The Trump shutdown

When this trade shit was first being discussed, I heard multiple reports from local manufacturers that were being contacted multiple times from foreign manufacturers looking to move production to the US to avoid any trade barriers.


how has that worked out? I saw where Apple was thinking of moving to India, but I do not really see how that helps.
 
Did it build a wall?
Honestly don't know BUT Trump agreed to it so how bad could it have been?
Then where is it?
In the trash Hannity didn't like it Coulter either



Why did they not?
House passes spending bill with border wall money — setting up shutdown stalemate with Senate
PUBLISHED THU, DEC 20 2018 • 6:00 PM EST | UPDATED FRI, DEC 21 2018 • 11:02 AM EST

Jacob Pramuk@JACOBPRAMUK





KEY POINTS
  • The House passes a temporary spending bill with more than $5 billion for President Donald Trump’s border wall.
  • The legislation is unlikely to get approval in the Senate, potentially increasing the chances of a partial government shutdown.
  • Funding for nine departmentswill lapse if lawmakers cannot pass funding bills by a midnight Friday deadline.




WATCH NOW
VIDEO01:18
President Trump promises ‘very long’ government shutdown over border wall funding

The House passed a temporary spending bill Thursday with money for President Donald Trump’s proposed border wall, further muddying the scramble to dodge a partial government shutdown by Friday.

The chamber approved the measure to keep the government running into February by a 217-185 vote. But the path forward now is murky. The bill likely will not clear the Senate because it includes more than $5 billion for the border barrier, increasing the chances that funding for nine departments lapses after the midnight Friday deadline.


Senators were told Thursday to prepare for potential votes Friday. The chamber convenes at noon.

The Senate unanimously approved a bill Wednesday night to keep the government running through Feb. 8 — without border wall money. Trump insisted Thursday that he would not sign it. It forced House Republicans to include the wall money in the new bill.
Trump never got a bill to sign, and the senate never voted on that house bill. Still looking for the bill he had that he turned down
 
Did it build a wall?
Honestly don't know BUT Trump agreed to it so how bad could it have been?
Then where is it?
In the trash Hannity didn't like it Coulter either



Why did they not?
House passes spending bill with border wall money — setting up shutdown stalemate with Senate
PUBLISHED THU, DEC 20 2018 • 6:00 PM EST | UPDATED FRI, DEC 21 2018 • 11:02 AM EST

Jacob Pramuk@JACOBPRAMUK





KEY POINTS
  • The House passes a temporary spending bill with more than $5 billion for President Donald Trump’s border wall.
  • The legislation is unlikely to get approval in the Senate, potentially increasing the chances of a partial government shutdown.
  • Funding for nine departmentswill lapse if lawmakers cannot pass funding bills by a midnight Friday deadline.





WATCH NOW
VIDEO01:18
President Trump promises ‘very long’ government shutdown over border wall funding

The House passed a temporary spending bill Thursday with money for President Donald Trump’s proposed border wall, further muddying the scramble to dodge a partial government shutdown by Friday.

The chamber approved the measure to keep the government running into February by a 217-185 vote. But the path forward now is murky. The bill likely will not clear the Senate because it includes more than $5 billion for the border barrier, increasing the chances that funding for nine departments lapses after the midnight Friday deadline.


Senators were told Thursday to prepare for potential votes Friday. The chamber convenes at noon.

The Senate unanimously approved a bill Wednesday night to keep the government running through Feb. 8 — without border wall money. Trump insisted Thursday that he would not sign it. It forced House Republicans to include the wall money in the new bill.

Why did they not?
 
When this trade shit was first being discussed, I heard multiple reports from local manufacturers that were being contacted multiple times from foreign manufacturers looking to move production to the US to avoid any trade barriers.


how has that worked out? I saw where Apple was thinking of moving to India, but I do not really see how that helps.



NOt well, because the policy has not been implemented.


Yet.
 
Honestly don't know BUT Trump agreed to it so how bad could it have been?
Then where is it?
In the trash Hannity didn't like it Coulter either



Why did they not?
House passes spending bill with border wall money — setting up shutdown stalemate with Senate
PUBLISHED THU, DEC 20 2018 • 6:00 PM EST | UPDATED FRI, DEC 21 2018 • 11:02 AM EST

Jacob Pramuk@JACOBPRAMUK





KEY POINTS
  • The House passes a temporary spending bill with more than $5 billion for President Donald Trump’s border wall.
  • The legislation is unlikely to get approval in the Senate, potentially increasing the chances of a partial government shutdown.
  • Funding for nine departmentswill lapse if lawmakers cannot pass funding bills by a midnight Friday deadline.




