trump begs Florida judge to restore his Twitter account

[Rigby5]

Dumbfuck, data transport is done by ISP's. And storage has nothing to do with it. That reflects how crazy you are.

As far as your claim of some sort of "short haul," there is no thing. People either upload data to Twitter, which is "carried" from their device to Twitter by an ISP; or people download data from Twitter which is "carried" from Twitter to their device by an ISP.

The ISP is the transport layer. ISP's charge a fee for that service. That's why ISP's are common carriers while private Internet businesses are not.

Wrong.
The Transport Layer of the internet is called "Packet Switching", and each machine in the network builds and routes packets.
That is what Twitter does.
It builds and routes internet protocol packets.
It does nothing to the content.
The difference between what Twitter does and the government servers along the network backbone of the internet, is that Twitter also stores them.

The ISPs do not build internet protocol packets.
The end terminators do that, which makes them part of the Transport Layer.

Private internet businesses create content, while Twitter does not.
And private internet businesses are regulated against discrimination of arbitrary denial of services, due to the Terms of Service agreements that ISPs require them to accept.
And the ISPs have to do that because they are regulated by FCC and FTC rules.

 

[Rigby5]

Oh? What data is Twitter transporting?

Tweets by Twitter members.

 

[Faun]

Wrong.
The Transport Layer of the internet is called "Packet Switching", and each machine in the network builds and routes packets.
That is what Twitter does.
It builds and routes internet protocol packets.
It does nothing to the content.
The difference between what Twitter does and the government servers along the network backbone of the internet, is that Twitter also stores them.

The ISPs do not build internet protocol packets.
The end terminators do that, which makes them part of the Transport Layer.

Private internet businesses create content, while Twitter does not.
And private internet businesses are regulated against discrimination of arbitrary denial of services, due to the Terms of Service agreements that ISPs require them to accept.
And the ISPs have to do that because they are regulated by FCC and FTC rules.

Dumbfuck, I didn't say ISP's "build internet protocol packets." I said they transport the data between Twitter and people who connect to Twitter. That's the transport of the data. And packet switching is done across the Internet using ISP's. Twitter does not "packet switch." Packet switching is merely an efficient method for transporting data.

 

[Faun]

Tweets by Twitter members.

False. That data is transported by ISP's. You really should stop speaking about topics you clearly know nothing about.

 

[Rigby5]

Dumbfuck, I didn't say ISP's "build internet protocol packets." I said they transport the data between Twitter and people who connect to Twitter. That's the transport of the data. And packet switching is done across the Internet using ISP's. Twitter does not "packet switch." Packet switching is merely an efficient method for transporting data.

Wrong.
By building packets, Twitter is packet switching.
Do you think Twitter only has 1 ISP connecting to their warehouses?
They are going to build between ISPs and connect between them.
If nothing else, that would hedge between ISPs price gouging.

 

[Rigby5]

False. That data is transported by ISP's. You really should stop speaking about topics you clearly know nothing about.

Wrong.
Each user computer is implementing the TCP/IP protocol stack and is transporting.
The fact they are not doing long haul is not relevant, because anyone anywhere along the network is bound by the FCC and FCT regulations of the entirely internet.
And that precludes arbitrary discrimination or banning.

That is what the whole Net Neutrality thing was about.
If you did not prevent it by regulations, then everyone, from ISPs, social media, browser creators, operating system creators, etc., could and would all discriminate and cause the internet to block everyone but the most wealthy and powerful.
Net Neutrality is essential, and that means social media can't arbitrarily censor or ban.
If Trump did something illegally harmful, then prove it in court.

And by the way, since I have routinely implemented entire internet protocol stacks, I know more about the internet than anyone else likely to be on this entirely board.

 

[FA_Q2]

You can';t take my quote on one subject and apply it to another you totally dishonest piece of shit. Go fuck yourself

And you cannot explain what it means because I hit the nail on the head and you have no way out.

And I did not have to tell you to fuck yourself one time to expose your lies. Carry on.

 

[Rigby5]

False. That data is transported by ISP's. You really should stop speaking about topics you clearly know nothing about.

And by the way, when a company like Twitter spends the money on the hardware and facilities to implement an operation like this, they also defer costs by being an ISP most often.
They deliberately look for a bottleneck and fill it with their facilities.
They get federal subsidies for doing that, besides being able to change locals for hook up.

 

[kaz]

And you cannot explain what it means because I hit the nail on the head and you have no way out.

And I did not have to tell you to fuck yourself one time to expose your lies. Carry on.

Well, we have one thing in common. Neither of us knows that the fuck you are talking about.

kaz: I wouldn't normally support Trump, but we need to defend ourselves from Democrats as they are trying to end democracy and they are serious about it.

FA-Q2: Oh ... my ... God ... You just said we can't do ANYTHING to defend liberty.


I do like your stupid shit now that you know what I think and I don't. You're fucking delusional as well as a total moron.

