Trump Is Speaking Right Now..............

[NYcarbineer]

What did she win?

The popular vote! That means more American voters wanted her to be the president than did the orange faced orangutan:


:

Remind me what that has to do with winning the presidential election,

We have a weird undemocratic system for electing presidents. An obsolete relic left over from the days of powdered wigs and slavery.

If you're proud of that, that's all we need to know about your character.

Absolutely!!

The electoral college was devised to satisfy a need when somebody had to ride a horse 75-150 miles just to cast one electoral vote. Now......when every vote in the country can be tabulated and totaled within half a day the electoral college has long since outlived it's usefulness. Let's update our country to the 21st century!!

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........end of story:

Clinton 62,521,739

Trump 61,195,258

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........

More people in the Blue Wall wanted Hillary.

More states wanted someone else.

Unfortunately, that was Trump

He took 3/5s of the states.

I hope the day never comes when 10-15 of the most populous states decide the presidency

If all states were equal in population, MAYBE more states wanting someone for president would be an acceptable measure from a democratic perspective.

You're arguing for each state having ONE vote for president; that is retarded even for you.

 

[Auld Phart]

The popular vote! That means more American voters wanted her to be the president than did the orange faced orangutan:


:

Remind me what that has to do with winning the presidential election,

We have a weird undemocratic system for electing presidents. An obsolete relic left over from the days of powdered wigs and slavery.

If you're proud of that, that's all we need to know about your character.

Absolutely!!

The electoral college was devised to satisfy a need when somebody had to ride a horse 75-150 miles just to cast one electoral vote. Now......when every vote in the country can be tabulated and totaled within half a day the electoral college has long since outlived it's usefulness. Let's update our country to the 21st century!!

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........end of story:

Clinton 62,521,739

Trump 61,195,258

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........

More people in the Blue Wall wanted Hillary.

More states wanted someone else.

Unfortunately, that was Trump

He took 3/5s of the states.

I hope the day never comes when 10-15 of the most populous states decide the presidency

If all states were equal in population, MAYBE more states wanting someone for president would be an acceptable measure from a democratic perspective.

You're arguing for each state having ONE vote for president; that is retarded even for you.

You're arguing for each state having ONE vote for president; that is retarded even for you.

Who said that?

California has far more than one electoral vote, based on it's population.

So do all other states.

You want to see a state only get one vote?

Have the Electoral College drop Trump below 270.

Then it goes to the House.

and each state gets ONE vote, for a total of 51, (counting DC).

Do you even have a clue how the Electoral College works?

 

[Campbell]

Remind me what that has to do with winning the presidential election,

We have a weird undemocratic system for electing presidents. An obsolete relic left over from the days of powdered wigs and slavery.

If you're proud of that, that's all we need to know about your character.

Absolutely!!

The electoral college was devised to satisfy a need when somebody had to ride a horse 75-150 miles just to cast one electoral vote. Now......when every vote in the country can be tabulated and totaled within half a day the electoral college has long since outlived it's usefulness. Let's update our country to the 21st century!!

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........end of story:

Clinton 62,521,739

Trump 61,195,258

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........

More people in the Blue Wall wanted Hillary.

More states wanted someone else.

Unfortunately, that was Trump

He took 3/5s of the states.

I hope the day never comes when 10-15 of the most populous states decide the presidency

If all states were equal in population, MAYBE more states wanting someone for president would be an acceptable measure from a democratic perspective.

You're arguing for each state having ONE vote for president; that is retarded even for you.

You're arguing for each state having ONE vote for president; that is retarded even for you.

Who said that?

California has far more than one electoral vote, based on it's population.

So do all other states.

You want to see a state only get one vote?

Have the Electoral College drop Trump below 270.

Then it goes to the House.

and each state gets ONE vote, for a total of 51, (counting DC).

Do you even have a clue how the Electoral College works?

Yep....it works for the party who can spend the most money for TV ads in key states.

 

[Auld Phart]

We have a weird undemocratic system for electing presidents. An obsolete relic left over from the days of powdered wigs and slavery.

If you're proud of that, that's all we need to know about your character.

Absolutely!!

The electoral college was devised to satisfy a need when somebody had to ride a horse 75-150 miles just to cast one electoral vote. Now......when every vote in the country can be tabulated and totaled within half a day the electoral college has long since outlived it's usefulness. Let's update our country to the 21st century!!

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........end of story:

Clinton 62,521,739

Trump 61,195,258

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........

More people in the Blue Wall wanted Hillary.

More states wanted someone else.

Unfortunately, that was Trump

He took 3/5s of the states.

I hope the day never comes when 10-15 of the most populous states decide the presidency

If all states were equal in population, MAYBE more states wanting someone for president would be an acceptable measure from a democratic perspective.

