Treasoness Judge Apprehended by Free Sovereign Men (Breat Britian); Court is siezed

[The2ndAmendment]

The Swift doctrine

Until 1938, federal courts in America followed the doctrine set forth in the 1842 case of Swift v. Tyson.[1] In that case, the United States Supreme Court held that federal courts hearing cases brought under their diversity jurisdiction (allowing them to hear cases between parties from different states) had to apply the statutory law of the states, but not the common law developed by state courts. Instead, the Supreme Court permitted the federal courts to make their own common law based on general principles of law.

The reasoning behind the decision in Swift v. Tyson was that the federal courts would craft a superior common law, and the states would choose to adopt it. This hope was not fulfilled, however, as the principles of various states' common law continued to dramatically diverge. Some litigants began to abuse the availability of the federal courts for the specific purpose of having cases decided under the federal common law principles.
The Erie doctrine

In 1938, the Supreme Court decided Erie Railroad v. Tompkins.[2] Erie overruled Swift v. Tyson, holding instead that federal courts exercising diversity jurisdiction had to use all of the same substantive laws as the courts of the states in which they were located. As the Erie Court put it, there is no "federal general common law", with the operative word being "general."

The Erie decision did not put an end to other types of federal common law. Several areas of federal common law remain, in two basic categories: areas where Congress has given the courts power to develop substantive law, and areas where a federal rule of decision is necessary to protect uniquely federal interests.[3]

The U.S. Congress has given courts power to formulate common law rules in areas such as admiralty law, antitrust, bankruptcy law, interstate commerce, and civil rights. Congress often lays down broad mandates with vague standards, which are then left to the courts to interpret, and these interpretations eventually give rise to complex understandings of the original intent of Congress, informed by the courts' understanding of what is just and reasonable.

Furthermore, in the 1943 case of Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States,[4] the Court recognized that federal courts could still create federal common law, albeit in limited circumstances where federal or Constitutional interests were at stake, Congress had inadequately addressed the situation sub judice, and the application of individual state laws in various jurisdictions would create unacceptable levels of diversity or uncertainty. When fashioning new federal common law, the Court may either adopt a reasonable state law, look to its own precedent, or create new law.
Congressional repeal of federal common law

Federal common law is valid only to the extent that Congress has not repealed the common law. The Supreme Court has explained that, "when Congress addresses a question previously governed by a decision resting on federal common law, the need for such an unusual exercise of law-making by federal courts disappears."[5]

During the era when the Constitution was written, it was understood that common law was alterable by legislatures. For example, Alexander Hamilton emphasized in The Federalist that the New York Constitution made the common law subject "to such alterations and provisions as the legislature shall from time to time make concerning the same."[6] Thus, even when a federal court has authority to make common law, that law is subject to alteration by Congress. This principle finds expression in the first sentence of the Constitution: "All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives."

The people of Great Britain invoked their Magna Carta right to apprehend a corrupt judge and size a treasonous Court.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsgXWPRbKQE]Sovereign, freeman arrest a treasonous judge and seize court - YouTube[/ame]

We the people, citizens of our State, as Sovereigns (determined by the Supreme Court in Chisholm vs Georgia, 1793), have the right to face our accuser, and to challenge the Jurisdiction of the presiding court.

The "United States" or "New York" etc, does not qualify as an "accuser." First have the right to demand that the prosecutor signs his name under the Plaintiff Bar. 99% of all people do NOT know this.

Furthermore, if your name is in capital letters "UNITED STATES vs JOHN SMITH," that is NOT you. That is a fictional "corporate" entity, created at birth, it is your Strawman. The federal courst operate under MARITIME JURISDICTION, as such they only have JURISDICTION over your fictional corporate entity, not you.

You, as a Sovereign citizen, can deny to "stand under the charges," of your fictional entity.

Don't believe me? Watch this second video:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55pjFKalOVc]What?! "Sovereign Man" walks out of court, scares off the judge?!?! - YouTube[/ame]

Watch these too:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W468GRDD8Hw]How to use your Sovereign Rights in Court and Win! 1 of 2 - YouTube[/ame]




Stand AGAINST this extreme overreach of Federal Power, they have extended Maritime (international commerce) Jurisdiction onto Land and every part of our lives (via abuse of the Commerce Clause).


--------------------------

More for citizens of Canada, England (and other countries under the Magna Carta)




-=-=-=-=-===-=-
Arrest the District Attorney: How to!

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Know your rights. Know how to defeat Tyranny. Know you are a sovereign .

