Trump budget would spike deficits by nearly 5 times Harris proposal, says Penn Wharton

berg80

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 2017
17,695
14,804
2,320
Former President Donald Trump’s economic proposals would increase federal deficits by $5.8 trillion over the next decade, almost five times more than those of Vice President Kamala Harris, which would add $1.2 trillion, according to a new pair of studies from the nonpartisan Penn Wharton Budget Model.

The Trump report found that his plan to permanently extend the 2017 tax cuts would add over $4 trillion to deficits over the next 10 years. His proposal to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits comes with a $1.2 trillion price tag, while his pledge to further reduce corporate taxes would add nearly $6 billion.

The Harris analysis showed that her plan to expand the Child Tax Credit, the Earned Income Tax Credit and other tax credits would raise deficits by $2.1 trillion in the coming 10 years. And her proposal to create a $25,000 subsidy for all qualifying first-time homebuyers would add $140 billion over a decade.

But the Harris report found that raising the corporate tax rate to 28% from its current level of 21%, as the vice president has floated, could partially offset the costs of her spending by $1.1 trillion.

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/27/trump-harris-budget-deficit-economy-election.html

Don lives for the now. He wants the kind of adulation associated with a strong economy (the kind Biden never got) coming from the stimulative affect of a tax cut. Just like in his first term. One wonders if he'll claim a tax cut will cause a reduction in the deficit as he did last time. It's a promise Repubs frequently make, never coming to fruition.

Note to Don's minions: don't assassinate the character of the guy who authored the study. If you can find fault with his methodology, fine. Just don't waste time with ad hominem attacks.
 
Former President Donald Trump’s economic proposals would increase federal deficits by $5.8 trillion over the next decade, almost five times more than those of Vice President Kamala Harris, which would add $1.2 trillion, according to a new pair of studies from the nonpartisan Penn Wharton Budget Model.

The Trump report found that his plan to permanently extend the 2017 tax cuts would add over $4 trillion to deficits over the next 10 years. His proposal to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits comes with a $1.2 trillion price tag, while his pledge to further reduce corporate taxes would add nearly $6 billion.

The Harris analysis showed that her plan to expand the Child Tax Credit, the Earned Income Tax Credit and other tax credits would raise deficits by $2.1 trillion in the coming 10 years. And her proposal to create a $25,000 subsidy for all qualifying first-time homebuyers would add $140 billion over a decade.

But the Harris report found that raising the corporate tax rate to 28% from its current level of 21%, as the vice president has floated, could partially offset the costs of her spending by $1.1 trillion.

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/27/trump-harris-budget-deficit-economy-election.html

Don lives for the now. He wants the kind of adulation associated with a strong economy (the kind Biden never got) coming from the stimulative affect of a tax cut. Just like in his first term. One wonders if he'll claim a tax cut will cause a reduction in the deficit as he did last time. It's a promise Repubs frequently make, never coming to fruition.

Note to Don's minions: don't assassinate the character of the guy who authored the study. If you can find fault with his methodology, fine. Just don't waste time with ad hominem attacks.
LOL Amazing how they performed this analysis without Harris ever releasing an economic proposal.
 
Yea, I'm kinda curious, WHAT IS THE HARRIS ECONOMIC PROPOSAL?

All I read is she wants to boost TAXES by 5 trillion. Yea, that'll help the economy won't it?
The Harris analysis showed that her plan to expand the Child Tax Credit, the Earned Income Tax Credit and other tax credits would raise deficits by $2.1 trillion in the coming 10 years. And her proposal to create a $25,000 subsidy for all qualifying first-time homebuyers would add $140 billion over a decade.

But the Harris report found that raising the corporate tax rate to 28% from its current level of 21%, as the vice president has floated, could partially offset the costs of her spending by $1.1 trillion.
 
Yea, I'm kinda curious, WHAT IS THE HARRIS ECONOMIC PROPOSAL?

All I read is she wants to boost TAXES by 5 trillion. Yea, that'll help the economy won't it?
Reading might be a tough skill for you:

Remember that Penn Wharton is where Trump went to Business School...

Trump increased deficits considerably before COVID and his tax cuts never paid for themselves or never intended too either...

Harris is the vote for true fiscal conservative when it comes to free trade and minimising National Debt... Even they see through the borrow and give to the rich as very bad economic policy. Wharton is one of the most republican leaning campuses in America.
 
