This was an actual headline concerning the mueller report release

[caddo kid]

a moderator SHOULD be much more reserved in their bitchfest.

The post you replied to was very simple; very restrained = "And you don’t understand what the report says."

Yet you come in with your primary bitch fest like some wanna B super hero of the TrumpRight.

You may be a poster but you need to remember that some here see your replies as a representation of the administration/mod staff.

When a member of the mod staff comes across so strong, as you have in this instance, you will lose credibility even if you view yourself as just a poster; you are still a member of the 'house' and folks see you as such, if they have a brain.

Sure; maybe the 'house' does win 97% of the time but do you really want to make the house look like a collection of dickheads?

You don't know shit, caddo....let's get that straight right now. I can post however I want without running it
by your sorry ass.
Don't tell me how I can or can't post.....especially a foul mouthed punk such as yourself.
Now, go stick your head up your ass and roll down the sidewalk, son.
I hope that was tame enough for you.
I've seen enough of the report to understand the meat of it, you buffoon. You people are scrambling for damage control.

I am not 'telling' you how to post but any moderator of any forum would WISELY step more sofly when they post, than you did.

Next time try farting, instead of taking a shit, when you post. Just a suggestion, dear.

but any moderator of any forum would WISELY step more sofly when they post, than you did.

why aren't you on one of those more pleasant forums?

banned?

"more pleasant?"

Have you ever noticed the typical Trump supporter here comes out of the gate posting insults, profanities, and other various & sundry bullshit, even before they are 'insulted?'

At least I wait to unload after I get shit on.

Banned? LOFL .........

dude, you've lost. accept it now. it's over. witch hunt is done. you should focus on 2020, or push your traitors to keep up the walk on the gangplank. I'm sure they'll jump.

Lost? I haven't lost a thing.

 

[jc456]

So, YOU blame "they" and you blame "journalism" for putting this out there for public consumption; BIG FUCKING DEAL.

Does that mean it did not happen? NO, it does NOT.

What YOU & your kind need to get over is the FACT that Trump had CRIMINAL INTENT as far as the 'obstruction' issue is concerned BUT Trump subordinates actually saved Trump from an 'obstruction' charge by refusing Trump's numerous requests.

WHY in Hell are YOU & others here too goddamn fucking stupid to grasp that?

Where, post that part of mueller’s Ir nunes reports!

It is in the report. WHY in Hell are you fuck wads too fucking lazy to go & read the goddamn fucking report?

dude it's over. no criminal intent. and again, you can post the line from the report that says there was. I'm offering you the opportunity to prove your claim. I know it's over. Criminally trump and his campaign are cleared, exonerated. anything nadler does is his political suicide. urge him on for me.

caddo just can't come to grips that it's over and he lost. When you lose, it's bad enough.
But, when you have the TDS affliction and lose....it's a guaranteed psychotic episode as you just witnessed.

There is nothing criminal....that is the bottom line.

I haven't lost a thing.

If you're OK with any POTUS making massive amounts of attempts to obstruct DOJ investigations then I am not surprised that you hate the rule of law.

That isn't my problem; that is your lack of morality as far as the rule of law is concerned.

That means you lost something; not me.

you've lost. sorry, there is no further discussion point. all that is left is political suicide over impeachment. that's it. you aren't paying attention. nor do you even know that the DOJ exonerated him over anything criminal. It's over. you can keep screaming all you want. I'm going to post you lost for ever now.

 

[jc456]

So, YOU blame "they" and you blame "journalism" for putting this out there for public consumption; BIG FUCKING DEAL.

Does that mean it did not happen? NO, it does NOT.

What YOU & your kind need to get over is the FACT that Trump had CRIMINAL INTENT as far as the 'obstruction' issue is concerned BUT Trump subordinates actually saved Trump from an 'obstruction' charge by refusing Trump's numerous requests.

WHY in Hell are YOU & others here too goddamn fucking stupid to grasp that?

