Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bullshit. Many people were there because they opposed the Democrats trying to cover up the history of their disgusting racist party.He shouldn't have called ANYONE at that Rally a "fine person". None of them were.
He shouldn't have called ANYONE at that Rally a "fine person". None of them were. And, yes, if you are out there fighting for a statue of an old dead racist, it's because you are a racist yourself.
Hey, funny thing. You go to Germany, you won't find ONE Statue of Hitler or any other prominent Nazi. Why? BECAUSE THEY KNOW WHAT THOSE GUYS DID WAS WRONG!
This shouldn't even be an issue at this point. A bunch of people tried to destroy the Union so a few rich white people could keep owning slaves.
Seriously, what are you proud of? That your part of the country systematically kidnapped, tortured, and raped human beings and sold them as property? That you were willing to destroy the Union so that this could continue? That you were willing to throw away THOUSANDS of lives to do it? That even after the war, when you were treated fairly beneficently, you then immediately tried to undo all the gains in rights for ex slaves?
Seriously, what the fuck do you have to be so proud of, Cleetus?
What shit-hole country are you from? We're not talking "cultures" we're talking the US and world powers.Britain was the only other country or government in the world? LOL you need to open a book. Slavery was banned in some cultures THOUSANDS of years before 1776. But you know since everyone else was doing it in America, that makes it ok, because America is exceptional.
Wait now you're saying someone that wont take on a country with a billion people and nuclear weapons by themselves is as bad as someone who has slaves? You're an idiot.What shit-hole country are you from? We're not talking "cultures" we're talking the US and world powers.
Point being that slavery was a generally accepted practice in 1776 until it wasn't.
Will you volunteer or send your kids to fight the Chinese to free the Uighur slaves? Didn't think so.
So pound that self-righteous bullshit up your....
Point being that slavery is accepted today, in China, as well as other places.Wait now you're saying someone that wont take on a country with a billion people and nuclear weapons by themselves is as bad as someone who has slaves? You're an idiot.
Yes it does. It is a fact Jefferson knew slavery was wrong, but did nothing about it. Because he was gutless. Meanwhile several European countries had banned slavery hundreds of years before 1776, and yes, some ancient cultures even before that.Point being that slavery is accepted today, in China, as well as other places.
So your ancient no-slavery "cultures" example doesn't work.
Slavery was acceptable in 1776, period.
The Founding Fathers are American heroes, even if they had slaves.
Maybe they should also teach about all the black people who owned black slaves.
History shows legalized slave owner in U.S. was a black man | Laurinburg Exchange
Some interesting facts that do not fit the Democrat narrative of the evil white man being the only slave owners in America.www.laurinburgexchange.com
And
Dr. Ellison's family secret is free at last
People here know Dr. Henry S. Ellison III as the giving doctor. He has volunteered for so many boards, done so much to help so many people, they sometimes wonder how he found time for doctoring.www.tampabay.com
Those are 2 examples of the many blacks who owned black slaves. So no, it wasn't just whitey.
Mlk saw a rape and encouraged the rapist, he was also a womanizer and abuser.
I’m an MLK scholar – and I’ll never be able to view King in the same light
King was once thought of as a saint beyond reproach. It eventually emerged that he was a womanizer. But we now have to ask the unthinkable: Did King enable abuse?theconversation.com
www.smithsonianmag.com
Slavery is accepted and practiced in Africa TODAY. They attack each other, and then hold the women as slaves and concubines.Point being that slavery is accepted today, in China, as well as other places.
So your ancient no-slavery "cultures" example doesn't work.
Slavery was acceptable in 1776, period.
The Founding Fathers are American heroes, even if they had slaves.
John Ross was half white, dipshit. He got rich off of slavery. I have zero problems with statues of him being removed from public areas.Things to include in CRT teachings number...
6- Native Americans aka "Indians" were also themselves avid slave owners. So what now, wokesters, tear down all statues and symbols of native Americans in public arenas? Do you see where this insanity is going? No of course not.
What you probably don’t picture are Cherokee slaveholders, foremost among them Cherokee chief John Ross. What you probably don’t picture are the numerous African-American slaves, Cherokee-owned, who made the brutal march themselves, or else were shipped en masse to what is now Oklahoma aboard cramped boats by their wealthy Indian masters.How Native American Slaveholders Complicate the Trail of Tears Narrative
The new exhibition 'Americans' at the National Museum of the American Indian prompts a deeper dive for historic truths
Barack Hussein Obama was also half white, dipshit. I guess anybody who's even half white is guilty as charged.John Ross was half white, dipshit. He got rich off of slavery. I have zero problems with statues of him being removed from public areas.
