This Is So Moving: Elite School Tells Sixth Graders The Swastika Is A Symbol Of Peace

[PaintMyHouse]

I know you're all down on Christianity, but Jesus is comin' back and he's going to fix all this.

He's roughly 2,000 years overdue BTW.

“For the Son of Man is going to come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and will then repay every man according to his deeds. Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.“ (Matthew 16: 27, 28)

The last book of the Bible is fuck-all nuts BTW. It should, like the Gospel named for John, never have been included.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

Madame Blavatsky (a Russian Luciferian) was the person who brought the Swastika back from Tibet. She was the first to introduce it to Europe. Hitler adopted it later on. It's an ancient occult symbol. The parents ought to pull their children out of that school.

You're a nut, truly.

History of the Swastika

"The swastika has an extensive history. It was used at least 5,000 years before Adolf Hitler designed the Nazi flag. The word swastika comes from the Sanskrit svastika, which means “good fortune” or “well-being." The motif (a hooked cross) appears to have first been used in Neolithic Eurasia, perhaps representing the movement of the sun through the sky. To this day it is a sacred symbol in Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Odinism. It is a common sight on temples or houses in India or Indonesia. Swastikas also have an ancient history in Europe, appearing on artifacts from pre-Christian European cultures"
History of the Swastika

Madame Blavasky went to Tibet and while there was shown the symbol of the swatstika - she introduced the symbol to Europe and it was used prior to Hitler adopting it for the Nazi's.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

I know you're all down on Christianity, but Jesus is comin' back and he's going to fix all this.

He's roughly 2,000 years overdue BTW.

“For the Son of Man is going to come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and will then repay every man according to his deeds. Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.“ (Matthew 16: 27, 28)

The last book of the Bible is fuck-all nuts BTW. It should, like the Gospel named for John, never have been included.

And those standing there did indeed watch him ascend into heaven after he arose from the grave on the 3rd day he appeared to hundreds of people, PMH. Nothing unusual about that as he was crucified and rose from the grave shortly after telling them this. Why would that be so difficult to believe? The people who were present didn't die until after Jesus ascended to heaven.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I know you're all down on Christianity, but Jesus is comin' back and he's going to fix all this.

He's roughly 2,000 years overdue BTW.

“For the Son of Man is going to come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and will then repay every man according to his deeds. Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.“ (Matthew 16: 27, 28)

The last book of the Bible is fuck-all nuts BTW. It should, like the Gospel named for John, never have been included.

And those standing there did indeed watch him ascend into heaven after he arose from the grave on the 3rd day he appeared to hundreds of people, PMH. Nothing unusual about that as he was crucified and rose from the grave shortly after telling them this. Why would that be so difficult to believe? The people who were present didn't die until after Jesus ascended to heaven.

That speaks of his return, not his leaving. And no one in the Gospels saw him ascend, and no one goes to Heaven until he returns BTW, and he's very, very late.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Madame Blavatsky (a Russian Luciferian) was the person who brought the Swastika back from Tibet. She was the first to introduce it to Europe. Hitler adopted it later on. It's an ancient occult symbol. The parents ought to pull their children out of that school.

You're a nut, truly.

History of the Swastika

"The swastika has an extensive history. It was used at least 5,000 years before Adolf Hitler designed the Nazi flag. The word swastika comes from the Sanskrit svastika, which means “good fortune” or “well-being." The motif (a hooked cross) appears to have first been used in Neolithic Eurasia, perhaps representing the movement of the sun through the sky. To this day it is a sacred symbol in Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Odinism. It is a common sight on temples or houses in India or Indonesia. Swastikas also have an ancient history in Europe, appearing on artifacts from pre-Christian European cultures"
History of the Swastika

Madame Blavasky went to Tibet and while there was shown the symbol of the swatstika - she introduced the symbol to Europe and it was used prior to Hitler adopting it for the Nazi's.

It's 5,000 years old...

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

I know you're all down on Christianity, but Jesus is comin' back and he's going to fix all this.

He's roughly 2,000 years overdue BTW.

Based upon what, specifically?

“For the Son of Man is going to come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and will then repay every man according to his deeds. Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.“

(Matthew 16: 27, 28)

The last book of the Bible is fuck-all nuts BTW. It should, like the Gospel named for John, never have been included.

LOL! Well I usually take advice on the scriptures out of hand from inveterate anti-theists, but I guess I'm just feeling a tad askew today, so I'll have to ask you what evidence a have that some of those standing there did not taste death until they saw the Son of Man going into his Kingdom?