 

[The2ndAmendment]

The FBI and SPL (Southern Poverty Law Center) have declared people believing in Jurisdictions of the Federal Courts (Common Law [Land Law], Equity [Contract] and Maritime [Sea/Air/International] Law are domestic terrorists!

FBI ? The Sovereign Citizen Movement

http://www.policeone.com/investigat...tactics-for-investigating-Sovereign-Citizens/



Obviously this is what the NDAA and Patriot Acts are meant for, THOSE TERRORISTS DEFENDING THEIR UNALIENABLE RIGHTS!!!

 

[Mad Scientist]

The FBI and SPL (Southern Poverty Law Center) have declared people believing in Jurisdictions of the Federal Courts (Common Law [Land Law], Equity [Contract] and Maritime [Sea/Air/International] Law are domestic terrorists!

That's because the King (Government) is Sovereign, not man.

 

[Oldguy]

Before you decide to jump onboard with the sovereign citizen movement, take a few minutes to research these former members:

Terry Nichols
Joseph T. Kane
David Russell Myrland
Samuel Lynn Davis
Edward and Elaine Brown
Monty and Patricia Ervin
Timothy Garrison
Francis August Shaeffer Cox
Anson Chi
Shawn Talbot Rice
Lonnie G. and Karen Vernon
David B. Graham
James Timothy Turner
Phillip Monroe Ballard
Jennifer Herring
Glenn Richard Unger

Where are they now?

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Before you decide to jump onboard with the sovereign citizen movement, take a few minutes to research these former members:

Terry Nichols
Joseph T. Kane
David Russell Myrland
Samuel Lynn Davis
Edward and Elaine Brown
Monty and Patricia Ervin
Timothy Garrison
Francis August Shaeffer Cox
Anson Chi
Shawn Talbot Rice
Lonnie G. and Karen Vernon
David B. Graham
James Timothy Turner
Phillip Monroe Ballard
Jennifer Herring
Glenn Richard Unger

Where are they now?

There are black members and supporters of the NAACP who commit violent crimes, does this mean the NAACP is a terrorist organization?

----------------
Also good job watching these videos, where the courts failed to prove their jurisdiction and HAD to DISMISS the case. However, because my name is 2nd Amendment, you will never agree with anything I say.


The sky is blue (Watch Oldguy disagree).

 

[Oldguy]

Before you decide to jump onboard with the sovereign citizen movement, take a few minutes to research these former members:

Terry Nichols
Joseph T. Kane
David Russell Myrland
Samuel Lynn Davis
Edward and Elaine Brown
Monty and Patricia Ervin
Timothy Garrison
Francis August Shaeffer Cox
Anson Chi
Shawn Talbot Rice
Lonnie G. and Karen Vernon
David B. Graham
James Timothy Turner
Phillip Monroe Ballard
Jennifer Herring
Glenn Richard Unger

Where are they now?

There are black members and supporters of the NAACP who commit violent crimes, does this mean the NAACP is a terrorist organization?

----------------
Also good job watching these videos, where the courts failed to prove their jurisdiction and HAD to DISMISS the case. However, because my name is 2nd Amendment, you will never agree with anything I say.


The sky is blue (Watch Oldguy disagree).

I didn't say anything about them being terrorists. I merely asked where are they now? What did their sovereign citizen status gain them?

(hint: They're all either dead or in jail.)

 

[Crackerjaxon]

WTF is a treasoness?

 

[crussmith2]

Not all members of al Queda are killers either. Riiiight!
If there was ever a group that needed the FBI oppressing them more it would be these 'brave patriot' terrorists who don't mind watering the tree of liberty with a little innocent blood.

Take a look at the handiwork of madmen:
https://www.google.com/search?q=okl...lIGABg&sqi=2&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&biw=1152&bih=746

 

[crussmith2]

If they are not terrorists their arguments are designed solely to promote terror. They would have us believe the USA was a vast conspiracy designed solely to end all freedom. In case your convinced by their that thin gruel foolishness you are in dire need of protection from e-mail scams that start out with offers of riches for sending a Ghana tycoons widow her deserved loot. But you would lose more than your money if you fall victim to these bunko artists - they want real lives to be lost in the fight against their phantoms.
One mans annihilation of these terror promoting bunko artists:
Sovereign Citizens movement | Skeptic-At-Law

 

[Old Rocks]

2nd, thank you for showing how truly insane people like you are.