WATCH NOW
VIDEO01:18
President Trump promises ‘very long’ government shutdown over border wall funding

The House passed a temporary spending bill Thursday with money for President Donald Trump’s proposed border wall, further muddying the scramble to dodge a partial government shutdown by Friday.

The chamber approved the measure to keep the government running into February by a 217-185 vote. But the path forward now is murky. The bill likely will not clear the Senate because it includes more than $5 billion for the border barrier, increasing the chances that funding for nine departments lapses after the midnight Friday deadline.


Senators were told Thursday to prepare for potential votes Friday. The chamber convenes at noon.

The Senate unanimously approved a bill Wednesday night to keep the government running through Feb. 8 — without border wall money. Trump insisted Thursday that he would not sign it. It forced House Republicans to include the wall money in the new bill.
Trump never got a bill to sign, and the senate never voted on that house bill. Still looking for the bill he had that he turned down

So the fault lies not only with Trump but also the GOP Congress.

OK..
 
Then where is it?
In the trash Hannity didn't like it Coulter either



Why did they not?
House passes spending bill with border wall money — setting up shutdown stalemate with Senate
PUBLISHED THU, DEC 20 2018 • 6:00 PM EST | UPDATED FRI, DEC 21 2018 • 11:02 AM EST

Jacob Pramuk@JACOBPRAMUK





KEY POINTS
  • The House passes a temporary spending bill with more than $5 billion for President Donald Trump’s border wall.
  • The legislation is unlikely to get approval in the Senate, potentially increasing the chances of a partial government shutdown.
  • Funding for nine departmentswill lapse if lawmakers cannot pass funding bills by a midnight Friday deadline.




WATCH NOW
VIDEO01:18
President Trump promises ‘very long’ government shutdown over border wall funding

The House passed a temporary spending bill Thursday with money for President Donald Trump’s proposed border wall, further muddying the scramble to dodge a partial government shutdown by Friday.

The chamber approved the measure to keep the government running into February by a 217-185 vote. But the path forward now is murky. The bill likely will not clear the Senate because it includes more than $5 billion for the border barrier, increasing the chances that funding for nine departments lapses after the midnight Friday deadline.


Senators were told Thursday to prepare for potential votes Friday. The chamber convenes at noon.

The Senate unanimously approved a bill Wednesday night to keep the government running through Feb. 8 — without border wall money. Trump insisted Thursday that he would not sign it. It forced House Republicans to include the wall money in the new bill.
Trump never got a bill to sign, and the senate never voted on that house bill. Still looking for the bill he had that he turned down

So the fault lies not only with Trump but also the GOP Congress.

OK..
Did trump get a bill? I asked you and you didn’t answer. Instead you made up a lie. Go ... fking.... figure
 
Trump is delivering on his promises and as long as he does that the people who voted for him will vote for him again.

Some will, but some will not. And chances are this sort of thing will not gain him a single vote.


Libs insisted that Trump would not do this. If he actually does it, anyone who supported border security but believed the libs that Trump would not do this, would have it proven that Trump WOULD DO it, because he HAS.


That should get him quite a few votes.

Assuming border security is a top issue for them. Otherwise this will not help. Shutdowns always hurt the economy as a whole, and if he actually shuts down the border (which I do not think he will) he will cost billions since no goods will be able to flow either way. The economy wins way more votes than a wall with nothing else being done about illegals.


The economy has been good, and it did not translate to more votes in the midterms.


The Left has demonstrated that propaganda is more powerful that good governance.

How long do you think the economy will do good if he closes the border?
 
Trump is delivering on his promises and as long as he does that the people who voted for him will vote for him again.

Some will, but some will not. And chances are this sort of thing will not gain him a single vote.


Libs insisted that Trump would not do this. If he actually does it, anyone who supported border security but believed the libs that Trump would not do this, would have it proven that Trump WOULD DO it, because he HAS.


That should get him quite a few votes.

Assuming border security is a top issue for them. Otherwise this will not help. Shutdowns always hurt the economy as a whole, and if he actually shuts down the border (which I do not think he will) he will cost billions since no goods will be able to flow either way. The economy wins way more votes than a wall with nothing else being done about illegals.


