Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Their protection isn’t the same, and their requirements aren’t the same.
ATT and Verizon are protected from liability due to their status as a common carrier. That has obligations to carry communication for everyone.
Social media has protections from the CDA which has no obligations.
They’re regulated by completely different frameworks and although some of their protections are the same, many aren’t and their obligations are totally different.
It clearly isn't. Nothing Trump said can be legitimately construed to advocate the disorder weExplain how tis is incitement to violence...
“To all of those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th.”
The claim that Trump is responsible doesn't pass the laugh test. Progs say this because it allows them to pretend they aren't scumbag NAZIs.No, they say they are open to anyone that abides by their terms of service. Now argue if you wish that they do not enforce them equally but all Trump had to do was Tweet like an adult.
This is a lie.
Yes, Twitter is a common carrier. if it's not, then it can be sued into bankruptcy.Verizon is a common carrier.
Twitter is not.
This is an extremely important distinction.
As for treating Twitter as a publisher, it’s a stupid idea. People keep talking about whether Twitter should be regulated like a phone company or a newspaper. It’s neither. It shouldn’t be forced into a regulatory structure that wasn’t designed for something like it. It should be regulated as a social media platform.
If their TOS says so.
Twitter Removed 3.8M Tweets for Violating Twitter Rules in Second Half of 2020
Left doesn't care about the facts. That is the problem. Even as he calls for them not to do it, they ignore his statements. The TDS is just too strong. They hear what they want to hear, and no facts are going to change that.It clearly isn't. Nothing Trump said can be legitimately construed to advocate the disorder we
saw at the nation's capitol on 1/6. That's a fact.
What Biden's commies are doing is putting us at the mercy of terrorists states on purpose.We should unfetter domestic energy production and leave the middle east. Let's do what the French and Brits did in handing the whole middle east mess to us and hand it to someone else
Twitter is already interferring. What he's asking for is to have Twitter stop interfering.That's nonsense. You're asking the courts to step into every controversy between two parties, even if no issue of law is involved, or remedy available.
You want everybody to be able to sue anybody for any reason. Judicial anarchy.
They’re completely different regulatory structures, so you’re incorrect.Some protections are the same as you said. To me Twitter is closer to the NYT than Verizon. And should be regulated as such. Legal scholars cannot agree on this so our debate is tangible. To me if I can say that Colfax abuses cats and Twitter blocks you from a retort they are in fact a publisher of content now. That’s my view. Let the courts and legal scholars fight it out.
Course the government could just take over Facebook and Twitter like Obama took over General Motors and Chrysler.Wrong.
TOS can't be arbitrary or inherently discriminatory in wording or application.
If it harms no one and does not risk litigation, then it can't be censored, even if Twitter does not agree with it.
I'm shocked you didn't know the history of Hamas and the Taliban.See what happens when you provide actual evidence? Amazing, isn't it?
You are such a fucking moron. Inciting a riot is a crime, and Trump said nothing that be construed as doing so.Trump did the equivalent of inciting a riot. Which is an actual crime.
On Friday night, with just 12 days left in his presidency and two days after a mob of his supporters stormed the US Capitol, leading to several deaths, Twitter said it had permanently suspended Trump’s account “due to the risk of further incitement of violence.”
“To all of those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th.”
Psssssst…. the coast is clear......
Nonsense.
No one can enforce an amendment.
Amendments are only for federal appeals courts, and nothing else.
When there is grounds for litigation, that mean you sue someone, which is a civil court, and that is local, so has no recourse to federal documents like the Bill of Rights, constitution, etc. You can't bring up federal documents until you have appealed to federal courts.
I'm sure everyone would be happier and wiser if morons like you would just shut your fucking yaps.Instead of wishing and hoping here, why don't you actually do something and respond on twitter on Trumps behalf. I'm sure you could do a better job than Trump did.
Twitter has rights too, you know.Twitter is already interferring. What he's asking for is to have Twitter stop interfering.
Trump wasn't banned based on his politics. He was banned for the same reason he was impeached. Inciting insurrection, which as an act of violence, is against Twitters terms of service.
