The three main goals of libertarianism

The three main goals of libertarianism


1) Decrease wages salaries and benefits for the poor and middle class as much as possible. Lower wages salaries and benefits for those who labor means those who own can profit more.

2) Decrease taxes on the wealthy as much as possible. No explanation needed.

3) Remove all regulations that make it harder for the wealthy to herd the poor like cattle - and remove all regulations that make it possible for a healthy middle class to exist. Regulation is the enemy of profit and profit is the only thing that matters.


That about sums it up!

I think one of the main galas is to slap the shit out of idiots like you.


  1. Can you show me, specifically, what concept libertarians have that will decrease wages?
  2. This is true, in part. Libertarians generally want to decrease taxes across the board. This will result in less taxes on the wealthy, the middle class, and the poor.
  3. Again, I need specific examples.
 
The three main goals of libertarianism


1) Decrease wages salaries and benefits for the poor and middle class as much as possible. Lower wages salaries and benefits for those who labor means those who own can profit more.

2) Decrease taxes on the wealthy as much as possible. No explanation needed.

3) Remove all regulations that make it harder for the wealthy to herd the poor like cattle - and remove all regulations that make it possible for a healthy middle class to exist. Regulation is the enemy of profit and profit is the only thing that matters.


That about sums it up!

Actually, you may wish to look up the meaning of that word.

What you've described in your post is pretty much what the GOP wants, and it's not liberty, its more of a description of slavery.

Sorry.......................but I spent 20 years of my life defending this country, and I don't want to see some idiot corporation (that will never serve in a war zone) deciding what is good for my country or not.

Damn, another idiot.

Why don't you point out which Republican policies line up with your delusions.
 
If liberty is the ultimate form of political expression, then tell me this....................

Why is it easier for a rich man to influence the politicians than it is for the people who actually elected them?

I hope Boehener, McConnell and Cantor all lose their next elections............................

The simplest answer to that, and the one that you would reject out of hand, would be that we don't have liberty.
 
The ONE main goal of libertarianism: Sell out all of America to a small group of oligarchs.

Too bad you folks did a good job of selling us out to china and outsourcing tons of jobs overseas. Yes, Granny, our corporate taxes are the highest in the world. Who in their right minds would want to set up shop here, and employ people when they would never be able to survive the pressure of our business environment?

The main goal of liberalism is to tax the rich out of existence, make everyone prosper the same, equality in everyone and everything. Forgive me, but you people sound more like a bunch of utiopianists. You have more to do with communism and socialism than you do with capitalism. It's written all over your party's platform.

Yanno.................in the 1950's and 1960's, there was enough money for everyone. One of the main perks of serving a company for 20 or 30 years was you got a gold watch and a pension when you hit those marks.

The military still gives a person a pension at 20 years. I know, because I'm living on one right now.

And......................I don't have to work for some corporation now, because I'm able to make it on my pension (and still have enough for a dinner out every now and again, as well as a vacation once a year).


BTW...................you want to know what is killing capitalism? It's not the communists or the socialists....................

It's the greed at the top in the form of CEO's and "corporate managers".

There is never enough money, which is why people keep making more.
 
Oh man, not one of you got it right. We believe that liberty is the ultimate form of political expression. We believe in individual liberty, voluntary association and political freedom. We do not espouse the ideals of hating the rich or promoting them. We just want them to be allowed to be rich. See we believe it is the right of any person to to own their own property and make their own money, without the thing of government rigging the entire process. We want to limit government to the point where it is no longer coercive but cooperative with it's people. We would much rather have it work for us than us for it. We don't want to sell it out to anyone, we want it to do what it was originally designed to do, protect us from coercion and violent threats.


That's what the power elite who run the libertarian wing of the GOP tell you, indeed. They don't give a shit about any of it. Their only goal is to advance the agenda as outlined in the OP, and "individual liberty, voluntary association and political freedom" is whatever the fuck the Koch Bros. and their think tanks tell you it is. If they tell you "individual liberty" means not paying taxes - that's what it means. If they tell you "voluntary association" means prohibiting union shop agreements and allowing people to freeload off the backs of the unions - that's what it means. If they tell you "political freedom" means elections should go to the highest bidder - that's what it means.

