Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
recovering costs is price gouging?How big a rube do you have to be to believe the price gouging is to recover R&D expenses?how does that one thing give U.S companies a huge advantage. other than allowing them to try to recover the cost of their research and development.You claimed government regulations hampered US drug companies when in fact they give US companies a huge advantage.In your warped mind, you dont see a problem here?http://www.hazzardandhore.com/docs/papers/p7.pdf
That paper shows that regulations favor the drug companies in the US more than in Canada.
In the US, drug company patents last longer. Not only that, in Canada generic drugs are allowed even a patent is in effect. Not so in the US, which has exclusivity protections for drug companies.
So the claim drug prices are higher in the US because of regulations which hamper the drug companies is as bogus as it gets.
why should some crap company be allowed to reverse engineer a medication the day it comes out and be able to sell it for 1/10th the amount because they did not have to spend on bringing it to market in the first place.
are you honestly that big of an idiot or do you just post stupid shit to get a reaction
I'm sure that is a part of it, but I am not so stupid as to believe that is the whole. It doesn't take 20 years to recoup R&D. Nowhere near that long.
recovering costs is price gouging?How big a rube do you have to be to believe the price gouging is to recover R&D expenses?how does that one thing give U.S companies a huge advantage. other than allowing them to try to recover the cost of their research and development.You claimed government regulations hampered US drug companies when in fact they give US companies a huge advantage.In your warped mind, you dont see a problem here?http://www.hazzardandhore.com/docs/papers/p7.pdf
That paper shows that regulations favor the drug companies in the US more than in Canada.
In the US, drug company patents last longer. Not only that, in Canada generic drugs are allowed even a patent is in effect. Not so in the US, which has exclusivity protections for drug companies.
So the claim drug prices are higher in the US because of regulations which hamper the drug companies is as bogus as it gets.
why should some crap company be allowed to reverse engineer a medication the day it comes out and be able to sell it for 1/10th the amount because they did not have to spend on bringing it to market in the first place.
are you honestly that big of an idiot or do you just post stupid shit to get a reaction
I'm sure that is a part of it, but I am not so stupid as to believe that is the whole. It doesn't take 20 years to recoup R&D. Nowhere near that long.
how much of that 2.3 billion is required for them to continue research and development in the year following?recovering costs is price gouging?How big a rube do you have to be to believe the price gouging is to recover R&D expenses?how does that one thing give U.S companies a huge advantage. other than allowing them to try to recover the cost of their research and development.You claimed government regulations hampered US drug companies when in fact they give US companies a huge advantage.In your warped mind, you dont see a problem here?
why should some crap company be allowed to reverse engineer a medication the day it comes out and be able to sell it for 1/10th the amount because they did not have to spend on bringing it to market in the first place.
are you honestly that big of an idiot or do you just post stupid shit to get a reaction
I'm sure that is a part of it, but I am not so stupid as to believe that is the whole. It doesn't take 20 years to recoup R&D. Nowhere near that long.
I say again, how big a rube do you have to be to believe it is all about recovering R&D?
See post 81.
$2.3 billion in profits for one year for a company claiming among the largest R&D expenses in the industry.
Oh my god, you are funny!how much of that 2.3 billion is required for them to continue research and development in the year following?recovering costs is price gouging?How big a rube do you have to be to believe the price gouging is to recover R&D expenses?how does that one thing give U.S companies a huge advantage. other than allowing them to try to recover the cost of their research and development.You claimed government regulations hampered US drug companies when in fact they give US companies a huge advantage.
why should some crap company be allowed to reverse engineer a medication the day it comes out and be able to sell it for 1/10th the amount because they did not have to spend on bringing it to market in the first place.
are you honestly that big of an idiot or do you just post stupid shit to get a reaction
I'm sure that is a part of it, but I am not so stupid as to believe that is the whole. It doesn't take 20 years to recoup R&D. Nowhere near that long.
I say again, how big a rube do you have to be to believe it is all about recovering R&D?
See post 81.
