Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 97,430
- 73,668
- 3,645
One bank. One guy.the Banks
Funny thing is, the bank he worked at released a public statement that they would never work with Trump again.
So that talking point is also crap.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One bank. One guy.the Banks
A good conscience does not give poor advice to shill for a serial fraudster.. I cannot in good conscience to my clients do any business in NY.
That you for proving how to think like a pile of Cow dung.There's no 8th Amendment issue here.
Heck, Trump's fine isn't even in the top ten of fines against companies who break the law.
15 Biggest Compliance Fines ($1Billion and Above)
Look at the biggest compliance & bank fines from 2012 to 2022, involving Western financial institutions like the Bank of America, JP Morgan, and more.www.enzuzo.com
That you for proving how to think like a pile of Cow dung.
What a magic act.If Houdini was around he's like yer take
on how to float when sinking.While taking s nap.
1) He's not the PresidentIt's not getting answered.
Trump is an INDIVIDUAL.You concession is duly noted. Point was, some companies have been fined billions for similar misconduct. So Trump kind of got off easy.
No way Mar a largo is making that money .
Trump is an INDIVIDUAL.
The 8th Amendment will PREVAIL
But there was nothing excessive...Trump is an INDIVIDUAL.
The 8th Amendment will PREVAIL
Fuck all you communist SCUMBAGS
You fucking retarded wannabe Marxist Leninist revolutionaries forgot that we have the CONSTITUTION, and it CLEALY states that what you clowns are trying to do is completely UNCONSTITUTIONAL.The judgement is against FPOTUS#45 as an individual, the Trump Trust as a legal entity, and the Trump Organization as a business entity.
For a disgorgement of illegally obtained assets? Probably not since it is neither "bail" or "punishment" under the context of the 8th Amendment. It is recouping illegal gains.
WW
The bank is shitting themselves that one shareholder (doesn't matter how much he has) can bring the whole executive board up on Sarbane - Oxley violations...One bank. One guy.
Funny thing is, the bank he worked at released a public statement that they would never work with Trump again.
So that talking point is also crap.
A HALF A FUCKING BILLION DOLLARS ISN'T EXCESSIVE????????????(But there was nothing excessive...
James showed in court that the lies Trump Inc told saved them $168m in repayments on just one tranche.
Loading…
edition.cnn.com
So then he gets the penalties on top... Which doubles the original amount (remember Trump didn't plead guilty or attempt to work this out).
This is the breakdown...
Here's a look inside Donald Trump's $355 million civil fraud verdict
On the witness stand last year, Donald Trump proclaimed: “I have a lot of cash.” After Friday’s eye-popping penalty, he’s going to need it — and maybe more.apnews.com
If anything I think he got off a bit light...
All the other companies that have paid BILLIONS for misconduct much less than Trump's would disagree.You fucking retarded wannabe Marxist Leninist revolutionaries forgot that we have the CONSTITUTION, and it CLEALY states that what you clowns are trying to do is completely UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
You can contort yourself into a pretzel a you want, all this BULLSHIT is ILLEGAL.
Not only that, but it's all blatant ELECTION INTERFERENCE too.
So.......
Also, the 14th - which provides equal protection. Nobody else has ever been fined half a billion dollars for a victimless crime like this; and based on James’ “promise” she would “get Trump,” this is a case of targeting an individual and then searching for a crime,Trump is an INDIVIDUAL.
The 8th Amendment will PREVAIL
Fuck all you communist SCUMBAGS
Except the crime wasn't victimless.Also, the 14th - which provides equal protection. Nobody else has ever been fined half a billion dollars for a victimless crime like this; and based on James’ “promise” she would “get Trump,” this is a case of targeting an individual and then searching for a crime,
Not when you look at what Trump Inc. was defrauding. The savings Trump on there credit rating was saving hunreds of millions...A HALF A FUCKING BILLION DOLLARS ISN'T EXCESSIVE????????????(
You fucking retarded wannabe Marxist Leninist revolutionaries forgot that we have the CONSTITUTION, and it CLEALY states that what you clowns are trying to do is completely UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
You can contort yourself into a pretzel a you want, all this BULLSHIT is ILLEGAL.
Not only that, but it's all blatant ELECTION INTERFERENCE too.
So.......
All the other companies that have paid BILLIONS for misconduct much less than Trump's would disagree.
But Trump can't appeal anything until he comes up with the money.
All BULLSHITNot when you look at what Trump Inc. was defrauding. The savings Trump on there credit rating was saving hunreds of millions...
This is a financial crime, Trump Inc. knew what they were doing. the paper trail is plain to see...
What seems like small crimes have huge pay offs..
Small stuff can yeild huge savings:
Loading…
edition.cnn.com
Loading…
www.bettermarkets.org
From the Documents, Trump Inc. knew they were inflating the property prices by multiple amounts... Trump flew too close to the sun and when caught instead of pleading it out, he tried to fight it, that when you get fucked (Wesley Snipes fucked)....
Trump biggest sin, is guilty of being stupid, he could have got away with a slap on the wrist and big fine ($100m - $200m)..
The reason the bank MADE $100 million off the loan is because they gave Trump a favorable rate In order to win the contract. The bank was thrilled, and the stockholders made a fortune.The bank is shitting themselves that one shareholder (doesn't matter how much he has) can bring the whole executive board up on Sarbane - Oxley violations...
The executives of a company are legally bound to mind shareholders money... giving Trump Inc. $150m interest discount would not be acceptable..