Where, post that part of mueller’s Ir nunes reports!

It is in the report. WHY in Hell are you fuck wads too fucking lazy to go & read the goddamn fucking report?

dude it's over. no criminal intent. and again, you can post the line from the report that says there was. I'm offering you the opportunity to prove your claim. I know it's over. Criminally trump and his campaign are cleared, exonerated. anything nadler does is his political suicide. urge him on for me.

caddo just can't come to grips that it's over and he lost. When you lose, it's bad enough.
But, when you have the TDS affliction and lose....it's a guaranteed psychotic episode as you just witnessed.

There is nothing criminal....that is the bottom line.

I lost nothing

Trump won. so what did you win?

 

[Edgetho]

There are 10 specific instances laid out in the report in which Mueller demonstrates Trump made attempts to obstruct the investigation.

Go read the report; I am not doing your goddamn reading for you, lazy ass.

YOU are a lying piece of fucking shit.

Give us ONE example where Trump even came close to obstruction and watch as I shove it up your ass.

scumbag liar

 

[caddo kid]

So, YOU blame "they" and you blame "journalism" for putting this out there for public consumption; BIG FUCKING DEAL.

Does that mean it did not happen? NO, it does NOT.

What YOU & your kind need to get over is the FACT that Trump had CRIMINAL INTENT as far as the 'obstruction' issue is concerned BUT Trump subordinates actually saved Trump from an 'obstruction' charge by refusing Trump's numerous requests.

WHY in Hell are YOU & others here too goddamn fucking stupid to grasp that?

What proof do you have of intent? Because it seems wildly more likely he was pissed off about the collusion claims he was clubbed over the head with over 5,000 times (actual number not hyperbole) for 2 full years that was all BS. We already know his MO is to cover up the embarrassing shit he does, and he’s not at all adept at it. Example given: Stormy Fucking Daniels. Not a crime, he just doesn’t want it out there. NO ONE WOULD EVER TAKE AN OBSTRUCTION CASE AGAINST HIM, OR ANYONE ELSE WITH THE SAME FACTS AT HAND. Another big fact to mention...not a very good look to try someone for obstruction of justice, with the claim being they obstructed for crime they never committed. This is that Monty python ATHG black knight shit again. You have no arms or legs, you need to stop trying.

Look shit head; the information is in Mueller's report. There ARE at least TEN instances that Mueller specifically explains DID occur in which Trump attempted to obstruct the justice process.

Are you fucking assholes REALLY this fucking stupid, that you cannot fucking read a goddam fucking report & figure this shit out on your own?

Fuck; why even bother discuss it here if you cannot even get off your fucking lazy fucking ass & read something. Fuck ............

Mueller made a recommendation for charges being drawn up? Nope. Because the case is weak. Question is: “Did any violations occur?” “Attempting” to is a judgement call and an opinion. Holds no legal standing in a court of law.

I made no such claim; maybe you are blind. Try some different Coke bottle bottoms in your glass frames, next time.

sure you did. you should go learn how to read, especially what you wrote.

Again; I made no such claim.

If you insist on being a jack ass then post a quote in which I stated such; otherwise you can go fly a kite.

 

[caddo kid]

So, YOU blame "they" and you blame "journalism" for putting this out there for public consumption; BIG FUCKING DEAL.

Does that mean it did not happen? NO, it does NOT.

What YOU & your kind need to get over is the FACT that Trump had CRIMINAL INTENT as far as the 'obstruction' issue is concerned BUT Trump subordinates actually saved Trump from an 'obstruction' charge by refusing Trump's numerous requests.

WHY in Hell are YOU & others here too goddamn fucking stupid to grasp that?

