The Sham Trial Against Trump

[maybelooking]

What ever side your on, Everyone should at least admit its a very ugly mess. And there is no way Trump did not contribute to the mess he is in.

he did NOTHING that countless other businesses haven't done, and yet hes the ONLY one on trial for it!!!

odd.

 

[WorldWatcher]

They say if Trump would have just invested the money his daddy gave him in a safe 4% interest investment he'd have more money than he has now. How many times has he gone bankrupt?

None.

He uses other peoples money in business ventures, pulls out his profit, then lets the business go bankrupt so the other people take the financial bath.

WW

 

[bripat9643]

So you just exposed yourself as ignorant to this? I love it when you do that.

Generally speaking, searches within 100 miles of the border are more permissible without a warrant than those conducted elsewhere in the U.S. The doctrine also allows federal agents to search people at border crossings without a warrant or probable cause.

The federal government defines a “reasonable distance” as 100 air miles from any external boundary of the U.S. So, combining this federal regulation and the federal law regarding warrantless vehicle searches, CBP claims authority to board a bus or train without a warrant anywhere within this 100-mile zone.

Know Your Rights | 100 Mile Border Zone | ACLU

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects people from random and arbitrary stops and searches. Although the federal government claims the power to conduct certain kinds of warrantless stops within 100 miles of the U.S. border, important Fourth Amendment protections still apply. This...

www.aclu.org

The federal government defines things to suit itself. They invariably get it wrong. Only a Stalinist wouldn't object to such a policy.

Your theory that the police can violate your 4th amendment rights in Seattle and Detroit is too absurd for words.

 

[WorldWatcher]

he did NOTHING that countless other businesses haven't done, and yet hes the ONLY one on trial for it!!!

odd.

That is not true.

There are other business people that have been charged under the same law.

Ummm....

..... ..... ..... One is Donald Trump Jr.

..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... Another is Eric Trump.

..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... Seems like Ivanka dodged a bullet.

WW

 

[bripat9643]

None.

He uses other peoples money in business ventures, pulls out his profit, then lets the business go bankrupt so the other people take the financial bath.

WW

How does he "pull out his profit" without selling it? If he sells it, then he's not responsible for what happens to it after tha.

Your obviously an imbecile who doesn't understand how business operates.

 

[bripat9643]

So you just exposed yourself as ignorant to this? I love it when you do that.

Generally speaking, searches within 100 miles of the border are more permissible without a warrant than those conducted elsewhere in the U.S. The doctrine also allows federal agents to search people at border crossings without a warrant or probable cause.

The federal government defines a “reasonable distance” as 100 air miles from any external boundary of the U.S. So, combining this federal regulation and the federal law regarding warrantless vehicle searches, CBP claims authority to board a bus or train without a warrant anywhere within this 100-mile zone.

Know Your Rights | 100 Mile Border Zone | ACLU

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects people from random and arbitrary stops and searches. Although the federal government claims the power to conduct certain kinds of warrantless stops within 100 miles of the U.S. border, important Fourth Amendment protections still apply. This...

www.aclu.org

That may be some rule the federal government observes, but it's a clear violation of the 4th Amendment. Of course, when did the government ever follow the Constitution?

 

[WorldWatcher]

How does he "pull out his profit" without selling it? If he sells it, then he's not responsible for what happens to it after tha.

Your obviously an imbecile who doesn't understand how business operates.

One way is direct payments as "branding" for the Trump name.

Think of it like an advance on a book deal, money paid up front based on future performance actions.

WW

 

[Lastamender]

One way is direct payments as "branding" for the Trump name.

Think of it like an advance on a book deal, money paid up front based on future performance actions.

WW

The disclaimer vindicates Trump. That simple.

 

[WorldWatcher]

The disclaimer vindicates Trump. That simple.

The "worthless disclaimer" was already deemed worthless in court.

You can't lie on legal documents then say "hey I may have lied, don't believe me."

WW

 

[Lastamender]

The "worthless disclaimer" was already deemed worthless in court.

You can't lie on legal documents then say "hey I may have lied, don't believe me."

