Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 67,026
- 48,701
- 3,565
Post #52 is just Mac1958 trolling because he did not have a good rely to offerYou just stated it wasn't going to happen- want your cake and eat it too? Then bake your own cake-
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Post #52 is just Mac1958 trolling because he did not have a good rely to offerYou just stated it wasn't going to happen- want your cake and eat it too? Then bake your own cake-
The "inevitable violent reaction"? Why is it inevitable?If there is something to see...I have faith in our Conservative court to not only reject this ridiculous claim but to admonish EVERY Republican who endorses it.
Why should Republicans be "admonished" for protesting against stolen elections? There is really little point in spending the time or money to run for office if you are going to be swindled.
Further, no one will contribute to an election campaign that has no chance of succeeding because of fraud.
Because it wasn't stolen. For the first time in many election cycles, the Republican tactic of voter suppression was largely removed. Granted, it was because of the pandemic (which I'd like to point out was made worse by the lack of response from the WH and impeded by the Republican party). Individual states made their own election rules. It is up to the state to set those rules. If you truly believe in the Constitution, then you believe in state's rights. If not, it's just bullshit talk. You believe in selective interpretation. For the SC to rule in Texas favor, it would have to throw out and invalidate millions of legally cast votes. Straight up voter disenfranchisement. It's bad enough that the Republican party engages in voter suppression and gerrymandering, but this?...is straight up theft..and sedition.
How is making a person vote in person and prove they are eligible to vote voter surpression?
States made the election rules. There are states that have used mail in voting for years without incident. The military has used it for decades.
Voting in person (especially during a pandemic) may not be possible for everyone. Hence, a way for Republicans to practice voter suppression.
Everyone who cast a vote was eligible. 73 million of the morons voted for Trump.
Your man lost. And you're pissed. I get it. But this behavior is just un-American.
You just like mail in voting because it makes it easier to cheat, and you know your side has no issues with cheating.
Cry me a river. Trump lost. This extended temper tantrum is unseemly. There was no evidence of voter fraud. Federal and state officials (Republican and Democrat) have stated this was the smoothest and most secure election in years. All lawsuits have been thrown out. You're mad because your man lost. Tell me, what is so special about Donald John Trump that you are willing to sacrifice your honor, your intelligence, and your integrity? It really is perplexing to me.
The people who benefit from the cheating say there is no cheating, and the people responsible for making sure there is no cheating are saying there is no cheating. Sorry, but since we all know people like you are dishonest hacks that will stop at nothing to win I will not take your or their word for it.
The issue is assholes like you think you can get away with it, that's the issue. You are liars and cheats.
It's too bad. I don't where in the Trump orbit in the last five years that people like you turned from just being amusing at sheer loyalty of sheep to a shepard into a collection of metasasizing cancers?
There's no evidence of widespread voter fraud in any state. Every lawsuit brought forth so far has been dismissed out of hand. Yet here you are, still bleating like a sheep because the idiot you backed lost.
He blew the response to the pandemic so the voters showed him the door. But, you slink down into your alt-right media and your social media clutches and cluck like the fucking hens you are until you
become convinced that something happened here..that didn't. In other words, no matter your protestation, you and the rest of Trump Nation have lost the ability to think for yourselves.
Your assimilation is complete. So I reiterate. You Trump supporters are the dumbest, most ignorant, and most low information voting bloc I've seen rise in my lifetime.
More "nothing to see here, move along" bullshit from the people who benefitted from whatever happened.
All the words you spew don't change that.
Why can’t Republicans get any court in the land to accept their evidence?
Because the courts either agree that Trump had to go or don't have the balls to counter the inevitable violent reaction that will occur if somehow the election is brought to a contested status.
Uh...excuse me. I never said that. States get to make their own laws. Always. Governors and judges do not have the right to change those laws according to the constitution. Only LAW MAKERS do.Oh. I see. A state voted legally, and their electoral college votes are offset by a state that votes against the constitution. Got it.I laugh at those that attempt to debate and say things that are not factually correct. Its like "Rachel Maddow said this so I can regirgitate itSo you have no idea about how multiple state issues are resolved. It goes directly to the supreme court. Always. Always. Always.I'm not going to bothering reading the thread ... looks like the same vomit from yesterday ...