The economy has been good, and it did not translate to more votes in the midterms.


The Left has demonstrated that propaganda is more powerful that good governance.

How long do you think the economy will do good if he closes the border?

The economy is already doing good. The question should be "How long with government workers be out from work"?
 
Some will, but some will not. And chances are this sort of thing will not gain him a single vote.


Libs insisted that Trump would not do this. If he actually does it, anyone who supported border security but believed the libs that Trump would not do this, would have it proven that Trump WOULD DO it, because he HAS.


That should get him quite a few votes.

Assuming border security is a top issue for them. Otherwise this will not help. Shutdowns always hurt the economy as a whole, and if he actually shuts down the border (which I do not think he will) he will cost billions since no goods will be able to flow either way. The economy wins way more votes than a wall with nothing else being done about illegals.


The economy has been good, and it did not translate to more votes in the midterms.


The Left has demonstrated that propaganda is more powerful that good governance.

How long do you think the economy will do good if he closes the border?

The economy is already doing good. The question should be "How long with government workers be out from work"?

AGAIN FOR ONES THAT CANNOT UNDERSTAND. HOW LONG WILL OUR ECONOMY BE DOING GOOD IF THE SOUTHERN BORDER IS SHUT COMPLETELY DOWN?

IF YOU CARED ABOUT THE GOVERNMENT WORKERS YOU WOULD HAVE CHEERED ON THE SHUTDOWN.

Yes, screaming to an empty headed rightie who thinks the stock market and economy will stay as is if the southern border is closed. Google is your best friend if you care to search and find out what happens.
 
In the trash Hannity didn't like it Coulter either



Why did they not?
House passes spending bill with border wall money — setting up shutdown stalemate with Senate
PUBLISHED THU, DEC 20 2018 • 6:00 PM EST | UPDATED FRI, DEC 21 2018 • 11:02 AM EST

Jacob Pramuk@JACOBPRAMUK





KEY POINTS
  • The House passes a temporary spending bill with more than $5 billion for President Donald Trump’s border wall.
  • The legislation is unlikely to get approval in the Senate, potentially increasing the chances of a partial government shutdown.
  • Funding for nine departmentswill lapse if lawmakers cannot pass funding bills by a midnight Friday deadline.




WATCH NOW
VIDEO01:18
President Trump promises ‘very long’ government shutdown over border wall funding

The House passed a temporary spending bill Thursday with money for President Donald Trump’s proposed border wall, further muddying the scramble to dodge a partial government shutdown by Friday.

The chamber approved the measure to keep the government running into February by a 217-185 vote. But the path forward now is murky. The bill likely will not clear the Senate because it includes more than $5 billion for the border barrier, increasing the chances that funding for nine departments lapses after the midnight Friday deadline.


Senators were told Thursday to prepare for potential votes Friday. The chamber convenes at noon.

The Senate unanimously approved a bill Wednesday night to keep the government running through Feb. 8 — without border wall money. Trump insisted Thursday that he would not sign it. It forced House Republicans to include the wall money in the new bill.
Trump never got a bill to sign, and the senate never voted on that house bill. Still looking for the bill he had that he turned down

So the fault lies not only with Trump but also the GOP Congress.

OK..
Did trump get a bill? I asked you and you didn’t answer. Instead you made up a lie. Go ... fking.... figure
Coulter Hanitty and Limbaugh challenged Trumps manhood and trump wilted like he did when he saw stormy nude
 
Trump is delivering on his promises and as long as he does that the people who voted for him will vote for him again.

Some will, but some will not. And chances are this sort of thing will not gain him a single vote.


Libs insisted that Trump would not do this. If he actually does it, anyone who supported border security but believed the libs that Trump would not do this, would have it proven that Trump WOULD DO it, because he HAS.


That should get him quite a few votes.

Assuming border security is a top issue for them. Otherwise this will not help. Shutdowns always hurt the economy as a whole, and if he actually shuts down the border (which I do not think he will) he will cost billions since no goods will be able to flow either way. The economy wins way more votes than a wall with nothing else being done about illegals.


The economy has been good, and it did not translate to more votes in the midterms.


The Left has demonstrated that propaganda is more powerful that good governance.

How long do you think the economy will do good if he closes the border?



Depends on a number of factors. If it is in the context of a strong economy and leads to a decline in the labor supply, i think ti would be very good for the "economy".
 
