The white American conservative

[Votto]

The white American conservative is the new negro.

California Atty. Gen. Eyes Crackdown on Conservatives

If you need any evidence the left thinks it’s going to be in power for a long time to come, you have only to look at how California Attorney General Kamala Harris has turned her office into a government-sponsored effort to crack down on political enemies.

The Washington Free Beacon reports that Harris’ latest gambit has been decisively rejected by Federal District Court Judge Manuel Real.

Harris’ goal was to stifle free speech by demanding the confidential donor list of the conservative Americans for Prosperity Foundation.

Releasing this confidential list, that California state law does not require be released, would subject donors to pressure and potential commercial retaliation and job loss.

Just ask the contributors to Proposition 8 who lost their jobs after those “confidential” names were leaked.

Real ruled AFP “has proven that disclosing its Schedule B to the Attorney General would create a burden on its First Amendment rights.”

Schedule B is a donor list the non–profits must turn over to the IRS, and the IRS is in turn forbidden to disclose the names.

Harris wants the list. AFP has raised money in California since 2001 without any problems. Then in 2013, under the Harris’ regime, turning the list over to the attorney general's office suddenly became mandatory, because Harris said so.

The blatant political nature of the demand becomes obvious when you track Harris’ promises of confidentiality with the reality of her office.

Real found, “All told, AFP identified 1,778 confidential Schedule Bs that the Attorney General had publicly posted on the Registry’s website, including 38 which were discovered the day before this trial.

“The pervasive, recurring pattern of uncontained Schedule B disclosures — a pattern that has persisted even during this trial — is irreconcilable with the Attorney General’s assurances and contentions as to the confidentiality of Schedule Bs collected by the Registry.”

In other words, Harris is lying and the list will be public.

Harris is such a hypocrite. She refuses to extend political protection the left demanded in years past. In a 1958 case the Supreme Court ruled that Alabama’s demand for the names on the NAACP donor list violated the 1st Amendment.

As far as Harris is concerned those protections don’t extend to conservatives.

The actions of Harris and other members of the left who politicize the legal profession and use regulations to punish political opponents are a headlong rush down a dangerous road.

If one looks far enough, just beyond the last bend, a figure with a remarkable resemblance to Vladimir Putin is gazing our way.

 

[Votto]

Conservative states are the poorest.

Poor States Are Conservative; Rich States Are Liberal. Why, and Where?

Why are Progressive Democrats so rich? Moreover, why does their rhetoric seem to attack their wealth?

 

[MarcATL]

Better question is why do these companies/donors need this secrecy while they attempt to tamper with and influence public policy?

Public policy, by nature...is public. Meaning the public should know who is doing what.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[Two Thumbs]

Better question is why do these companies/donors need this secrecy while they attempt to tamper with and influence public policy?

Public policy, by nature...is public. Meaning the public should know who is doing what.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

read the op

people lost their jobs b/c leftist are subhuman and treat people like shit for holding a different view and even fire them from their jobs.

 

[Two Thumbs]

The left wants total, tyrannical control of everything. All aspects of life, from the cradle to the grave.

And the Constitution is nothing to them, nothing at all.

 

[Manchester]

Conservative states are the poorest.

Poor States Are Conservative; Rich States Are Liberal. Why, and Where?

Why are Progressive Democrats so rich? Moreover, why does their rhetoric seem to attack their wealth?

It goes hand in hand with the IQ demographics. On average higher IQ people vote Democrat, they also do better in school and in jobs. When there are more of them in a community then that community on average does better and therefore is wealthier. Meanwhile the poor Republican communities get the rough end of the stick and their media gets them spending their time worrying about god, transsexual toilet habits and gay marriage instead of important things like global trade, the economy and fact that the richest one percent is slowly stealing the entire country from them.

 

[DarkFury]

Better question is why do these companies/donors need this secrecy while they attempt to tamper with and influence public policy?

Public policy, by nature...is public. Meaning the public should know who is doing what.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

read the op

people lost their jobs b/c leftist are subhuman and treat people like shit for holding a different view and even fire them from their jobs.

Oh he read it he just doses not think you deserve the same rights as him.