What proof do you have of intent? Because it seems wildly more likely he was pissed off about the collusion claims he was clubbed over the head with over 5,000 times (actual number not hyperbole) for 2 full years that was all BS. We already know his MO is to cover up the embarrassing shit he does, and he’s not at all adept at it. Example given: Stormy Fucking Daniels. Not a crime, he just doesn’t want it out there. NO ONE WOULD EVER TAKE AN OBSTRUCTION CASE AGAINST HIM, OR ANYONE ELSE WITH THE SAME FACTS AT HAND. Another big fact to mention...not a very good look to try someone for obstruction of justice, with the claim being they obstructed for crime they never committed. This is that Monty python ATHG black knight shit again. You have no arms or legs, you need to stop trying.

Look shit head; the information is in Mueller's report. There ARE at least TEN instances that Mueller specifically explains DID occur in which Trump attempted to obstruct the justice process.

Are you fucking assholes REALLY this fucking stupid, that you cannot fucking read a goddam fucking report & figure this shit out on your own?

Fuck; why even bother discuss it here if you cannot even get off your fucking lazy fucking ass & read something. Fuck ............

Mueller made a recommendation for charges being drawn up? Nope. Because the case is weak. Question is: “Did any violations occur?” “Attempting” to is a judgement call and an opinion. Holds no legal standing in a court of law.

I made no such claim; maybe you are blind. Try some different Coke bottle bottoms in your glass frames, next time.

Your words...”10 Times Trump ATTEMPTED to obstruct the investigation” meaning obstruction of justice. Optimum word here being “attempted.”

Yes; attempted. You finally got it. Those attempts demonstrate clear intent by Trump to obstruct.

 

[Darkwind]

It's become a mania.

My wife thinks even less of Trump than I do, and she thinks the Dems and the media are being ridiculous and desperate.

This is insane.
.

What’s sad is that this actually works on people. There’s hordes out there who still believe that he is guilty of collusion, and that Barr, and I guess the entire mueller team, are gonna cover it up in the redactions. The mueller probe turned trumps “fixer” in Cohen with tax evasion charges, he took a deal, and they didn’t get squat off of his info.

Yeah. It's tough to say. I think it's possible that this whole circus won't change anyone's mind on Trump one way or the other. Even Independents.
.

It's an attention-getter. Even MindWars has started a thread on it, and you know how much she loves Trump.
I agree with you it is misleading, but it's all about drawing in readers. Everyone will be using it to grab customers. Trump said the F word and it sounds a lot worse than it is.

Oh that’s totally what it is. Problem is, it works, people buy into it. They haven’t caught onto the fact that this is basically the new version of Nigerian prince emails, they don’t necessarily steal money...but they keep this stupid media dinosaur alive. Just die already. You’re old, you’re antiquated, and you’re terrible at your job mainstream media. Ugh, I wanna wash the sliminess and antiquatedness off of me now.

Why would people "buy it?" Unless they only read headlines, they are going to know almost immediately when and in what context those remarks were made.
Without the press, our democracy dies. Jefferson said he would rather see press and no government than government and no press.
You cannot take the press away. Sorry. I won't let you.

They need to be held to a minimum of standards, don't you think? They're tearing the nation apart. You can't possibly think otherwise. You lefties are all for controlling what the common man says, thinks and owns. What makes the "press" exempt from your rules?

As I've said many times, the party has completely lost its shit. And that includes the media.
.

It makes me so angry. They can't see how close we are to forging a new path. Trump voters are by and large coming around to a more "left" leaning economic and foreign policies but they won't stop hammering us with their identity and gender hysteria which is the main point of contention between the two camps. No self respecting white male will ever, ever, ever sign on to that stuff.

And they know it. That's why they want to destroy us. Then they call us racist for getting defensive.

Okay, this is just a strange thing to say.

I am no Trump supporter, but no sane person moves leftward.