Anyone dared comment on the merits of the case yet? ... the OP is crazy wrong ... if we let Texas dictate how Michigan interprets their own laws ... pfffft ... worst, allow Texas to go straight to SCOTUS ... well ... then ... er ...
What's to stop California from telling Mississippi how to run their education system? ... and going straight to SCOTUS with the complaint ...
No ... I didn';t think anyone wanted to discuss this matter honestly ... sorry for interrupting ...
This is what annoys me the worst. I know this is a Hail Mary and it has no chance of overturning the election, but the fact that Texas even had a path to take this directly to the SC with 1) no successful lower court rulings, and 2) Able to file a lawsuit that essentially is looking to interfere in another states' affairs....is a complete travesty.
You are not worthy of adding to this conversation as you are naive as to how a republic works.
FYI....we are a republic.
There IS no issue, snowflake. That's the point. This is frivolous. Texas has NO standing to question another state's process. They suffered no harm.
So do me a favor and stow your upturned nose. I don't give a shit.
Good for you.
So what you're really trying to say here is that state's DON'T have the right to make their own laws. Again, selective interpretation. So much for that yellowed scrap of paper.
Texas wasn't harmed therefore has no standing to bring the suit...unless you are postulating that because Texas voted for Trump, these other states have to as well.
Know your stuff before you debate.
No chanceYes. All states certified the results. I expected that. The question is, should states have their electoral college numbers offset by states that had non law makers change their election laws? And 18 governors and AG's are protecting their state citizens from having their vote offset.This really isn't going to happen.
You guys really need to calm down. Go out and get some air. Spend the day in a forest with no cell phone.
Yep, just let the cheating happen, after all Progs know what's best for us because we don't.Cheating?Yep, just let the cheating happen, after all Progs know what's best for us because we don't.
All 50 governors have certified their election results.
Analogy.....
During a football game, there were 3 calls turned over by instant replay review. The last play of the game, where a player scored the winning touchdown, there was question whether or not his foot stepped on the sideline. It was an SEC team vs. an ACC game. You are an ACC fan. It was an SEC player that scored the apparent touchdown. The head ref decides to amend the rules and claims "we will not review the last play of a game"......would you not question what the hell and be upset about the mid game change of rules??
Now...that is a lousy football game. What about the election of a President of the United States?
I bet they would care if the tables were turned.Uh...excuse me. I never said that. States get to make their own laws. Always. Governors and judges do not have the right to change those laws according to the constitution. Only LAW MAKERS do.Oh. I see. A state voted legally, and their electoral college votes are offset by a state that votes against the constitution. Got it.I laugh at those that attempt to debate and say things that are not factually correct. Its like "Rachel Maddow said this so I can regirgitate itSo you have no idea about how multiple state issues are resolved. It goes directly to the supreme court. Always. Always. Always.I'm not going to bothering reading the thread ... looks like the same vomit from yesterday ...
Anyone dared comment on the merits of the case yet? ... the OP is crazy wrong ... if we let Texas dictate how Michigan interprets their own laws ... pfffft ... worst, allow Texas to go straight to SCOTUS ... well ... then ... er ...
What's to stop California from telling Mississippi how to run their education system? ... and going straight to SCOTUS with the complaint ...
No ... I didn';t think anyone wanted to discuss this matter honestly ... sorry for interrupting ...
This is what annoys me the worst. I know this is a Hail Mary and it has no chance of overturning the election, but the fact that Texas even had a path to take this directly to the SC with 1) no successful lower court rulings, and 2) Able to file a lawsuit that essentially is looking to interfere in another states' affairs....is a complete travesty.
You are not worthy of adding to this conversation as you are naive as to how a republic works.
FYI....we are a republic.
There IS no issue, snowflake. That's the point. This is frivolous. Texas has NO standing to question another state's process. They suffered no harm.
So do me a favor and stow your upturned nose. I don't give a shit.
Good for you.
