Political Junky
Gold Member
- May 27, 2009
- 25,793
- 3,990
The Trump fiasco is going down. ![mm :mm: :mm:](/styles/smilies/mm.gif)
![woohoo :woohoo: :woohoo:](/styles/smilies/woohoo.gif)
![mm :mm: :mm:](/styles/smilies/mm.gif)
![woohoo :woohoo: :woohoo:](/styles/smilies/woohoo.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In highly charged political investigations, indictments are often a tool for getting cooperation. None of these people want to face a public trial and Mueller doesn't care about the little fish. He wants the big enchilada.Honestly i don't give a crap what happens tomorrow.
Again. Why do so many here believe that caring has anything to do with reality?
Did you want to wait until we actually know what the indictments are for, CC? You don't seem to have ever heard the old expression that you could get a Grand Jury to indict a ham sandwich if that's what you wanted! The indictment is the easy part...actually proving guilt in a court of law is where Mueller needs to go next.
Let me remind you, there are a dozen separate counts against Manafort in the indictment. Only if a mistake in the indictment substantially effects a count can it be thrown out. Since the grand jury is still in session and meets about 5 days a month any change or correction to the indictment can be made by the grand jury.Unless the OP has his head firmly up Mueller's ass he knows:
- Mueller's indictment of Manafirt has nothing to do with Trump or 'Russian Collusion'...
- Mueller reportedly may have botched the Warrants - which means the entire case agsinst Manafort could be dropped and the evidence determined to be inadmissable
- Mueller's investigation / indictments track back all the way to 'Fat Tony P' who was known to be working for the KGB Bank - the primary financier of the Russian effort to purchase Uranium One - and the Russian Spy Agency
--- It has also been revealed the KGB Bank 'Fat Tony P' was working for, the one financing Russian One efforts, was the one funding Bill Clinton's half a million dollar speeches.
- Evidence was released last week revealing Mueller, Holder, and Obama hid the Russian scandal in 2009 until the Uranium One deal went through in 2010
- Mueller has reportedly been called to answer qyestions about his stacked Cpunsel and tbe evidence revealed against him last week...
Watch for it. Tomorrow no matter who is indicted and no matter for what reason Republicans will construct that tried and true strawman where they claim that liberals thought it would be much worse.
So an actual indictment isn't bad because liberals thought...blah blah you get the point.
While I have your attention isn't it funny how they seem to care more about how the indictment was leaked MORE than they care about someone within the Trump camp being indicted? And the total reason for the investigation is because Trump helped Russia fuck our democracy in the ass.
Oh but they want to tell you that what's really important is anything but Russia and Trump.
It's all fake news until someone gets indicted. Right?
In highly charged political investigations, indictments are often a tool for getting cooperation. None of these people want to face a public trial and Mueller doesn't care about the little fish. He wants the big enchilada.Honestly i don't give a crap what happens tomorrow.
Again. Why do so many here believe that caring has anything to do with reality?
Did you want to wait until we actually know what the indictments are for, CC? You don't seem to have ever heard the old expression that you could get a Grand Jury to indict a ham sandwich if that's what you wanted! The indictment is the easy part...actually proving guilt in a court of law is where Mueller needs to go next.
Let me remind you, there are a dozen separate counts against Manafort in the indictment. Only if a mistake in the indictment substantially effects a count can it be thrown out. Since the grand jury is still in session and meets about 5 days a month any change or correction to the indictment can be made by the grand jury.Unless the OP has his head firmly up Mueller's ass he knows:
- Mueller's indictment of Manafirt has nothing to do with Trump or 'Russian Collusion'...
- Mueller reportedly may have botched the Warrants - which means the entire case agsinst Manafort could be dropped and the evidence determined to be inadmissable
- Mueller's investigation / indictments track back all the way to 'Fat Tony P' who was known to be working for the KGB Bank - the primary financier of the Russian effort to purchase Uranium One - and the Russian Spy Agency
--- It has also been revealed the KGB Bank 'Fat Tony P' was working for, the one financing Russian One efforts, was the one funding Bill Clinton's half a million dollar speeches.
