Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[
Germany tried it and it worked.
France tried it and it worked.
The UK tried it and it worked.
Japan tried it and it worked.
And funny, last time I checked a map, North Korea and Cuba and Vietnam were still there.
As always, you miss the point.
I think it's great that the people who are pretending they care about what some people might have to pay to acquire mandatory health insurance are the same people who want to raise taxes on the poor.
That's because you don't have a point. I've literally humiliated you here. I've exposed your ignorance. You want to punish people for success. It's stupid beyond words. The Soviet Union tried it and collapsed. Vietnam tried it and collapsed. Cuba tried it and collapsed. North Korea tried it and collapsed.
It doesn't work. It has never worked. And you're too fuck'n stupid to learn from history and educate yourself. It's easier for you to sit in your trailer park getting high and complain on the internet about people who do, produce, and succeed.
You stopped defending your own assertions.
You claim that a tax rate can only be fair if it takes the same percentage of everyone's earnings.
Are you aware that the tax rate on a person's first 20,000 is the same for everyone? Whether you make a million dollars a year, or just that 20,000,
the tax rate on that 20,000 is the same.
Why is that unfair?
Is it true or false that you want a system that raises taxes on every person working for low wages,
if they do not currently pay any taxes?
[
Germany tried it and it worked.
France tried it and it worked.
The UK tried it and it worked.
Japan tried it and it worked.
And funny, last time I checked a map, North Korea and Cuba and Vietnam were still there.
The countries you listed all have largely capitalist economies.
No, they have social democracies with strong welfare states, high taxation on the wealthy, universal health care and living wages.
Oh, and the main reason. After WWII, all the new Dealers went over there and formed governments without input from Republican idiots.
She?
Yes...she. When you act like a bitch and you cry like a bitch I will treat you like a bitch. When you grow a pair, grow up, act like a man, and stop blaming successful people for your problems, I'll treat you like a man with respect.
Until then, I'll properly refer to you in response to the way you are acting.
Oh please, one more Internet tough guy (or gal, who can know), thinking they're the only one with something important to say. FO!
“I’m sick of hearing Democrats call today’s tax rates “historically low.” That is another lie. There are many factors that determine your tax bill—including deductions and tax credits. Overall, we are all paying among the highest taxes ever....
[
So why are you so afraid to move to Cuba and experience your "utopia" first hand?
Game. Set. Match.
As always, you miss the point.
I think it's great that the people who are pretending they care about what some people might have to pay to acquire mandatory health insurance are the same people who want to raise taxes on the poor.
That's because you don't have a point. I've literally humiliated you here. I've exposed your ignorance. You want to punish people for success. It's stupid beyond words. The Soviet Union tried it and collapsed. Vietnam tried it and collapsed. Cuba tried it and collapsed. North Korea tried it and collapsed.
It doesn't work. It has never worked. And you're too fuck'n stupid to learn from history and educate yourself. It's easier for you to sit in your trailer park getting high and complain on the internet about people who do, produce, and succeed.
You stopped defending your own assertions.
You claim that a tax rate can only be fair if it takes the same percentage of everyone's earnings.
Are you aware that the tax rate on a person's first 20,000 is the same for everyone? Whether you make a million dollars a year, or just that 20,000,
the tax rate on that 20,000 is the same.
Why is that unfair?
It's the tax rate, dumbass! The top 1% of the wealthy earn 13% of all income but pay 39% of all income taxes (that is 3x's as much taxes as their share of the income: 13x3=39)
The top 5% pay an astounding 64% of all income taxes
The top 20% the richalready pay 94.1% of income taxes
The bottom 60% pay on net less than zero income taxes, once the tax credits the government pays them are taken into account
Top 1% earns 13% of the wealth but pays 39% of the taxes
Top 5% paid 40% of taxes, what is their 'fair' share?
Top 20% Paid 94.1% of Income Taxes in 2009
Excerpt From: Wayne Allyn Root. The Ultimate Obama Survival Guide. Regnery Publishing, 2013-03-26. iBooks.
This material may be protected by copyright.
Check out this book on the iBooks Store: https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/ultimate-obama-survival-guide/id601965000?mt=11
.
If we could be more efficient with a tax dollar, and if our tax dollars were not controlled by narcissistic liars who only care about fundraising and re-election, I wonder if our disagreements over taxes would be less intense.
.
.
If we could be more efficient with a tax dollar, and if our tax dollars were not controlled by narcissistic liars who only care about fundraising and re-election, I wonder if our disagreements over taxes would be less intense.
.
.
If we could be more efficient with a tax dollar, and if our tax dollars were not controlled by narcissistic liars who only care about fundraising and re-election, I wonder if our disagreements over taxes would be less intense.
.
Depends on what you mean by efficient.
I suspect there is just as much inefficiency in the private sector as the public, having worked in both.
the real problem is, of course, is we want government to pay for all these things, and we don't want to pay for it. The politicians figured out the best way to do this was to simply borrow money.
Which ironically has created more demand for government, not less.
If you point this out to people like Poodle, they'll scream Communism all day.
Just the name and the first 30 seconds prove this is a false narrative (and proves how ignorant you are). There is NO "wealth distribution" in America (that's what you want - but we don't have it). Nobody stands in bread lines for miles while some government bureaucrat stands around and "distributes" the nations wealth.
Wealth is EARNED not "distributed". What this nation actually has is an EFFORT Inequality in America. People like myself work hard and achieve success while people like [MENTION=31057]JoeB131[/MENTION] and [MENTION=13671]Vel[/MENTION]vetacheese sit in the trailer parks smoking dope and bitching incessantly about how their life sucks and women reject them.
Joe is too fuck'n lazy to start his own business but wants to make that my problem for some reason...
Guy, nobody earning 8 figures is doing 8 figures of actual work.
Deal with it.
If an enterprise "earns" wealth, and the people who did the actual work aren't getting a fair share of it, then it is not "distributed" properly. If people who did no work but just bought company A instead of company B, but they get the majority of the wealth earned, that's not proper distribution, either.
Now if you accept that there SHOULD be concentrations of wealth to get things done, there's an argument that can be made for that.
But it should be more equitable and working folks should have reasonable protections from abuse.
And i KNOW that there is a big difference between public and private sector. What is that difference? One if a voluntarily conducted human action and the other is forced.
A private business can be as inefficient as its pocket can afford. A public one continues this indefinitely because a public institution has no money of its own.