So what you're really trying to say here is that state's DON'T have the right to make their own laws. Again, selective interpretation. So much for that yellowed scrap of paper.
Texas wasn't harmed therefore has no standing to bring the suit...unless you are postulating that because Texas voted for Trump, these other states have to as well.
Know your stuff before you debate.
No chanceYes. All states certified the results. I expected that. The question is, should states have their electoral college numbers offset by states that had non law makers change their election laws? And 18 governors and AG's are protecting their state citizens from having their vote offset.This really isn't going to happen.
You guys really need to calm down. Go out and get some air. Spend the day in a forest with no cell phone.
Yep, just let the cheating happen, after all Progs know what's best for us because we don't.Cheating?Yep, just let the cheating happen, after all Progs know what's best for us because we don't.
All 50 governors have certified their election results.
Analogy.....
During a football game, there were 3 calls turned over by instant replay review. The last play of the game, where a player scored the winning touchdown, there was question whether or not his foot stepped on the sideline. It was an SEC team vs. an ACC game. You are an ACC fan. It was an SEC player that scored the apparent touchdown. The head ref decides to amend the rules and claims "we will not review the last play of a game"......would you not question what the hell and be upset about the mid game change of rules??
Now...that is a lousy football game. What about the election of a President of the United States?
They literally do not care
They are psychopaths -
You should have read the lawsuit. Don't blame me for your ignorance.They state a lot of things “might” have happened and that “might” somehow is sufficient reason to rewrite election law or trash the constitutional rights of people who voted in our Republic.Yeah, you’ll forgive us if after these allegations have been slapped down in literally dozens of lawsuits that we are getting a little sick of this shit.I must have hit a nerve. All the usual suspects came stampeding out of the barn like it was on fire.
What the Texas lawsuit states happened
Did happen, that is not in dispute
Will the court, follow the law.
Never know with courts and juries.
Nope
Maybe you can explain how it is possible to cheat in a mail in ballot?I have faith in our Conservative court to not only reject this ridiculous claim but to admonish EVERY Republican who endorses it.
Why should Republicans be "admonished" for protesting against stolen elections? There is really little point in spending the time or money to run for office if you are going to be swindled.
Further, no one will contribute to an election campaign that has no chance of succeeding because of fraud.
Because it wasn't stolen. For the first time in many election cycles, the Republican tactic of voter suppression was largely removed. Granted, it was because of the pandemic (which I'd like to point out was made worse by the lack of response from the WH and impeded by the Republican party). Individual states made their own election rules. It is up to the state to set those rules. If you truly believe in the Constitution, then you believe in state's rights. If not, it's just bullshit talk. You believe in selective interpretation. For the SC to rule in Texas favor, it would have to throw out and invalidate millions of legally cast votes. Straight up voter disenfranchisement. It's bad enough that the Republican party engages in voter suppression and gerrymandering, but this?...is straight up theft..and sedition.
How is making a person vote in person and prove they are eligible to vote voter surpression?
States made the election rules. There are states that have used mail in voting for years without incident. The military has used it for decades.
Voting in person (especially during a pandemic) may not be possible for everyone. Hence, a way for Republicans to practice voter suppression.
Everyone who cast a vote was eligible. 73 million of the morons voted for Trump.
Your man lost. And you're pissed. I get it. But this behavior is just un-American.
You just like mail in voting because it makes it easier to cheat, and you know your side has no issues with cheating.
Do millions of soldiers and sailors cheat every year when they vote by mail?
harvesting is the biggest one.
Usually mail in ballots are requested, which allows for tracing.
It adds also the chance for stuffing in the counting rooms, by increasing the paper count.
How do you stuff ballots when each ballot has a unique bar code traceable to a registered voter?
If ballots were stuffed, multiple votes would show up for registered voters.......There were no instances of that happening
Each outer envelope is unique, the ballots are not as they have to be anonymous.
Harvesting is going around picking up unused ballots and sending them in.
So how about after the election we do a full count and comparison? I have a feeling many of these have already been destroyed to cover up.