You're arguing for each state having ONE vote for president; that is retarded even for you.

You're arguing for each state having ONE vote for president; that is retarded even for you.

Who said that?

California has far more than one electoral vote, based on it's population.

So do all other states.

You want to see a state only get one vote?

Have the Electoral College drop Trump below 270.

Then it goes to the House.

and each state gets ONE vote, for a total of 51, (counting DC).

Do you even have a clue how the Electoral College works?

Yep....it works for the party who can spend the most money for TV ads in key states.

Who spent the most this last election?

Trump, or Hillary?

 

[NYcarbineer]

What did she win?

The popular vote! That means more American voters wanted her to be the president than did the orange faced orangutan:


:

Remind me what that has to do with winning the presidential election,

We have a weird undemocratic system for electing presidents. An obsolete relic left over from the days of powdered wigs and slavery.

If you're proud of that, that's all we need to know about your character.

Absolutely!!

The electoral college was devised to satisfy a need when somebody had to ride a horse 75-150 miles just to cast one electoral vote. Now......when every vote in the country can be tabulated and totaled within half a day the electoral college has long since outlived it's usefulness. Let's update our country to the 21st century!!

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........end of story:

Clinton 62,521,739

Trump 61,195,258

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........

More people in the Blue Wall wanted Hillary.

More states wanted someone else.

Unfortunately, that was Trump

He took 3/5s of the states.

I hope the day never comes when 10-15 of the most populous states decide the presidency

Remind me what that has to do with winning the presidential election,

We have a weird undemocratic system for electing presidents. An obsolete relic left over from the days of powdered wigs and slavery.

If you're proud of that, that's all we need to know about your character.

Absolutely!!

The electoral college was devised to satisfy a need when somebody had to ride a horse 75-150 miles just to cast one electoral vote. Now......when every vote in the country can be tabulated and totaled within half a day the electoral college has long since outlived it's usefulness. Let's update our country to the 21st century!!

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........end of story:

Clinton 62,521,739

Trump 61,195,258

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........

More people in the Blue Wall wanted Hillary.

More states wanted someone else.

Unfortunately, that was Trump

He took 3/5s of the states.

I hope the day never comes when 10-15 of the most populous states decide the presidency

If all states were equal in population, MAYBE more states wanting someone for president would be an acceptable measure from a democratic perspective.

You're arguing for each state having ONE vote for president; that is retarded even for you.

You're arguing for each state having ONE vote for president; that is retarded even for you.

Who said that?

California has far more than one electoral vote, based on it's population.

So do all other states.

You want to see a state only get one vote?

Have the Electoral College drop Trump below 270.

Then it goes to the House.

and each state gets ONE vote, for a total of 51, (counting DC).

Do you even have a clue how the Electoral College works?

You said it. You said it matters how many states Trump won.

 

[Auld Phart]

The popular vote! That means more American voters wanted her to be the president than did the orange faced orangutan:


:

Remind me what that has to do with winning the presidential election,

We have a weird undemocratic system for electing presidents. An obsolete relic left over from the days of powdered wigs and slavery.

If you're proud of that, that's all we need to know about your character.

Absolutely!!

The electoral college was devised to satisfy a need when somebody had to ride a horse 75-150 miles just to cast one electoral vote. Now......when every vote in the country can be tabulated and totaled within half a day the electoral college has long since outlived it's usefulness. Let's update our country to the 21st century!!

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........end of story:

Clinton 62,521,739

Trump 61,195,258

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........

More people in the Blue Wall wanted Hillary.

More states wanted someone else.

Unfortunately, that was Trump

He took 3/5s of the states.

I hope the day never comes when 10-15 of the most populous states decide the presidency

We have a weird undemocratic system for electing presidents. An obsolete relic left over from the days of powdered wigs and slavery.

If you're proud of that, that's all we need to know about your character.

Absolutely!!

The electoral college was devised to satisfy a need when somebody had to ride a horse 75-150 miles just to cast one electoral vote. Now......when every vote in the country can be tabulated and totaled within half a day the electoral college has long since outlived it's usefulness. Let's update our country to the 21st century!!

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........end of story:

Clinton 62,521,739

Trump 61,195,258

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........

More people in the Blue Wall wanted Hillary.

More states wanted someone else.

Unfortunately, that was Trump

He took 3/5s of the states.

I hope the day never comes when 10-15 of the most populous states decide the presidency

If all states were equal in population, MAYBE more states wanting someone for president would be an acceptable measure from a democratic perspective.

You're arguing for each state having ONE vote for president; that is retarded even for you.

You're arguing for each state having ONE vote for president; that is retarded even for you.