I mean... if ya don't have any evidence, then given your assertion, that would mean that you're fuck-all nuts... and since your record here demonstrates that you're bat-shit crazy, that would be a real tragedy for you.

So... what evidence would you present in defense of your soon to be self-refuted assertion?

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

"Even when there were a lot of happy Germans there were hundreds of thousands who were being killed because they were deformed."

And this, also never happened. Nowhere near that number.

Of course it did, it happened in the USA too!

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

Madame Blavatsky (a Russian Luciferian) was the person who brought the Swastika back from Tibet. She was the first to introduce it to Europe. Hitler adopted it later on. It's an ancient occult symbol. The parents ought to pull their children out of that school.

You're a nut, truly.

History of the Swastika

"The swastika has an extensive history. It was used at least 5,000 years before Adolf Hitler designed the Nazi flag. The word swastika comes from the Sanskrit svastika, which means “good fortune” or “well-being." The motif (a hooked cross) appears to have first been used in Neolithic Eurasia, perhaps representing the movement of the sun through the sky. To this day it is a sacred symbol in Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Odinism. It is a common sight on temples or houses in India or Indonesia. Swastikas also have an ancient history in Europe, appearing on artifacts from pre-Christian European cultures"
History of the Swastika

Madame Blavasky went to Tibet and while there was shown the symbol of the swatstika - she introduced the symbol to Europe and it was used prior to Hitler adopting it for the Nazi's.

It's 5,000 years old...

What is your point? I didn't say she created it - I said that she discovered it while on her travels in Tibet.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Based upon what, specifically?

“For the Son of Man is going to come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and will then repay every man according to his deeds. Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.“

Just as wrong then as he was when dying on the cross, and realizing that he fucked up and God wasn't going to save him.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

"Even when there were a lot of happy Germans there were hundreds of thousands who were being killed because they were deformed."

And this, also never happened. Nowhere near that number.

Of course it did, it happened in the USA too!

Nope. And his number is the problem.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

You

Madame Blavatsky (a Russian Luciferian) was the person who brought the Swastika back from Tibet. She was the first to introduce it to Europe. Hitler adopted it later on. It's an ancient occult symbol. The parents ought to pull their children out of that school.

You're a nut, truly.

History of the Swastika

"The swastika has an extensive history. It was used at least 5,000 years before Adolf Hitler designed the Nazi flag. The word swastika comes from the Sanskrit svastika, which means “good fortune” or “well-being." The motif (a hooked cross) appears to have first been used in Neolithic Eurasia, perhaps representing the movement of the sun through the sky. To this day it is a sacred symbol in Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Odinism. It is a common sight on temples or houses in India or Indonesia. Swastikas also have an ancient history in Europe, appearing on artifacts from pre-Christian European cultures"
History of the Swastika

Madame Blavasky went to Tibet and while there was shown the symbol of the swatstika - she introduced the symbol to Europe and it was used prior to Hitler adopting it for the Nazi's.

It's 5,000 years old...

What is your point? I didn't say she created it - I said that she discovered it while on her travels in Tibet.

Big fucking deal.

I understand that you do not like losing but to become so emotional about it and resort to cursing?
It isn't healthy. You should really pace yourself.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

"Even when there were a lot of happy Germans there were hundreds of thousands who were being killed because they were deformed."

And this, also never happened. Nowhere near that number.

Of course it did, it happened in the USA too!

Nope. And his number is the problem.

Prove it.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

I know you're all down on Christianity, but Jesus is comin' back and he's going to fix all this.

He's roughly 2,000 years overdue BTW.

“For the Son of Man is going to come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and will then repay every man according to his deeds. Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.“ (Matthew 16: 27, 28)

The last book of the Bible is fuck-all nuts BTW. It should, like the Gospel named for John, never have been included.

And those standing there did indeed watch him ascend into heaven after he arose from the grave on the 3rd day he appeared to hundreds of people, PMH. Nothing unusual about that as he was crucified and rose from the grave shortly after telling them this. Why would that be so difficult to believe? The people who were present didn't die until after Jesus ascended to heaven.

That speaks of his return, not his leaving. And no one in the Gospels saw him ascend, and no one goes to Heaven until he returns BTW, and he's very, very late.

180 degrees wrong.

100% in alignment with Progressivism. You people are incapable of being correct about ANYTHING. It seems that truth evades you.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Based upon what, specifically?