OohPah is just launching a smear campaign on me and members of my party, with piddly liberal class warfare rhetoric. How lame. I cannot believe it, you guys are more scared of us than you are the Republicans. Go on, we won't be going anywhere. Our movement is growing, now more than ever since this government has gone completely out of control.


Your movement is a bunch of fucking whiny babies. You live in the freest nation there ever was yet all you do is constantly whine and moan that your freedoms are being impinged on. Its getting old.

Scared? I know you are. You can't stand it. It's driving you insane. You have not in the entirety of this thread tried to debunk the tenets of libertarianism, all you have done is launch a puerile smear campaign. You are intellectually bankrupt.
 
The three main goals of libertarianism


1) Decrease wages salaries and benefits for the poor and middle class as much as possible. Lower wages salaries and benefits for those who labor means those who own can profit more.

2) Decrease taxes on the wealthy as much as possible. No explanation needed.

3) Remove all regulations that make it harder for the wealthy to herd the poor like cattle - and remove all regulations that make it possible for a healthy middle class to exist. Regulation is the enemy of profit and profit is the only thing that matters.


That about sums it up!

I think one of the main galas is to slap the shit out of idiots like you.


  1. Can you show me, specifically, what concept libertarians have that will decrease wages?
  2. This is true, in part. Libertarians generally want to decrease taxes across the board. This will result in less taxes on the wealthy, the middle class, and the poor.
  3. Again, I need specific examples.

It's a pure romper room thread, isn't it?
 
"Definitions vary, but broadly speaking, libertarianism is the idea that people should be as free as possible from state coercion so long as they don’t harm anyone. The job of the state is limited to fighting crime, providing for the common defense, and protecting the rights and contracts of citizens. The individual is sovereign; he is the captain of himself."

Watch how they all ignore this.

I don't see anyone ignoring it - but people who know a lot more about Rand than you do will also tell you that the reason no country has ever attempted to implement her ideas is because so much coercion would be required to remove all of the legislation currently preventing the plutocracy from doing whatever the hell they want.

As I mentioned earlier, a Randian society would like place no environmental controls on companies.

Do you not think coercion would be required to repress the opposition to that move?

Of course it would!

The new boss would be very, very much like the old boss - only the new boss would be a wealthy elite of company owners and bosses.
 
The three main goals of libertarianism


1) Decrease wages salaries and benefits for the poor and middle class as much as possible. Lower wages salaries and benefits for those who labor means those who own can profit more.

2) Decrease taxes on the wealthy as much as possible. No explanation needed.

3) Remove all regulations that make it harder for the wealthy to herd the poor like cattle - and remove all regulations that make it possible for a healthy middle class to exist. Regulation is the enemy of profit and profit is the only thing that matters.


That about sums it up!


You are way off, 0 for 3.


It is not the government responsibility to intervene in employment contracts. How much you earn depends on you and the putative employer.

Taxation is a bad word for Libertarians. You pay for what you use or consume.

We believe in businesses being regulated by the marketplace.

.

He is right in all three - and you seem to largely prove that here yourself.

1. With no labour laws or unions to protect employees, wages WILL go down. It's obvious.

2. Here you agree. Taxation is a bad word, hence taxes for the wealthy WILL go down.

3. Here you both agree - there would be no regulation of the market beyond what the market chooses. What the OP rightly adds is that when producers control the market, there will be no regulation at all. Monopolies - fine. Cartels - fine. That is the point here.
 
First off...................it's SAILOR, not "soldier". Never been a ground pounder or a bullet sponge (Army and Marines) nor do I ever wish to become one. When I first joined in 1982, I thought camping as a hobby was fine, but as a lifestyle left much to be desired (which is why I didn't join the Army).

I also thought that being on the front lines and getting fired at was not exactly what I wanted as well, which is why I joined the Navy.

Being on the front lines (like Beruit, Desert Storm for both Pt. 1 and 2, as well as Kosovo) was exciting enough, but in addition to going to battle stations, I could get a decent hot meal later.

Want to know what's killing capitalism? It's idiots like Mittens RobMe and his ilk. They don't care about the workers or what they produce or how well it's done, they just want to fortify their bottom line and make more cash.

And yeah..................Mittens RobMe isn't a slash about his failed campaign, it's about the people who think like him.

