Trump guilty of battery and defamation of E Jean Carroll

[BackAgain]

Plus, the verdict of “liable” was based on no evidence, other than the testimony of the jury who already judged the claimant to be a liar.

You make a good point. The verdict makes practically no sense. But that’s another story. That’s why we have appeals.

 

[Lisa558]

And what jury found Biden sexually abused anyone?

You know, like this jury did for Trump:

Asked on its verdict sheet whether Carroll, 79, had proven “by a preponderance of the evidence” that “Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carroll,” the nine-person jury checked the box that said “no.” Asked whether Carroll had proven “by a preponderance of the evidence” that “Mr. Trump sexually abused Ms. Carroll,” the jury checked the box that said “yes.” Both allegations were elements of Carroll’s battery claim.

There was no evidence. Only the testimony of the witness that the jury already deemed a liar.

 

[BackAgain]

She had two women corroborate her word. trump did not even show up.

Nobody could corroborate her story you imbecile. All they did was claim that she had made a reference to her fantasy story at or near that time.

 

[Lisa558]

She had two women corroborate her word. trump did not even show up.

So two women were willing to lie, long after the fact. The hate for Trump is that bad, thanks to the media that brainwashed you fools.

He was the best president in decades.

 

[Lisa558]

You make a good point. The verdict makes practically no sense. But that’s another story. That’s why we have appeals.

It will be appealed on that basis alone. A jury cannot decide that a witness is a liar in one part of her testimony, but truthful in other parts, when the only evidence is the witness’s testimony.

 

[Lisa558]

How to destroy a country:

1) Open your border and let millions of unknown immigrants with their drugs, crime, diseases into your country
2) Defund, attack and undermine your police force
3) Divide the people and pit them against each other
4) Incite attacks on Supreme Court justices
5) Install DAs in major cities who release criminals back onto the streets

6) Have a president who declares anyone who doesn’t submit to the regime’s “truth” is a threat to the nation.
7) Focus children’s education on how terrible America is.
8) Weaponize federal agencies to wage war on political opponents, including jailing them without a trial.

 

[Faun]

How to destroy a country:

1) Open your border and let millions of unknown immigrants with their drugs, crime, diseases into your country
2) Defund, attack and undermine your police force
3) Divide the people and pit them against each other
4) Incite attacks on Supreme Court justices
5) Install DAs in major cities who release criminals back onto the streets

Dayam, don't break your pearl necklace, clutching it so hard.

Millions have been coming in before Biden became president.

Police were not defended.

Americans were divided before Biden.

An attempted attack on a SCOTUS justice did not end the nation. That fuckhead was arrested and charged. The opposite of ending a nation.

If any DA is not doing their job, the people can vote them out. Again, the opposite of destroying a country.

 

[BackAgain]

It will be appealed on that basis alone. A jury cannot decide that a witness is a liar in one part of her testimony, but truthful in other parts, when the only evidence is the witness’s testimony.

Actually, a jury can do that. The legal doctrine is known as “falsis in uno.” Basically, a judge tells a jury that they may conclude that a witness who has lied in one respect may well have lied in all respects. But the jury remains free to accept whatever portion it finds to be the truth and reject the rest.

 

[Road Runner]

He certainly implied it and dozens of women have said he did it to them.

Oh he did not and those women don't have anything to backup their story.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Any jury that votes to hold Trump liable for a sexual abuse claim when there is no evidence, and that supposedly happened 27 years ago, and where the accuser never filed a police report is biased.

There was evidence. It was presented at trial.

You may not like it, but it was presented.

WW

 

[Lisa558]

Actually, a jury can do that. The legal doctrine is known as “falsis in uno.” Basically, a judge tells a jury that they may conclude that a witness who has lied in one respect may well have lied in all respects. But the jury remains free to accept whatever portion it finds to be the truth and reject the rest.

False in uno: false in one thing, false in everything. DOES NOT GEL with a judge (and a biased one such as the one on Trump’s trial) telling jurors they can pick and choose which parts are lies and which parts false.

Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Lisa558]

There was evidence. It was presented at trial.

You may not like it, but it was presented.

WW

The only evidence was the woman’s testimony, and the jury determined her to be a liar.

 

[Road Runner]

There was evidence. It was presented at trial.

The evidence was women claiming Trump was mean to them. Really America?

 

[WorldWatcher]

The evidence was women claiming Trump was mean to them. Really America?

No.

The evidence I was referring to was concerning contemporaneous statements at the time of the event.

But you are correct, The was other evidence to show a pattern of behavior.

WW

 

[BackAgain]

False in uno: false in one thing, false in everything. DOES NOT GEL with a judge (and a biased one such as the one on Trump’s trial) telling jurors they can pick and choose which parts are lies and which parts false.

Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

It is a permissive rule. It does not tell any jury how they must decide. It simply advises them how they MAY decide.

I’ve had people lie to my face before. I suspect we all have. That wouldn’t require any of us to conclude that the person necessarily can never be truthful. But it might make us hesitate on any decision to believe that person the next time they say something.

 

[bodecea]

There was no evidence. Only the testimony of the witness that the jury already deemed a liar.

"the jury already deemed a liar"...............oh really? Where did you get that information?

 

[San Souci]

Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll, must pay her $5 million, jury says

Donald Trump must pay $5 million in damages for sexually abusing magazine writer E. Jean Carroll in the 1990s and then defaming her by branding her a liar, a jury decided on Tuesday.

www.reuters.com

Makes ya proud, MAGA?

Another Gold digging whore.

 

[0311]

Georgia Prosecutor Fights Back Against Trump Attempt To Remove Her From Election Probe.

Georgia prosecutor fights back against Trump attempt to remove her from election probe

The Georgia prosecutor who’s investigating whether Donald Trump and his allies broke any laws as they tried to overturn his 2020 election loss in the state is fighting back against the former president’s attempt to remove her from the case and exclude certain evidence. Trump’s Georgia legal team...

apnews.com

ATLANTA (AP) — The Georgia prosecutor who’s investigating whether Donald Trump and his allies broke any laws as they tried to overturn his 2020 election loss in the state fought back Monday against the former president’s attempt to remove her from the case and exclude evidence.

Trump’s Georgia legal team in March asked the court to toss out the report of a special grand jury that had been seated in the case and to prevent prosecutors from using any evidence or testimony stemming from the panel’s investigation. They also asked that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and her office be barred from continuing to investigate or prosecute the case.

Willis responded in a filing Monday that the Trump’s motion is “procedurally flawed” and advances “arguments that lack merit.”

 

[JimH52]

There was no evidence. Only the testimony of the witness that the jury already deemed a liar.

trump is a sexual deviant.

 

[JimH52]

The only evidence was the woman’s testimony, and the jury determined her to be a liar.

They ruled in her favor unanimously. Everyone knew she was telling the truth. Why do you MAGA cult members lie so much?