Libs insisted that Trump would not do this. If he actually does it, anyone who supported border security but believed the libs that Trump would not do this, would have it proven that Trump WOULD DO it, because he HAS.


That should get him quite a few votes.

Assuming border security is a top issue for them. Otherwise this will not help. Shutdowns always hurt the economy as a whole, and if he actually shuts down the border (which I do not think he will) he will cost billions since no goods will be able to flow either way. The economy wins way more votes than a wall with nothing else being done about illegals.


The economy has been good, and it did not translate to more votes in the midterms.


The Left has demonstrated that propaganda is more powerful that good governance.

How long do you think the economy will do good if he closes the border?

The economy is already doing good. The question should be "How long with government workers be out from work"?

AGAIN FOR ONES THAT CANNOT UNDERSTAND. HOW LONG WILL OUR ECONOMY BE DOING GOOD IF THE SOUTHERN BORDER IS SHUT COMPLETELY DOWN?

IF YOU CARED ABOUT THE GOVERNMENT WORKERS YOU WOULD HAVE CHEERED ON THE SHUTDOWN.

Yes, screaming to an empty headed rightie who thinks the stock market and economy will stay as is if the southern border is closed. Google is your best friend if you care to search and find out what happens.


Controlling who and what enters the nation is the most basic function of good governance.


If Trump is tying to do that, he is doing the right thing.
 
Why did they not?
House passes spending bill with border wall money — setting up shutdown stalemate with Senate
PUBLISHED THU, DEC 20 2018 • 6:00 PM EST | UPDATED FRI, DEC 21 2018 • 11:02 AM EST

Jacob Pramuk@JACOBPRAMUK





KEY POINTS
  • The House passes a temporary spending bill with more than $5 billion for President Donald Trump’s border wall.
  • The legislation is unlikely to get approval in the Senate, potentially increasing the chances of a partial government shutdown.
  • Funding for nine departmentswill lapse if lawmakers cannot pass funding bills by a midnight Friday deadline.




WATCH NOW
VIDEO01:18
President Trump promises ‘very long’ government shutdown over border wall funding

The House passed a temporary spending bill Thursday with money for President Donald Trump’s proposed border wall, further muddying the scramble to dodge a partial government shutdown by Friday.

The chamber approved the measure to keep the government running into February by a 217-185 vote. But the path forward now is murky. The bill likely will not clear the Senate because it includes more than $5 billion for the border barrier, increasing the chances that funding for nine departments lapses after the midnight Friday deadline.


Senators were told Thursday to prepare for potential votes Friday. The chamber convenes at noon.

The Senate unanimously approved a bill Wednesday night to keep the government running through Feb. 8 — without border wall money. Trump insisted Thursday that he would not sign it. It forced House Republicans to include the wall money in the new bill.
Trump never got a bill to sign, and the senate never voted on that house bill. Still looking for the bill he had that he turned down

So the fault lies not only with Trump but also the GOP Congress.

OK..
Did trump get a bill? I asked you and you didn’t answer. Instead you made up a lie. Go ... fking.... figure
Coulter Hanitty and Limbaugh challenged Trumps manhood and trump wilted like he did when he saw stormy nude


Link to support your shit, or admit that you are just spewing shit from your face hole.
 
Some will, but some will not. And chances are this sort of thing will not gain him a single vote.


Libs insisted that Trump would not do this. If he actually does it, anyone who supported border security but believed the libs that Trump would not do this, would have it proven that Trump WOULD DO it, because he HAS.


That should get him quite a few votes.

Assuming border security is a top issue for them. Otherwise this will not help. Shutdowns always hurt the economy as a whole, and if he actually shuts down the border (which I do not think he will) he will cost billions since no goods will be able to flow either way. The economy wins way more votes than a wall with nothing else being done about illegals.


The economy has been good, and it did not translate to more votes in the midterms.


The Left has demonstrated that propaganda is more powerful that good governance.

How long do you think the economy will do good if he closes the border?



Depends on a number of factors. If it is in the context of a strong economy and leads to a decline in the labor supply, i think ti would be very good for the "economy".
Our birth rate has been going down our immigration #s are also.... how are less workers good for our economy ? Educate me please
 
Some of you are talking about this little tantrum as if it is a legitimate grievance. Trump has no mandate to pursue this. None at all.
 

Forum List

Back
Top