Odd that your love for workers doesn't extend to soldiers. Now everyone know why navy pukes are pretty much considered light in the loafers.

You're really quite the little idiot, ain't ya? Seems that you took the reasons why I personally chose not to enlist in the Army as a slam on all soldiers.

Got news for you...................doesn't matter what branch they served in, all of them are my fellow brothers and sisters in arms and I'm happy to defend any of them.

But..................like I said.....................camping is a great hobby, but as a lifestyle, it leaves something to be desired in my book.

Being able to get autodog every night for dessert was a definite plus, and it's one of the reasons I'm glad I joined the Navy. And yeah..............even though the only personal space I had was my bunk and coffin locker, at least I never had to pack it up and carry it with me (however...................if the ship sank, I'd end up losing all my stuff).

Main reason I responded as I did? Because I'm not a fucking ground pounder, I'm a water walker and Sailors are magical creatures. We travel more than the average military person.

Quick question sportcheck..................what service did YOU serve in?
 
Last edited:
If liberty is the ultimate form of political expression, then tell me this....................

Why is it easier for a rich man to influence the politicians than it is for the people who actually elected them?

Cause and effect. It takes money to get people to actually elect the politician. The problem is not, and has never been, rich people buying politicians, it is, and always will be, the ability of politicians to have something to sell to rich men.

Politicians continually work to increase the amount of product they can sell by increasing their reach into our lives. The more control they have over our ability to prosper, the more need there is for their favors, and consequently an increased ability to sell those favors.

The problem hasn't been rich people buying politicians?

Really?

Ever hear of the Koch brothers? How about Sheldon Addelson? What about that idiot in SC named Pope?

All of them have tried to buy politicians. Only problem is, it seems that the Koch brothers and Addelson weren't as smart as Pope. Pope has managed to buy elections for the GOP.

Oh................Wanna talk about "Americans for Prosperity"?
 
Too bad you folks did a good job of selling us out to china and outsourcing tons of jobs overseas. Yes, Granny, our corporate taxes are the highest in the world. Who in their right minds would want to set up shop here, and employ people when they would never be able to survive the pressure of our business environment?

The main goal of liberalism is to tax the rich out of existence, make everyone prosper the same, equality in everyone and everything. Forgive me, but you people sound more like a bunch of utiopianists. You have more to do with communism and socialism than you do with capitalism. It's written all over your party's platform.

Yanno.................in the 1950's and 1960's, there was enough money for everyone. One of the main perks of serving a company for 20 or 30 years was you got a gold watch and a pension when you hit those marks.

The military still gives a person a pension at 20 years. I know, because I'm living on one right now.

And......................I don't have to work for some corporation now, because I'm able to make it on my pension (and still have enough for a dinner out every now and again, as well as a vacation once a year).


BTW...................you want to know what is killing capitalism? It's not the communists or the socialists....................

It's the greed at the top in the form of CEO's and "corporate managers".

If there was "enough money for everyone" why was there a need for the Great Society and the War on Poverty?

Dunno....................however, I do know that the poverty rates today are much larger than what they were in 1964.

I also understand that up until the 70's, companies used to give out pretty decent retirements at the 25 and 30 year mark.

Sadly..................that was gone by the 80's, which is why I joined the military and retired at 38.
 
Actually, you may wish to look up the meaning of that word.

What you've described in your post is pretty much what the GOP wants, and it's not liberty, its more of a description of slavery.

Sorry.......................but I spent 20 years of my life defending this country, and I don't want to see some idiot corporation (that will never serve in a war zone) deciding what is good for my country or not.


The libertarians have co-opted the GOP. Did you know David Koch was the Libertarian Party's Vice Presidential candidate in 1980? Guess who was the Presidential candidate for the Libertarian Party in 1988? Ron Paul. They are Republicans now - and they are doing everything to advance the three goals outlined in the OP.

That's right. We've taken over the Republican Party. That's how Mitt Romney got nominated. All part of the vast libertarian conspiracy.


Mitt Romney's policies are 100% in line with the three main goals of the libertarian party mentioned in the OP.
 
Oopie, the root of libertarianism is you leave me to do what I want and I'll leave you to do what you want. I won't harm you and you won't harm me.