“For the Son of Man is going to come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and will then repay every man according to his deeds. Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.“

Just as wrong then as he was when dying on the cross, and realizing that he fucked up and God wasn't going to save him.

So what you're trying NOT to say, is that you have absolutely NO means to state scripture in context... .

My guess is that to state scripture in context literally burns the demon. Which is why they are never found doing so.

If you come up with some evidence, you be sure to get back to me. Ya poor intellectually crippled fuck.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I know you're all down on Christianity, but Jesus is comin' back and he's going to fix all this.

He's roughly 2,000 years overdue BTW.

“For the Son of Man is going to come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and will then repay every man according to his deeds. Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.“ (Matthew 16: 27, 28)

The last book of the Bible is fuck-all nuts BTW. It should, like the Gospel named for John, never have been included.

And those standing there did indeed watch him ascend into heaven after he arose from the grave on the 3rd day he appeared to hundreds of people, PMH. Nothing unusual about that as he was crucified and rose from the grave shortly after telling them this. Why would that be so difficult to believe? The people who were present didn't die until after Jesus ascended to heaven.

That speaks of his return, not his leaving. And no one in the Gospels saw him ascend, and no one goes to Heaven until he returns BTW, and he's very, very late.

180 degrees wrong.

100% in alignment with Progressivism. You people are incapable of being correct about ANYTHING. It seems that truth evades you.

Jesus died naked on the cross. The Kingdom (meaning Reign) of God is still not here and the disciples have been dead for more than 19 centuries. He was wrong, boys, deal with it.

If you study the Jesus cult at that time you'll discover that when Jesus died so did the cult essentially. There were others claiming to be the messiah around then anyway, some far better known than Jesus was. That's why it took Paul, who never met Jesus, changing the cult into a Gentile movement to bring it back to life when Jesus came only for the Jews, he didn't even bother to preach to the Gentiles. He was there, so he believed, to fulfill the prophesy of the Jews. At no time was he concerned with Gentiles, meaning, you two.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Based upon what, specifically?

“For the Son of Man is going to come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and will then repay every man according to his deeds. Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.“

Just as wrong then as he was when dying on the cross, and realizing that he fucked up and God wasn't going to save him.

So what you're trying NOT to say, is that you have absolutely NO means to state scripture in context... .

My guess is that to state scripture in context literally burns the demon. Which is why they are never found doing so.

If you come up with some evidence, you be sure to get back to me. Ya poor intellectually crippled fuck.

That is in context. Jesus said the Kingdom of God was near, and would be here before all of those with him had died. They are 19 centuries long dead and it still isn't here. He's not the Messiah of the Jews for no reason, boys. He was wrong, a loon, batshit crazy, but interesting.

Why do most Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah?

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Help for you, again:

I can put random dots on a page, too. Hitler was a collectivist. You don't even follow your own sh**.

Those dots aren't random. And he rallied a nation for war and domination, most here approve of that, as long it's them doing so.

Yea, they're not random. They're libtard propaganda. Everything Hitler did is being executed by modern day leftists.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Hitler was a socialist. Liberals decided that was "right"

Hitler was no socialist. He was a Fascist. There are elements of all kinds of things in that but they are primarily right-wing things, nationalism, militarism, expansionism, racism, state-sponsored capitalism, family, competition, indoctrination, etc. Socialism is economics, not politics and governing.

You think that Stalin wasn't into nationalism, militarism, expansionism, racism? Give me a break. The one poster was right; you're just trying to muddy the waters.

Stalin wasn't a fascist, he was a communist. We have nationalism here, and propaganda, in times of war. Does that mean Hitler and FDR were the same? No, but they sure as hell had things in common.

They were both collectivists; and they both trounced upon human rights for the alleged good of their states.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

"Even when there were a lot of happy Germans there were hundreds of thousands who were being killed because they were deformed."

And this, also never happened. Nowhere near that number.

Of course it did, it happened in the USA too!

Nope. And his number is the problem.

Prove it.

He's the one who made the claim, and the best he could do was 130k and change. As for the US, you prove it, it's your claim and it didn't happen. Not like there but you might manage to find a case or two? Here we just sterilized them.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Help for you, again:

I can put random dots on a page, too. Hitler was a collectivist. You don't even follow your own sh**.

Those dots aren't random. And he rallied a nation for war and domination, most here approve of that, as long it's them doing so.

Yea, they're not random. They're libtard propaganda. Everything Hitler did is being executed by modern day leftists.

Nope...