Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Listen partisan, get rid of your bias and hatred of Biden.
Good for you, when you start ranting about relatives being eaten by cannibals, we'll be certain to let you know.You pay lip service to integrity, for if you had a smidgeon of integrity, you wouldn't accuse a man of something that requires clinical expertise and medical knowledge. He got through SOTU with flying colors. I was a caregiver many years ago, for the elderly, many of whom had dementia, and my experience tells me that this man only has what is normal for a man of his age to have. Some are better, some are slightly worse, but Trump is far worse than Biden. Nothing but stupid evacuates the lips of Trump. You're not paying attejntion.
I am near his age, and have similar speech faults, and I do not have dementia.
LOL Like the goal of you and you fellow partisan fraudsters is anything but keeping him from running again.Which media was it that was deemed liars to the tune of a $787 million settlement? Hint: it wasn't a liberal media.
No, the name of the game is to take a criminal pervert fraudster off the street.
I don't hate him. I think his policies suck donkey dick, and his diminished capacity scares the fuck out of me. No one with his level of cognitive decline should hold the most important and the most stressful job in the world.
Good for you, when you start ranting about relatives being eaten by cannibals, we'll be certain to let you know.
Not an argument. Fail.LOL Like the goal of you and you fellow partisan fraudsters is anything but keeping him from running again.
LOL Speaking on an integrity test, here's one for you Rumpy. In the entire history of our country, 250 years, name a single person that has faced four simultaneous criminal prosecutions in four different jurisdictions on four different sets of charges. Just one, other than your cult's partisan witch hunt against TrumpNot an argument. Fail.
A normal adult would understand that this is a comment on Trump.LOL Speaking on an integrity test, here's one for you Rumpy. In the entire history of our country, 250 years name a single person that has faced four simultaneous criminal prosecutions in four different jurisdictions on four different sets of charges. Just one, other than your cult's partisan witch hunt against Trump
LOL Speaking on an integrity test, here's one for you Rumpy. In the entire history of our country, 250 years, name a single person that has faced four simultaneous criminal prosecutions in four different jurisdictions on four different sets of charges. Just one, other than your cult's partisan witch hunt against Trump
Nothing flawed about the premise at all Rumpy. 250 years of our country, 550 million Americans. You cannot name a single single person that has faced four simultaneous criminal prosecutions in four different jurisdictions on four different sets of charges.Your question has a flawed premise.
Your premise is that he's facing four simultaneous criminal prosecutions in four different jurisdictions on four different sets of charges, because he was President.Let's do a flip side of your question, which will reveal that flaw:
Name one president in 250 years whose criminal conduct would result in 4 indictments, 88 felony counts, in four different jurisdictions?
There are none, and that, in direct opposition to what you are implying, is the real reason. You are trying to shift the blame to Democrats, but the blame belongs squarely on Trump's shoulders, and none of other.
He was the one who incited an insurrection, an insurrection that was upheld by several state judges and 9 justices of the Supreme Court (none of the judges or justices contested the lower court's finding of fact, that Trump incited, and/or, aided and gave comfort to, insurrection to the constitution of the United States), and his acts leading for months up to and including 1/6, led to two indictments.
He was the one whose aggravated circumstances surrounding the documents case, when all he has to do to not have been indicted was merely to cooperate fully with the government, as did Reagan, Pence, and Biden, and he wouldn't not have been charged. But he conspired to obstruct the government's efforts to retrieve valuable NDI documents, including at least on nuclear document (that one, alone, will get you 5 years), noting that the charge of espionage does not depend on any classification regime (making all claims of 'classification' moot).
