Can you point to the law or where in the constitution that said secession was illegal?Wrong
Texas Vs. White, US Supreme Court Ruled unilateral secession and the secession of 1860/1861 was illegal.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you point to the law or where in the constitution that said secession was illegal?Wrong
That was AFTER the fact. Principle of legalityCan you point to the law or where in the constitution that said secession was illegal?Wrong
Texas Vs. White, US Supreme Court Ruled unilateral secession and the secession of 1860/1861 was illegal.
so you would support trump trashing the constitution to get his agenda across?
Texas v. White | law caseCan you point to the law or where in the constitution that said secession was illegal?Wrong. The CSA killed over 300,000 Union soldiers because their land was invaded by a Tyrant warmonger who got his in the end also. Sic Semper Tyrannis
Yes he did invade, after the Confederacy spent about a day bombing a US fort. I would hope that if North Korea nuked Guam, we would fight back as well.
Wrong. Secession was legal. Fort Sumter was therefore the property of the State of SC.
Wrong
That case was after the fact. There was NOTHING in current case law, written law or the constitution that made it illegal. Principle of legality my man.Texas v. White | law caseCan you point to the law or where in the constitution that said secession was illegal?Wrong. The CSA killed over 300,000 Union soldiers because their land was invaded by a Tyrant warmonger who got his in the end also. Sic Semper Tyrannis
Yes he did invade, after the Confederacy spent about a day bombing a US fort. I would hope that if North Korea nuked Guam, we would fight back as well.
Wrong. Secession was legal. Fort Sumter was therefore the property of the State of SC.
Wrong
That was AFTER the fact. Principle of legality
That case was after the fact. There was NOTHING in current case law, written law or the constitution that made it illegal. Principle of legality my man.Texas v. White | law caseCan you point to the law or where in the constitution that said secession was illegal?Yes he did invade, after the Confederacy spent about a day bombing a US fort. I would hope that if North Korea nuked Guam, we would fight back as well.
Wrong. Secession was legal. Fort Sumter was therefore the property of the State of SC.
Wrong
I have. I have read the dissenting opinions as well.That case was after the fact. There was NOTHING in current case law, written law or the constitution that made it illegal. Principle of legality my man.Texas v. White | law caseCan you point to the law or where in the constitution that said secession was illegal?Wrong. Secession was legal. Fort Sumter was therefore the property of the State of SC.
Wrong
Read the court's decision.
....
I never really cared what the SC says anyways......
I have. I have read the dissenting opinions as well.
I never really cared what the SC says anyways. Everyone knows they are nothing but activists. Hell, even one of the dissenting opinions in texas vs white was only because of bonds...
The constitution isnt broad. And the words are there in basic english.
Not at the time. You can scream and shout all you want. But it is what it is. There was no case law, written law or specifics in the COTUS. Just like with internment, ACA and so many other bullshit opinions, they grasped at straws.....
I never really cared what the SC says anyways......
Well, there you go. They are the highest law in the nation, and you are an irrelevant nobody. Secession was illegal.
And im saying it was. You cant make up new laws to prosecute on crimes already committed. Basically, thats what you guys are saying.I have. I have read the dissenting opinions as well.
I never really cared what the SC says anyways. Everyone knows they are nothing but activists. Hell, even one of the dissenting opinions in texas vs white was only because of bonds...
The constitution isnt broad. And the words are there in basic english.
While it is interesting that you don't care what the Constitution says (and the powers it gives the Supreme Court), that doesn't mean much of anything. You asked if it was legal, not how much you liked it being illegal. .
Not at the time. You can scream and shout all you want. But it is what it is. There was no case law, written law or specifics in the COTUS. Just like with internment, ACA and so many other bullshit opinions, they grasped at straws.
so you would support trump trashing the constitution to get his agenda across?
If secession was illegal, then we are an illegal nation and belong to Great Britain. Our country was born of secession.
If secession was illegal, then we are an illegal nation and belong to Great Britain. Our country was born of secession.
Show me where it says it cause thats not what you guys are saying. You are relying on a third party.Not at the time. You can scream and shout all you want. But it is what it is. There was no case law, written law or specifics in the COTUS. Just like with internment, ACA and so many other bullshit opinions, they grasped at straws.
Nobodies screaming. Just saying that according to the US Constitution secession was illegal.
nice consistencyso you would support trump trashing the constitution to get his agenda across?
Well, no, Trump's a moron the American people didn't vote for...
UOTE="Scamp, post: 17945138, member: 63644"]Lincoln the Tyrant in my State... Maryland was getting ready to vote[Q for secession.
Yup. Lincoln did a great job stomping racist traitors into the dirt. We need to follow his fine example today.
Not at the time. You can scream and shout all you want. But it is what it is. There was no case law, written law or specifics in the COTUS. Just like with internment, ACA and so many other bullshit opinions, they grasped at straws.
Nobodies screaming. Just saying that according to the US Constitution secession was illegal.