 

[ptbw forever]

Conservative states are the poorest.

Poor States Are Conservative; Rich States Are Liberal. Why, and Where?

Why are Progressive Democrats so rich? Moreover, why does their rhetoric seem to attack their wealth?

It goes hand in hand with the IQ demographics. On average higher IQ people vote Democrat, they also do better in school and in jobs. When there are more of them in a community then that community on average does better and therefore is wealthier. Meanwhile the poor Republican communities get the rough end of the stick and their media gets them spending their time worrying about god, transsexual toilet habits and gay marriage instead of important things like global trade, the economy and fact that the richest one percent is slowly stealing the entire country from them.

The change in racial demographics is already making that false.

California is among the least educated states in the nation and it is all Democrat.

 

[Votto]

Better question is why do these companies/donors need this secrecy while they attempt to tamper with and influence public policy?

Public policy, by nature...is public. Meaning the public should know who is doing what.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

read the op

people lost their jobs b/c leftist are subhuman and treat people like shit for holding a different view and even fire them from their jobs.

Right on.

People will still have their "rights", they just won't be able to find a job.

 

[Votto]

Conservative states are the poorest.

Poor States Are Conservative; Rich States Are Liberal. Why, and Where?

Why are Progressive Democrats so rich? Moreover, why does their rhetoric seem to attack their wealth?

It goes hand in hand with the IQ demographics. On average higher IQ people vote Democrat, they also do better in school and in jobs. When there are more of them in a community then that community on average does better and therefore is wealthier. Meanwhile the poor Republican communities get the rough end of the stick and their media gets them spending their time worrying about god, transsexual toilet habits and gay marriage instead of important things like global trade, the economy and fact that the richest one percent is slowly stealing the entire country from them.

I don't understand. I thought that all public schools were equal and fair since the state runs them. Are you trying to convince me that parents worrying about transsexuals and evolution are to blame?

 

[g5000]

Better question is why do these companies/donors need this secrecy while they attempt to tamper with and influence public policy?

Public policy, by nature...is public. Meaning the public should know who is doing what.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Yes, the names of people who donated to abolitionist causes should have been publicized so the lynch mob knew where to find them.

 

[westwall]

Conservative states are the poorest.

Poor States Are Conservative; Rich States Are Liberal. Why, and Where?

Why are Progressive Democrats so rich? Moreover, why does their rhetoric seem to attack their wealth?

It goes hand in hand with the IQ demographics. On average higher IQ people vote Democrat, they also do better in school and in jobs. When there are more of them in a community then that community on average does better and therefore is wealthier. Meanwhile the poor Republican communities get the rough end of the stick and their media gets them spending their time worrying about god, transsexual toilet habits and gay marriage instead of important things like global trade, the economy and fact that the richest one percent is slowly stealing the entire country from them.

Sounds like you're trying to follow that discredited "Bell Curve" BS. Unsurprising. You're not smart enough to do more than parrot what your masters tell you to.

 

[Old Rocks]

Just have to love all the people that knock California. Were it an independent nation, it would be between the sixth and eighth largest economy in the world. Eleventh largest average income in the nation. Home of Silicon Valley, and Tesla.

And, meanwhile, what do the Red States have, other than sucking on the tit of the Federal Government, which we blue states provide.

 

[Old Rocks]

Better question is why do these companies/donors need this secrecy while they attempt to tamper with and influence public policy?

Public policy, by nature...is public. Meaning the public should know who is doing what.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Yes, the names of people who donated to abolitionist causes should have been publicized so the lynch mob knew where to find them.

I don't think that the Americans of that day would have even considered lynching Benjamin Franklin.

 

[westwall]

Just have to love all the people that knock California. Were it an independent nation, it would be between the sixth and eighth largest economy in the world. Eleventh largest average income in the nation. Home of Silicon Valley, and Tesla.

And, meanwhile, what do the Red States have, other than sucking on the tit of the Federal Government, which we blue states provide.

And hemorrhaging jobs and industry faster than anywhere else in the USA. It takes a long time to kill the goose that lays the golden egg but progressives are just about there.