 

[Oldguy]

If they are not terrorists their arguments are designed solely to promote terror. They would have us believe the USA was a vast conspiracy designed solely to end all freedom. In case your convinced by their that thin gruel foolishness you are in dire need of protection from e-mail scams that start out with offers of riches for sending a Ghana tycoons widow her deserved loot. But you would lose more than your money if you fall victim to these bunko artists - they want real lives to be lost in the fight against their phantoms.
One mans annihilation of these terror promoting bunko artists:
Sovereign Citizens movement | Skeptic-At-Law

We used to have a term in the Army to describe the kind of person whose philosophies and "legal" advice undergird this band of morons: Shit house lawyers.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

I didn't say anything about them being terrorists. I merely asked where are they now? What did their sovereign citizen status gain them?

(hint: They're all either dead or in jail.)

What about the people (a several hundreds of others) who have managed to have their charges dismissed, because the Courts could not prove jurisdiction?

These people are not violent in anyone of these videos either, so I don't get the analogy that you are drawing.

Just because someone invokes an argument doesn't mean it's a valid argument. The videos I provided are cases where the argument invoked (sovereignty and/or jurisdiction) were valid.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

They would have us believe the USA was a vast conspiracy designed solely to end all freedom.

Is using a Federal Reserve Note a DISCHARGE OF DEBT? Yes!

Does that mean that a Federal Reserve Note carries a hidden lien? Yes!

Whom is the Creditor, is it the Federal Reserve? Yes!

Is the Federal Reserve a foreign corporation? Yes!

Are contracts involving Foreign Corporations considered Maritime/Admiralty Jurisdiction? Yes!

Therefore does the Federal Reserve (private corporation) have recourse through the District Courts (Admiralty Courts) to acquire possession of any piece of property that carries a Maritime Hypothecation (hidden lien)? Yes! This is done through the IRS!

When any contract is transacted via a Federal Reserve Note, is the primary party the Federal Reserve? Yes!

Your turn!

----------------
P.S. Try your best to refute any of the above, so that I may embarrass you.

The Federal District Courts are the only courts in the country that have jurisdiction in Limited Liability (cases) for the Payment of Debts. Every time you are hauled into a Federal District Court on a tax matter,.. or what you think is a tax matter,.. the judge issues a decision, and expands upon the Maritime Law.

While you are involved in Maritime Law, if you are damaged by a seaman, you cannot collect damages due you caused by a seaman. This is the reason why people who file civil rights suits against the IRS and judges get shot down.

The required report method? You lose because of failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. You are a seaman aboard spaceship Earth trying to redress a right, but you have no rights when you're involved in National Credit.

Once you understand the maritime law and how it works everything falls right into place including the Internal Revenue Service. In maritime law they have what is called double insurance. Its very common because of the complexity of the goods carried on each ship they make sure there are two insurance policies so if one should fail the other will take its place. The first insurance policy is Social Security and the second one is the Income Tax.

Quoting Mr. Brobst, "Limited Liability for the Payment of Debts works like this: I heard there was a man in Missouri by the name of Layne Crist who had left his beans in a grain elevator for storage. When the elevator announced bankruptcy, Crist went to the elevator to get his beans out. The elevator people said he couldn't take them out but Crist forcefully removed them anyway, where upon the Elevator prosecuted him. They could do so because Crist no longer owned the beans!

They had been stored in a commune,.. an elevator in which there were multiple demands on stored property. So when Crist went back for his beans he was arrested for stealing property. The reason? That property belonged to the Commune,.. that is to everybody that deals in the public National Credit. He enjoyed Limited Liability for the Payment of Debts.

There was another thing that Crist didn't know. He never owned the beans in the first place because he was involved in Public National Credit and he got a loan to grow the beans,.. so there was a lien on the beans before they came up out of the ground.

Now he also owns a tractor. That is he thinks he owns a tractor, but whenever you can't perform on a loan everything you have becomes pledge for your activity. So, in such a case ,..one really "owns" nothing! One becomes a feudal serf upon the land.

The minute you quit performing, the authorities will confiscate everything you own and eject you from the land. That is the "CON" game they have going under the IRS Federal Reserve System!

To free yourself from these restrictions, imposed under the Maritime (Admiralty jurisdiction) , you would have to sever yourself from Social Security, liquidate your home mortgage, give up bank accounts, and liquidate all loans. Everything that ties you in to the Public National Credit. Otherwise everything you make, or will make, becomes a common pledge to the national security while you're on a "joint venture for profit".

