Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think that's so. What do you base such a biased notion on?That's because they don't exist or the defender is involved in criminal activity.
The unfortunate fact is it is extremely difficult to obtain a CCW in most parts of the U.S. If this were not so there would be a dramatic increase in the number of gun-related defense incidents -- both self-defense and defense of another.
I don't think that's so. What do you base such a biased notion on?That's because they don't exist or the defender is involved in criminal activity.
The unfortunate fact is it is extremely difficult to obtain a CCW in most parts of the U.S. If this were not so there would be a dramatic increase in the number of gun-related defense incidents -- both self-defense and defense of another.
There was also a woman, a pro gun advocate named Jamie Gilt that was accidentally shot in the back by her 4 year old son. We REALLY need guns to protects from other people with guns.
Because it rarely happens that way. Of all the mass shootings, very few were stopped by civilian gun owners with conceal carry permits. So few as to make this debate a joke.There was also a woman, a pro gun advocate named Jamie Gilt that was accidentally shot in the back by her 4 year old son. We REALLY need guns to protects from other people with guns.
We will for sure hear about the mishaps over people that carry. We seldom hear about people that defend themselves successfully because of being armed.
Because it rarely happens that way. Of all the mass shootings, very few were stopped by civilian gun owners with conceal carry permits. So few as to make this debate a joke.There was also a woman, a pro gun advocate named Jamie Gilt that was accidentally shot in the back by her 4 year old son. We REALLY need guns to protects from other people with guns.
We will for sure hear about the mishaps over people that carry. We seldom hear about people that defend themselves successfully because of being armed.
Because it rarely happens that way. Of all the mass shootings, very few were stopped by civilian gun owners with conceal carry permits. So few as to make this debate a joke.There was also a woman, a pro gun advocate named Jamie Gilt that was accidentally shot in the back by her 4 year old son. We REALLY need guns to protects from other people with guns.
We will for sure hear about the mishaps over people that carry. We seldom hear about people that defend themselves successfully because of being armed.
Because it rarely happens that way. Of all the mass shootings, very few were stopped by civilian gun owners with conceal carry permits. So few as to make this debate a joke.There was also a woman, a pro gun advocate named Jamie Gilt that was accidentally shot in the back by her 4 year old son. We REALLY need guns to protects from other people with guns.
We will for sure hear about the mishaps over people that carry. We seldom hear about people that defend themselves successfully because of being armed.
There was also a woman, a pro gun advocate named Jamie Gilt that was accidentally shot in the back by her 4 year old son. We REALLY need guns to protects from other people with guns.
Because it rarely happens that way. Of all the mass shootings, very few were stopped by civilian gun owners with conceal carry permits. So few as to make this debate a joke.There was also a woman, a pro gun advocate named Jamie Gilt that was accidentally shot in the back by her 4 year old son. We REALLY need guns to protects from other people with guns.
We will for sure hear about the mishaps over people that carry. We seldom hear about people that defend themselves successfully because of being armed.
We need guns to protect us from other people with guns. I have heard that a time or two. Imagine IF those bad people didn't have firearms, would that hurt us as a society not to feel the need to carry guns for protection? Would THAT be such a terrible thing?
We need guns to protect us from other people with guns. I have heard that a time or two. Imagine IF those bad people didn't have firearms, would that hurt us as a society not to feel the need to carry guns for protection? Would THAT be such a terrible thing?
We saw what happened....Europe disarmed their citizens after World War 1.....20 years later they marched 12 million innocent men, women and children into gas chambers...
if you average the number of people murdered by their governments because they were disarmed......the murder in Europe exceeds the yearly murder rate in the U.S.........
And gun crime in Britain is up 4% after they confiscated guns....and they are now arming more of their police to deal with the increased gang, gun crime.....
Australia is also seeing an increase in gun crime....and they also confiscated their guns.......
Because it rarely happens that way. Of all the mass shootings, very few were stopped by civilian gun owners with conceal carry permits. So few as to make this debate a joke.There was also a woman, a pro gun advocate named Jamie Gilt that was accidentally shot in the back by her 4 year old son. We REALLY need guns to protects from other people with guns.
We will for sure hear about the mishaps over people that carry. We seldom hear about people that defend themselves successfully because of being armed.
We need guns to protect us from other people with guns. I have heard that a time or two. Imagine IF those bad people didn't have firearms, would that hurt us as a society not to feel the need to carry guns for protection? Would THAT be such a terrible thing?
We saw what happened....Europe disarmed their citizens after World War 1.....20 years later they marched 12 million innocent men, women and children into gas chambers...
if you average the number of people murdered by their governments because they were disarmed......the murder in Europe exceeds the yearly murder rate in the U.S.........
And gun crime in Britain is up 4% after they confiscated guns....and they are now arming more of their police to deal with the increased gang, gun crime.....
Australia is also seeing an increase in gun crime....and they also confiscated their guns.......
Most of Europe has low ownership and they are fine. Low crime rates and almost no accidental shootings.
