The Trump implosion

[The Derp]

^^^ still trolling

Actually, you'd be the troll since you're replying and not contributing anything to the conversation.

What is it with Conservatives and projecting their insecurities out on others?

 

[BluesLegend]

^^^ still trolling

Actually, you'd be the troll since you're replying and not contributing anything to the conversation.

What is it with Conservatives and projecting their insecurities out on others?

What part of "get lost troll" is beyond your ability to comprehend?

 

[The Derp]

There is no proof. The NSA and FBI already testified there was NEVER any crime proven , never any 'collusion'. Even with Kelly it was declared nothing illegal was done.

The point of an investigation is to find proof. Trump has been under investigation since July of last year. A federal grand jury has already issued subpoenas, which they only do if probable cause exists. From probable cause comes the investigation which reveals proof. This is how investigations work. Maybe not in Russia, where you are from, but here in America.

Democrats are continuing to push these witch hunts.

How? Democrats do not have any power in DC because they don't control the House or Senate. They also don't control the White House, who has control over the DOJ, of which the FBI is a part.

So you're blaming Democrats for doing things they have no ability or power to even do.

Seriously, man...get a grip.

TBetter question is why aren't there any substantive investigations into the crimes that have already been PROVEN to have occurred, such as the Felony Espionage perpetrated by the Obama administration and his loyalists?

Because it's not a crime what Obama did. The only reason Trump associates were "unmasked" is because they were talking with Russian spies in the first place. If they weren't talking to Russian spies, they would not have been unmasked.

Seems to me you're more upset that people found out Trump was talking with Russian spies, than the fact that he was talking to Russian spies in the first place.

Why were they even talking with Russian spies at all?

 

[BlindBoo]

The attackers were the ones Obama and Hillary helped out and called 'allies'.

An obvious and ridiculous lie.

The rescue attempt was conducted by CIA Agents told to 'stand down' and 'wait'.

As the commander of the station gathered his response effort to ensure a successful counter assault without needlessly risking his men who were eager to go.

The Americans saved were actually rescued by Ex-Gaddafi officers who Obama called our 'enemies'.

The Libyan Army secured passage for the team sent from Tripoli, for the trip from the airport to the CIA compound and back. That arrival was when the two other Americans were killed.

 

[The Derp]

Derp - make history: be the 1st to provide any evidence.

The point of an investigation is to uncover evidence. You don't even want an investigation. Why? I think it's pretty obvious.

 

[The Derp]

What part of "get lost troll" is beyond your ability to comprehend?

You know you can just prevent my words from appearing on your screen by clicking "ignore". But just know that doing so opens you up to an hilarious round of mocking for being such a snowflake, you have to hide text on your computer screen because it upsets you so much.

 

[Crixus]

What part of "get lost troll" is beyond your ability to comprehend?

You know you can just prevent my words from appearing on your screen by clicking "ignore". But just know that doing so opens you up to an hilarious round of mocking for being such a snowflake, you have to hide text on your computer screen because it upsets you so much.

And they see it in a quote and continue to respond. You are a troll if you in any challenge them. Gay.

 

[BlindBoo]

She admitted her people targeted Americans but lied about how the act was not 'partisan'. It was determined that those targeted had the terms 'TEA Party', 'TEA', and 'PATRIOT' in their names. Only a snowflake could claim there was no 'partisan bias' in the selection of those targeted

Her explanation was that those names indicated that these groups might be more politically active than the regulations allows for tax exempt status. But regardless of her reasoning behind her decision to base the sample selected for verification on certain names, fact is it was her job and her decision. President Obama had nothing to do with it.

It's just another one of theGoebbel facts continually pushed by the RussianWNJ's

 

[Dschrute3]

Be careful, don't get sucked into the Democrat 'Daily Trump Outrage' Fake News. However, the OP did make some good points. Hillary Clinton could be in there right now. Let's not forget that. If Trump can appoint 2-3 Supreme Court Justices and at least attempt to fix our broken Immigration System, he'll have done all i asked of him. Those are the two issues that will decide our nation's future.

I knew going in what i was getting with him. He's not a Conservative, and he never claimed to be. But what was the alternative? So don't give into the Democrat Fake News hysteria. Stay calm and rational. Trump was the viable alternative to Hillary Clinton. He wasn't the ideal choice, but he was pretty much the only choice. It is what it is.

 

[JoeMoma]

How did tax cuts create the housing bubble?

Bush tied the tax cuts to his housing policy during his 2004 campaign. So why would he do that?