That is not true at least in MI and PA. The outer envelope has the voter’s name and signature the ballot does not but both share the same number. The ballot is anonymous as it has no name on it for any counter to see. Different people verify and open the envelopes than those counting the ballots.Each outer envelope is unique, the ballots are not as they have to be anonymous.
The question is, should states have their electoral college numbers offset by states that had non law makers change their election laws? And 18 governors and AG's are protecting their state citizens from having their vote offset.
Analogy.....
During a football game, there were 3 calls turned over by instant replay review. The last play of the game, where a player scored the winning touchdown, there was question whether or not his foot stepped on the sideline. It was an SEC team vs. an ACC game. You are an ACC fan. It was an SEC player that scored the apparent touchdown. The head ref decides to amend the rules and claims "we will not review the last play of a game"......would you not question what the hell and be upset about the mid game change of rules??
Now...that is a lousy football game. What about the election of a President of the United States?
Let's torture the analogy more.During a football game, there were 3 calls turned over by instant replay review. The last play of the game, where a player scored the winning touchdown, there was question whether or not his foot stepped on the sideline. It was an SEC team vs. an ACC game. You are an ACC fan. It was an SEC player that scored the apparent touchdown. The head ref decides to amend the rules and claims "we will not review the last play of a game"......would you not question what the hell and be upset about the mid game change of rules??
We didn't when the tables were turned.I bet they would care if the tables were turned.
State courts popuated by leftwing and establishment scumbags.You're annoyed that the courts will examine the Dim's election fraud.I'm not going to bothering reading the thread ... looks like the same vomit from yesterday ...
Anyone dared comment on the merits of the case yet? ... the OP is crazy wrong ... if we let Texas dictate how Michigan interprets their own laws ... pfffft ... worst, allow Texas to go straight to SCOTUS ... well ... then ... er ...
What's to stop California from telling Mississippi how to run their education system? ... and going straight to SCOTUS with the complaint ...
No ... I didn';t think anyone wanted to discuss this matter honestly ... sorry for interrupting ...
This is what annoys me the worst. I know this is a Hail Mary and it has no chance of overturning the election, but the fact that Texas even had a path to take this directly to the SC with 1) no successful lower court rulings, and 2) Able to file a lawsuit that essentially is looking to interfere in another states' affairs....is a complete travesty.
Uh..where you been? Quite a few courts and judges in six states have examined the "evidence" that Trump's D-Team of crack lawyers has brought forth....and dismissed all of it out of hand.
The Hillary supporters got the fuck over it, like adultsI bet they would care if the tables were turned.Uh...excuse me. I never said that. States get to make their own laws. Always. Governors and judges do not have the right to change those laws according to the constitution. Only LAW MAKERS do.Oh. I see. A state voted legally, and their electoral college votes are offset by a state that votes against the constitution. Got it.I laugh at those that attempt to debate and say things that are not factually correct. Its like "Rachel Maddow said this so I can regirgitate itSo you have no idea about how multiple state issues are resolved. It goes directly to the supreme court. Always. Always. Always.I'm not going to bothering reading the thread ... looks like the same vomit from yesterday ...
Anyone dared comment on the merits of the case yet? ... the OP is crazy wrong ... if we let Texas dictate how Michigan interprets their own laws ... pfffft ... worst, allow Texas to go straight to SCOTUS ... well ... then ... er ...
What's to stop California from telling Mississippi how to run their education system? ... and going straight to SCOTUS with the complaint ...
No ... I didn';t think anyone wanted to discuss this matter honestly ... sorry for interrupting ...
This is what annoys me the worst. I know this is a Hail Mary and it has no chance of overturning the election, but the fact that Texas even had a path to take this directly to the SC with 1) no successful lower court rulings, and 2) Able to file a lawsuit that essentially is looking to interfere in another states' affairs....is a complete travesty.
You are not worthy of adding to this conversation as you are naive as to how a republic works.
FYI....we are a republic.
There IS no issue, snowflake. That's the point. This is frivolous. Texas has NO standing to question another state's process. They suffered no harm.
So do me a favor and stow your upturned nose. I don't give a shit.
Good for you.
So what you're really trying to say here is that state's DON'T have the right to make their own laws. Again, selective interpretation. So much for that yellowed scrap of paper.