 

[Old Rocks]

Just have to love all the people that knock California. Were it an independent nation, it would be between the sixth and eighth largest economy in the world. Eleventh largest average income in the nation. Home of Silicon Valley, and Tesla.

And, meanwhile, what do the Red States have, other than sucking on the tit of the Federal Government, which we blue states provide.

And hemorrhaging jobs and industry faster than anywhere else in the USA. It takes a long time to kill the goose that lays the golden egg but progressives are just about there.

Liar.

California economy is poised to grow in 2016 and 2017, report says

Employers in Los Angeles and the rest of California will keep hiring in the next two years but at a slightly slower pace than in 2015, a new report said.

The state is poised to add more than 650,000 jobs this year and next, pushing down the current 7% unemployment rate to about 5.9% by 2017, according to an annual forecast released Wednesday by the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corp.

After climbing 3% in 2015, nonfarm jobs are expected to rise 2.4% this year and 1.6% in 2017, the report said. The slower pace of growth will also be reflected in the United States overall, and is a natural slowdown more than six years after the Great Recession ended, said Robert Kleinhenz, the group’s chief economist.

 

[Syriusly]

The white American conservative is the new negro.
.

Ah well Conservatives tell us all that there is complete equality now- so you white conservatives should be overjoyed that you are being treated just like 'negroes'

LOL....oh the poor victimhood of my white brethren.

 

[MarcATL]

Better question is why do these companies/donors need this secrecy while they attempt to tamper with and influence public policy?

Public policy, by nature...is public. Meaning the public should know who is doing what.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

read the op

people lost their jobs b/c leftist are subhuman and treat people like shit for holding a different view and even fire them from their jobs.

Then don't go trying to interfere and/or influence in public policy. Leave it to those who will do so out in the open. You're messing w/people's lives here.

They get what they deserve.

 

[boilermaker55]

You are , without a doubt, the true definition of a true, "teabagger"

The white American conservative is the new negro.

California Atty. Gen. Eyes Crackdown on Conservatives

If you need any evidence the left thinks it’s going to be in power for a long time to come, you have only to look at how California Attorney General Kamala Harris has turned her office into a government-sponsored effort to crack down on political enemies.

The Washington Free Beacon reports that Harris’ latest gambit has been decisively rejected by Federal District Court Judge Manuel Real.

Harris’ goal was to stifle free speech by demanding the confidential donor list of the conservative Americans for Prosperity Foundation.

Releasing this confidential list, that California state law does not require be released, would subject donors to pressure and potential commercial retaliation and job loss.

Just ask the contributors to Proposition 8 who lost their jobs after those “confidential” names were leaked.

Real ruled AFP “has proven that disclosing its Schedule B to the Attorney General would create a burden on its First Amendment rights.”

Schedule B is a donor list the non–profits must turn over to the IRS, and the IRS is in turn forbidden to disclose the names.

Harris wants the list. AFP has raised money in California since 2001 without any problems. Then in 2013, under the Harris’ regime, turning the list over to the attorney general's office suddenly became mandatory, because Harris said so.

The blatant political nature of the demand becomes obvious when you track Harris’ promises of confidentiality with the reality of her office.

Real found, “All told, AFP identified 1,778 confidential Schedule Bs that the Attorney General had publicly posted on the Registry’s website, including 38 which were discovered the day before this trial.

“The pervasive, recurring pattern of uncontained Schedule B disclosures — a pattern that has persisted even during this trial — is irreconcilable with the Attorney General’s assurances and contentions as to the confidentiality of Schedule Bs collected by the Registry.”

In other words, Harris is lying and the list will be public.

Harris is such a hypocrite. She refuses to extend political protection the left demanded in years past. In a 1958 case the Supreme Court ruled that Alabama’s demand for the names on the NAACP donor list violated the 1st Amendment.

As far as Harris is concerned those protections don’t extend to conservatives.

The actions of Harris and other members of the left who politicize the legal profession and use regulations to punish political opponents are a headlong rush down a dangerous road.

If one looks far enough, just beyond the last bend, a figure with a remarkable resemblance to Vladimir Putin is gazing our way.

 

[boilermaker55]

The poor fat old white teabaggers are starting to realize, their power is being taken away from them..
It is about time.