Trump was the one who fornicated with a playboy playmate while his newly wed wife was pregnant, then fornicated with a pornstar four months after she gave birth, then several years later, when he became a candidate for US President, conspired with Cohen & Pecker to cover up the sexual acts given that it might hurt his chances to become president, whereupon he and Cohen concocted the scheme that Cohen would take out a HELOC loan on his property, pay Stormy $130k hush money, get her to sign and NDA, and Nat Enquirer President Pecker would pay McDougal $250k to kill her story (she thought it was going to be published), and when Trump won the presidency, he reimbursed Cohen via 8 checks for $35 grand each, reported it falsely as a 'legal expense' (leading to the 8 felony counts of falsifying biz records, elevated to felonies because of the tie in to the cover up) but failed to mention that it was, in essence, and in kind campaign donation, violated federal wire transfer laws, violated election campaign laws (or whatever the actual felonies were), which was never prosecuted (Because Bill Barr, at Trump's instruction, pressured the the DA and/or the SDNY not to prosecute--[I forget which] ), whereupon, when Bragg became DA of NY, investigated the case and a staff attorney convinced him that they had the evidence to elevate the 8 misdemeanor counts to felonies because of the cover up.
No prior president did these things.
You see, Rawley, the flaw in your premise is that although you are suggesting that there is something wrong with Democrats (noting that Garland is a centrist and Smith is an independent, destroying your argument right there), because there never has been, in 250 years, a president whose criminal conduct would result is so many indictments.
There was no fraud. That will be the ruling on appeal.Which media was it that was deemed liars to the tune of a $787 million settlement? Hint: it wasn't a liberal media.
No, the name of the game is to take a criminal pervert fraudster off the street.
www.foxbusiness.com
nypost.com
nypost.com
The Trump fraud case is one example. There is no crime if there is no victim.Contrived, bad faith posting. When you post like this, you embarrass yourself.
Let's demonstrate:
Pick a felony charge and argue why Trump is not guilty of it.
See you in NEVER. You Trumpers are long on wind, but short on arguments.
This demonstration makes it crystal clear who has been deceived and brainwashed.
Spoiler alert: it's you.
nypost.com
Why don't you list them?LOL Speaking on an integrity test, here's one for you Rumpy. In the entire history of our country, 250 years, name a single person that has faced four simultaneous criminal prosecutions in four different jurisdictions on four different sets of charges. Just one, other than your cult's partisan witch hunt against Trump
Zero until your cult began their lawfare Jihad against Trump. Not a single single person in 250 years of our country, 550 million Americans, has faced four simultaneous criminal prosecutions in four different jurisdictions on four different sets of chargesWhy don't you list them?
They aren't. That's bullshit propaganda.If there was a crime investors would not be pulling out of New York.
Trump will be fined increasingly with each violation.I found this from CNN, which I thought was very funny. CNN analyst Mark Preston and panel talked about civil unrest around the country if Trump were to be jailed, even for a short time, due to violating a gag order in the hush money case.
“If that were to happen, first of all, I think you would probably see civil unrest across the country, certainly in some cities. That’s one,” he said, highlighted by Mediaite. “And two, politically, if I’m the Biden campaign, I don’t want to necessarily see him in jail, because that’s just going to get people more inflamed and more fired up.”
And yet they are all too stupid to see what would happen if they found Trump criminally guilty and sentenced him to jail in this hush money case. Don't they think the same thing or worse would happen then, motivating his supporters even more to go out and vote for Trump? These guys are just so damned stupid.
CNN analyst warns of ‘civil unrest across the country’ if Trump jailed for gag order violation
CNN analyst Mark Preston said he thinks if former President Trump is jailed for violating the gag order in his hush money trial, there would be “civil unrest across the country” and it would help him in the polls. Preston joined CNN’s Jim Acosta and others to discuss the possibility of Judge...www.yahoo.com
Umm…Ummmmm, if everyone else has a first amendment right to speak then why shouldn't Trump?
No.They are inherently unfair. You let everyone else say what they want except for the accused.
The defense had exactly the same opportunity to choose or reject potential jurors as the prosecution did.but it's ok for media to spoil the jury pool instead? huh?
Umm…It all depends on the circumstances, doesn't it. And there has never been the circumstance of a political party bringing criminal charges against a former President of the United States, in the middle of an election, when he's the opposing party's presumptive nominee.
LOL How quaint a thought. Just one big old coincidence that every single prosecutor that brought these unprecedented and ridiculous charges against Trump is a DemocratUmm…
Political parties have no authority or ability to bring criminal charges on anyone.
Your fraught imaginings don’t change what I posted.L
LOL How quaint a thought. Just one big old coincidence that every single prosecutor that brought these unprecedented and ridiculous charges against Trump is a Democrat