Texas wasn't harmed therefore has no standing to bring the suit...unless you are postulating that because Texas voted for Trump, these other states have to as well.
Know your stuff before you debate.
No chanceYes. All states certified the results. I expected that. The question is, should states have their electoral college numbers offset by states that had non law makers change their election laws? And 18 governors and AG's are protecting their state citizens from having their vote offset.This really isn't going to happen.
You guys really need to calm down. Go out and get some air. Spend the day in a forest with no cell phone.
Yep, just let the cheating happen, after all Progs know what's best for us because we don't.Cheating?Yep, just let the cheating happen, after all Progs know what's best for us because we don't.
All 50 governors have certified their election results.
Analogy.....
During a football game, there were 3 calls turned over by instant replay review. The last play of the game, where a player scored the winning touchdown, there was question whether or not his foot stepped on the sideline. It was an SEC team vs. an ACC game. You are an ACC fan. It was an SEC player that scored the apparent touchdown. The head ref decides to amend the rules and claims "we will not review the last play of a game"......would you not question what the hell and be upset about the mid game change of rules??
Now...that is a lousy football game. What about the election of a President of the United States?
They literally do not care
They are psychopaths -
Maybe you can explain how it is possible to cheat in a mail in ballot?I have faith in our Conservative court to not only reject this ridiculous claim but to admonish EVERY Republican who endorses it.
Why should Republicans be "admonished" for protesting against stolen elections? There is really little point in spending the time or money to run for office if you are going to be swindled.
Further, no one will contribute to an election campaign that has no chance of succeeding because of fraud.
Because it wasn't stolen. For the first time in many election cycles, the Republican tactic of voter suppression was largely removed. Granted, it was because of the pandemic (which I'd like to point out was made worse by the lack of response from the WH and impeded by the Republican party). Individual states made their own election rules. It is up to the state to set those rules. If you truly believe in the Constitution, then you believe in state's rights. If not, it's just bullshit talk. You believe in selective interpretation. For the SC to rule in Texas favor, it would have to throw out and invalidate millions of legally cast votes. Straight up voter disenfranchisement. It's bad enough that the Republican party engages in voter suppression and gerrymandering, but this?...is straight up theft..and sedition.
How is making a person vote in person and prove they are eligible to vote voter surpression?
States made the election rules. There are states that have used mail in voting for years without incident. The military has used it for decades.
Voting in person (especially during a pandemic) may not be possible for everyone. Hence, a way for Republicans to practice voter suppression.
Everyone who cast a vote was eligible. 73 million of the morons voted for Trump.
Your man lost. And you're pissed. I get it. But this behavior is just un-American.
You just like mail in voting because it makes it easier to cheat, and you know your side has no issues with cheating.
Do millions of soldiers and sailors cheat every year when they vote by mail?
harvesting is the biggest one.
Usually mail in ballots are requested, which allows for tracing.
It adds also the chance for stuffing in the counting rooms, by increasing the paper count.
How do you stuff ballots when each ballot has a unique bar code traceable to a registered voter?
If ballots were stuffed, multiple votes would show up for registered voters.......There were no instances of that happening
Each outer envelope is unique, the ballots are not as they have to be anonymous.
Harvesting is going around picking up unused ballots and sending them in.
So how about after the election we do a full count and comparison? I have a feeling many of these have already been destroyed to cover up.That is not true at least in MI and PA. The outer envelope has the voter’s name and signature the ballot does not but both share the same number. The ballot is anonymous as it has no name on it for any counter to see. Different people verify and open the envelopes than those counting the ballots.Each outer envelope is unique, the ballots are not as they have to be anonymous.
I bet they would care if the tables were turned.Uh...excuse me. I never said that. States get to make their own laws. Always. Governors and judges do not have the right to change those laws according to the constitution. Only LAW MAKERS do.Oh. I see. A state voted legally, and their electoral college votes are offset by a state that votes against the constitution. Got it.I laugh at those that attempt to debate and say things that are not factually correct. Its like "Rachel Maddow said this so I can regirgitate itSo you have no idea about how multiple state issues are resolved. It goes directly to the supreme court. Always. Always. Always.I'm not going to bothering reading the thread ... looks like the same vomit from yesterday ...