The Harris analysis showed that her plan to expand the Child Tax Credit, the Earned Income Tax Credit and other tax credits would raise deficits by $2.1 trillion in the coming 10 years. And her proposal to create a $25,000 subsidy for all qualifying first-time homebuyers would add $140 billion over a decade.

But the Harris report found that raising the corporate tax rate to 28% from its current level of 21%, as the vice president has floated, could partially offset the costs of her spending by $1.1 trillion.

Ok so what is her economic plan? I see a link to a college website. I want it out of the bitches mouth. Anything else could be manipulated data.
 
Golly gee, what a liar.
I do not know if deficits will continue. They most likely will. To really try to bring manufacturing home or at least starting it and to invest in infrastructure where we really get new infrastructure and renovated infrastructure from legislation will create employment with fair wages. Progs signed off on paying people off under Joe and Kamala.
 
Former President Donald Trump’s economic proposals would increase federal deficits by $5.8 trillion over the next decade, almost five times more than those of Vice President Kamala Harris, which would add $1.2 trillion, according to a new pair of studies from the nonpartisan Penn Wharton Budget Model.

The Trump report found that his plan to permanently extend the 2017 tax cuts would add over $4 trillion to deficits over the next 10 years. His proposal to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits comes with a $1.2 trillion price tag, while his pledge to further reduce corporate taxes would add nearly $6 billion.

The Harris analysis showed that her plan to expand the Child Tax Credit, the Earned Income Tax Credit and other tax credits would raise deficits by $2.1 trillion in the coming 10 years. And her proposal to create a $25,000 subsidy for all qualifying first-time homebuyers would add $140 billion over a decade.

But the Harris report found that raising the corporate tax rate to 28% from its current level of 21%, as the vice president has floated, could partially offset the costs of her spending by $1.1 trillion.

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/27/trump-harris-budget-deficit-economy-election.html

Don lives for the now. He wants the kind of adulation associated with a strong economy (the kind Biden never got) coming from the stimulative affect of a tax cut. Just like in his first term. One wonders if he'll claim a tax cut will cause a reduction in the deficit as he did last time. It's a promise Repubs frequently make, never coming to fruition.

Note to Don's minions: don't assassinate the character of the guy who authored the study. If you can find fault with his methodology, fine. Just don't waste time with ad hominem attacks.
Suddenly democrats are concerned about deficits? Roflmao
 
Former President Donald Trump’s economic proposals would increase federal deficits by $5.8 trillion over the next decade, almost five times more than those of Vice President Kamala Harris, which would add $1.2 trillion, according to a new pair of studies from the nonpartisan Penn Wharton Budget Model.

The Trump report found that his plan to permanently extend the 2017 tax cuts would add over $4 trillion to deficits over the next 10 years. His proposal to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits comes with a $1.2 trillion price tag, while his pledge to further reduce corporate taxes would add nearly $6 billion.

The Harris analysis showed that her plan to expand the Child Tax Credit, the Earned Income Tax Credit and other tax credits would raise deficits by $2.1 trillion in the coming 10 years. And her proposal to create a $25,000 subsidy for all qualifying first-time homebuyers would add $140 billion over a decade.

But the Harris report found that raising the corporate tax rate to 28% from its current level of 21%, as the vice president has floated, could partially offset the costs of her spending by $1.1 trillion.

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/27/trump-harris-budget-deficit-economy-election.html

Don lives for the now. He wants the kind of adulation associated with a strong economy (the kind Biden never got) coming from the stimulative affect of a tax cut. Just like in his first term. One wonders if he'll claim a tax cut will cause a reduction in the deficit as he did last time. It's a promise Repubs frequently make, never coming to fruition.

Note to Don's minions: don't assassinate the character of the guy who authored the study. If you can find fault with his methodology, fine. Just don't waste time with ad hominem attacks.
There is nothing republicans love more than ballooning our deficits
 
I do not know if deficits will continue. They most likely will. To really try to bring manufacturing home or at least starting it and to invest in infrastructure where we really get new infrastructure and renovated infrastructure from legislation will create employment with fair wages. Progs signed off on paying people off under Joe and Kamala.
1724799254623.png


Biden looks to have made a start...

Do you not get this from your Right Wing Media sources?
 
A bankrupt nation with few options , and even fewer that understand it is a recipe for doom.....~S~
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top