BlueGin
Diamond Member
- Jul 10, 2004
- 24,546
- 17,001
- 1,405
Women who miscarry mourn and go through deep depressions. Why do you think that is?Common sense and adherence to conventional reality...What makes you think some don't?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Women who miscarry mourn and go through deep depressions. Why do you think that is?Common sense and adherence to conventional reality...What makes you think some don't?
I see comprehending the written word is hard for you I see.I agree with you Islam had nothing to do with anything. It was the nut job islamic radilist who killed in a jihad moment as he felt he interpreted from the quran. It is a common radical ideology about what is meant in the quran. Like women having no rights.The motive is to change the perception of terrorism, to destigmatize Islam and other terrorist groups.You' re the one supporting a cop killer by saying this guy sniping from a barricaded location was not a terrorist.
I don't understand the fixation to label this guy as Terrorist? OK he was a Terrorist, crazy as the Joker.
You're partially right for a change.
Islam has nothing to do with a nutjob taking an airliner hostage anymore than the Bible has to do with a nutjob setting off bombs at an abortion clinic. The nutjobs' bastardized interpretation of the teachings of the religions is the only motivation at play.
"Islam" is not a terrorist group. I had a small modicum of hope for you up until you told that whopper.
Great...now you get it. Sort of.
Oh...please enlighten us on the passages from the Quran (Koran) that are so--in their own way--controversial? I'm still kind of hung up on the parts to where you can sell your daughter into slavery. Or if you grow different crops side by side, you can lose your land. Of if you're wearing clothes made by two different materials, you can be killed.
Oh wait, that is the Bible.
they were hoping to have a baby ....but did not...Women who miscarry mourn and go through deep depressions. Why do you think that is?Common sense and adherence to conventional reality...What makes you think some don't?
So have any Christian terror groups claimed responsibility for this shooting?
Let me answer...no.
Nope. Lying again. Nobody said they agreed with anybody else's politics.Timothy McVeigh was a terrorist, you bet. he was a mean one. believed in a new government had a plan and was looking for a change in the populace. He wanted liberlism gone. government gone. Believed in his cult religious beliefs. He had partners and in a group defining history.huh? he's a nut job. A whacked out nut job. but......he ain't no terrorist. And was your claim. dumb fk.Ahh...now we're getting to the real reason these two are willing to go to bat for the cop killer...
Abortion.
I wonder how many cops he could have would have had to have killed before these two would stop supporting him?
Because he didn't shout out someone's name or go through training. Oh yeah...I forgot those were the determining factors.
Was Eric Rudolph a terrorist?
What about Timothy McVeigh?
Eric Rudolph, nope not a terrorist. defined in wikipedia as one, but doesn't fit the profile. He was anti gay and anti abortion. he was killing for innocence not a new government or the depletion of mankind.
So if you agree with the politics...they are not terrorists. I got it.
I see comprehending the written word is hard for you I see.I agree with you Islam had nothing to do with anything. It was the nut job islamic radilist who killed in a jihad moment as he felt he interpreted from the quran. It is a common radical ideology about what is meant in the quran. Like women having no rights.The motive is to change the perception of terrorism, to destigmatize Islam and other terrorist groups.I don't understand the fixation to label this guy as Terrorist? OK he was a Terrorist, crazy as the Joker.
You're partially right for a change.
Islam has nothing to do with a nutjob taking an airliner hostage anymore than the Bible has to do with a nutjob setting off bombs at an abortion clinic. The nutjobs' bastardized interpretation of the teachings of the religions is the only motivation at play.
"Islam" is not a terrorist group. I had a small modicum of hope for you up until you told that whopper.
Great...now you get it. Sort of.
Oh...please enlighten us on the passages from the Quran (Koran) that are so--in their own way--controversial? I'm still kind of hung up on the parts to where you can sell your daughter into slavery. Or if you grow different crops side by side, you can lose your land. Of if you're wearing clothes made by two different materials, you can be killed.
Oh wait, that is the Bible.
huh? what does that have to do with the price of oil in china?So have any Christian terror groups claimed responsibility for this shooting?
Let me answer...no.
so it's ok when a rabid group of Christians incite their wacko flank.
you see all muslims blowing up stuff?
percentages, dear. now maybe if you wackos stop banging the drum.
no stating that someone didn't understand what I wrote. Comprehending what I said since I never said it.I see comprehending the written word is hard for you I see.I agree with you Islam had nothing to do with anything. It was the nut job islamic radilist who killed in a jihad moment as he felt he interpreted from the quran. It is a common radical ideology about what is meant in the quran. Like women having no rights.The motive is to change the perception of terrorism, to destigmatize Islam and other terrorist groups.
You're partially right for a change.
Islam has nothing to do with a nutjob taking an airliner hostage anymore than the Bible has to do with a nutjob setting off bombs at an abortion clinic. The nutjobs' bastardized interpretation of the teachings of the religions is the only motivation at play.