Now perhaps you can understand how you can be involved under the Federal system, which ties you in with "Maritime" Laws and subjects you to "Admiralty" jurisdiction under the law.

For banks, Limited Liability for the Payment of Debts works like this. Let's say that you owe me $10,000, and you have $10,0000 in a savings bank but the bank collapses. You think you're OK because the bank has FDIC to protect you. But the Bank relies on Limited Liability for the Payment of Debts and the insurance company that operates under Limited Liability is the FDIC and for every dollar you have in the bank there is only ½ cent available upon demand. So if you have $10,000 in the bank you can't pay me, and I can't pay my bills either.

Quoting from Mr. Brobst:

The IRS Tax Court is a court of insurance right out of British law. It is called a 'Court of Insurance' in Blackstone's Commentaries, Vol. 3 or 4.

Our Federal District Court judges are set up as judges of Maritime law. Once you get into this and understand it, you will see how the Federal District Courts work. Maritime law was separate from the rest of the court system. When you went into a maritime court, the papers you received there stated in the caption at the top "IN ADMIRALTY".

I found out from Benders Federal Practices Manual, Vol. 1, that the hiding of Admiralty law started in 1966. At that time, our courts joined admiralty with other law forms, so if you went into court on whatever type of case, whether In Equity, common law, or some other form, you would not know, or be told that your case would be in "Admiralty", but it would be switched into Admiralty without your knowledge. Thus you no longer know what is going on in the Federal courts.

In Maritime Law , your insurance is good for a year at a time, just as the IRS asks for payment of their "insurance premium," a year at a time. You have to re-program your mind to think: "insurance" in place of "income tax". We are not dealing with real money today, backed with gold or silver... We are dealing with maritime law and credit, and this is something you must remember.

When people revoke their marriage licenses they have a common law marriage and the State loses its jurisdiction over them. That is one way of beating the community property laws.

Twenty years after enactment of the Federal Reserve Act, on June 5, 1933, during a Banking Holiday which lasted for three weeks, Congress enacted HJR-192 to suspend the gold standard and abrogate the gold clause in contracts.

This resolution declared that "Whereas the holding or dealing in gold affect the public interest, and are therefore subject to proper regulation and restriction; and whereas the existing emergency has disclosed that provisions or obligations which purport to give the oblige a right to require payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency,.. are inconsistent with the declared policy of Congress,.. in the payment of debts."

This resolution thereby declared that any obligation requiring "payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency, or in an amount in money of the United States measured thereby, is declared to be against public policy; and, Every obligation, heretofore or hereafter incurred, shall be "discharged" upon payment, dollar for dollar, in any coin or currency which at the time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts."

Note that the words do not talk about "payment" of debt, but clearly states that "Every obligation,.. shall be discharged." Once we understand the facts, a light comes on with regard to our understanding of what has been, and is, going on in our courts.

Every court in the land is operating under the jurisdiction of Admiralty, and in this jurisdiction, among other things:

(1) The jury if there is one, is merely advisor to the chancellor (judge),
(2) The advisory jury must see and hear only the evidence that the judge must see and hear only the evidence
that the judge permits,
(3) The Advisory jury must take the law as the judge dictates it to them;
(4) Substantive common law (Bill of rights) is not cognizable,
(5) There is Limited Liability for Payment of Debt,
(6) There are no such things as rights, only privileges,
(7) Performance is compelled for receiving benefits from privilege.

Proceeding with the observations of Mr. Lee Brobst:

I am now going to take you back in time to 1933. Because there was an Act of Congress known as HJR 192 that suspended our gold standard. What this did was to forbid the American people to pay their debts at law. The only thing we have been able to do since then is to SKIP paying our debts! When you cannot pay your debts at law, you are put into the jurisdiction of "limited capacity" which limits you from performing an act,.. and this is you are prevented from paying debts. What happened in 1933 is this: When Congress suspended our National money system they opened the flood gates for Maritime Law to come inland, into situations formerly dominated by common law.

Now the founding fathers set up two jurisdictions for us in this country. One was the Maritime Law and the other was the Common Law for local use of the states. So when Congress suspended the gold standard they thereby released Maritime Law into land areas formerly dominated by Common Law. The effect was to destroy what is called the "allodial land title" which is the substance of common law.

In 1933, we went into instant "bankruptcy" or "receivership" to the private Federal Reserve Corporation. All of \our money went into the hands of a private group of bankers who are the stockholders of the Federal Reserve,.. the central bankers from Europe, in cooperation with some of our own.