Who said that?

California has far more than one electoral vote, based on it's population.

So do all other states.

You want to see a state only get one vote?

Have the Electoral College drop Trump below 270.

Then it goes to the House.

and each state gets ONE vote, for a total of 51, (counting DC).

Do you even have a clue how the Electoral College works?

You said it. You said it matters how many states Trump won.

it mattered, because he picked up the electoral votes in those states.

Hillary could pick up another 50 million votes in California, New York, and other states in the Blue Wall, and it wouldn't matter, because the FF were smart enough to make the presidency the decision of ALL states, not just the 10-15 most populous.

What do you have against democracy?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Isn't it great? Right after the election, the RWnuts around here couldn't shut up about how unimportant the popular vote was,
because the electoral college was all that mattered.

But since then we've baited them into going off on every lunatic argument under the sun as to how Trump,

somehow!!!! won the popular vote.

These idiots are as malleable as Playdough.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Remind me what that has to do with winning the presidential election,

We have a weird undemocratic system for electing presidents. An obsolete relic left over from the days of powdered wigs and slavery.

If you're proud of that, that's all we need to know about your character.

Absolutely!!

The electoral college was devised to satisfy a need when somebody had to ride a horse 75-150 miles just to cast one electoral vote. Now......when every vote in the country can be tabulated and totaled within half a day the electoral college has long since outlived it's usefulness. Let's update our country to the 21st century!!

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........end of story:

Clinton 62,521,739

Trump 61,195,258

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........

More people in the Blue Wall wanted Hillary.

More states wanted someone else.

Unfortunately, that was Trump

He took 3/5s of the states.

I hope the day never comes when 10-15 of the most populous states decide the presidency

Absolutely!!

The electoral college was devised to satisfy a need when somebody had to ride a horse 75-150 miles just to cast one electoral vote. Now......when every vote in the country can be tabulated and totaled within half a day the electoral college has long since outlived it's usefulness. Let's update our country to the 21st century!!

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........end of story:

Clinton 62,521,739

Trump 61,195,258

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........

More people in the Blue Wall wanted Hillary.

More states wanted someone else.

Unfortunately, that was Trump

He took 3/5s of the states.

I hope the day never comes when 10-15 of the most populous states decide the presidency

If all states were equal in population, MAYBE more states wanting someone for president would be an acceptable measure from a democratic perspective.

You're arguing for each state having ONE vote for president; that is retarded even for you.

You're arguing for each state having ONE vote for president; that is retarded even for you.

Who said that?

California has far more than one electoral vote, based on it's population.

So do all other states.

You want to see a state only get one vote?

Have the Electoral College drop Trump below 270.

Then it goes to the House.

and each state gets ONE vote, for a total of 51, (counting DC).

Do you even have a clue how the Electoral College works?

You said it. You said it matters how many states Trump won.

it mattered, because he picked up the electoral votes in those states.

Hillary could pick up another 50 million votes in California, New York, and other states in the Blue Wall, and it wouldn't matter, because the FF were smart enough to make the presidency the decision of ALL states, not just the 10-15 most populous.

What do you have against democracy?

Democracy is one person one vote, not some concoction by the Founders, who, btw, fucked up in a lot of areas.

 

[Auld Phart]

We have a weird undemocratic system for electing presidents. An obsolete relic left over from the days of powdered wigs and slavery.

If you're proud of that, that's all we need to know about your character.

Absolutely!!

The electoral college was devised to satisfy a need when somebody had to ride a horse 75-150 miles just to cast one electoral vote. Now......when every vote in the country can be tabulated and totaled within half a day the electoral college has long since outlived it's usefulness. Let's update our country to the 21st century!!

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........end of story:

Clinton 62,521,739

Trump 61,195,258

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........

More people in the Blue Wall wanted Hillary.

More states wanted someone else.

Unfortunately, that was Trump

He took 3/5s of the states.

I hope the day never comes when 10-15 of the most populous states decide the presidency

More people in the Blue Wall wanted Hillary.

More states wanted someone else.

Unfortunately, that was Trump

He took 3/5s of the states.

I hope the day never comes when 10-15 of the most populous states decide the presidency

If all states were equal in population, MAYBE more states wanting someone for president would be an acceptable measure from a democratic perspective.

You're arguing for each state having ONE vote for president; that is retarded even for you.

You're arguing for each state having ONE vote for president; that is retarded even for you.

Who said that?

California has far more than one electoral vote, based on it's population.

So do all other states.

You want to see a state only get one vote?

Have the Electoral College drop Trump below 270.

Then it goes to the House.

and each state gets ONE vote, for a total of 51, (counting DC).

Do you even have a clue how the Electoral College works?