Anyone dared comment on the merits of the case yet? ... the OP is crazy wrong ... if we let Texas dictate how Michigan interprets their own laws ... pfffft ... worst, allow Texas to go straight to SCOTUS ... well ... then ... er ...
What's to stop California from telling Mississippi how to run their education system? ... and going straight to SCOTUS with the complaint ...
No ... I didn';t think anyone wanted to discuss this matter honestly ... sorry for interrupting ...
This is what annoys me the worst. I know this is a Hail Mary and it has no chance of overturning the election, but the fact that Texas even had a path to take this directly to the SC with 1) no successful lower court rulings, and 2) Able to file a lawsuit that essentially is looking to interfere in another states' affairs....is a complete travesty.
You are not worthy of adding to this conversation as you are naive as to how a republic works.
FYI....we are a republic.
There IS no issue, snowflake. That's the point. This is frivolous. Texas has NO standing to question another state's process. They suffered no harm.
So do me a favor and stow your upturned nose. I don't give a shit.
Good for you.
So what you're really trying to say here is that state's DON'T have the right to make their own laws. Again, selective interpretation. So much for that yellowed scrap of paper.
Texas wasn't harmed therefore has no standing to bring the suit...unless you are postulating that because Texas voted for Trump, these other states have to as well.
Know your stuff before you debate.
No chanceYes. All states certified the results. I expected that. The question is, should states have their electoral college numbers offset by states that had non law makers change their election laws? And 18 governors and AG's are protecting their state citizens from having their vote offset.This really isn't going to happen.
You guys really need to calm down. Go out and get some air. Spend the day in a forest with no cell phone.
Yep, just let the cheating happen, after all Progs know what's best for us because we don't.Cheating?Yep, just let the cheating happen, after all Progs know what's best for us because we don't.
All 50 governors have certified their election results.
Analogy.....
During a football game, there were 3 calls turned over by instant replay review. The last play of the game, where a player scored the winning touchdown, there was question whether or not his foot stepped on the sideline. It was an SEC team vs. an ACC game. You are an ACC fan. It was an SEC player that scored the apparent touchdown. The head ref decides to amend the rules and claims "we will not review the last play of a game"......would you not question what the hell and be upset about the mid game change of rules??
Now...that is a lousy football game. What about the election of a President of the United States?
They literally do not care
They are psychopaths -
What election fraud did Republicans commit?We didn't when the tables were turned.I bet they would care if the tables were turned.
![]()
WATCH: Hillary Clinton Concedes Presidential Race To Donald Trump
"This is not the outcome we wanted or worked so hard for. I'm sorry we didn't win this election for the values we share and the vision we hold for our country," the Democratic nominee told supporters.www.npr.org
Same amount that the Democratic party committed.What election fraud did Republicans commit?
My guess is you didnt.You should have read the lawsuit. Don't blame me for your ignorance.They state a lot of things “might” have happened and that “might” somehow is sufficient reason to rewrite election law or trash the constitutional rights of people who voted in our Republic.Yeah, you’ll forgive us if after these allegations have been slapped down in literally dozens of lawsuits that we are getting a little sick of this shit.I must have hit a nerve. All the usual suspects came stampeding out of the barn like it was on fire.
What the Texas lawsuit states happened
Did happen, that is not in dispute
Will the court, follow the law.
Never know with courts and juries.
Nope
The Hillary supporters got the fuck over it, like adultsI bet they would care if the tables were turned.Uh...excuse me. I never said that. States get to make their own laws. Always. Governors and judges do not have the right to change those laws according to the constitution. Only LAW MAKERS do.Oh. I see. A state voted legally, and their electoral college votes are offset by a state that votes against the constitution. Got it.I laugh at those that attempt to debate and say things that are not factually correct. Its like "Rachel Maddow said this so I can regirgitate itSo you have no idea about how multiple state issues are resolved. It goes directly to the supreme court. Always. Always. Always.I'm not going to bothering reading the thread ... looks like the same vomit from yesterday ...