 

[jc456]

What proof do you have of intent? Because it seems wildly more likely he was pissed off about the collusion claims he was clubbed over the head with over 5,000 times (actual number not hyperbole) for 2 full years that was all BS. We already know his MO is to cover up the embarrassing shit he does, and he’s not at all adept at it. Example given: Stormy Fucking Daniels. Not a crime, he just doesn’t want it out there. NO ONE WOULD EVER TAKE AN OBSTRUCTION CASE AGAINST HIM, OR ANYONE ELSE WITH THE SAME FACTS AT HAND. Another big fact to mention...not a very good look to try someone for obstruction of justice, with the claim being they obstructed for crime they never committed. This is that Monty python ATHG black knight shit again. You have no arms or legs, you need to stop trying.

Look shit head; the information is in Mueller's report. There ARE at least TEN instances that Mueller specifically explains DID occur in which Trump attempted to obstruct the justice process.

Are you fucking assholes REALLY this fucking stupid, that you cannot fucking read a goddam fucking report & figure this shit out on your own?

Fuck; why even bother discuss it here if you cannot even get off your fucking lazy fucking ass & read something. Fuck ............

Mueller made a recommendation for charges being drawn up? Nope. Because the case is weak. Question is: “Did any violations occur?” “Attempting” to is a judgement call and an opinion. Holds no legal standing in a court of law.

I made no such claim; maybe you are blind. Try some different Coke bottle bottoms in your glass frames, next time.

sure you did. you should go learn how to read, especially what you wrote.

Again; I made no such claim.

If you insist on being a jack ass then post a quote in which I stated such; otherwise you can go fly a kite.

Post#137...
"Look shit head; the information is in Mueller's report. There ARE at least TEN instances that Mueller specifically explains DID occur in which Trump attempted to obstruct the justice process."

What did you mean by this? you think trump can be arrested. dude, the house can't arrest anyone. you've been played like a fiddle cause you believe nadler can arrest Trump. too funny.

All of those demoloser reps screaming over and over, just wait, we're gonna subpoena, go for it, they can't do jack shit but kill their party. I say go for it.

 

[caddo kid]

Where, post that part of mueller’s Ir nunes reports!

It is in the report. WHY in Hell are you fuck wads too fucking lazy to go & read the goddamn fucking report?

dude it's over. no criminal intent. and again, you can post the line from the report that says there was. I'm offering you the opportunity to prove your claim. I know it's over. Criminally trump and his campaign are cleared, exonerated. anything nadler does is his political suicide. urge him on for me.

caddo just can't come to grips that it's over and he lost. When you lose, it's bad enough.
But, when you have the TDS affliction and lose....it's a guaranteed psychotic episode as you just witnessed.

There is nothing criminal....that is the bottom line.

I lost nothing

Trump won. so what did you win?

I did not win, nor lose; I have no skin in the game.

Why are you so fucking stupid?

 

[Edgetho]

Yes; attempted. You finally got it. Those attempts demonstrate clear intent by Trump to obstruct.

There is no law against 'attempted' obstruction, scumbag. Give us all the Code, shithead.

You either obstruct (coercion, actually) or you don't. Fucking moron

Got anything else from your fucking CNN education?

idiot

 

[jc456]

It is in the report. WHY in Hell are you fuck wads too fucking lazy to go & read the goddamn fucking report?

dude it's over. no criminal intent. and again, you can post the line from the report that says there was. I'm offering you the opportunity to prove your claim. I know it's over. Criminally trump and his campaign are cleared, exonerated. anything nadler does is his political suicide. urge him on for me.

caddo just can't come to grips that it's over and he lost. When you lose, it's bad enough.
But, when you have the TDS affliction and lose....it's a guaranteed psychotic episode as you just witnessed.

There is nothing criminal....that is the bottom line.

I lost nothing

Trump won. so what did you win?

I did not win, nor lose; I have no skin in the game.

Why are you so fucking stupid?

then why are you here arguing for the demolosers so fervently?

 

[caddo kid]

There are 10 specific instances laid out in the report in which Mueller demonstrates Trump made attempts to obstruct the investigation.