You said it. You said it matters how many states Trump won.

it mattered, because he picked up the electoral votes in those states.

Hillary could pick up another 50 million votes in California, New York, and other states in the Blue Wall, and it wouldn't matter, because the FF were smart enough to make the presidency the decision of ALL states, not just the 10-15 most populous.

What do you have against democracy?

Democracy is one person one vote, not some concoction by the Founders, who, btw, fucked up in a lot of areas.

and that's how it was handled, on a state per state basis.

Don't like the Electoral College?

Next time the democrats have control, get rid of it.

Til that time, it stands as policy,

and HIllary lost

 

[NYcarbineer]

Oh, and btw, there's a good argument to be made that the electoral college, as it is implemented in the states,
may be unconstitutional from a voting rights standpoint.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Absolutely!!

The electoral college was devised to satisfy a need when somebody had to ride a horse 75-150 miles just to cast one electoral vote. Now......when every vote in the country can be tabulated and totaled within half a day the electoral college has long since outlived it's usefulness. Let's update our country to the 21st century!!

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........end of story:

Clinton 62,521,739

Trump 61,195,258

More of us wanted Hillary to be the president..........

More people in the Blue Wall wanted Hillary.

More states wanted someone else.

Unfortunately, that was Trump

He took 3/5s of the states.

I hope the day never comes when 10-15 of the most populous states decide the presidency

If all states were equal in population, MAYBE more states wanting someone for president would be an acceptable measure from a democratic perspective.

You're arguing for each state having ONE vote for president; that is retarded even for you.

You're arguing for each state having ONE vote for president; that is retarded even for you.

Who said that?

California has far more than one electoral vote, based on it's population.

So do all other states.

You want to see a state only get one vote?

Have the Electoral College drop Trump below 270.

Then it goes to the House.

and each state gets ONE vote, for a total of 51, (counting DC).

Do you even have a clue how the Electoral College works?

You said it. You said it matters how many states Trump won.

it mattered, because he picked up the electoral votes in those states.

Hillary could pick up another 50 million votes in California, New York, and other states in the Blue Wall, and it wouldn't matter, because the FF were smart enough to make the presidency the decision of ALL states, not just the 10-15 most populous.

What do you have against democracy?

Democracy is one person one vote, not some concoction by the Founders, who, btw, fucked up in a lot of areas.

and that's how it was handled, on a state per state basis.

Don't like the Electoral College?

Next time the democrats have control, get rid of it.

Til that time, it stands as policy,

and HIllary lost

Saying that 'it's policy' is not an argument for its merits. Legalized slavery was once 'policy'.

 

[Auld Phart]

Oh, and btw, there's a good argument to be made that the electoral college, as it is implemented in the states,
may be unconstitutional from a voting rights standpoint.

Then there should be no problem with SCOTUS shutting it down, right?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Oh, and btw, there's a good argument to be made that the electoral college, as it is implemented in the states,
may be unconstitutional from a voting rights standpoint.

Then there should be no problem with SCOTUS shutting it down, right?

Why would you say that? Other than that you can't debate...

 

[Auld Phart]

More people in the Blue Wall wanted Hillary.

More states wanted someone else.

Unfortunately, that was Trump

He took 3/5s of the states.

I hope the day never comes when 10-15 of the most populous states decide the presidency

Who said that?

California has far more than one electoral vote, based on it's population.

So do all other states.

You want to see a state only get one vote?

Have the Electoral College drop Trump below 270.

Then it goes to the House.

and each state gets ONE vote, for a total of 51, (counting DC).

Do you even have a clue how the Electoral College works?

You said it. You said it matters how many states Trump won.

it mattered, because he picked up the electoral votes in those states.

Hillary could pick up another 50 million votes in California, New York, and other states in the Blue Wall, and it wouldn't matter, because the FF were smart enough to make the presidency the decision of ALL states, not just the 10-15 most populous.

What do you have against democracy?

Democracy is one person one vote, not some concoction by the Founders, who, btw, fucked up in a lot of areas.

and that's how it was handled, on a state per state basis.

Don't like the Electoral College?

Next time the democrats have control, get rid of it.

Til that time, it stands as policy,

and HIllary lost

Saying that 'it's policy' is not an argument for its merits. Legalized slavery was once 'policy'.

and that policy was overturned.

now all you have to do is go thru the red tape to get the EC overturned

 

[Auld Phart]

Oh, and btw, there's a good argument to be made that the electoral college, as it is implemented in the states,
may be unconstitutional from a voting rights standpoint.

Then there should be no problem with SCOTUS shutting it down, right?

Why would you say that? Other than that you can't debate...

If it's unconstitutional, SCOTUS should have no problem shutting it down.

Don't you understand that statement?