Anyone dared comment on the merits of the case yet? ... the OP is crazy wrong ... if we let Texas dictate how Michigan interprets their own laws ... pfffft ... worst, allow Texas to go straight to SCOTUS ... well ... then ... er ...
What's to stop California from telling Mississippi how to run their education system? ... and going straight to SCOTUS with the complaint ...
No ... I didn';t think anyone wanted to discuss this matter honestly ... sorry for interrupting ...
This is what annoys me the worst. I know this is a Hail Mary and it has no chance of overturning the election, but the fact that Texas even had a path to take this directly to the SC with 1) no successful lower court rulings, and 2) Able to file a lawsuit that essentially is looking to interfere in another states' affairs....is a complete travesty.
You are not worthy of adding to this conversation as you are naive as to how a republic works.
FYI....we are a republic.
There IS no issue, snowflake. That's the point. This is frivolous. Texas has NO standing to question another state's process. They suffered no harm.
So do me a favor and stow your upturned nose. I don't give a shit.
Good for you.
So what you're really trying to say here is that state's DON'T have the right to make their own laws. Again, selective interpretation. So much for that yellowed scrap of paper.
Texas wasn't harmed therefore has no standing to bring the suit...unless you are postulating that because Texas voted for Trump, these other states have to as well.
Know your stuff before you debate.
No chanceYes. All states certified the results. I expected that. The question is, should states have their electoral college numbers offset by states that had non law makers change their election laws? And 18 governors and AG's are protecting their state citizens from having their vote offset.This really isn't going to happen.
You guys really need to calm down. Go out and get some air. Spend the day in a forest with no cell phone.
Yep, just let the cheating happen, after all Progs know what's best for us because we don't.Cheating?Yep, just let the cheating happen, after all Progs know what's best for us because we don't.
All 50 governors have certified their election results.
Analogy.....
During a football game, there were 3 calls turned over by instant replay review. The last play of the game, where a player scored the winning touchdown, there was question whether or not his foot stepped on the sideline. It was an SEC team vs. an ACC game. You are an ACC fan. It was an SEC player that scored the apparent touchdown. The head ref decides to amend the rules and claims "we will not review the last play of a game"......would you not question what the hell and be upset about the mid game change of rules??
Now...that is a lousy football game. What about the election of a President of the United States?
They literally do not care
They are psychopaths -
wow. What a substantial answer. Full of fact.Same amount that the Democratic party committed.What election fraud did Republicans commit?
Maybe you can explain how it is possible to cheat in a mail in ballot?I have faith in our Conservative court to not only reject this ridiculous claim but to admonish EVERY Republican who endorses it.
Why should Republicans be "admonished" for protesting against stolen elections? There is really little point in spending the time or money to run for office if you are going to be swindled.
Further, no one will contribute to an election campaign that has no chance of succeeding because of fraud.
Because it wasn't stolen. For the first time in many election cycles, the Republican tactic of voter suppression was largely removed. Granted, it was because of the pandemic (which I'd like to point out was made worse by the lack of response from the WH and impeded by the Republican party). Individual states made their own election rules. It is up to the state to set those rules. If you truly believe in the Constitution, then you believe in state's rights. If not, it's just bullshit talk. You believe in selective interpretation. For the SC to rule in Texas favor, it would have to throw out and invalidate millions of legally cast votes. Straight up voter disenfranchisement. It's bad enough that the Republican party engages in voter suppression and gerrymandering, but this?...is straight up theft..and sedition.
How is making a person vote in person and prove they are eligible to vote voter surpression?
States made the election rules. There are states that have used mail in voting for years without incident. The military has used it for decades.
Voting in person (especially during a pandemic) may not be possible for everyone. Hence, a way for Republicans to practice voter suppression.
Everyone who cast a vote was eligible. 73 million of the morons voted for Trump.
Your man lost. And you're pissed. I get it. But this behavior is just un-American.
You just like mail in voting because it makes it easier to cheat, and you know your side has no issues with cheating.
Do millions of soldiers and sailors cheat every year when they vote by mail?
harvesting is the biggest one.
