Frank the Tank
VIP Member
- Dec 15, 2017
- 719
- 72
From the article you cited.Analysis | 7 key moments from Peter Strzok’s wild hearing
All i see is a federal offical ,who was not subpoenaed, nor under oath before a room full of partisan hacks looking to either uphold or assinate his character
None were focused on the letter of constitutional law
Which is what they're electred and PAID to do
~S~
Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tex.) seized upon Strzok's contention that his texts didn't demonstrate personal “bias” and said that argument amounted to him lying.
Of course Strzoks was biased and lying about it. It is as plain as the nose on your face. We dont need lawyers to tell us if it is or is not. The FBI looks stupid defending this obvious liar.
It's worth noting that Goodlatte's justification — that the committee's investigation is ongoing — was the same one Strzok offered for not answering questions about the special counsel's Russia probe. In the latter case, apparently, Republicans don't think it applies.
Obviously an OVERSIGHT group has the right to see the evidence of an ongoing investigation or else it cannot execute its oversight.
Strzok should be sacked and the FBI and DOJ purged of their Marxist members as a result of this obstruction of Congressional oversight.
“Sir, was that not intelligible?” Strzok said. “You just want to hear — for me to repeat it.”
“Please,” Issa said.
“Okay, sir. Sure,” Strzok shot back snidely. “Happy to indulge you.”
Snide and snarky responses and a contemptuous attitude toward the representatives of the People of the United States says all that really needs to be said about the DOJ as they have the audacity to display their contempt for the American people on national television.
Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.) went the furthest.
“Mr. Strzok, if I could give you a Purple Heart, I would,” Cohen said when he began his questioning.
To give this fool a Purple Heart for his contempt of the American people is the perfect epitome of the Dimocratic Party today.
That the Washington Post would focus on minute detail and ignore the broader picture shouldnt really shock anyone.
HA HA HA! So, your opinion is based on the fact he was too snarky when he answered?!?!??!
Gee, here I thought you were going to say something stupid.