Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NY is not in play. It is in the Dem column.That's true, but he also possibly puts several blue states into play.
Trump doesn't put ANY blue states in play
LOL yeah New York wouldn't be in play at all if it was Donald vs Hillary........
You putz. I'm not taking Hillary's word for it.You are in love with Hillary; therefore, your vision is skewed.
I'll take the word of the brave men who were actually in Benghazi .
I'll bet you believe the attack was the result of a video.
I'm taking the word of seven Republican-led investigations comprised of those who wanted to nail her in a coffin the most -- and even they could find nothing incriminating.
Oftentimes, a code of silence is issued.
BOMBSHELL: New email shows Pentagon tried to send ...
pssssst ... your "new" email is from 2015 ... not so new, and you're not so smart.
Oh, so you were in Benghazi when the attack happened?
nope and neither were you, so STFU.
I read the date on your article ... try it sometime ya big dummy.
You putz. I'm not taking Hillary's word for it.You are in love with Hillary; therefore, your vision is skewed.
I'll take the word of the brave men who were actually in Benghazi .
I'll bet you believe the attack was the result of a video.
I'm taking the word of seven Republican-led investigations comprised of those who wanted to nail her in a coffin the most -- and even they could find nothing incriminating.
Oftentimes, a code of silence is issued.
BOMBSHELL: New email shows Pentagon tried to send ...
pssssst ... your "new" email is from 2015 ... not so new, and you're not so smart.
Oh, so you were in Benghazi when the attack happened?
nope and neither were you, so STFU.
I read the date on your article ... try it sometime ya big dummy.
You putz. I'm not taking Hillary's word for it.You are in love with Hillary; therefore, your vision is skewed.
I'll take the word of the brave men who were actually in Benghazi .
I'll bet you believe the attack was the result of a video.
I'm taking the word of seven Republican-led investigations comprised of those who wanted to nail her in a coffin the most -- and even they could find nothing incriminating.
Oftentimes, a code of silence is issued.
BOMBSHELL: New email shows Pentagon tried to send ...
pssssst ... your "new" email is from 2015 ... not so new, and you're not so smart.
Oh, so you were in Benghazi when the attack happened?
Were you?
Yes, Hillary is a terrible candidate. No one is denying that. Problem is that Trump is a worse candidate. Until a viable third party option shows up (which may still happen), those now appear to be the choices: Trump or Hillary. Of the two, Trump is worse by a long country mile.There are people on here that will actually vote for Hillary. And they admit as much on a public forum! I knew the Dims weren't very bright, but this takes stupid to a whole new level.
Whats wrong with that... Trying to ridicule people who are voting for candidate with the most experience in the White House...
She has been thoroughly vetted.. Actually, probably the most scrutinized presidential candidate in history...
Her policies are vetted and realistic. She will run a tight ship....
The last Clinton presidency was a success so what's your point... Do you want George W back or something...
You see this is the GOP only hope... Keep attacking Clinton rather than promote their own actual idea or policies...
There candidates are quite poor and there policies are unrealistic...
That's HILARIOUS given how many threads there are attacking Trump rather than extolling the virtues of Hillary.
Hillary is a TERRIBLE candidate, and her numbers show that, so pretending that the GOP somehow has a worse candidate is a laugh.
Who knows what you think that has to do with Hillary?You putz. I'm not taking Hillary's word for it.The Republican-led Congress most certainly does and they found nothing incriminating on Hillary.The heroes of Benghazi have no political affiliation.
Because they are so politically biased and because they found nothing incriminating, they opened a second investigation. Still nothing.
For that same reason, they launched a third investigation. Then a fourth and a fifth and a sixth and a seventh and an eighth investigation.
The first seven concluded and found nothing incriminating. Some of them even included testimony from the very heroes of Benghazi of whom you speak.
The eighth investigation is still ongoing and given how the lead Republican in that investigation has already confessed he started it up for political reasons, you can be certain they will release their findings before the election should Hillary be nominated.
You are in love with Hillary; therefore, your vision is skewed.
I'll take the word of the brave men who were actually in Benghazi .
I'll bet you believe the attack was the result of a video.
I'm taking the word of seven Republican-led investigations comprised of those who wanted to nail her in a coffin the most -- and even they could find nothing incriminating.
Oftentimes, a code of silence is issued.
BOMBSHELL: New email shows Pentagon tried to send ...Hillary didn't send that email, she didn't receive that email, she had absolutely nothing to do with it. Even worse for your dementia, even your link reveals that email was sent after Ambassador Stevens and Smith were killed.
