Tone Down the Rhetoric?

[struth]

Barely 6 weeks ago Trump insisted that Harris would bring nuclear WWIII.

If y'all want to tone down the rhetoric, tone down the rhetoric. But you can't dial the rhetoric to a panty-shitting 11, then snivel and whine about the tone of the rhetoric.

Well…between Iran bombing israel, and the Ukrainian war…seems like it’s a safe beat. She’s been nothing by chaos

 

[Rawley]

There was only 1 assassination "attempt." The guy in Mara lago never laid is gun sights on Trump.

Was he hunting rabbits or something else at the golf course?

 

[Skylar]

Well…between Iran bombing israel, and the Ukrainian war…seems like it’s a safe beat. She’s been nothing by chaos

It really doesn't. But again, if y'all want to tone down the rhetoric, then tone down the rhetoric.

Instead, we're getting weak justifications for dialing the panty-shitting to 11.

And then whining about the tone of the rhetoric.

 

[struth]

It really doesn't. But again, if y'all want to tone down the rhetoric, then tone down the rhetoric.

Instead, we're getting weak justifications for dialing the panty-shitting to 11.

And then whining about the tone of the rhetoric.

How is highlighting her failed leadership as VP the same as telling your followers to put trump in their bullseye?

 

[skye]

One of those bitches on THE VIEW said Trump is “AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO HUMANITY.”

Fuck all you cult pieces of trash.

^^^ That

 

[Skylar]

How is highlighting her failed leadership as VP the same as telling your followers to put trump in their bullseye?

Highlighting 'failed leadership' by insisting that Harris will bring a nuclear WWIII?

Again, if you want to dial back the rhetoric, then dial it back. But you don't. You want to JUSTIFY the most hysteric, panty-shitting nonsense about immigrants eating dogs and Harris bringing a nuclear WWIII....

....and then whining about the tone of the rhetoric.

You'll dance to the tune you're playing.

 

[struth]

Highlighting 'failed leadership' by insisting that Harris will bring a nuclear WWIII?

Again, if you want to dial back the rhetoric, then dial it back. But you don't. You want to JUSTIFY the most hysteric, panty-shitting nonsense about immigrants eating dogs and Harris bringing a nuclear WWIII....

....and then whining about the tone of the rhetoric.

You'll dance to the tune you're playing.

Yeah failed leadership…hence the war in Europe, and chaos in the Middle East again

 

[progressive hunter]

Trump is doing the opposite. He’s so afraid of losing that he’s advocating for someone to hurt the opposition

 

[Skylar]

Yeah failed leadership…hence the war in Europe, and chaos in the Middle East again

So when you're ready to dial back the rhetoric, you can complain about the tone of the rhetoric.

As long as you're insisting that Harris will bring nuclear WWIII......any whining about the tone of the rhetoric is just meaningless nonsense. As you're eagerly embracing the very panty shitting that your ilk claim to denounce.

 

[struth]

So when you're ready to dial back the rhetoric, you can complain about the tone of the rhetoric.

As long as you're insisting that Harris will bring nuclear WWIII......any whining about the tone of the rhetoric is just meaningless nonsense.

Yes I’ve said you all should

But highlighting the failure of leadership isn’t bad rhetoric

 

[Skylar]

Yes I’ve said you all should

But highlighting the failure of leadership isn’t bad rhetoric

Welp, you can't really complain about the tone of the rhetoric. As you are spewing the panty-shittiest of the panty-shitting nonsense.

 

[struth]

Welp, you can't really complain about the tone of the rhetoric. As you are spewing the panty-shittiest of the panty-shitting nonsense.

Telling people not to assassinate their opposition, I guess is expecting too much from you demafasict