Tone Down the Rhetoric?

Does that mean he wasn’t planning on asdassianting trump?

He had a gun, was hidden, had been stalking the area

Of course he was planning on shooting him. He was set up, waiting for Trump to come to the 6th hole. But that's not "nearly shooting."
 
Trump is doing the opposite. He’s so afraid of losing that he’s advocating for someone to hurt the opposition



"Tone down the rhetoric" is what MAGA says to try and prevent any criticism of Trump. Even as Trump spews the most hysteric "Harris will take us into a Nuclear World War III!" panty shitting nonsense.
 
Do you know something different?

Not the question. You made the claim. But you don’t know whether he ever took aim at that location, or not. Taking aim doesn’t require pulling the trigger.
I'm pretty confident that if there was anymore, the media would've covered it as they did the Routh attempt.
Nobody cares what you think you’re confident of. Since you have no such information, your confidence means nothing. You are merely guessing.
Trump loves the publicity.
I’m sure he could live as well or better without publicity generated by would be assassins.
And the media loves assassination attempts they can report.
Also beside the point. The only point is that you claimed he hadn’t aimed his weapon at President but you don’t know if your speculation is true or not.
 
Even as Trump spews the most hysteric "Harris will take us into a Nuclear World War III!" panty shitting nonsense.
Yeah becuz no one ever said Trump was going to start a World War right?

 
Yeah becuz no one ever said Trump was going to start a World War right?



That's from 2017. Trump offered us his panty shitting inflammatory hysterics of Harris taking us into Nuclear World War III about 6 weeks ago.

But tell us more about 'toning down the rhetoric'.

You can't dial up the rhetoric and then snivel about the rhetoric.
 
That's from 2017. Trump offered us his panty shitting inflammatory hysterics of Harris taking us into Nuclear World War III about 6 weeks ago.

But tell us more about 'toning down the rhetoric'.

You can't dial up the rhetoric and then snivel about the rhetoric.
You mean when her failed leadership lead to iran bombing israel?
 
The first link is a story from this year.

Some random democrat vs the leader of the Republican Party and Presidential Candidate insisting 6 weeks ago that Harris would cause a nuclear WWIII?

Again, if you want to tone down the rhetoric, then tone down the rhetoric. But y'all don't. You want to dial it to 11 with panty shitting hysterics, then whine about the tone of the rhetoric.

Either tone down the rhetoric, or dance to the tune you're playing. You can't have it both ways.
 
Never topped 3% and only even APPROACHED that one year

What is it now?
That with strong metrics as manufacturing was starting to return and there were less people collecting checks and benefits off the government and less government employees. We had oil pipelines being built. We had oil drilling occurring as to help force the price fixing away from OPEC. These are positives. Printing up fiat currency and not seeing much for it except inflation is not good growth. Since we left the last thread to gold in 1971 and affirmative action, quotas and feminism started and now has evolved into DEI, the growth is around what you said and less.
 
"Tone down the rhetoric" is what MAGA says to try and prevent any criticism of Trump. Even as Trump spews the most hysteric "Harris will take us into a Nuclear World War III!" panty shitting nonsense.
There are people warning. If its limited and specific in a few detonations to Prog areas, machismo rules.
 
There are people warning. If its limited and specific in a few detonations to Prog areas, machismo rules.


Barely 6 weeks ago Trump insisted that Harris would bring nuclear WWIII.

If y'all want to tone down the rhetoric, tone down the rhetoric. But you can't dial the rhetoric to a panty-shitting 11, then snivel and whine about the tone of the rhetoric.
 

Forum List

Back
Top