Touting his tax cuts as the economy's savior — and pointing to the strong housing market as proof — Bush said "more people own their own home now than ever." More than 50 percent of minorities owned their own homes in the last three months of 2003 for the first time ever, the president said.​

The housing policy, relaxing loan standards for low income people, allowed people who really could not afford the loans to get the loans anyway. This is one thing that lead to the housing bubble. Tax cuts.....No, they did not. That being said, lower taxes would help a family to afford that house payment.

If you believe that tax cuts created the housing bubble, then you should also believe that higher taxes would have prevented the housing bubble.

 

[jc456]

Yep. Intelligence Lapses and Double Standards

Is an opinion piece considered facts now?

well you're following fake news about russia. how's that going for ya after eleven months? you still lost the election and SCOTUS and maybe more seats in 2018. and yet you follow along blindly to the left fairytale. tsk, tsk.

how have all those pats on the head been for ya? your butt hurt so bad I understand your need for sympathy. have fun for the next eight years bubba. you'll have many days where you need that pat.

 

[jc456]

You hang on to that electoral college map.

That's how the president is elected, chief. If only you hadn't dropped out of high school and missed that class on U.S. government - uh?

Yes, that's how it works....but don't think it was a landslide....more PEOPLE voted for Hillary but LEGALLY trump became president.

sure it was a landslide bubba. how many states did he pick up on the vote that matters? 306 to 232 . slammed.....oops.

 

[OldLady]

No I'm not

Yes you are, stupid. You are saying these investigations are happening absent of proof (even though there is enough probable cause to justify grand jury subpoenas). So then why are they happening if there isn't any proof? Spite.

^^^ Troll clean up isle 4, troll clean up isle 4 the rotted festering stench of libtroll is making people puke.

He's offering you a factual argument. Why are you calling him a "troll?"

 

[jc456]

No I'm not

Yes you are, stupid. You are saying these investigations are happening absent of proof (even though there is enough probable cause to justify grand jury subpoenas). So then why are they happening if there isn't any proof? Spite.

^^^ Troll clean up isle 4, troll clean up isle 4 the rotted festering stench of libtroll is making people puke.

He's offering you a factual argument. Why are you calling him a "troll?"

what exactly is factual? queue jeopardy music.

 

[BluesLegend]

No I'm not

Yes you are, stupid. You are saying these investigations are happening absent of proof (even though there is enough probable cause to justify grand jury subpoenas). So then why are they happening if there isn't any proof? Spite.

^^^ Troll clean up isle 4, troll clean up isle 4 the rotted festering stench of libtroll is making people puke.

He's offering you a factual argument. Why are you calling him a "troll?"

Because he's a troll I would have thought that was obvious.

 

[The Derp]

The housing policy, relaxing loan standards for low income people, allowed people who really could not afford the loans to get the loans anyway. This is one thing that lead to the housing bubble. Tax cuts.....No, they did not. That being said, lower taxes would help a family to afford that house payment.

Interesting you say that because household debt skyrocketed immediately after the Bush Tax Cuts. So, no, tax cuts did not help a family afford a house payment. All the Bush Tax Cuts did was push people into debt.

But why would Bush tie his tax policy to the housing market?

If you believe that tax cuts created the housing bubble, then you should also believe that higher taxes would have prevented the housing bubble.

They probably would have. But that's really beside the point. It's Bush who tied his tax cuts to his housing policy. So if it had nothing to do with the housing bubble, why did Bush tie the two together?

 

[The Derp]

Because he's a troll I would have thought that was obvious.

It's only trolling if it undermines your argument.

 

[The Derp]

what exactly is factual? queue jeopardy music.

That the grand jury has issued subpoenas and only do so if there's probable cause.

 

[jc456]

The housing policy, relaxing loan standards for low income people, allowed people who really could not afford the loans to get the loans anyway. This is one thing that lead to the housing bubble. Tax cuts.....No, they did not. That being said, lower taxes would help a family to afford that house payment.

Interesting you say that because household debt skyrocketed immediately after the Bush Tax Cuts. So, no, tax cuts did not help a family afford a house payment. All the Bush Tax Cuts did was push people into debt.

But why would Bush tie his tax policy to the housing market?

If you believe that tax cuts created the housing bubble, then you should also believe that higher taxes would have prevented the housing bubble.

They probably would have. But that's really beside the point. It's Bush who tied his tax cuts to his housing policy. So if it had nothing to do with the housing bubble, why did Bush tie the two together?

how did that happen? why did households go into debt when they got more money to spend? explain your position.

 

[jc456]

what exactly is factual? queue jeopardy music.

That the grand jury has issued subpoenas and only do so if there's probable cause.

whose grand jury would it be you are referring to?