- Evidence was released last week revealing Mueller, Holder, and Obama hid the Russian scandal in 2009 until the Uranium One deal went through in 2010
- Mueller has reportedly been called to answer qyestions about his stacked Cpunsel and tbe evidence revealed against him last week...
Watch for it. Tomorrow no matter who is indicted and no matter for what reason Republicans will construct that tried and true strawman where they claim that liberals thought it would be much worse.
So an actual indictment isn't bad because liberals thought...blah blah you get the point.
While I have your attention isn't it funny how they seem to care more about how the indictment was leaked MORE than they care about someone within the Trump camp being indicted? And the total reason for the investigation is because Trump helped Russia fuck our democracy in the ass.
Oh but they want to tell you that what's really important is anything but Russia and Trump.
It's all fake news until someone gets indicted. Right?
Honestly i don't give a crap what happens tomorrow.
Again. Why do so many here believe that caring has anything to do with reality?
Did you want to wait until we actually know what the indictments are for, CC? You don't seem to have ever heard the old expression that you could get a Grand Jury to indict a ham sandwich if that's what you wanted! The indictment is the easy part...actually proving guilt in a court of law is where Mueller needs to go next.
Watch for it. Tomorrow no matter who is indicted and no matter for what reason Republicans will construct that tried and true strawman where they claim that liberals thought it would be much worse.
So an actual indictment isn't bad because liberals thought...blah blah you get the point.
While I have your attention isn't it funny how they seem to care more about how the indictment was leaked MORE than they care about someone within the Trump camp being indicted? And the total reason for the investigation is because Trump helped Russia fuck our democracy in the ass.
Oh but they want to tell you that what's really important is anything but Russia and Trump.
It's all fake news until someone gets indicted. Right?
When have you Communists ever thought?
I'm not sure what you think the Manafort indictments gain you, but Tony Podesta is convinced he and his brother John are next.
{WASHINGTON — Tony Podesta, a prominent lobbyist and Democratic donor who has come under scrutiny from the escalating special counsel investigation, stepped down on Monday from the firm he co-founded, according to people familiar with the firm.}
Under Mueller Scrutiny, Democratic Donor Tony Podesta Resigns From Lobbying Firm
But by all means, hack on Comrade.
Not even low level in his administration, so I guess on that point I was wrong. But did I call it or what? I said that there would be indictments but no related to the Russians and I was exactly right. I think if anyone is investigated, costing millions, something is bound to turn up, and it did, Freewill scores again.You watch it, no matter what the left wing liberals on the board will compare the indictments to Watergate, you watch. The liberals are already foaming at the mouth waiting in grand expectation. Sad little people who won't accept the will of the people.Watch for it. Tomorrow no matter who is indicted and no matter for what reason Republicans will construct that tried and true strawman where they claim that liberals thought it would be much worse.
So an actual indictment isn't bad because liberals thought...blah blah you get the point.
While I have your attention isn't it funny how they seem to care more about how the indictment was leaked MORE than they care about someone within the Trump camp being indicted? And the total reason for the investigation is because Trump helped Russia fuck our democracy in the ass.
Oh but they want to tell you that what's really important is anything but Russia and Trump.
It's all fake news until someone gets indicted. Right?
My opinion of what happens is exactly what you say because that is what is going to happen. The indictments are floated out there to try and pressure someone into admitting something about someone. They will be all indictments directed at low level flunkies in an attempt to get at Trump. Trump hasn't been even been questioned yet, so don't get your hopes up.They will be all indictments directed at low level flunkies in an attempt to get at Trump.
Low level like Trump's campaign chairman?
I said that there would be indictments but no related to the Russians and I was exactly right.