Some experts are saying that he could, but it is the same as saying Correll could become a communist. Not likely.NY is not in play. It is in the Dem column.That's true, but he also possibly puts several blue states into play.
LOL yeah New York wouldn't be in play at all if it was Donald vs Hillary........
Okay , all the experts say Trump COULD win NY , but Jake from USMB says otherwise, so he must be right.
Some experts are saying that he could, but it is the same as saying Correll could become a communist. Not likely.NY is not in play. It is in the Dem column.That's true, but he also possibly puts several blue states into play.
LOL yeah New York wouldn't be in play at all if it was Donald vs Hillary........
Okay , all the experts say Trump COULD win NY , but Jake from USMB says otherwise, so he must be right.
The narrative you are reading is simplistic. The facts are that a Democratic administration and a Republican congress could not agree to increase security at Benghazi. The fact is that the four were dead before anyone in DC were aware of the incident. The facts are that four died at embassies in this administration, more than sixty during Bush's time, and several hundred during Clinton's time. These are facts.You're a bully.
I've read the book written by Mitchell Zuckoff and the brave men who fought in Benghazi, and I believe them. They were there; they saw their friends killed because the State Dept. (headed by Clinton) did not heed their calls for help.
Clinton claims Ambassador Stevens was her friend, yet he had not spoken to him in over a year, and he did not have the cell phone number or her infamous e-mail address.
She blamed the attack on a video. Some friend!
It's not in play. In the New York Primary Trump got about 525,000 votes. Even if you add all of the other GOP votes to Trump, the GOP turned out only around 840,000 voters or so. Hillary got 1,054,000 voters on her own. Bernie turned out about 764,000 voters.NY is not in play. It is in the Dem column.That's true, but he also possibly puts several blue states into play.
LOL yeah New York wouldn't be in play at all if it was Donald vs Hillary........
Okay , all the experts say Trump COULD win NY , but Jake from USMB says otherwise, so he must be right.
Who thinks women are just not going to vote. That is pie in the sky dreaming.Some experts are saying that he could, but it is the same as saying Correll could become a communist. Not likely.NY is not in play. It is in the Dem column.
LOL yeah New York wouldn't be in play at all if it was Donald vs Hillary........
Okay , all the experts say Trump COULD win NY , but Jake from USMB says otherwise, so he must be right.
LOL that's what people said about him becoming the nominee to begin with. It all comes down to "can Hillary get women to come out an vote for her?"
If women dislike them both an just don't vote, that's advantage Trump. Hillary on the other hand MUST have them.
That's true, but he also possibly puts several blue states into play.
LOL yeah New York wouldn't be in play at all if it was Donald vs Hillary........
The narrative you are reading is simplistic. The facts are that a Democratic administration and a Republican congress could not agree to increase security at Benghazi. The fact is that the four were dead before anyone in DC were aware of the incident. The facts are that four died at embassies in this administration, more than sixty during Bush's time, and several hundred during Clinton's time. These are facts.You're a bully.
I've read the book written by Mitchell Zuckoff and the brave men who fought in Benghazi, and I believe them. They were there; they saw their friends killed because the State Dept. (headed by Clinton) did not heed their calls for help.
Clinton claims Ambassador Stevens was her friend, yet he had not spoken to him in over a year, and he did not have the cell phone number or her infamous e-mail address.
She blamed the attack on a video. Some friend!
No, it wasn't Bush's doing. That's a left wing smear since it's all they have to offer. What helps a whole bunch is the popular media outlets polishing left wing shit and selling it as candy and blaming literally everything wrong on the right. People are tired of it and that's why Trump is leading.The GOP helped Obama get re-elected twice. Bush screwed things over so much he destroyed the "Permanent Republican Majority" and kneecapped McCain's campaign. Romney was one of the worst nominees from a major party I'd seen prior to Trump.obama's getting elected twice proves how stupid Americans are, we don't need outside opinions. He's weak, ineffective and piss poor for the economy, just the way many nations want.
Who knows what you. think that has to do with Hillary?You putz. I'm not taking Hillary's word for it.The Republican-led Congress most certainly does and they found nothing incriminating on Hillary.
Because they are so politically biased and because they found nothing incriminating, they opened a second investigation. Still nothing.
For that same reason, they launched a third investigation. Then a fourth and a fifth and a sixth and a seventh and an eighth investigation.