YOU CANNOT TAKE A QUOTE AND APPLY IT TO A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT SUBJECT.



No, I didn't say that you stupid, empty headed delusional fuck

 

[kaz]

And you cannot explain what it means

Actually you stupid piece of lying shit you never asked. You took my quote from one post, applied it to a different subject and told me what I think. You were wrong. Go fuck yourself

 

[Faun]

Wrong.
By building packets, Twitter is packet switching.
Do you think Twitter only has 1 ISP connecting to their warehouses?
They are going to build between ISPs and connect between them.
If nothing else, that would hedge between ISPs price gouging.

Holy shit.

Dumbfuck, Packet switching is not transferring the data. Packet switching is merely breaking up data into small packets which can be routed faster and routed through the fastest networks available, and then reassembled at the other end. The ISP's transfer those packets. So Twitter is still not transferring data. :eusa_duh:

 

[kaz]

When you can only have one, then it is an inherent monopoly, and it then had better be government owned.
A government monopoly at least can be somewhat controlled by voting.
When it is private, you get no say in it at all.

But in reality EVERYONE knows socialism and communism are vastly superior to capitalism.
There is not a single family, religious order, tribe, community, etc., that is any good, that is not socialist or communist.
Everything good about the US, such as public school, social security, public transportation, fire/police, etc., are all socialism/communism.

Socialism and communism are only better if you are an elite in government

Winston Churchill: The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal distribution of blessings. The inherent virtue of socialism is the equal distribution of misery

Well, unless you're a government elite. Must be your plan since you keep saying how much you love it, and no one plans to be poor

 

[Faun]

Wrong.
Each user computer is implementing the TCP/IP protocol stack and is transporting.
The fact they are not doing long haul is not relevant, because anyone anywhere along the network is bound by the FCC and FCT regulations of the entirely internet.
And that precludes arbitrary discrimination or banning.

That is what the whole Net Neutrality thing was about.
If you did not prevent it by regulations, then everyone, from ISPs, social media, browser creators, operating system creators, etc., could and would all discriminate and cause the internet to block everyone but the most wealthy and powerful.
Net Neutrality is essential, and that means social media can't arbitrarily censor or ban.
If Trump did something illegally harmful, then prove it in court.

And by the way, since I have routinely implemented entire internet protocol stacks, I know more about the internet than anyone else likely to be on this entirely board.

Retard, that's like saying ... because UPS is a common carrier since they deliver my package to my designated destination, that I too am a common carrier since I deliver my package to UPS.

You're a fucking idiot.

 

[bripat9643]

Dumbfuck, data transport is done by ISP's. And storage has nothing to do with it. That reflects how crazy you are.

As far as your claim of some sort of "short haul," there is no thing. People either upload data to Twitter, which is "carried" from their device to Twitter by an ISP; or people download data from Twitter which is "carried" from Twitter to their device by an ISP.

The ISP is the transport layer. ISP's charge a fee for that service. That's why ISP's are common carriers while private Internet businesses are not.

According to the definition of common carrier you got off some hack leftwing website

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Their terms of service are fraudulent.

hahahahaha

Oh boy. Someone has completely run out of horseshit material. Now all the rules are wrong. Good stuff.

 

[bripat9643]

hahahahaha

Oh boy. Someone has completely run out of horseshit material. Now all the rules are wrong. Good stuff.

No, but Twitter's rules are wrong. Not even Twitter follows them.

The fact that your heroes are scumbags doesn't mean everyone is a scumbag

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No, but Twitter's rules are wrong.

hahahahah

twitter can choose to follow or not follow them. And there's not a damn thing any whiny little bitch can do about it.

"My heroes"... oops, you have confused yourself again. Everyone thinks themselves to be normal. You, being an apoplectic, reactionary cultist who tongue bathes anyone who affirms your preconceptions, naturally assumes himself to be "normal" and so thinks other people share your childish mental handicaps. Sorry dude, but they don't.

 

[bripat9643]

hahahahah

twitter can choose to follow or not follow them. And there's not a damn thing any whiny little bitch can do about it.

"My heroes"... oops, you have confused yourself again. Everyone thinks themselves to be normal. You, being an apoplectic, reactionary cultist who tongue bathes anyone who affirms your preconceptions, naturally assumes himself to be "normal" and so thinks other people share your childish mental handicaps. Sorry dude, but they don't.

That's actually not true. If they make a TOS, then they have to follow it. Otherwise, they can be sued. Furthermore, their TOS docne't comply with government regulations.

Almost everything you say about this subject is pure fantasy.

You assholes believe Twitter is totally above the law. That's because you're a bunch of fucking NAZIs.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Wow a lot of venom in this thread. LOL

 

[Faun]

According to the definition of common carrier you got off some hack leftwing website

LOL

Cornell Law School is hardly a "hack leftwing website," but g'head, fucking moron... post a link to your source for the definition of a common carrier...