Because it rarely happens that way. Of all the mass shootings, very few were stopped by civilian gun owners with conceal carry permits. So few as to make this debate a joke.There was also a woman, a pro gun advocate named Jamie Gilt that was accidentally shot in the back by her 4 year old son. We REALLY need guns to protects from other people with guns.
We will for sure hear about the mishaps over people that carry. We seldom hear about people that defend themselves successfully because of being armed.
And the press rarely covers gun self defense...
KORWIN: The Undetectable Gun Myth & If Self Defense Was Common News Would Report It To You Myth
If-Self-Defense-Was-Common-It-Would-Be-In-The-News-More Myth:
“It’s easy to prove that guns serve no valid purpose, because if they really stopped crime and worked for self defense you’d see it more in the news! Hah!”
Case in point: The Fabricius Case is about an ASU professor who, with his high-school-student son, counted local crime stories, decided self defense is rare, and declared it a scientific study. The community paper (now defunct), and a medical journal (from Canada), ran the “conclusion” as if it meant something. They took heat, but let it stand (juicy details at the link).
The media deliberately suppresses stories about self defense and highlights stories about misuse of guns, “for reasons that were unclear at press time.”
Actually, the reasons are well known—mainstream reporters are generally left-leaning gun-hating liberals. Studies constantly show it suits them, fits their bias, and matches their world view to hide truth on this issue. That’s what they do, they can’t see it, won’t admit it. I follow it closely, confront them about it all the time, it’s like they’re brain dead. Google the subject and be stunned.
An Associated Press bureau reporter once told me his bureau chief wouldn’t let a self-defense story run because it might encourage copy cats. I report on it frequently here, and here. The CBS-TV ratio of anti-rights to pro-rights stories recently was 22 to 1 against. Their ethical standards? They have none.
Dr. John Lott surveyed the media, the numbers are impossibly upside down. In one year, USA Today ran 6,000 words on gun-related crime and zero on the good that guns enable. A book is available (Armed) outlining 13 scholarly studies showing between 700,000 and 2.5 million defensive gun uses every year. Bloomfield Press pays to put self-defense stories in USA Today, as ads, so at least some news gets out. Excellent write up about it here.
Media excuses for suppressing self defense are myths unto themselves: they certainly wouldn’t want: to promote “vigilantism” (which is a criminal act and not self defense); frontier justice and taking the law into your own hands (which has nothing to do with self defense against assault); a dangerously armed public with everyone “packing heat” (a derogatory slur reporters love and use constantly); individual responsibility (OMG!) supplanting big-brother government safety (which everyone sees doesn’t work); stand-your-ground “shoot-first” Wild-West scenarios (silliness reflecting neither law nor common sense)—reporting on this is as mythical as virtually everything else you see about guns, if it’s on TV or in a “news” paper.
We need guns to protect us from other people with guns. I have heard that a time or two. Imagine IF those bad people didn't have firearms, would that hurt us as a society not to feel the need to carry guns for protection? Would THAT be such a terrible thing?
We saw what happened....Europe disarmed their citizens after World War 1.....20 years later they marched 12 million innocent men, women and children into gas chambers...
if you average the number of people murdered by their governments because they were disarmed......the murder in Europe exceeds the yearly murder rate in the U.S.........
And gun crime in Britain is up 4% after they confiscated guns....and they are now arming more of their police to deal with the increased gang, gun crime.....
Australia is also seeing an increase in gun crime....and they also confiscated their guns.......
Most of Europe has low ownership and they are fine. Low crime rates and almost no accidental shootings.
Because it rarely happens that way. Of all the mass shootings, very few were stopped by civilian gun owners with conceal carry permits. So few as to make this debate a joke.There was also a woman, a pro gun advocate named Jamie Gilt that was accidentally shot in the back by her 4 year old son. We REALLY need guns to protects from other people with guns.
We will for sure hear about the mishaps over people that carry. We seldom hear about people that defend themselves successfully because of being armed.
And the press rarely covers gun self defense...
KORWIN: The Undetectable Gun Myth & If Self Defense Was Common News Would Report It To You Myth
If-Self-Defense-Was-Common-It-Would-Be-In-The-News-More Myth:
“It’s easy to prove that guns serve no valid purpose, because if they really stopped crime and worked for self defense you’d see it more in the news! Hah!”
Case in point: The Fabricius Case is about an ASU professor who, with his high-school-student son, counted local crime stories, decided self defense is rare, and declared it a scientific study. The community paper (now defunct), and a medical journal (from Canada), ran the “conclusion” as if it meant something. They took heat, but let it stand (juicy details at the link).
The media deliberately suppresses stories about self defense and highlights stories about misuse of guns, “for reasons that were unclear at press time.”
Actually, the reasons are well known—mainstream reporters are generally left-leaning gun-hating liberals. Studies constantly show it suits them, fits their bias, and matches their world view to hide truth on this issue. That’s what they do, they can’t see it, won’t admit it. I follow it closely, confront them about it all the time, it’s like they’re brain dead. Google the subject and be stunned.
