitted to taking them.
I don't have a problem investigating how they came to be there. I don't have a problem prosecuting anyone who intentionally broke any laws to get them there. It just doesn't look like a nefarious plan to steal documents for personal gain, like in Trump's situation.
 
Repubs are threatening to vote against the budget increase that is required to pay our bills.
And? I was talking specifically to green bills, which could add to inflation by throwing trillions into an economy.

As far as the threat? I have heard for years the threat of not increasing a budget and so far it never has happened, threat after threat after threat, time and again we have heard this and never have we defaulted. I’m not buying into it.
 
I don't have a problem investigating how they came to be there. I don't have a problem prosecuting anyone who intentionally broke any laws to get them there. It just doesn't look like a nefarious plan to steal documents for personal gain, like in Trump's situation.
What makes you think Trump taking them was nefarious, or for personal gain? You see what's happening here? For biden..we need to wait to see what exactly happened..but for trump...'it was for criminal and financial reasons!". also, before we even know anything, "it doesn't look nefarious", but when trump did it, immediately "its nefarious!".

And, if Biden knew he had them, then yes, he intentionally broke the law. if he was careless enough with them that he allowed them to be packed into a box and unknowingly moved to an unauthorized location, then there was obviously some security protocols broken.
 
Burning it down would only speed up the inevitable. 30 TRILLION dollars isn't sustainable.
 
Repubs are threatening to vote against the budget increase that is required to pay our bills.
Kind of off topic here, but, does anyone else not think out debt ceiling method is backwards? We spend money...then we have to raise the debt ceiling to cover what we already spent. That's just backwards. Really when you promise to pay money in the future, you've essentially raised the debt ceiling at that point. You are not raising the debt ceiling to cover future expense, but past expenses....which means the whole idea of a debt ceiling is pointless, because you've already spent the money.

Isn't the idea of having a debt ceiling supposed to be that it is a limiting factor on our spending? But if we are raising the debt ceiling to cover money already spent...then the debt ceiling isn't really a ceiling at all. It should work like...we raise the debt ceiling to borrow more money for future expenditures, but we're spending money, then just raising the ceiling to cover.
 
First order of business would be to get the lawlessness and corruption of the Left under control first.
Everything else would then fall into place nicely.

There's no real left in the US, it's all practically, with very few exceptions, right or right of center. Leftists aren't members of either party, just like Bernie Sanders and a few others who were once leftists, but weren't Republican or Democrats. Bernie was dispatched, eliminated quickly by the Democratic Party establishment when he made the foolish decision to run as a Democrat. Actual leftists aren't welcomed in either party, we are of the independent electorate and when we run for office we're either running as independent candidates or the candidate of a party that openly identifies itself as socialist, communist, or Marxist. The "woke" MSNBC Rachel Maddow liberals aren't leftists (they're a joke and a fraud).
 
Last edited:
When industry needs more labor, they wisely choose making their current employees work more hours than hiring new and paying benefits. It's cheaper in the long run.

So how many IRS agents are working more than 8 hours a day or six days a week?

The more government workers, the more Democrat votes statistic wise. If the IRS wants to audit those evil rich, let them stop auditing Ma and Pa workers.

Those capitalist masters will get their rude awakening as the labor force becomes more populated by the younger generation, which is much more aware of its power and ability to unionize. Eventually, in the not-too-distant future, the capitalist fief-lords will go the way of the dodo. The means of production will be in the hands of workers. The people that have to work for a living, otherwise they starve to death or become homeless. Those are the real producers in the world, not the parasitical rich.

eattherich.png

BEFORE THEY EAT YOU.
 
Last edited:
And? I was talking specifically to green bills, which could add to inflation by throwing trillions into an economy.

As far as the threat? I have heard for years the threat of not increasing a budget and so far it never has happened, threat after threat after threat, time and again we have heard this and never have we defaulted. I’m not buying into it.
The country's credit rating was lowered because childish repubs refused to do what the country needed. Our government has been shut down because of their childish behavior too. That cost us a fortune.
 
What makes you think Trump taking them was nefarious, or for personal gain? You see what's happening here? For biden..we need to wait to see what exactly happened..but for trump...'it was for criminal and financial reasons!". also, before we even know anything, "it doesn't look nefarious", but when trump did it, immediately "its nefarious!".

And, if Biden knew he had them, then yes, he intentionally broke the law. if he was careless enough with them that he allowed them to be packed into a box and unknowingly moved to an unauthorized location, then there was obviously some security protocols broken.
Trump didn't cooperate. After months, they finally had to go get the documents. Trump lied from the start of the incident, as he always does.
 

Forum List

Back
Top