$2.3 billion in profits for one year for a company claiming among the largest R&D expenses in the industry.
always good to know I can make an idiot laugh. Im sure it brightens their day.Oh my god, you are funny!how much of that 2.3 billion is required for them to continue research and development in the year following?recovering costs is price gouging?How big a rube do you have to be to believe the price gouging is to recover R&D expenses?how does that one thing give U.S companies a huge advantage. other than allowing them to try to recover the cost of their research and development.
why should some crap company be allowed to reverse engineer a medication the day it comes out and be able to sell it for 1/10th the amount because they did not have to spend on bringing it to market in the first place.
are you honestly that big of an idiot or do you just post stupid shit to get a reaction
I'm sure that is a part of it, but I am not so stupid as to believe that is the whole. It doesn't take 20 years to recoup R&D. Nowhere near that long.
I say again, how big a rube do you have to be to believe it is all about recovering R&D?
See post 81.
$2.3 billion in profits for one year for a company claiming among the largest R&D expenses in the industry.
How big a rube do you have to be to believe the price gouging is to recover R&D expenses?how does that one thing give U.S companies a huge advantage. other than allowing them to try to recover the cost of their research and development.You claimed government regulations hampered US drug companies when in fact they give US companies a huge advantage.In your warped mind, you dont see a problem here?http://www.hazzardandhore.com/docs/papers/p7.pdf
That paper shows that regulations favor the drug companies in the US more than in Canada.
In the US, drug company patents last longer. Not only that, in Canada generic drugs are allowed even a patent is in effect. Not so in the US, which has exclusivity protections for drug companies.
So the claim drug prices are higher in the US because of regulations which hamper the drug companies is as bogus as it gets.
why should some crap company be allowed to reverse engineer a medication the day it comes out and be able to sell it for 1/10th the amount because they did not have to spend on bringing it to market in the first place.
are you honestly that big of an idiot or do you just post stupid shit to get a reaction
I'm sure that is a part of it, but I am not so stupid as to believe that is the whole. It doesn't take 20 years to recoup R&D. Nowhere near that long.
More socialist nonsense. Why do you leftist believe you are entitled to have everything given to you?
You do make a valid point. Too many truly believe they deserve or are entitled to everything. It's a huge problem these days.
So the topic is about higher drug prices and to you two fools that means that someone wants something for free?
Every topic is "The left believes..." with some crazy made up shit.
Do that Stephanie
How are you not wanting something for free?
Simple! Because I didnt mention getting anything for any particular price dumb fucker
How big a rube do you have to be to believe the price gouging is to recover R&D expenses?how does that one thing give U.S companies a huge advantage. other than allowing them to try to recover the cost of their research and development.You claimed government regulations hampered US drug companies when in fact they give US companies a huge advantage.In your warped mind, you dont see a problem here?http://www.hazzardandhore.com/docs/papers/p7.pdf
That paper shows that regulations favor the drug companies in the US more than in Canada.
In the US, drug company patents last longer. Not only that, in Canada generic drugs are allowed even a patent is in effect. Not so in the US, which has exclusivity protections for drug companies.
So the claim drug prices are higher in the US because of regulations which hamper the drug companies is as bogus as it gets.
why should some crap company be allowed to reverse engineer a medication the day it comes out and be able to sell it for 1/10th the amount because they did not have to spend on bringing it to market in the first place.
are you honestly that big of an idiot or do you just post stupid shit to get a reaction
I'm sure that is a part of it, but I am not so stupid as to believe that is the whole. It doesn't take 20 years to recoup R&D. Nowhere near that long.
This is how its been the whole thread. They say that the prices are high because it costs a lot of money to develop it. I've asked them time after time what that has to do with the difference in pricing and that leads them to call names to cover the fact that they dont know shit
More socialist nonsense. Why do you leftist believe you are entitled to have everything given to you?
You do make a valid point. Too many truly believe they deserve or are entitled to everything. It's a huge problem these days.
So the topic is about higher drug prices and to you two fools that means that someone wants something for free?
Every topic is "The left believes..." with some crazy made up shit.
Do that Stephanie
How are you not wanting something for free?
Simple! Because I didnt mention getting anything for any particular price dumb fucker
You want people to be able to get drugs at lower prices. You want the product discounted. The margin between the current price and the discounted price is what you are asking for as a handout, or a "freebie".
By the way, your command of the English language sucks.