Go read the report; I am not doing your goddamn reading for you, lazy ass.

YOU are a lying piece of fucking shit.

Give us ONE example where Trump even came close to obstruction and watch as I shove it up your ass.

scumbag liar

here is a clue, jackass: Don McGahn. He may have saved Trump's presidency by refusing to do as Trump ordered him to do.
McGahn twice refused Trump's orders to obstruct the investigation.

Now, get off your lazy ass & go read the report if you want to understand.

 

[dannyboys]

It’s honestly bewildering.

It's become a mania.

My wife thinks even less of Trump than I do, and she thinks the Dems and the media are being ridiculous and desperate.

This is insane.
.

Same with my wife.

 

[caddo kid]

Look shit head; the information is in Mueller's report. There ARE at least TEN instances that Mueller specifically explains DID occur in which Trump attempted to obstruct the justice process.

Are you fucking assholes REALLY this fucking stupid, that you cannot fucking read a goddam fucking report & figure this shit out on your own?

Fuck; why even bother discuss it here if you cannot even get off your fucking lazy fucking ass & read something. Fuck ............

Mueller made a recommendation for charges being drawn up? Nope. Because the case is weak. Question is: “Did any violations occur?” “Attempting” to is a judgement call and an opinion. Holds no legal standing in a court of law.

I made no such claim; maybe you are blind. Try some different Coke bottle bottoms in your glass frames, next time.

sure you did. you should go learn how to read, especially what you wrote.

Again; I made no such claim.

If you insist on being a jack ass then post a quote in which I stated such; otherwise you can go fly a kite.

Post#137...
"Look shit head; the information is in Mueller's report. There ARE at least TEN instances that Mueller specifically explains DID occur in which Trump attempted to obstruct the justice process."

What did you mean by this? you think trump can be arrested. dude, the house can't arrest anyone. you've been played like a fiddle cause you believe nadler can arrest Trump. too funny.

All of those demoloser reps screaming over and over, just wait, we're gonna subpoena, go for it, they can't do jack shit but kill their party. I say go for it.

As I have stated: I made NO CLAIM concerning Mueller recommending charges against Trump.

AGAIN: If you can quote where I did that, then post it.

Otherwise go fuck off.

 

[jc456]

There are 10 specific instances laid out in the report in which Mueller demonstrates Trump made attempts to obstruct the investigation.

Go read the report; I am not doing your goddamn reading for you, lazy ass.

YOU are a lying piece of fucking shit.

Give us ONE example where Trump even came close to obstruction and watch as I shove it up your ass.

scumbag liar

here is a clue, jackass: Don McGahn. He may have saved Trump's presidency by refusing to do as Trump ordered him to do.
McGahn twice refused Trump's orders to obstruct the investigation.

Now, get off your lazy ass & go read the report if you want to understand.

here you are again arguing against trump. he won, it's over, why are you still going on about McGahn? so what. what is it you think can happen? I told you the only option. you don't believe me? LOL.

 

[Bush92]

So, YOU blame "they" and you blame "journalism" for putting this out there for public consumption; BIG FUCKING DEAL.

Does that mean it did not happen? NO, it does NOT.

What YOU & your kind need to get over is the FACT that Trump had CRIMINAL INTENT as far as the 'obstruction' issue is concerned BUT Trump subordinates actually saved Trump from an 'obstruction' charge by refusing Trump's numerous requests.

WHY in Hell are YOU & others here too goddamn fucking stupid to grasp that?

Where, post that part of mueller’s Ir nunes reports!

It is in the report. WHY in Hell are you fuck wads too fucking lazy to go & read the goddamn fucking report?

dude it's over. no criminal intent. and again, you can post the line from the report that says there was. I'm offering you the opportunity to prove your claim. I know it's over. Criminally trump and his campaign are cleared, exonerated. anything nadler does is his political suicide. urge him on for me.

caddo just can't come to grips that it's over and he lost. When you lose, it's bad enough.
But, when you have the TDS affliction and lose....it's a guaranteed psychotic episode as you just witnessed.