Usually mail in ballots are requested, which allows for tracing.
It adds also the chance for stuffing in the counting rooms, by increasing the paper count.
How do you stuff ballots when each ballot has a unique bar code traceable to a registered voter?
If ballots were stuffed, multiple votes would show up for registered voters.......There were no instances of that happening
Each outer envelope is unique, the ballots are not as they have to be anonymous.
Harvesting is going around picking up unused ballots and sending them in.
So how about after the election we do a full count and comparison? I have a feeling many of these have already been destroyed to cover up.
How does one pick up unused ballots?
Do you go door to door?
Why are there no reports of widespread soliciting of unused ballots?
You are just making shit up
Well lets investigate to find out. Start with back-checking samples of mailed ballot envelopes and ask the people if they did mail the ballots in or not.
Match exactly the envelope counts to the ballot counts. full review.
Derp...Well lets investigate to find out. Start with back-checking samples of mailed ballot envelopes and ask the people if they did mail the ballots in or not.
Match exactly the envelope counts to the ballot counts. full review.
Anyone who "get's over" a swindled election is a scumbag.The Hillary supporters got the fuck over it, like adultsI bet they would care if the tables were turned.Uh...excuse me. I never said that. States get to make their own laws. Always. Governors and judges do not have the right to change those laws according to the constitution. Only LAW MAKERS do.Oh. I see. A state voted legally, and their electoral college votes are offset by a state that votes against the constitution. Got it.I laugh at those that attempt to debate and say things that are not factually correct. Its like "Rachel Maddow said this so I can regirgitate itSo you have no idea about how multiple state issues are resolved. It goes directly to the supreme court. Always. Always. Always.I'm not going to bothering reading the thread ... looks like the same vomit from yesterday ...
Anyone dared comment on the merits of the case yet? ... the OP is crazy wrong ... if we let Texas dictate how Michigan interprets their own laws ... pfffft ... worst, allow Texas to go straight to SCOTUS ... well ... then ... er ...
What's to stop California from telling Mississippi how to run their education system? ... and going straight to SCOTUS with the complaint ...
No ... I didn';t think anyone wanted to discuss this matter honestly ... sorry for interrupting ...
This is what annoys me the worst. I know this is a Hail Mary and it has no chance of overturning the election, but the fact that Texas even had a path to take this directly to the SC with 1) no successful lower court rulings, and 2) Able to file a lawsuit that essentially is looking to interfere in another states' affairs....is a complete travesty.
You are not worthy of adding to this conversation as you are naive as to how a republic works.
FYI....we are a republic.
There IS no issue, snowflake. That's the point. This is frivolous. Texas has NO standing to question another state's process. They suffered no harm.
So do me a favor and stow your upturned nose. I don't give a shit.
Good for you.
So what you're really trying to say here is that state's DON'T have the right to make their own laws. Again, selective interpretation. So much for that yellowed scrap of paper.
Texas wasn't harmed therefore has no standing to bring the suit...unless you are postulating that because Texas voted for Trump, these other states have to as well.
Know your stuff before you debate.
No chanceYes. All states certified the results. I expected that. The question is, should states have their electoral college numbers offset by states that had non law makers change their election laws? And 18 governors and AG's are protecting their state citizens from having their vote offset.This really isn't going to happen.
You guys really need to calm down. Go out and get some air. Spend the day in a forest with no cell phone.
Yep, just let the cheating happen, after all Progs know what's best for us because we don't.Cheating?Yep, just let the cheating happen, after all Progs know what's best for us because we don't.
All 50 governors have certified their election results.
Analogy.....
During a football game, there were 3 calls turned over by instant replay review. The last play of the game, where a player scored the winning touchdown, there was question whether or not his foot stepped on the sideline. It was an SEC team vs. an ACC game. You are an ACC fan. It was an SEC player that scored the apparent touchdown. The head ref decides to amend the rules and claims "we will not review the last play of a game"......would you not question what the hell and be upset about the mid game change of rules??
Now...that is a lousy football game. What about the election of a President of the United States?
They literally do not care
They are psychopaths -