Tone Down the Rhetoric?

[BackAgain]

Yeah but I repeat that accusing somebody falsely is a very big deal.

Most of us learned that long long ago.

Somebody please tell our Dumbocraps.

 

[YoursTruly]

Like I said, both sides say the side that won cheated. 2016? Trump cheated! 2020? Biden cheated! It's happening every election cycle now.

And the fact is, both sides are playing their voters. Because when you get right down to it, there's not an ounce of difference in Harris or Trump. Policy wise. The only real difference is the rhetoric (lies) they use to get votes.

 

[Road Runner]

Somebody please tell our Dumbocraps.

What's the point when they don't care anyways? They say that Trump is a threat to democracy and that he must be stopped they're looked at like heroes, I substitute Kamala's name for Trump's and it's I should be on a terrorist watch list.

 

[YoursTruly]

One way to tone down the rhetoric would be to stop latching on to every offhand, incoherent comment Trump makes and pretending it's a genuine threat.

LOL... Or Trump could stop creating rhetoric. Then the left would have nothing to latch onto.

 

[Billiejeens]

Trump is doing the opposite. He’s so afraid of losing that he’s advocating for someone to hurt the opposition

The person who has been shot at twice and hit once, should tone down the rhetoric.

Sounds legit

 

[Billiejeens]

Harris is a threat to democracy. She is a monster that must be stopped.

All I did was quote left wing communist cult fucks and changed TRUMP TO HARRIS.

Your comment is actually true though

 

[YoursTruly]

The person who has been shot at twice and hit once, should tone down the rhetoric.

Sounds legit

Shot at twice? LOL

 

[Road Runner]

LOL... Or Trump could stop creating rhetoric. Then the left would have nothing to latch onto.

What rhetoric was Trump using!? My gosh he's concerned about people's safety if they say that they're a Kamala supporter because they know that true American patriots are ticked off with her right now. The only difference is that there have been zero assassination attempts on her life. Now, how do you like them apples?

 

[Billiejeens]

Trump is telling his minions to attack Harris supporters!

sadly he is not

He loves the country too much

 

[Road Runner]

Shot at twice? LOL

Well, nearly shot at anyways.

 

[YoursTruly]

Well, nearly shot at anyways.

Nearly shot at? lol

Talk about lying. FFS, you can't "nearly" shoot at something.

 

[struth]

Nearly shot at? lol

Talk about lying. FFS, you can't "nearly" shoot at something.

Of course yoj can, it’s called a miss

 

[Billiejeens]

I don't care if you're pissed.

No, you are hiding overseas.

 

[YoursTruly]

Of course yoj can, it’s called a miss

There was only 1 assassination "attempt." The guy in Mara lago never laid is gun sights on Trump.

 

[Billiejeens]

And the fact is, both sides are playing their voters. Because when you get right down to it, there's not an ounce of difference in Harris or Trump. Policy wise. The only real difference is the rhetoric (lies) they use to get votes.

You are fringe and your words have no value -

Go away.

 

[struth]

There was only 1 assassination "attempt." The guy in Mara lago never laid is gun sights on Trump.

He was caught before he could get s shot off

Doesnt mean he wasn’t trying to assassinate him

Try again

 

[BackAgain]

There was only 1 assassination "attempt." The guy in Mara lago never laid is gun sights on Trump.

You don’t know that.

 

[YoursTruly]

He was caught before he could get s shot off

Doesnt mean he wasn’t trying to assassinate him

Try again

Trump wasn't even in his sights, when he was caught.

Again, you can't nearly shoot at someone. That a statement that sounds scarier than "he was waiting for Trump to get close enough to shoot."

It's called political rhetoric. Something that both sides use too often. And to way more extremes than they should.
It reminds me of todays Youtube clickbait titles.

 

[YoursTruly]

You don’t know that.

Do you know something different?

I'm pretty confident that if there was anymore, the media would've covered it as they did the Routh attempt. Trump loves the publicity. And the media loves assassination attempts they can report.

 

[struth]

Trump wasn't even in his sights, when he was caught.

Again, you can't nearly shoot at someone. That a statement that sounds scarier than "he was waiting for Trump to get close enough to shoot."

It's called political rhetoric. Something that both sides use too often. And to way more extremes than they should.
It reminds me of todays Youtube clickbait titles.

Does that mean he wasn’t planning on asdassianting trump?

He had a gun, was hidden, had been stalking the area