Obama owned slaves?Barack Hussein Obama was also half white, dipshit. I guess anybody who's even half white is guilty as charged.
He was half White, so his ancestors did. He should pitch in from his own entitled pocket because his ancestors may have done something.Obama owned slaves?
nypost.com
Sorry I triggered you. Now you're just going off on totally unrelated tangents. It got me to laugh at you though. So there is that. Bottom line I dont think slave holder statues should be on public property. History will agree with me on that. In fact, they are all coming down as we speak. And there is nothing you can do about it.He was half White, so his ancestors did. He should pitch in from his own entitled pocket because his ancestors may have done something. Oh wait, Obama didn't even lift a finger to help his own poor suffering brother in Kenya. What was that again he used to say "keeper of my brother blah blah blah...". These DemNazis sure do have a way with words, don't they.
Now if this was someone else, the fake news media would be interviewing him 24/7 for four years, but since he's the DemNazi Messiah's brother, faggetaboutit.
Barack Obama’s half-brother rips ‘cold and ruthless’ ex-president
A “cold and ruthless” President Obama abandoned his Kenyan family in their greatest hours of need, according to a new tell-all by estranged half brother Malik Obama.
Hmmmm...maybe that's why Obama threw his mom and grandmother under the bus, the same people who raised him as opposed to his dead beat alcoholic father he dedicated a book to, just because his father had the right skin color. But then again, the piece of Marxist anti American shit didn't even care about his own family in Kenya.Sorry I triggered you. Now you're just going off on totally unrelated tangents. It got me to laugh at you though. So there is that. Bottom line I dont think slave holder statues should be on public property. History will agree with me on that. In fact, they are all coming down as we speak. And there is nothing you can do about it.
Do you always bring up Obama for no reason when you're triggered?Hmmmm...maybe that's why Obama threw his mom and grandmother under the bus, the same people who raised him as opposed to his dead beat alcoholic father he dedicated a book to, just because his father had the right skin color. But then again, the piece of Marxist anti American shit didn't even care about his own family in Kenya.
Of course Jefferson knew slavery was morally wrong, BUT, he also knew that the southern states needed slavery and would never sign the Declaration if it freed the slaves. So he (and several other Founding Fathers) made the strategic decision to not address slavery in 1776. It wasn't "gutless", it was a strategic decision. Britain didn't stop slavery until 1833. Look what happened in 1860, the southern states left the union over slavery.Yes it does. It is a fact Jefferson knew slavery was wrong, but did nothing about it. Because he was gutless. Meanwhile several European countries had banned slavery hundreds of years before 1776, and yes, some ancient cultures even before that. Slavery was not acceptable in 1776. Jefferson knew that.
Yeah, it was pretty much gutless.Of course Jefferson knew slavery was morally wrong, BUT, he also knew that the southern states needed slavery and would never sign the Declaration if it freed the slaves. So he (and several other Founding Fathers) made the strategic decision to not address slavery in 1776. It wasn't "gutless", it was a strategic decision. Britain didn't stop slavery until 1833. Look what happened in 1860, the southern states left the union over slavery.
Was the founding of the US worth a delay in eliminating slavery? Hell yes it was.
1. Jefferson was NOT the only Founding Father, so why do you blame him? He was founding a new country.Yeah, it was pretty much gutless.
You think the founding of the US was worth an almost 100 year delay in getting rid of slavery? LOL that just shows how inhumane you are.
Drive around Rome Italy, France, Spain etc. You will see statues and monuments of rulers, Caesars and kings who conquered, invaded and killed. The Vatican itself has a long history of crusades and Inquisitions, but nobody is calling for it to be torn down and destroyed. It seems this insanity is exclusive to Leftists and their Marxist brethren.1. Jefferson was NOT the only Founding Father, so why do you blame him? He was founding a new country.
It was the original "1776 Committee" from 13 colonies.
View attachment 590679
2. Yes I think the founding of the US was worth a 100 year delay in getting rid of slavery. Slavery was there like it or not. It wasn't going away in 1776 no matter what, so there was no "delay", it was the way the world was. Eliminating slavery in 1776 was what we call a "non-starter".
3. How inhumane I am? I look at history as a realist, not as a whiny idealist. What part of slavery wasn't going away in 1776 no matter what, don't you get?
