candycorn
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #61
Yes I do want them to get a fair trial don't you? Stop being obtuse. What I don't want is to lock them up for 20 years and have us foot the bill. There is a better way. You like the status quo? And what about after 20 years? Do you trust them then? I guess we should lock them up forever then.Don't allow them internet access.How many more people did they scam in the 20 years?Ok, so I’m 25 and I commit this crime. You want to jail them for 20 years. How much money will they be able to generate for their victims once they get out at 45?Totally agree but we got to stop putting people in jail. Jail should be for people we are afraid of not mad at.Scams are on the increase. There needs to be stricter sentences for these people.
![]()
COVID-19 scam reports, by the numbers
If you’re a regular reader of this blog — or of the news, you know that scammers are out in force, taking advantage of all aspects of the Coronavirus pandemic.www.consumer.ftc.gov
Unlike drug use where the victim is the user, there are real victims to these crimes and the penalties should be severe.
so the person convicted has to pay $100k plus what they stole back to the people they stole with.
these people are strictly monitored and on probation until they pay off the debt. Stop making payments and you are called back in.
How much should payments be a month? Treat this like child support. Whatever the guy makes, a certain percent is auto taken out every paycheck.
if they get an inheritance that money goes straight to victims. Lotto win? Straight to victims.
if the debt is still not paid off at 67 then the victims get 20% of your social security.
Most people who commit these crimes don't go to jail.
I think they should face decades of prison then financial destruction for the rest of their lives.
Paying a fine is already built into their scam. It does nothing to discourage them from continuing to do it nor does it discourage people from getting involved with it.
Yes they should pay back the money they stole and hefty fines and interest to those they stole from.
None of that discourages anyone from committing the crime in the first place.
Hit them where it hurts. Take their freedom from them then force them to live in total poverty for the rest of their lives. That will discourage anyone from doing this type of crime.
Those who do this sort of crime are greedy jerks. They care very much about money and freedom.
So you want to pay $30,000 a year to house, feed and give them medical insurance for 20 years? I don't.
do you want them to get a fair trial? That costs money too.
I don't think you're thinking this through.
Well you’re couching this in economic terms. The trial costs money; why no objections to spending that money?
As for when they get out, repeat offenders often commit the same crimes. Should we lock everyone up for life?