Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You’re being obtuse.It is if you classify it as legal fees when it was hush money while in the middle of an election.
You’re being obtuse.
The alleged reimbursement of scumbag Cohen came after the election. Ergo, it couldn’t possibly have been to influence the election.
NDA’s are legal. Paying for them is legal. Paying an attorney’s invoice is legal and how else would it have been entered in the business records other than legal expenses. Paying your attorney and paying for an NDA is a legal expense.
Except the payment was made BEFORE the election.
Nope. The fact that he reimbursed Cohen at all isn’t established. Trump paid a damn lawyer invoice. Nowhere did it mention that it was for reimbursement of the payment of the NDA fee. So all you’ve got is the testimony of a self serving scumbag who has already been convicted of perjury.The fact that he punted compensating Cohen until after the election shows that he knew it was criminal and was trying to hide it.
According to whom? How does anyone know that Trump even knew that he was reimbursing anybody for the NDA fee? Again, rely on the word of a convicted perjured?Except you have to list the settlement separate from legal fees.
No evidence that he would have had to.Trump didn't do that.
Everytime his lips move lies come out.Man that sharing of truth , honesty and reality is infuriating to the witch hunters
Pull your head out of Trumps ass BackAgain!So what? How is that material or relevant?
Nope. The fact that he reimbursed Cohen at all isn’t established. Trump paid a damn lawyer invoice. Nowhere did it mention that it was for reimbursement of the payment of the NDA fee. So all you’ve got is the testimony of a self serving scumbag who has already been convicted of perjury.
According to whom? How does anyone know that Trump even knew that he was reimbursing anybody for the NDA fee? Again, rely on the word of a convicted perjured?
No evidence that he would have had to.
Nope. The fact that he reimbursed Cohen at all isn’t established. Trump paid a damn lawyer invoice. Nowhere did it mention that it was for reimbursement of the payment of the NDA fee. So all you’ve got is the testimony of a self serving scumbag who has already been convicted of perjury.
No. They don’t.Okay, I realize that you Trump cultists live in your own little world, but they have documentation and corroborating testimony from SEVERAL witnesses.
Wrong. Scumbag Cohen is the sole witness who connects Trump to any alleged “crime” (as weak as that legal theory is in the first place). The jury is going to have to buy what that convicted perjurer is peddling to warrant any conviction, even in theory.Now, yeah, if it was Trump vs. Cohen, even though we know Trump is a lying scumbag, reasonable doubt should favor Trump.
No. It’s not.But it's Trump vs. Cohen and Daniels and Pecker and a ton of other witnesses along with a pile of documents.
Wrong. Scumbag Cohen is the sole witness who connects Trump to any alleged “crime” (as weak as that legal theory is in the first place). The jury is going to have to buy what that convicted perjurer is peddling to warrant any conviction, even in theory.
How was it supposed to be classified legally?It is if you classify it as legal fees when it was hush money while in the middle of an election.
/—-/ Trump has every right to be angry. So stuff it.So Trump couldn't help himself, attacking the judge and reading verbatim the opinions of favorable journalists outside of the courthouse right now. He called the judge both "corrupt" and "conflicted" and "weaponized" and a lot of other things I don't remember.
The Cohen testimony provided just enough pressure to make the dam burst.
He should find a mirror then./—-/ Trump has every right to be angry. So stuff it.
Payment to Clifford, Stephanie $130,000.How was it supposed to be classified legally?
*directed by Trump, per the evidence and testimonyPayment to Clifford, Stephanie $130,000.
The checks were made out to Cohen. What you are suggesting would clearly be falsification of a record.Payment to Clifford, Stephanie $130,000.
Truth thoughTired cliche
BackAgain fails again.No. They don’t.
Wrong. Scumbag Cohen is the sole witness who connects Trump to any alleged “crime” (as weak as that legal theory is in the first place). The jury is going to have to buy what that convicted perjurer is peddling to warrant any conviction, even in theory.
No. It’s not.
No. I’m denying any conspiracy.Your premise is that the only person who benefitted from the conspiracy is the only one who wasn't in on it. That Daniels and Cohen decided on their own to pay her off, and then Cohen presented him with a bill after the election for legal services not provided.
To give you an example. Most people agree Richard Nixon had no knowledge of the Watergate break in before it happened. But he engaged in a conspiracy to hide the involvement of his campaign in it.
You are clueless. Per usual.The answer is supposed to precede the trial.
That’s true in burglary cases in NY. It is dubious for these bullshit charges. But a dolt like you wouldn’t understand shit that isn’t spoon fed to you gullible assholes by propagandist media.
Wrong. And there are many reasons why.
You remain an idiot regardless.
