para bellum
Platinum Member
Yes, but but Trump is the decision-maker. They can't just start liquidating his assets. He can keep running his businesses and the monitors are returned to an oversight role.Subject to..
WW
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, but but Trump is the decision-maker. They can't just start liquidating his assets. He can keep running his businesses and the monitors are returned to an oversight role.Subject to..
WW
I found one site that reported in October that she may be able to confiscate Mar A Lago but it goes on to say since her judge placed a low price on the property that could derail her from trying because the property would have to be reevaluated for its value... it would make her case a joke... and it would show the judge to be a dishonest evaluator or just flat out wrong...I didn't say she is. But if she was so inclined she COULD. Maga-Lardo is under the umbrella of the tRump Organization. Which is incorporated in New York!
MAGA
So you don't agree that the half billion dollar and counting court judgement is real?Wrong.
So you don't agree that the half billion dollar and counting court judgement is real?
OK then.
What is your alternate reality?
Yes, but but Trump is the decision-maker. They can't just start liquidating his assets. He can keep running his businesses and the monitors are returned to an oversight role.
I found one site that reported in October that she may be able to confiscate Mar A Lago but it goes on to say since her judge placed a low price on the property that could derail her from trying because the property would have to be reevaluated for its value... it would make her case a joke... and it would show the judge to be a dishonest evaluator or just flat out wrong...
Yeah, they said that before too! Their Bank said no more to Trump after he sued them, well....that was before one of their venture capitol divisions loaned him all that money for 10 years that Trump committed fraud in the case he just lost!Deutsche Bank publicly stated they will no longer work with Trump.
Like I said if she was so inclined to do so she could. Please point to where I said that she actually did it! I will wait!I found one site that reported in October that she may be able to confiscate Mar A Lago but it goes on to say since her judge placed a low price on the property that could derail her from trying because the property would have to be reevaluated for its value... it would make her case a joke... and it would show the judge to be a dishonest evaluator or just flat out wrong...
Mar A Lago is not an 18 million dollar property... and that's what the NY case is built on.... it would really expose the whole thing when the property gets a proper evaluation.... I think it could cause the case to be overturned...If FPOSTUS#45 gets to the point where the court is seizing physical assets (not talking cash accounts), then the state will be hiring proper valuations from reputable experts.
This helps determine which properties to seize. Then the state will liquidate those assets. If there is money left over (judgement + interest + attorney fees + costs) it goes back to FPOTUS. If the first round of seizures doesn't satisfy the judgement, additional properties can be liquidated.
Shouldn't be to bad though, FPOTUS#45 said under oath he had $400 Million in cash and it was growing.
WW
But it could ruin her case when the property is valued at say 300 million....Like I said if she was so inclined to do so she could. Please point to where I said that she actually did it! I will wait!
MAGA
How's that?But it could ruin her case when the property is valued at say 300 million....
Fair? Meh. Probably not~The alternate reality is thinking this case is valid and fair.
Her case was built on Trump overvaluing his property in NY and Florida... the judge set a value of 18 million for Mar A Lago... everyone knows its ridiculous and if she tries to take it the property would have to have a real valuation...How's that?
FYII found one site that reported in October that she may be able to confiscate Mar A Lago but it goes on to say since her judge placed a low price on the property that could derail her from trying because the property would have to be reevaluated for its value... it would make her case a joke... and it would show the judge to be a dishonest evaluator or just flat out wrong...
Mar A Lago is not an 18 million dollar property... and that's what the NY case is built on.... it would really expose the whole thing when the property gets a proper evaluation.... I think it could cause the case to be overturned...
Her case was built on Trump overvaluing his property in NY and Florida... the judge set a value of 18 million for Mar A Lago.
Trump has 400 million in cash. They are taking 500 million, so he wants to take out a loan for the remaining 100 million, as opposed to selling properties.
You and the OP fell for a very weak hoax.