WW

The court is the useless thing. Have you heard what the judges wife is doing? Get yourself informed and try again.

 

[Dragonlady]

And you know this how? Honestly you of the TDS crowd get further and further into left field in your desperation to accuse him. And it is soooo obvious you don't have a clue what you're talking about.

Because Trump admitted that some of the numbers are inflated. And that his net worth is based on what he thinks the value of his “brand” is.

Trump’s “brand” is never reflected on his balance sheets, nor should it be because it’s not quantifiable. Bankers call it “Goodwill”.

If you own the best restaurant in town, where people are lined out the door every day, that’s worth real money to a prospective purchaser but it’s not in your balance sheet. And if your chef quits, that line up could go away along with the value of your goodwill.

For tax purposes for both the buyer and seller, the purchase agreement will reflect various values - land and buildings/lease, equipment and fixtures, inventory and goodwill. The value of all of these items will appear on the balance sheets of the business, except the value of the goodwill.

Trump also lied big time when he said that his “brand” and his name on the side of a building increased its value. It actually does the opposite because Trump is a crappy builder and an even worse project manager. And since January 6th, owners can’t get his name off their buildings fast enough.

 

[leftwinger]

They say

what a freakin dope up in here posting with actual intelligent persons. You’re a complete embarrassment, a joke. Like many of you verminous Anti-American filth.

 

[Marener]

The clueless make these claims but never ever back them up with anything.

DocumentCloud

www.documentcloud.org

It's on page 21.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Then cite your sources. Legitimate ones please and not hard core leftist ones.

The source is the trial coverage. If you read the trial coverage, you can learn a lot.

This is a discussion board, not Wikipedia. You are expected to have some knowledge of the topic before participating.

 

[Lastamender]

The source is the trial coverage. If you read the trial coverage, you can learn a lot.

This is a discussion board, not Wikipedia. You are expected to have some knowledge of the topic before participating.

That pretty much voids every one of your posts.

 

[WorldWatcher]

The court is the useless thing. Have you heard what the judges wife is doing? Get yourself informed and try again.

Yes I have. And I've heard that Justice Thomas agrees with her freedom of speech in such activities.

.... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... And even that her husband Clarance agrees with his wife.


WW

 

[Dragonlady]

The disclaimer vindicates Trump. That simple.

No disclaimer will get you off the hook if you knowingly lied in an effort to defraud the people you’re lying to.

Those “use at your own risk” disclaimers don’t work on amusement rides if the owners know they’re unsafe and keep them running anyway. If somebody is injured and it can proven you knew the ride was unsafe, that’s negligence and you’ll be arrested for endangering the public.

 

[Foxfyre]

Because Trump admitted that some of the numbers are inflated. And that his net worth is based on what he thinks the value of his “brand” is.

Trump’s “brand” is never reflected on his balance sheets, nor should it be because it’s not quantifiable. Bankers call it “Goodwill”.

If you own the best restaurant in town, where people are lined out the door every day, that’s worth real money to a prospective purchaser but it’s not in your balance sheet. And if your chef quits, that line up could go away along with the value of your goodwill.

For tax purposes for both the buyer and seller, the purchase agreement will reflect various values - land and buildings/lease, equipment and fixtures, inventory and goodwill. The value of all of these items will appear on the balance sheets of the business, except the value of the goodwill.

Trump also lied big time when he said that his “brand” and his name on the side of a building increased its value. It actually does the opposite because Trump is a crappy builder and an even worse project manager. And since January 6th, owners can’t get his name off their buildings fast enough.

I'm sorry my friend but opinions coming out of extreme TDS and backed up by nothing more than that TDS plus a nickel are worth a nickel.

 

[Foxfyre]

DocumentCloud

www.documentcloud.org

It's on page 21.

But you couldn't post the specific excerpt? Tsk tsk.

 

[Foxfyre]

The source is the trial coverage. If you read the trial coverage, you can learn a lot.

This is a discussion board, not Wikipedia. You are expected to have some knowledge of the topic before participating.

Trial coverage by TDS infused media is not what I call a reliable source.

But if you have actually read a reliable source that backs up your screeds, you should easily be able to post a link to it.