"Islam" is not a terrorist group. I had a small modicum of hope for you up until you told that whopper.
Great...now you get it. Sort of.
Oh...please enlighten us on the passages from the Quran (Koran) that are so--in their own way--controversial? I'm still kind of hung up on the parts to where you can sell your daughter into slavery. Or if you grow different crops side by side, you can lose your land. Of if you're wearing clothes made by two different materials, you can be killed.
Oh wait, that is the Bible.
projecting yet again?
I see comprehending the written word is hard for you I see.I agree with you Islam had nothing to do with anything. It was the nut job islamic radilist who killed in a jihad moment as he felt he interpreted from the quran. It is a common radical ideology about what is meant in the quran. Like women having no rights.The motive is to change the perception of terrorism, to destigmatize Islam and other terrorist groups.I don't understand the fixation to label this guy as Terrorist? OK he was a Terrorist, crazy as the Joker.
You're partially right for a change.
Islam has nothing to do with a nutjob taking an airliner hostage anymore than the Bible has to do with a nutjob setting off bombs at an abortion clinic. The nutjobs' bastardized interpretation of the teachings of the religions is the only motivation at play.
"Islam" is not a terrorist group. I had a small modicum of hope for you up until you told that whopper.
Great...now you get it. Sort of.
Oh...please enlighten us on the passages from the Quran (Koran) that are so--in their own way--controversial? I'm still kind of hung up on the parts to where you can sell your daughter into slavery. Or if you grow different crops side by side, you can lose your land. Of if you're wearing clothes made by two different materials, you can be killed.
Oh wait, that is the Bible.
It isn't. There isn't any correlation to anything other than hate.Nope. Lying again. Nobody said they agreed with anybody else's politics.Timothy McVeigh was a terrorist, you bet. he was a mean one. believed in a new government had a plan and was looking for a change in the populace. He wanted liberlism gone. government gone. Believed in his cult religious beliefs. He had partners and in a group defining history.huh? he's a nut job. A whacked out nut job. but......he ain't no terrorist. And was your claim. dumb fk.
Because he didn't shout out someone's name or go through training. Oh yeah...I forgot those were the determining factors.
Was Eric Rudolph a terrorist?
What about Timothy McVeigh?
Eric Rudolph, nope not a terrorist. defined in wikipedia as one, but doesn't fit the profile. He was anti gay and anti abortion. he was killing for innocence not a new government or the depletion of mankind.
So if you agree with the politics...they are not terrorists. I got it.
Okay if you're going to play stupid (God I hope you're really not this dense), why would it matter that he was "anti gay and anti abortion" and killing for "innocence".
and, so someone advertised an inaccurate news report. Happens all the time. No evidence has been presented, so again, I can say he was a libturd which he was, prove me wrong.
Told ya so.I agree with you Islam had nothing to do with anything. It was the nut job islamic radilist who killed in a jihad moment as he felt he interpreted from the quran. It is a common radical ideology about what is meant in the quran. Like women having no rights.The motive is to change the perception of terrorism, to destigmatize Islam and other terrorist groups.You' re the one supporting a cop killer by saying this guy sniping from a barricaded location was not a terrorist.
I don't understand the fixation to label this guy as Terrorist? OK he was a Terrorist, crazy as the Joker.
You're partially right for a change.
Islam has nothing to do with a nutjob taking an airliner hostage anymore than the Bible has to do with a nutjob setting off bombs at an abortion clinic. The nutjobs' bastardized interpretation of the teachings of the religions is the only motivation at play.
"Islam" is not a terrorist group. I had a small modicum of hope for you up until you told that whopper.
Great...now you get it. Sort of.
Oh...please enlighten us on the passages from the Quran (Koran) that are so--in their own way--controversial? I'm still kind of hung up on the parts to where you can sell your daughter into slavery. Or if you grow different crops side by side, you can lose your land. Of if you're wearing clothes made by two different materials, you can be killed.
Oh wait, that is the Bible.
and, so someone advertised an inaccurate news report. Happens all the time. No evidence has been presented, so again, I can say he was a libturd which he was, prove me wrong.
Yes. They lost a baby. A living growing thing... something they connected with physically, mentally and spiritually. Not a lifeless mass.they were hoping to have a baby ....but did not...Women who miscarry mourn and go through deep depressions. Why do you think that is?Common sense and adherence to conventional reality...What makes you think some don't?
Yes. They lost a baby. A living growing thing... something they connected with physically, mentally and spiritually. Not a lifeless mass.
Our body and conscience do know the difference you know.
Obama doesn't like that word.
Do you know why women who abort babies also go through deep depressions?Yes. They lost a baby. A living growing thing... something they connected with physically, mentally and spiritually. Not a lifeless mass.
Our body and conscience do know the difference you know.
are women being taken at gun point to terminate pregnancies? If so I oppose that...
"Islam" is not a terrorist group. I had a small modicum of hope for you up until you told that whopper.