An Associated Press bureau reporter once told me his bureau chief wouldn’t let a self-defense story run because it might encourage copy cats. I report on it frequently here, and here. The CBS-TV ratio of anti-rights to pro-rights stories recently was 22 to 1 against. Their ethical standards? They have none.
Dr. John Lott surveyed the media, the numbers are impossibly upside down. In one year, USA Today ran 6,000 words on gun-related crime and zero on the good that guns enable. A book is available (Armed) outlining 13 scholarly studies showing between 700,000 and 2.5 million defensive gun uses every year. Bloomfield Press pays to put self-defense stories in USA Today, as ads, so at least some news gets out. Excellent write up about it here.
Media excuses for suppressing self defense are myths unto themselves: they certainly wouldn’t want: to promote “vigilantism” (which is a criminal act and not self defense); frontier justice and taking the law into your own hands (which has nothing to do with self defense against assault); a dangerously armed public with everyone “packing heat” (a derogatory slur reporters love and use constantly); individual responsibility (OMG!) supplanting big-brother government safety (which everyone sees doesn’t work); stand-your-ground “shoot-first” Wild-West scenarios (silliness reflecting neither law nor common sense)—reporting on this is as mythical as virtually everything else you see about guns, if it’s on TV or in a “news” paper.
Yet when there is one it makes the news.
We need guns to protect us from other people with guns. I have heard that a time or two. Imagine IF those bad people didn't have firearms, would that hurt us as a society not to feel the need to carry guns for protection? Would THAT be such a terrible thing?
We saw what happened....Europe disarmed their citizens after World War 1.....20 years later they marched 12 million innocent men, women and children into gas chambers...
if you average the number of people murdered by their governments because they were disarmed......the murder in Europe exceeds the yearly murder rate in the U.S.........
And gun crime in Britain is up 4% after they confiscated guns....and they are now arming more of their police to deal with the increased gang, gun crime.....
Australia is also seeing an increase in gun crime....and they also confiscated their guns.......
Most of Europe has low ownership and they are fine. Low crime rates and almost no accidental shootings.
In a country of over 357 million guns in private hands......505 accidental deaths is almost no deaths......
Because it rarely happens that way. Of all the mass shootings, very few were stopped by civilian gun owners with conceal carry permits. So few as to make this debate a joke.There was also a woman, a pro gun advocate named Jamie Gilt that was accidentally shot in the back by her 4 year old son. We REALLY need guns to protects from other people with guns.
We will for sure hear about the mishaps over people that carry. We seldom hear about people that defend themselves successfully because of being armed.
And the press rarely covers gun self defense...
KORWIN: The Undetectable Gun Myth & If Self Defense Was Common News Would Report It To You Myth
If-Self-Defense-Was-Common-It-Would-Be-In-The-News-More Myth:
“It’s easy to prove that guns serve no valid purpose, because if they really stopped crime and worked for self defense you’d see it more in the news! Hah!”
Case in point: The Fabricius Case is about an ASU professor who, with his high-school-student son, counted local crime stories, decided self defense is rare, and declared it a scientific study. The community paper (now defunct), and a medical journal (from Canada), ran the “conclusion” as if it meant something. They took heat, but let it stand (juicy details at the link).
The media deliberately suppresses stories about self defense and highlights stories about misuse of guns, “for reasons that were unclear at press time.”
Actually, the reasons are well known—mainstream reporters are generally left-leaning gun-hating liberals. Studies constantly show it suits them, fits their bias, and matches their world view to hide truth on this issue. That’s what they do, they can’t see it, won’t admit it. I follow it closely, confront them about it all the time, it’s like they’re brain dead. Google the subject and be stunned.
An Associated Press bureau reporter once told me his bureau chief wouldn’t let a self-defense story run because it might encourage copy cats. I report on it frequently here, and here. The CBS-TV ratio of anti-rights to pro-rights stories recently was 22 to 1 against. Their ethical standards? They have none.
Dr. John Lott surveyed the media, the numbers are impossibly upside down. In one year, USA Today ran 6,000 words on gun-related crime and zero on the good that guns enable. A book is available (Armed) outlining 13 scholarly studies showing between 700,000 and 2.5 million defensive gun uses every year. Bloomfield Press pays to put self-defense stories in USA Today, as ads, so at least some news gets out. Excellent write up about it here.
Media excuses for suppressing self defense are myths unto themselves: they certainly wouldn’t want: to promote “vigilantism” (which is a criminal act and not self defense); frontier justice and taking the law into your own hands (which has nothing to do with self defense against assault); a dangerously armed public with everyone “packing heat” (a derogatory slur reporters love and use constantly); individual responsibility (OMG!) supplanting big-brother government safety (which everyone sees doesn’t work); stand-your-ground “shoot-first” Wild-West scenarios (silliness reflecting neither law nor common sense)—reporting on this is as mythical as virtually everything else you see about guns, if it’s on TV or in a “news” paper.
Yet when there is one it makes the news.
Not when there isn't video or a body.....which is the majority of defenses.....
