james bond
Gold Member
- Oct 17, 2015
- 13,407
- 1,802
What's wrong?
Harvey has liberal Hollywood values.
Harvey has liberal Hollywood values.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought that a serial rapist and adulterer like Trump getting to lecture Value voters on Morals was real goof ... I mean seriously apparently Bill Cosby could not confirm eh`
`
I thought Hillary and Obama feigning shock and surprise at Harvey Weinstein's conduct, to be a major hoot.
There are a lot of predators that are never prosecuted. That isn't hypocrisy. Truth is for years agencies of powers and principalities have covered up crap that men have pulled on women. It is not as bad as it used to be but it is still there. Some even coverup up what women have done but more generally it is males that are the abusers. Are there false accusations for political or other purposes some times? Yes but not generally in cases like this when you have a lot of people coming out of the woodwork to say that they knew it was going on. My question is why didn't any of those people that knew it was going on step forward earlier? It also bothers me to no end that state agencies cover for their nasty ass employees when they know something bad has gone down. Those same nasty perps get taxpayer paychecks and ultimately tax fund retirements. At minimum when those things happen even if it is an isolated instance the perpetrators should be fired or given an option to resign by their superiors. Instead a lot of times they ruthlessly go after the person who lodges the complaint....and somehow we'll think no one will notice the blatant hypocrisy.How we measure guilt in politics.... When it is someone we like... unless convicted, no matter how obvious...nothing happened. Then talk about how guilty someone else is (doing the same thing) When it is someone we don't like.... accusation = guilt. The more the story is repeated, the more it is true.
.
This isn't about taking someone else's word over mine you little minx.
You just said that when people settle they are innocent but when they don't settle they too are innocent. It just depends on which side Trump is on because the rules are different for him. Whatever he does is always good and true.
He didn't admit any such thing, you witless git.Democrats the self appointed champion of women allowed this deviant to prey on women for decades, talk about egg on their faces.
This is a stupid comment. How did Democrats allow this to happen? Did they know it was going on and turn a blind eye? Was this common knowledge? Had it been publicized?
If you're able to show that Democratic Party officials had knowledge of Weinstein's activities and did nothing, you might have a point.
But Republican officials had a videotape of Trump admitting to sexually assaulting women and they did nothing. So what's your point?
Once you scum latch onto a lie, you never let go.Bitch can't even mention DT's long history of assaulting women. Too dishonest.If you want to know what democrats are doing, just look at what they accuse others of. Democrats just took what they were doing to women and accused others of doing it. That's why the complaints are so similar.
Neither, asshole. They simply determine that they aren't going to win the case or that it will cost too much to win.Let's quit the game of footsy. When people settle are they GENERALLY innocent or guilty? When people don't settle are they GENERALLY innocent or guilty?
Let's hear it
Billy Bush's career came to an end just hanging with Donald Trump. The actual perpetrator himself went on to become president of the US despite being a serial sex offender.I wonder how the Right Wingers have managed to forget about all the sexual shenanigans at Fox News under Roger Ayles and Bill O'Reilly.
Grabbing pussy knows no politics. As Billy Bush.
Hilarious you need to run to Bill Clinton because the truth about Comrade Trump is too painful for you to handle.There’s Something Horribly Familiar About The Accusations Against Harvey Weinstein
Yup!
Bill Clinton, to name one of several more Democrat perv's.
It make's one start to wonder "is perversion rampant throughout the Democrat Party".
It was proven they lied, moron.Yeah dozens of Trump's victims are all lying and the biggest pathological liar on the planet is telling the truth.When did Trump settle?
Oh he didn't, because the accusations were completely baseless and fake. A technique the leftists use often.
It takes quite a sheep to believe that.
Name one actual victim.I've been on this site less than 5 minutes in a month so a swing and a miss there.Apparently the opposite is true, since you create a thread, complaining about trump every day.Hilarious you need to run to Bill Clinton because the truth about Comrade Trump is too painful for you to handle.There’s Something Horribly Familiar About The Accusations Against Harvey Weinstein
Yup!
