C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
Treason is extremely difficult to prove:
No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
Clearly it was the intent of the Framers to no longer allow treason to be used again as a political weapon, as had been the case for several centuries.
True. I would expect Mr. Snowden to recant his public admission if indicted. His attorney's would never allow him to take the stand and thus his public comments would be introduced into evidence by other means.
I could not be a member of the jury if Snowden were brought to trail, for I have already come to the conclusion that Mr. Snowden committed an act which provided aid and comfort to China, a nation which has apparently engaged in Cyber Espionage against our country. The fact that he sought refuge in Hong Kong is troubling to me; and if true that he earned a salary of $200.000 per year with only a GED from a Government Contractor is equally troubling.
What I find absolutely hilarious is the reaction of self defined conservatives who pride themselves as patriots - and few of them ever served a minute in our armed forces - suggesting the actions of Snowden and Manning are those of patriots. IMO George Washington as General of the Revolutionary Army would have had both of them hanged.
Snowden will likely be initially charged with crimes related to his access to government intelligence information and use of government computers, at least to have hem extradited from Hong Kong.
In addition to being potentially criminal, his actions were arrogant and foolish.
And the politics of the issue are indeed problematic for the right, desperate for anything they might perceive as a political weapon to use against Obama.
How, for example, will conservatives reconcile their traditional motif of America, love it or leave it? Snowden tried to harm America, how can any conservative super-patriot ignore that?
Imagine the rights response if Obama were a republican