The Stalwarts of "Democracy" (The Democrats) Are now Trashing the Supreme Court for not ruling in their favor

Mr. Friscus

Diamond Member
Dec 28, 2020
5,059
5,283
1,938
This would all be hilarious if it wasn't so tragic.

Let's review the Democrats the past years:
2016: It's okay to challenge an election because through paying for disinformation (Steele Dossier) against our political rival we can say that the presidential election was stolen and the president is illegitimate.
2020: It's an attack against Democracy to suggest an election was completely and totally legitimate for any reason, as it undermines our democracy

When SCOTUS decisions go favorable to the left: "THE SCOTUS Has spoken, you must obey this institution"
When SCOTUS decisions go unfavorable to the left: "The SCOTUS is a radical, activist, treasonist court that must be opposed (with insinuations to violence)

Remember, Kavanaugh had an assassination attempt on him that was thankfully broken up. It wasn't widely reported because the media hates him.

Here's the deal, it's either:
1. Elections are okay to question or they're not.
2. The SCOTUS is legitimate or its not.

You don't get to dance back and forth based on if you got your way. That's what children do.
 
This would all be hilarious if it wasn't so tragic.

Let's review
2016: It's okay to challenge an election because through paying for disinformation (Steele Dossier) against our political rival we can say that the presidential election was stolen and the president is illegitimate.
2020: It's an attack against Democracy to suggest an election was completely and totally legitimate for any reason, as it undermines our democracy

When SCOTUS decisions go favorable to the left: "THE SCOTUS Has spoken, you must obey this institution"
When SCOTUS decisions go unfavorable to the left: "The SCOTUS is a radical, activist, treasonist court that must be opposed (with insinuations to violence)

Remember, Kavanaugh had an assassination attempt on him that was thankfully broken up. It wasn't widely reported because the media hates him.
Rump Rump Rump you friggin losers. 6-3 isn't favorable to all.
 
This would all be hilarious if it wasn't so tragic.

Let's review
2016: It's okay to challenge an election because through paying for disinformation (Steele Dossier) against our political rival we can say that the presidential election was stolen and the president is illegitimate.
2020: It's an attack against Democracy to suggest an election was completely and totally legitimate for any reason, as it undermines our democracy

When SCOTUS decisions go favorable to the left: "THE SCOTUS Has spoken, you must obey this institution"
When SCOTUS decisions go unfavorable to the left: "The SCOTUS is a radical, activist, treasonist court that must be opposed (with insinuations to violence)

Remember, Kavanaugh had an assassination attempt on him that was thankfully broken up. It wasn't widely reported because the media hates him.
The outrage is not entirely over the fact that the court gave Trump a pass. The outrage is also over the fact that little by little they are destroying The Constitution by undermining it with their edicts, especially this year.

Keep gaping at that bright shiny object.
 
I'm very surprised that Biden addressed the media regarding this decision with a teleprompter but didn't take even one question. Considering the public opinion by the Dems to "move on" and "he had a bad night", it would have been a perfect time to take questions for a half our and counter the argument.

Such decisions don't help the narrative it reinforces it.
 
The outrage is not entirely over the fact that the court gave Trump a pass. The outrage is also over the fact that little by little they are destroying The Constitution by undermining it with their edicts, especially this year.

Keep gaping at that bright shiny object.
Listening to you shitlibs mewl and wring your hands about the Constitution, which you really don't give flying fuck #1 about, is sooooo tragicomic! :laugh2:
 
The outrage is not entirely over the fact that the court gave Trump a pass. The outrage is also over the fact that little by little they are destroying The Constitution by undermining it with their edicts, especially this year.

Keep gaping at that bright shiny object.
How did the court give Trump a "pass".. can you point to any precedent that the SCOTUS botched?
 
This would all be hilarious if it wasn't so tragic.

Let's review the Democrats the past years:
2016: It's okay to challenge an election because through paying for disinformation (Steele Dossier) against our political rival we can say that the presidential election was stolen and the president is illegitimate.
2020: It's an attack against Democracy to suggest an election was completely and totally legitimate for any reason, as it undermines our democracy

When SCOTUS decisions go favorable to the left: "THE SCOTUS Has spoken, you must obey this institution"
When SCOTUS decisions go unfavorable to the left: "The SCOTUS is a radical, activist, treasonist court that must be opposed (with insinuations to violence)

Remember, Kavanaugh had an assassination attempt on him that was thankfully broken up. It wasn't widely reported because the media hates him.

Here's the deal, it's either:
1. Elections are okay to question or they're not.
2. The SCOTUS is legitimate or its not.

You don't get to dance back and forth based on if you got your way. That's what children do.
You have to realize their hate is actually the Constitution. They spent 40 years building the administrative state. The unelected left wing occupied government agency with the ability to make rules on their own and without your consent.

40 years of just making shit up is now dependent upon actual law they can never achieve through congress.
 
The outrage is not entirely over the fact that the court gave Trump a pass. The outrage is also over the fact that little by little they are destroying The Constitution by undermining it with their edicts, especially this year.

Keep gaping at that bright shiny object.
Are laws set by your representatives you voted for or some government agency making your laws?
 
1719888848924.jpeg
 
You have to realize their hate is actually the Constitution. They spent 40 years building the administrative state. The unelected left wing occupied government agency with the ability to make rules on their own and without your consent.

40 years of just making shit up is now dependent upon actual law they can never achieve through congress.
At the same time, they're wetting the bed over the Chevron ruling, which says that it's congress that writes the rules and regs (y'know, MUH MOCRACY!), and not unelected extra-constitutional bureaucrats and technocrats.

They don't know whether to fight, flee, fuck, shit, or go blind. :auiqs.jpg:
 
At the same time, they're wetting the bed over the Chevron ruling, which says that it's congress that writes the rules and regs (y'know, MUH MOCRACY!), and not unelected extra-constitutional bureaucrats and technocrats.

They don't know whether to fight, flee, fuck, shit, or go blind. :auiqs.jpg:
I know, it's insane

Democrat:
Unelected Trump Prosecutor: "TOTALLY LEGIT"
SCOTUS says it has to be Congressional (of Democracacy): "BULLSHIT! FUCK THE PEOPLE!!"
 
The left is rightly concerned every single government administration rule is heading to court and will have to be ruled on as Constitutional or not. And they should be. This is going to put every single rule they have passed into limbo. Unenforceable garbage. The flood gates of regulation are now open. Sue the fuck out of them.
 
Get a new routine...You're more fucking boring than Larry the Cable Guy.
I put him on ignore, he's not worth your time. He just throws temper tantrums and offers no substance. I suggest you do the same.

I can have civilized discussions with people I disagree with no problem. Okfine is just a whining child. Don't bother.
 

Forum List

Back
Top