How big a rube do you have to be to believe the price gouging is to recover R&D expenses?how does that one thing give U.S companies a huge advantage. other than allowing them to try to recover the cost of their research and development.You claimed government regulations hampered US drug companies when in fact they give US companies a huge advantage.In your warped mind, you dont see a problem here?
why should some crap company be allowed to reverse engineer a medication the day it comes out and be able to sell it for 1/10th the amount because they did not have to spend on bringing it to market in the first place.
are you honestly that big of an idiot or do you just post stupid shit to get a reaction
I'm sure that is a part of it, but I am not so stupid as to believe that is the whole. It doesn't take 20 years to recoup R&D. Nowhere near that long.
This is how its been the whole thread. They say that the prices are high because it costs a lot of money to develop it. I've asked them time after time what that has to do with the difference in pricing and that leads them to call names to cover the fact that they dont know shit
Who gives a fuck what their profits margins are? It really is none of your business, is it?
Oh my god, you are funny!how much of that 2.3 billion is required for them to continue research and development in the year following?recovering costs is price gouging?How big a rube do you have to be to believe the price gouging is to recover R&D expenses?how does that one thing give U.S companies a huge advantage. other than allowing them to try to recover the cost of their research and development.
why should some crap company be allowed to reverse engineer a medication the day it comes out and be able to sell it for 1/10th the amount because they did not have to spend on bringing it to market in the first place.
are you honestly that big of an idiot or do you just post stupid shit to get a reaction
I'm sure that is a part of it, but I am not so stupid as to believe that is the whole. It doesn't take 20 years to recoup R&D. Nowhere near that long.
I say again, how big a rube do you have to be to believe it is all about recovering R&D?
See post 81.
$2.3 billion in profits for one year for a company claiming among the largest R&D expenses in the industry.
Novartis Third-Quarter Profit Climbs on New Products
Already making profits off new products. Like I said, it doesn't take 20 years to recoup R&D.
$3.35 billion profit for one quarter. Donald Trump is a rank amateur next to these guys. He couldn't even pay their lunch tab.
As in investor, I love profits. But let's not kid ourselves that Big Pharma is struggling to keep its head above water over R&D expenses, mm-kay?
They use the legislative protections they bought from the American Politboro to their fullest advantage.
You do make a valid point. Too many truly believe they deserve or are entitled to everything. It's a huge problem these days.
So the topic is about higher drug prices and to you two fools that means that someone wants something for free?
Every topic is "The left believes..." with some crazy made up shit.
Do that Stephanie
How are you not wanting something for free?
Simple! Because I didnt mention getting anything for any particular price dumb fucker
You want people to be able to get drugs at lower prices. You want the product discounted. The margin between the current price and the discounted price is what you are asking for as a handout, or a "freebie".
By the way, your command of the English language sucks.
Lower prices? What do you mean? You said I wanted shit for free now you're going to go against yourself like that?
Apologize to yourself!
I simply asked why is it discounted other places. You, not being able to provide an answer, started talking about what I want instead of the story itself. No better way to troll I guess.
So apologize to yourself for being a dumbass and tell yourself that free doesnt mean discounted.
How big a rube do you have to be to believe the price gouging is to recover R&D expenses?how does that one thing give U.S companies a huge advantage. other than allowing them to try to recover the cost of their research and development.You claimed government regulations hampered US drug companies when in fact they give US companies a huge advantage.
why should some crap company be allowed to reverse engineer a medication the day it comes out and be able to sell it for 1/10th the amount because they did not have to spend on bringing it to market in the first place.
are you honestly that big of an idiot or do you just post stupid shit to get a reaction
I'm sure that is a part of it, but I am not so stupid as to believe that is the whole. It doesn't take 20 years to recoup R&D. Nowhere near that long.
This is how its been the whole thread. They say that the prices are high because it costs a lot of money to develop it. I've asked them time after time what that has to do with the difference in pricing and that leads them to call names to cover the fact that they dont know shit
Who gives a fuck what their profits margins are? It really is none of your business, is it?
If you dont care the door is that way <------------
Or you want to stick around and stroke my dick sommore?
What did I lie about dumbass. I pointed out that pill cost different prices and all you dummies are talking about R&D. Ok, a drug costs a lot to develop what does that have to do with the price difference?
Or the price of tea in china?