So what happened is this: The bankers started creating check book money over our land title which means that this involvement which has taken place since 1933 changed America from a common law "allodial" system into a common law feudal system.

Upon the total bankruptcy of America the powers that be who own the Federal Reserve System will foreclose on the U.S. Treasury. In the process, they will have turned the U.S. into a private profit making corporation for their exclusive benefit, and you will be but a serf in their employ.

An insurable interest, under Maritime, triggers a multiple of things, such as: the liability for a State Income Tax, a County Income Tax, a right to work tax, etc. It triggers additional insurance policies to protect an "insurable interest" under Maritime.

When we plead a tax case in court, we think we are pleading taxes, but the judge takes a different view of it, that it is a matter of insurance in a Maritime contract, and that it heretofore comes under "Admiralty" jurisdiction and procedures.

Under Maritime Law, we are responsible for any loss which occurs while involved in maritime commerce. Under the common law which prevailed prior to this case (1948) we were responsible for our debts. If you and I own a ship and we want to transport goods to Japan, we solicit people to ship goods with us. Three days out of port we are hit by a severe storm which damaged goods on board our ship.

Under the common law, we would have been responsible for the loss of goods on board. The shippers saw this as a threat to maritime shipping so they induced Congress to pass a law which is called "The Public Liability Statute", which was passed on March 3, 1851. So as a result, the ship owners are now exempt and the shippers are responsible for their goods, under maritime law.

Now in 1933, when we lost our public National money system, we were all thrown into national bankruptcy under law and insurance. When you are involved in maritime law all your property, including the shirt on your back, is a common pledge for the security of everyone concerned.

In years past, it was too dangerous to ship money. The maritime law supplied the credit system to replace money,.. a credit system which has to deal with bills, notes, and checks as we have today. So this is the modern way,.. bills, notes, and checks, simply paper, called "money." All this is legal under authority of mercantile law under "Admiralty" jurisdiction.

According to Mr. Brobst, the foreclosure of America by the Federal Reserve System will occur when the debt becomes so large that we can no longer pay the interest, or the interest exceeds the principal. According to Mr. Brobst, at that time the powers behind the Fed will own all the land titles and we will all be but serfs upon the land we once owned.

Finally, having introduced you to the implications of Admiralty laws, as described by Mr. Brobst, we encourage you to research some of our writings which describe why we must replace the fictitious so-called "Federal" Reserve System, with an Association of States, thereby reasserting our control over our future, whereby we become tax-free once again.

 

[crussmith2]

Give it up - the militia movement, like the KKK, the Know-Nothings and every other vile nativist incitement to murder your fellow countrymen will appeal only to the same small bunch of haters it always did - the legal spin adds nothing!

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

WTF is a treasoness?

Where is Breat Britain?

 

[crussmith2]

You guys are getting some attention;

Sovereign Citizens
A Growing Domestic Threat to Law Enforcement
By the FBI’s Counterterrorism Analysis Section
FBI ? Sovereign Citizens

 

[JakeStarkey]

In East Texas, we were well aware of who is who in the sovereign citizen stupidity.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Give it up - the militia movement, like the KKK, the Know-Nothings and every other vile nativist incitement to murder your fellow countrymen will appeal only to the same small bunch of haters it always did - the legal spin adds nothing!

Are Federal Reserve Notes the property of the Federal Reserve? Yes

Is the Federal Reserve a foreign corporation? Yes!

Is using a Federal Reserve Note a DISCHARGE OF DEBT? Yes!

Whose DEBT? The DEBT OF THE UNITED STATES? Yes!

Whom is the Creditor, is it the Federal Reserve? Yes!

Does that mean that a Federal Reserve Note carries a hidden lien in all contracts which use Federal Reserve Notes? Yes!

Are contracts involving Foreign Corporations considered Maritime/Admiralty Jurisdiction? Yes!

Does the IRS operate under Maritime Jurisdiction? yes!

Refute the above.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Before you decide to jump onboard with the sovereign citizen movement, take a few minutes to research these former members:

Terry Nichols
Joseph T. Kane
David Russell Myrland
Samuel Lynn Davis
Edward and Elaine Brown
Monty and Patricia Ervin
Timothy Garrison
Francis August Shaeffer Cox
Anson Chi
Shawn Talbot Rice
Lonnie G. and Karen Vernon
David B. Graham
James Timothy Turner
Phillip Monroe Ballard
Jennifer Herring
Glenn Richard Unger

Where are they now?

There’s also no such thing as a ‘sovereign citizen.’