Top 5 democratic leaders hypocrites SCOTUS PROCESS

A POTUS is elected to serve for four years. "Four" doesn't mean "three".

Elections have consequences, you lost
Elections have consequences. This is one of them. Obama gets to appoint Supreme Court Justices for the entirety of his Constitutional four year term, hypocrite.
elections have consequences.
He can nominate whoever he wants......and the senate can do with that nominee what they want.

You are aware, I am sure, that the legislative body has more power as it directly affects the day to day lives of the people than the President.

Just reminding you of that.
 
Another hater of the Constitution:
Fuck what ANY democrat says. Just block it until Obama is gone. If Americans don't like it they can vote their displeasure in November
Cry more leftist
You are a raging hypocrite. And you should be aware you are shooting yourself in the mouth when you accuse someone with integrity of being a leftist.

Oh the irony of that post from this far left drone!
 
I have said numerous times that President Obama would be ignoring his constitutional responsibility if he did NOT put up a nominee.

However, if he puts up a very far left nominee, the Senate would be remiss in confirming that person seeing as the people spoke when they voted in a republic body of legislators....and the truth is, if the people want a left leaning judge, they will vote in a democratic president.

Um...
 
A POTUS is elected to serve for four years. "Four" doesn't mean "three".

Elections have consequences, you lost
Elections have consequences. This is one of them. Obama gets to appoint Supreme Court Justices for the entirety of his Constitutional four year term, hypocrite.
elections have consequences.
He can nominate whoever he wants......and the senate can do with that nominee what they want.

You are missing the fact that McConnell has said he isn't even going to give the Senate the opportunity to vote up or down on an Obama nominee.

He HATES the Constitution. As does anyone who supports his bullshit.
 
A POTUS is elected to serve for four years. "Four" doesn't mean "three".

Elections have consequences, you lost
Elections have consequences. This is one of them. Obama gets to appoint Supreme Court Justices for the entirety of his Constitutional four year term, hypocrite.
Guess you never heard of checks and balances.
he obviously does not understand WHY the senate must confirm a nominee.
 
A POTUS is elected to serve for four years. "Four" doesn't mean "three".

Elections have consequences, you lost
Elections have consequences. This is one of them. Obama gets to appoint Supreme Court Justices for the entirety of his Constitutional four year term, hypocrite.

Oh! you forgot the Schumer Rule!

Obama can nominate, and if he nominates another Scalia, they'll fly through; if Obama decides to get all hyper-partisan and nominate a radical leftist, we'll invoke the Schumer Rule. As they say, payback is a barack
 
The people elected a Democratic president. The Constitution says that Democratic President has a four year term, not three.

Elections have consequences. This is one of them.
 
A POTUS is elected to serve for four years. "Four" doesn't mean "three".

Elections have consequences, you lost
Elections have consequences. This is one of them. Obama gets to appoint Supreme Court Justices for the entirety of his Constitutional four year term, hypocrite.
elections have consequences.
He can nominate whoever he wants......and the senate can do with that nominee what they want.

You are missing the fact that McConnell has said he isn't even going to give the Senate the opportunity to vote up or down on an Obama nominee.

He HATES the Constitution. As does anyone who supports his bullshit.
I did not miss that fact. He is wrong in announcing it....but has the right to do it.

Weiner is a pervert. Should we define the party based on his antics?
 
This topic proves some people support the Constitution only when it is convenient.

When the Constitution is inconvenient, they show their TRUE colors.
 
The people elected a Democratic president. The Constitution says that Democratic President has a four year term, not three.

Elections have consequences. This is one of them.
ahhh....falling back on talking points...."4 years, not 3....blah blah blah....."

Give it a rest. This is government at work.
 
This topic proves some people support the Constitution only when it is convenient.

When the Constitution is inconvenient, they show their TRUE colors.
the constitution states that the senate MUST confirm a nominee?

Shwo me where.
 
It has nothing to do with ideology. IF the gop makes up a new rule, it WILL EVENTUALLY come back to bite them on the ass. Politics is always about payback. That said, Justice Kennedy has always been a lock solid conservative vote on everything except gay stuff. But, being a conservative can also entail upholding the concept of Roe because it is settled law. When the dems confirmed Kennedy without any dissenting votes, they did so because they KNEW he was conservative and would come down on that side when issues were in doubt, but he was fair, committed to precedent and not a bomb thrower.

If Obama gives the gop someone along those lines, they'd be crazy not to confirm him/her because it is at best even money for them that Hillary will beat the Donald, and don't think for a second that she'll play nice.
 
The people elected a Democratic president. The Constitution says that Democratic President has a four year term, not three.

Elections have consequences. This is one of them.
ahhh....falling back on talking points...."4 years, not 3....blah blah blah....."

Give it a rest. This is government at work.
Nope. Scalia is dead.
We must place another lesbo, transvestite, female, Hispanic, or Blacklivesmatters activist on the bench immediately.
 
Last edited:
What moronic right wingers fail to consider is WHAT Article 2 actually states regarding a SC nominee....

The Founders CLEARLY stated that it is up to the president...and NOT up to a referendum by the people....to nominate a justice....One would think that the wise Founders assumed that elections have consequences and that in a representative democracy, when a president is elected (for FOUR years, by the way) that individual assumes the responsibility of nominating someone.
 
Obama and the Democrats have no credibility and no reason to bitch and complain about the GOP since they are on record doing the same thing. The Democrat's double standards are nothing new but in this case they really shot themselves in the foot.
 
As the months wear on, with the majority of circuit courts in blue hands, I think we can expect to see a fair number of cases where a SCOTUS tie vote will throw it back to the lower courts ---> result? A win for the democrats.

You GOP quackadoodles don't realize if you go this route, by not even entertaining the idea of a hearing -- or allowing the seat to remain vacant for over a year -- either way, Obama wins.
 

Forum List

Back
Top