Bill Clinton, to name one of several more Democrat perv's.
It make's one start to wonder "is perversion rampant throughout the Democrat Party".
Now that's hilarious
Plus giving cover to a self admitted serial sex offender who has left a long trail of his victims in the dust and then VOTING for him is one of the most shameful things I've ever heard.
I bet you're a huge Cosby fan too.
That is true. Sometimes it is less to settle a case where someone is lying than it is to take it to court. As much as I hated to I once paid a lying ass former employee a pittance for a settlement verses spending thirty times as much to pay for a trail attorney cost in court.Neither, asshole. They simply determine that they aren't going to win the case or that it will cost too much to win.Let's quit the game of footsy. When people settle are they GENERALLY innocent or guilty? When people don't settle are they GENERALLY innocent or guilty?
Let's hear it
Neither, asshole. They simply determine that they aren't going to win the case or that it will cost too much to win.Let's quit the game of footsy. When people settle are they GENERALLY innocent or guilty? When people don't settle are they GENERALLY innocent or guilty?
Let's hear it
That is true. Sometimes it is less to settle a case where someone is lying than it is to take it to court. As much as I hated to I once paid a lying ass former employee a pittance for a settlement verses spending thirty times as much to pay for a trail attorney cost in court.Neither, asshole. They simply determine that they aren't going to win the case or that it will cost too much to win.Let's quit the game of footsy. When people settle are they GENERALLY innocent or guilty? When people don't settle are they GENERALLY innocent or guilty?
Let's hear it
If he is the slime you claim by all means get some real proof. Surely you know some good looking babes somewhere to get those unwanted advance on video (truly I doubt all that but hey you never know)That is true. Sometimes it is less to settle a case where someone is lying than it is to take it to court. As much as I hated to I once paid a lying ass former employee a pittance for a settlement verses spending thirty times as much to pay for a trail attorney cost in court.Neither, asshole. They simply determine that they aren't going to win the case or that it will cost too much to win.Let's quit the game of footsy. When people settle are they GENERALLY innocent or guilty? When people don't settle are they GENERALLY innocent or guilty?
Let's hear it
Yeah, where would Trump find the funds to be able to handle the financial onslought that would be brought forth from...whoever those women were.
Good point! They could've bankrupted the poor guy.
There is no "guilt" or "innocence" in the legal sense in a law suit, dumbass.Neither, asshole. They simply determine that they aren't going to win the case or that it will cost too much to win.Let's quit the game of footsy. When people settle are they GENERALLY innocent or guilty? When people don't settle are they GENERALLY innocent or guilty?
Let's hear it
Lmao the very definition of duplicitous. So settling a case to this guy means the person is in most cases guilty and not guilty. Way to go!
If he is the slime you claim by all means get some real proof. Surely you know some good looking babes somewhere to get those unwanted advance on video (truly I doubt all that but hey you never know)That is true. Sometimes it is less to settle a case where someone is lying than it is to take it to court. As much as I hated to I once paid a lying ass former employee a pittance for a settlement verses spending thirty times as much to pay for a trail attorney cost in court.Neither, asshole. They simply determine that they aren't going to win the case or that it will cost too much to win.Let's quit the game of footsy. When people settle are they GENERALLY innocent or guilty? When people don't settle are they GENERALLY innocent or guilty?
Let's hear it
Yeah, where would Trump find the funds to be able to handle the financial onslought that would be brought forth from...whoever those women were.
Good point! They could've bankrupted the poor guy.
There is no "guilt" or "innocence" in the legal sense in a law suit, dumbass.Neither, asshole. They simply determine that they aren't going to win the case or that it will cost too much to win.Let's quit the game of footsy. When people settle are they GENERALLY innocent or guilty? When people don't settle are they GENERALLY innocent or guilty?
Let's hear it
Lmao the very definition of duplicitous. So settling a case to this guy means the person is in most cases guilty and not guilty. Way to go!