Trump guilty of battery and defamation of E Jean Carroll

[0311]

What poster 0311 doesn’t realize - not too smart a guy - is that it shows how extremely biased that jury was if they tried to remove a potential juror simply because he occasionally listened to a conservative podcaster.

What that shows is that the jury was composed of 11 people so extremely biased to the left that they never even listened to anything but anti-Trump liberal news, and 1 poster who occasionally listened to a conservative podcast.

Tried and failed, which of course you do not mention.

One vote MAGA MAGGOT just one vote.

What happened to that courage of convictions shit pot?

 

[Lisa558]

Tried and failed, which of course you do not mention.

One vote MAGA MAGGOT just one vote.

What happened to that courage of convictions shit pot?

There was no conservative on the jury. You’re considering that because ONE juror occasionally listed to a podcast by a conservative, that makes him a conservative?

Wow. You libtards sure don’t allow any independence of thought….you must listen and read ONLY liberal sources, 100% of the time, or you are a MAGGOT!

You are nauseating.

 

[PredFan]

This verdict will almost certainly be rejected on appeal.

Here's something that even the thickest headed leftist might understand:

Since Trump was found not guilty of rape, and since she lied about being raped, how can he possibly defame her by calling her a liar?

Is that too difficult for your tiny dysfunctional brains to comprehend?

 

[Lisa558]

Tried and failed, which of course you do not mention.

One vote MAGA MAGGOT just one vote.

What happened to that courage of convictions shit pot?

There was no “maggot” on the jury. In fact, there are no maggots, anywhere, ever, except perhaps on dead meat sitting out by the road.

 

[Lisa558]

This verdict will almost certainly be rejected on appeal.

Here's something that even the thickest headed leftist might understand:

Since Trump was found not guilty of rape, and since she lied about being raped, how can he possibly defame her by calling her a liar?

Is that too difficult for your tiny dysfunctional brains to comprehend?

BINGO!!

I was almost going to start a thread on that very thing. It’s accepted in legal circles that once someone is determined to be a liar in a trial, any of the following testimony is not to be trusted either, since the witness has lost credibility.

So the jury decided she lied when she said Trump raped her, but she told the truth when she said he sexually abused her?

 

[Faun]

Of course they were biased. They were from NY, and believed a woman’s crazy accusation that something happened 30 years when she had no evidence, and no police report.

Yes, based on Trump's lies and self-proclaimed entitlement to grab women by the pussy.

 

[Faun]

Question:

When the decision is overturned on appeal, which it certainly will be, will you be as quick to pronounce him not guilty?

You won't because you are an ignorant hack.

Overturned, based on what grounds?

 

[Faun]

No rape pumkin

Yeah, just "sexual assault." You still gonna vote for him?

 

[Ralph Norton]

Overturned, based on what grounds?

Lack of evidence.

 

[PredFan]

There was no “maggot” on the jury. In fact, there are no maggots, anywhere, ever, except perhaps on dead meat sitting out by the road.

Or in the dead meat between liberal ears.

 

[MarathonMike]

Yeah, just "sexual assault." You still gonna vote for him?

I'll vote for anyone who can get the Chinacrats out of power. They are destroying this country.

 

[PredFan]

Leftists who support a pedophile rapist Joe Biden and want to make pedophilia a protected sexual preference are acting like it's crazy that we would vote for a guy who is accused of sexual misconduct.

You can't, no way can you make this idiocy up.

 

[beagle9]

The Trump’s were providing legitimate services long before Donald was president, and they didn’t set up laundering companies to disguise. Not so the Biden’s - with secret payouts even going to the grandchildren.

That's where we are at .... Thanks

 

[0311]

Question:

When the decision is overturned on appeal, which it certainly will be, will you be as quick to pronounce him not guilty?

You won't because you are an ignorant hack.

Remind me, how many times has the Rapist and Traitor won in court recently? Not his hand picked SCOTUS choices have supported him.

As for finding him guilty, you were idiots shouting "Lock Her Up", and there was no trial at all.

I ask one more time, that guy who listened to Pool, where were his courage to his convictions? Where was his own strength of character?

There would been for overturning the judgement if HE had been removed from the jury and he was not.

All that handwringing over how the Rapist and Traitor was being treated. Did that one guy pussy out, or did he see the evidence supported Ms. Carroll?

 

[0311]

I'll vote for anyone who can get the Chinacrats out of power. They are destroying this country.

The Rapist and Traitor pays taxes in China dolt.

 

[beagle9]

You have a list of the jurors names so you verified they were bias?

Name's ? Hell all anyone has to do is understand the ruling, and understand how they came to the conclusion - otherwise they are extremely biased plain and simple. There's no precedent for what they've done, and in Trump's cases there never is because of the extreme Bias.

Media has the same problem, but of course they do, because they are top heavy with brainwashed from childhood leftist, and so they are eat up with bias through in and through out it appears.

Once it becomes concentrated, it's hell on wheels. However wheels can't run flat forever.

Soon they start to come off.

 

[Lisa558]

Name's ? Hell all anyone has to do is understand the ruling, and understand how they came to the conclusion - otherwise they are extremely biased plain and simple. There's no precedent for what they've done, and in Trump's cases there never is because of the extreme Bias.

Media has the same problem, but of course they do, because they are top heavy with brainwashed from childhood leftist, and so they are eat up with bias through in and through out it appears.

Once it becomes concentrated, it's hell on wheels. However wheels can't run flat forever.

Soon they start to come off.

The other hint that the jury was biased in that they even objected to a guy who OCCASIONALLY listened to a podcast by a conservative. IOW, they were looking for people so close-minded and far to the left that they never even listened to anything but lying liberal media exclusively. They got 11 diehard leftists, and one somewhat moderate. There was no conservative or Trump supporter on that jury.

The case should be overturned in the basis that the decided the woman was a liar when she accused Trump of rape. Thus, a liar’s testimony has no credibility and nothing she says can be trusted.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Name's ? Hell all anyone has to do is understand the ruling, and understand how they came to the conclusion - otherwise they are extremely biased plain and simple. There's no precedent for what they've done, and in Trump's cases there never is because of the extreme Bias.

The jury, judge and prosecutor's understood the ruling.

Trump is a sexual abuser.

There is plenty of precedent for sexual abuse cases.

Media has the same problem, but of course they do, because they are top heavy with brainwashed from childhood leftist, and so they are eat up with bias through in and through out it appears.

What does the media have to with this?

They didn't sit on the jury.

Once it becomes concentrated, it's hell on wheels. However wheels can't run flat forever.

Soon they start to come off.

That is what we are seeing on the right at the moment.

 

[Road Runner]

Yes, based on Trump's lies and self-proclaimed entitlement to grab women by the pussy.

He never personally said that he did that. He was just talking about how men in general do that.

 

[Faun]

Lack of evidence.

Not possible since there was evidence entered which the jury decided met a preponderance to find Trump liable.