The first seven concluded and found nothing incriminating. Some of them even included testimony from the very heroes of Benghazi of whom you speak.
The eighth investigation is still ongoing and given how the lead Republican in that investigation has already confessed he started it up for political reasons, you can be certain they will release their findings before the election should Hillary be nominated.
You are in love with Hillary; therefore, your vision is skewed.
I'll take the word of the brave men who were actually in Benghazi .
I'll bet you believe the attack was the result of a video.
I'm taking the word of seven Republican-led investigations comprised of those who wanted to nail her in a coffin the most -- and even they could find nothing incriminating.
Oftentimes, a code of silence is issued.
BOMBSHELL: New email shows Pentagon tried to send ...
As Secretary of State, what exactly did Hillary do? Nothing!
Bush blew the Republican majority in 2006. He had help doing it, but ultimately he led his party into a defeat, just as Obama did in 2010. That handicapped McCain out of the gate. Bush pretty much finished off McCain when he started negotiations to withdraw from Iraq in the fall. Up to that point McCain had ran on Bush's (winning) 2004 platform of "stay the course." Once it became clear we were leaving Iraq it took away one of the few things that separated McCain and Obama politically. They became almost the same candidate and people voted against the sitting party as they had 2 years earlier.No, it wasn't Bush's doing. That's a left wing smear since it's all they have to offer. What helps a whole bunch is the popular media outlets polishing left wing shit and selling it as candy and blaming literally everything wrong on the right. People are tired of it and that's why Trump is leading.The GOP helped Obama get re-elected twice. Bush screwed things over so much he destroyed the "Permanent Republican Majority" and kneecapped McCain's campaign. Romney was one of the worst nominees from a major party I'd seen prior to Trump.obama's getting elected twice proves how stupid Americans are, we don't need outside opinions. He's weak, ineffective and piss poor for the economy, just the way many nations want.
The narrative you are reading is simplistic. The facts are that a Democratic administration and a Republican congress could not agree to increase security at Benghazi. The fact is that the four were dead before anyone in DC were aware of the incident. The facts are that four died at embassies in this administration, more than sixty during Bush's time, and several hundred during Clinton's time. These are facts.You're a bully.
I've read the book written by Mitchell Zuckoff and the brave men who fought in Benghazi, and I believe them. They were there; they saw their friends killed because the State Dept. (headed by Clinton) did not heed their calls for help.
Clinton claims Ambassador Stevens was her friend, yet he had not spoken to him in over a year, and he did not have the cell phone number or her infamous e-mail address.
She blamed the attack on a video. Some friend!
There are people on here that will actually vote for Hillary. And they admit as much on a public forum! I knew the Dims weren't very bright, but this takes stupid to a whole new level.
Speaking as a citizen of a foreign country, the rest of the world is shocked and appalled that anyone in their right mind might would vote for Drumpf. We consider the fact that he is a "creditable" candidate in this election, proof positive that some Americans need to have their heads examined.
Anyone who would legitimately vote for Donald Trump, has no business suggesting that others are stupid.
Let me reiterate, shut the fuck up, no one cares what a foreigner thinks about American elections.
This is the way to go...
You have no defense just insults... Your behaviour is the reason your kind in America is the laughing stock of the world...
So continue with the insults, you are just making a jackass out of yourself...
Perhaps I wasn't clear, I don't care what a foreigner thinks of me, or my choice of candidate.
LOLWho knows what you think that has to do with Hillary?You putz. I'm not taking Hillary's word for it.The Republican-led Congress most certainly does and they found nothing incriminating on Hillary.
Because they are so politically biased and because they found nothing incriminating, they opened a second investigation. Still nothing.
For that same reason, they launched a third investigation. Then a fourth and a fifth and a sixth and a seventh and an eighth investigation.
The first seven concluded and found nothing incriminating. Some of them even included testimony from the very heroes of Benghazi of whom you speak.
The eighth investigation is still ongoing and given how the lead Republican in that investigation has already confessed he started it up for political reasons, you can be certain they will release their findings before the election should Hillary be nominated.
You are in love with Hillary; therefore, your vision is skewed.
I'll take the word of the brave men who were actually in Benghazi .
I'll bet you believe the attack was the result of a video.
I'm taking the word of seven Republican-led investigations comprised of those who wanted to nail her in a coffin the most -- and even they could find nothing incriminating.
Oftentimes, a code of silence is issued.
BOMBSHELL: New email shows Pentagon tried to send ...
As Secretary of State, what exactly did Hillary do? Nothing!
