The ten year old rape victim that did exist.

They're flailing now with trying to start the lie up again...trying to say she could have gotten an abortion in Ohio (she couldn't)...attacking the doctor....making it about her mom....making it about illegal immigration status of her rapist (as if it would have been ok if her rapist was an American citizen).
The Ohio AG says otherwise. Going through local Ohio agencies likely would have sent up red flags. Why was the child not removed from the home if she's raped by the mother's boyfriend? Not to worry, I know you don't care about that, you folks got your baby sacrifice, no need to take this further.
 

The initial reporting never included any analysis from Ohio legislators. If it had, they would have discovered two things: Ohio does not have a 6-week ban on abortions, and Ohio law has several exceptions for abortions in these types of extreme cases that would have covered the abused child. Ohio Republicans, including Attorney General Dave Yost, have all affirmed that this child’s case would have been covered under the exception. “Ohio has a medical emergency section, broader than just the life of the mother. This young girl, if she exists and if this horrible thing actually happened to her… she did not have to leave Ohio to find treatment,” Yost told Jesse Watters on Fox News’ “Primetime” on July 11, one day before anyone was alerted that there was a criminal case into this situation.


It also taught us that the Indianapolis Star published a story with a political agenda, used a real 10-year-old rape victim as a political football, and didn’t bother to get the facts right first. They didn’t even publish the law as it is written, which would have at least raised questions about abortionist and activist Dr. Caitlin Bernard’s claims.

This story is a perfect example of media bias and lazy or corrupt journalism. The Indy Star had a narrative to push and pushed it without care for the victim, the facts, or the fallout.
 
The Ohio AG says otherwise. Going through local Ohio agencies likely would have sent up red flags. Why was the child not removed from the home if she's raped by the mother's boyfriend? Not to worry, I know you don't care about that, you folks got your baby sacrifice, no need to take this further.
Why is the mother not being deported since she is an illegal alien?
 
just something to think about...


WTF??

"Then things got worse. We found out next that the victim’s mother didn’t want the rapist prosecuted. At first, I imagined that might be because he was in a cartel, and she feared retribution. But nope. The rapist is her boyfriend, and she wants to keep him. So she’s willing to pimp out her daughter, and kill her grandchild, to keep rapist boyfriend happy — and in America, since he could be subject to deportation."

There is no deeper, darker pit than where these people reside
 
The same AG that said this girl didn't exist in the first place?

"Then things got worse. We found out next that the victim’s mother didn’t want the rapist prosecuted. At first, I imagined that might be because he was in a cartel, and she feared retribution. But nope. The rapist is her boyfriend, and she wants to keep him. So she’s willing to pimp out her daughter, and kill her grandchild, to keep rapist boyfriend happy — and in America, since he could be subject to deportation."

Are the Democrats Ruled Now by Demons? The 10-Year-Old Rape Victim’s Story Might Prove It - The Stream
 
"Then things got worse. We found out next that the victim’s mother didn’t want the rapist prosecuted. At first, I imagined that might be because he was in a cartel, and she feared retribution. But nope. The rapist is her boyfriend, and she wants to keep him. So she’s willing to pimp out her daughter, and kill her grandchild, to keep rapist boyfriend happy — and in America, since he could be subject to deportation."

Are the Democrats Ruled Now by Demons? The 10-Year-Old Rape Victim’s Story Might Prove It - The Stream
None of that nonsense has anything to do with the FACT that the girl was raped, could not get an abortion in Ohio and the AG lied about every aspect of it
 
From the article i posted above!!!!


The 10-Year-Old Rape Victim Democrats Exploited
And nothing makes that clearer than the case of the 10-year-old rape victim whom Joe Biden decided to use. We must steel ourselves and look at this story in granular detail to understand how evil the Democrats really are, and wish to remain. From that unhappy exercise, we’ll learn exactly how wicked and inhuman the pro-choice movement really is.

First we learned from Joe Biden that a young girl had been raped, and couldn’t get an abortion because of pro-life laws in her state. Next we found out that in fact the state in question permitted such abortions. After that we discovered that the rapist was an illegal alien, one of millions Biden waved freely into our country. Then we learned that the abortionist had lied about the rapist’s age, so she wouldn’t have to file a police report.


Then things got worse. We found out next that the victim’s mother didn’t want the rapist prosecuted. At first, I imagined that might be because he was in a cartel, and she feared retribution. But nope. The rapist is her boyfriend, and she wants to keep him. So she’s willing to pimp out her daughter, and kill her grandchild, to keep rapist boyfriend happy — and in America, since he could be subject to deportation.

For all the squalid, degrading and (yes) demonic details, go read Mia Cathell’s carefully reported story at Townhall. It even includes a picture of the happy, evil couple.

The Democrats Cover Up for Rape with Murder
The Democrats want laws (Option 1) that make it possible for these two adults to get away with everything. To keep custody of the rape victim, in the home where she’s being abused. (The quiet abortion and compliant abortionist kept Social Services blind to the situation.) Just shove the kid into the car, willing or not, drag her into the clinic, and scrape her clean. Everybody’s happy, right?

Lame, lax pro-life laws (Option 2) would have the same effect. No help for the visible victim, and death for her unborn child. Indeed, the only reason Gerson Fuentes is being arraigned for rape is the press coverage Joe Biden unwittingly directed toward the story. The victim’s mother ought to face child exploitation and endangerment charges, and lose all parental rights.
 

Forum List

Back
Top