That may be the the word means - but libertarianism in America has become something else. Its main purpose is to protect and enrich the wealthy at the expense of the poor and middle class.
Can't they unionize and negotiate?
No, not anymore, not really. In about half the states in the union, the "libertarians" have stripped the unions of the ability to freely negotiate a union shop agreement with business .This renders them more or less moot.
Haven't you been paying attention?
 
The libertarians have co-opted the GOP. Did you know David Koch was the Libertarian Party's Vice Presidential candidate in 1980? Guess who was the Presidential candidate for the Libertarian Party in 1988? Ron Paul. They are Republicans now - and they are doing everything to advance the three goals outlined in the OP.

That's right. We've taken over the Republican Party. That's how Mitt Romney got nominated. All part of the vast libertarian conspiracy.


Mitt Romney's policies are 100% in line with the three main goals of the libertarian party mentioned in the OP.

That's what I'm saying. We nominated Mitt "Mr. Libertarian" Romney for a reason.
 
Oopie, the root of libertarianism is you leave me to do what I want and I'll leave you to do what you want. I won't harm you and you won't harm me.

That may be the the word means - but libertarianism in America has become something else. Its main purpose is to protect and enrich the wealthy at the expense of the poor and middle class.
Can't they unionize and negotiate?
No, not anymore, not really. In about half the states in the union, the "libertarians" have stripped the unions of the ability to freely negotiate a union shop agreement with business .This renders them more or less moot.
Haven't you been paying attention?

Right. Libertarians also control the governments in half of the states in the country.
 
The three main goals of libertarianism


1) Decrease wages salaries and benefits for the poor and middle class as much as possible. Lower wages salaries and benefits for those who labor means those who own can profit more.

2) Decrease taxes on the wealthy as much as possible. No explanation needed.

3) Remove all regulations that make it harder for the wealthy to herd the poor like cattle - and remove all regulations that make it possible for a healthy middle class to exist. Regulation is the enemy of profit and profit is the only thing that matters.


That about sums it up!


You are way off, 0 for 3.


It is not the government responsibility to intervene in employment contracts. How much you earn depends on you and the putative employer.

Taxation is a bad word for Libertarians. You pay for what you use or consume.

We believe in businesses being regulated by the marketplace.

.

He is right in all three - and you seem to largely prove that here yourself.

1. With no labour laws or unions to protect employees, wages WILL go down. It's obvious.

2. Here you agree. Taxation is a bad word, hence taxes for the wealthy WILL go down.

3. Here you both agree - there would be no regulation of the market beyond what the market chooses. What the OP rightly adds is that when producers control the market, there will be no regulation at all. Monopolies - fine. Cartels - fine. That is the point here.

Blimey.

Since Britons are enjoying a massive welfare/warfare nowadays, are you and your fellow dishwashers filthy rich now?

.
 
That may be the the word means - but libertarianism in America has become something else. Its main purpose is to protect and enrich the wealthy at the expense of the poor and middle class.

That's approximately as valid as the claim that liberalism has become 'something else', and is now nothing more than cover for authoritarian corporatists. The fact that buzzwords are co-opted by unscrupulous leaders shouldn't be used to bash legitimate movements and political philosophies. Unless, of course, your goal is partisan propaganda.
 
That's right. We've taken over the Republican Party. That's how Mitt Romney got nominated. All part of the vast libertarian conspiracy.


Mitt Romney's policies are 100% in line with the three main goals of the libertarian party mentioned in the OP.

That's what I'm saying. We nominated Mitt "Mr. Libertarian" Romney for a reason.

LOL.. exactly. Libertarians really lined up behind Mitt, didn't they... :cuckoo:
 
Oopie, the root of libertarianism is you leave me to do what I want and I'll leave you to do what you want. I won't harm you and you won't harm me.

That may be the the word means - but libertarianism in America has become something else. Its main purpose is to protect and enrich the wealthy at the expense of the poor and middle class.

No, that's a lie.

Can't they unionize and negotiate?
No, not anymore, not really. In about half the states in the union, the "libertarians" have stripped the unions of the ability to freely negotiate a union shop agreement with business .This renders them more or less moot.
Haven't you been paying attention?[/QUOTE][/quote]

No, that's another lie. You need to stop lying!
 

Forum List

Back
Top