'Fiasco'...as in false accusations of 'non-existent collusion', the witch hunt - yeah, it's 'going down' as in collapsing.
'non-existent collusion',
In highly charged political investigations, indictments are often a tool for getting cooperation. None of these people want to face a public trial and Mueller doesn't care about the little fish. He wants the big enchilada.Honestly i don't give a crap what happens tomorrow.
Again. Why do so many here believe that caring has anything to do with reality?
Did you want to wait until we actually know what the indictments are for, CC? You don't seem to have ever heard the old expression that you could get a Grand Jury to indict a ham sandwich if that's what you wanted! The indictment is the easy part...actually proving guilt in a court of law is where Mueller needs to go next.
That may be true, Flopper but indictments are also used to divert attention from something you don't want the public to fixate on...to something you do! In this case it's a rather remarkable coincidence that the Mueller team has decided to issue indictments NOW just as the Clinton "dossier" narrative was getting a lot of coverage! I've been around long enough to know how the game is played. Quite frankly I wouldn't be surprised what so ever if the indictments just issued don't amount to much once they are argued in a court of law!
All of the indictments move toward the Russians, particularly that of Papadapolous.
And Flynn has not been indicted. Yet.
Clear Trump of WHAT, NUMBNUTS?Watch for it. Tomorrow no matter who is indicted and no matter for what reason Republicans will construct that tried and true strawman where they claim that liberals thought it would be much worse.
So an actual indictment isn't bad because liberals thought...blah blah you get the point.
While I have your attention isn't it funny how they seem to care more about how the indictment was leaked MORE than they care about someone within the Trump camp being indicted? And the total reason for the investigation is because Trump helped Russia fuck our democracy in the ass.
Oh but they want to tell you that what's really important is anything but Russia and Trump.
It's all fake news until someone gets indicted. Right?
When have you Communists ever thought?
I'm not sure what you think the Manafort indictments gain you, but Tony Podesta is convinced he and his brother John are next.
{WASHINGTON — Tony Podesta, a prominent lobbyist and Democratic donor who has come under scrutiny from the escalating special counsel investigation, stepped down on Monday from the firm he co-founded, according to people familiar with the firm.}
Under Mueller Scrutiny, Democratic Donor Tony Podesta Resigns From Lobbying Firm
But by all means, hack on Comrade.
How does that clear Trump?
So wait a Grand Jury of Democrats, being lobbied by an All Star Storm Trooper unit of Clinton Donors and Clinton Ex Attorneys, found probable cause for Mueller (The Guy who ENFORCED OBAMA's GAG ORDER to stop THE URANIUM ONE INFORMANT TO TELL US WHAT HE KNOWS)to proceed with a court case? Grand Jury's are a joke. Completely violate the principle of DUE process. Indictments actually mean NOTHING.Let me remind you, there are a dozen separate counts against Manafort in the indictment. Only if a mistake in the indictment substantially effects a count can it be thrown out. Since the grand jury is still in session and meets about 5 days a month any change or correction to the indictment can be made by the grand jury.Unless the OP has his head firmly up Mueller's ass he knows:
- Mueller's indictment of Manafirt has nothing to do with Trump or 'Russian Collusion'...
- Mueller reportedly may have botched the Warrants - which means the entire case agsinst Manafort could be dropped and the evidence determined to be inadmissable
- Mueller's investigation / indictments track back all the way to 'Fat Tony P' who was known to be working for the KGB Bank - the primary financier of the Russian effort to purchase Uranium One - and the Russian Spy Agency
--- It has also been revealed the KGB Bank 'Fat Tony P' was working for, the one financing Russian One efforts, was the one funding Bill Clinton's half a million dollar speeches.
- Evidence was released last week revealing Mueller, Holder, and Obama hid the Russian scandal in 2009 until the Uranium One deal went through in 2010
- Mueller has reportedly been called to answer qyestions about his stacked Cpunsel and tbe evidence revealed against him last week...