There is nothing criminal....that is the bottom line.

I haven't lost a thing.

If you're OK with any POTUS making massive amounts of attempts to obstruct DOJ investigations then I am not surprised that you hate the rule of law.

That isn't my problem; that is your lack of morality as far as the rule of law is concerned.

That means you lost something; not me.

“Attempt’s” to is an opinion. I saw none.

 

[caddo kid]

dude it's over. no criminal intent. and again, you can post the line from the report that says there was. I'm offering you the opportunity to prove your claim. I know it's over. Criminally trump and his campaign are cleared, exonerated. anything nadler does is his political suicide. urge him on for me.

caddo just can't come to grips that it's over and he lost. When you lose, it's bad enough.
But, when you have the TDS affliction and lose....it's a guaranteed psychotic episode as you just witnessed.

There is nothing criminal....that is the bottom line.

I lost nothing

Trump won. so what did you win?

I did not win, nor lose; I have no skin in the game.

Why are you so fucking stupid?

then why are you here arguing for the demolosers so fervently?

not your concern; is it?

 

[jc456]

Mueller made a recommendation for charges being drawn up? Nope. Because the case is weak. Question is: “Did any violations occur?” “Attempting” to is a judgement call and an opinion. Holds no legal standing in a court of law.

I made no such claim; maybe you are blind. Try some different Coke bottle bottoms in your glass frames, next time.

sure you did. you should go learn how to read, especially what you wrote.

Again; I made no such claim.

If you insist on being a jack ass then post a quote in which I stated such; otherwise you can go fly a kite.

Post#137...
"Look shit head; the information is in Mueller's report. There ARE at least TEN instances that Mueller specifically explains DID occur in which Trump attempted to obstruct the justice process."

What did you mean by this? you think trump can be arrested. dude, the house can't arrest anyone. you've been played like a fiddle cause you believe nadler can arrest Trump. too funny.

All of those demoloser reps screaming over and over, just wait, we're gonna subpoena, go for it, they can't do jack shit but kill their party. I say go for it.

As I have stated: I made NO CLAIM concerning Mueller recommending charges against Trump.

AGAIN: If you can quote where I did that, then post it.

Otherwise go fuck off.

again, I asked what you meant by the statement if not that he should be charged for it? explain?

 

[jc456]

caddo just can't come to grips that it's over and he lost. When you lose, it's bad enough.
But, when you have the TDS affliction and lose....it's a guaranteed psychotic episode as you just witnessed.

There is nothing criminal....that is the bottom line.

I lost nothing

Trump won. so what did you win?

I did not win, nor lose; I have no skin in the game.

Why are you so fucking stupid?

then why are you here arguing for the demolosers so fervently?

not your concern; is it?

well I'm here and so are you. what is your purpose if not to push and agenda at Trump? I'll defend him all the way buck.

 

[Edgetho]

here is a clue, jackass: Don McGahn. He may have saved Trump's presidency by refusing to do as Trump ordered him to do.
McGahn twice refused Trump's orders to obstruct the investigation.

Now, get off your lazy ass & go read the report if you want to understand.

NOTHING HAPPENED fuckface.

For one thing, POTUS has the power to fire ANY Executive Branch Employee at any FUCKING time without cause and without recourse. It's in Article II of the US Constitution, you fucking imbecile.

But he didn't. It would have caused a shitstorm, so he didn't do it. It would NOT have been illegal, but it would have been politically insensitive and unwise. But NOT illegal.

Besides, I thought this Country was set so that ELECTED Officials ran it and not so that BUREAUCRATS run it. But, being a good commie apparatchik, I'm sure you believe in letting bureaucrats run everything, right comrade?

End of that bullshit.

Next.

fucking idiot